The Syndicate

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:34 am**

Votes are still not changeable TH.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:34 am**

I'm out for the night. Thank you Epi for getting that post up so quickly.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:35 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.

Thank you DH.

In unrelated news, I am once again voting early for my boy DH.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:37 am**

Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.
Thank you DH.

In unrelated news, I am once again voting early for my boy DH.

Th noooooo

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:40 am**

I'll send location PMs tomorrow afternoon.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:41 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.

Funny. I checked the poll when you posted this and TH hadn't voted.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:41 am**

Epignosis wrote:This much I can tell you: we have strong voices working on this case. Many are doing side projects to round up those escaped inmates but for the most part, I would trust the big personalities. The quiet ones are the ones that I would ask to speak up or you may be brought in for suspicion.

I wouldn't oppose cutting some dead weight today. It's kinda ridiculous that at Day 6 we still have players who haven't voted in a single poll.

Which, to be fair, is only Floyd. Bass and Equivocate at least voted in like, one.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:43 am**

Turnip Head wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Btw why did you vote for DharmaHelper?
I had a momentary lapse where I thought votes were changeable and tried to signal that I wanted him to stfu about juliets. I thought he was being opportunistic going after her; I still think that, I just think he was being opportunistic in the civilian kinda way.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:43 am**

I feel dirty

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:44 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.
Thank you DH.

In unrelated news, I am once again voting early for my boy DH.
Th noooooo

Chrysanthemums tawdrier maid nag motherfucker. Who you looking at today?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:44 am**

sabie is still on the poll

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:46 am**

Enrique wrote:sabie is still on the poll

I think we'll all push through this horrific tragedy.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:47 am**

Anyone who doesn't vote for sabie today is confirmed mafia

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:47 am**

Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.
Thank you DH.

In unrelated news, I am once again voting early for my boy DH.
Th noooooo
Chrysanthemums tawdrier maid nag motherfucker. Who you looking at today?

I'd like to bunker down and take a look at the sabie lynch in order to see if her teammates stand out RE: Mac voters or RE: Sprityo voters.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:52 am**

Is there a reason you voted for me TH?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:55 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:Is there a reason you voted for me TH?

I was not forced, targeted or poisoned by any role.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:55 am**

Lol ok Bill Clinton

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:56 am**

Have you been poisoned before TH?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:57 am**

Enrique wrote:Have you been poisoned before TH?

No comment.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:59 am**

Why not?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:59 am**

Enrique wrote:Why not?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:12 am**

It's mad late and I promise I'll do the legwork of this at some point but check this shit out:

I bet if we cross reference the list of players who voted to go to locations other than the ones sabie went to with the list of say, Mac or Sprityo or w/e voter, we will end up with a pretty meaty case for her teammate(s).

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:17 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:It's mad late and I promise I'll do the legwork of this at some point but check this shit out:

I bet if we cross reference the list of players who voted to go to locations other than the ones sabie went to with the list of say, Mac or Sprityo or w/e voter, we will end up with a pretty meaty case for her teammate(s).

Oooooh. Me likey.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:20 am**

sprityo wrote:Autocorrect is a cruel mistrust

This, honestly sprityo, sig this right now. It's amazing! Early nominee for Sockys 2016!

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:21 am**

MacDougall wrote:
Matt wrote:
Typhoony wrote:I've always wanted to be the target of Matts crazy theories. I finally did it!
It's simple.

One of us is not being truthful. Either way, lynch me or lynch you, we find out you're the dishonest one here. Not so crazy, really.

I don't think this is a fact.

But I will admit I chuckled at your response there.

Okay, here's a crazy theory since you asked about motivation...

I was up Turnip's ass asking him questions about the Riddler. Let's assume you and Turnip are partners, so you come swinging in saying "Nope my experience is in line with Turnips" to make me look bad. There's your motivation.

LOL okay.
Matt is back y'all.

Matt the Knife?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:23 am**

God damn it why didn't you assholes kill me.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:23 am**

juliets wrote:
Golden wrote:I wonder if we just lost the commissioner.

Rip scotty.
Did you see a hint that suggested that Golden?

The surprise in the commish's note about still being alive without a bulletproof vest... confirmed civ who has already survived a lynch... it's just a maybe. We'll see what happens.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:23 am**

Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Votes are still not changeable TH.
Thank you DH.

In unrelated news, I am once again voting early for my boy DH.

Would you say he is your number one suspect?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:25 am**

Turns out that was a short list.

LoRab
Matt
SVS

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:27 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:Turns out that was a short list.

LoRab
Matt
SVS

SVS and Matt also voted Mac. SVS at a particularly suspicion time.

I'll admit I already came into today with my eye firmly on SVS, but if I get the chance I am going to be seriously checking her out for a possible sabie teamie.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:28 am**

"A particularly suspicion time"

Can anyone tell that I'm too busy?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:29 am**

Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Turns out that was a short list.

LoRab
Matt
SVS
SVS and Matt also voted Mac. SVS at a particularly suspicion time.

I'll admit I already came into today with my eye firmly on SVS, but if I get the chance I am going to be seriously checking her out for a possible sabie teamie.

My list was based on who voted Mac/sprityo *AND* also never visited a location on the same night as sabie. I haven't yet checked to ee if they visited the same locations on different nights though

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:30 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:It's mad late and I promise I'll do the legwork of this at some point but check this shit out:

I bet if we cross reference the list of players who voted to go to locations other than the ones sabie went to with the list of say, Mac or Sprityo or w/e voter, we will end up with a pretty meaty case for her teammate(s).

I actually did this last night, more or less. Sabie had at least one location in common with evey player after excluding Bass/Bubbles/Equivocate/Floyd/MM.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:31 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:
Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Turns out that was a short list.

LoRab
Matt
SVS
SVS and Matt also voted Mac. SVS at a particularly suspicion time.

I'll admit I already came into today with my eye firmly on SVS, but if I get the chance I am going to be seriously checking her out for a possible sabie teamie.
My list was based on who voted Mac/sprityo *AND* also never visited a location on the same night as sabie. I haven't yet checked to ee if they visited the same locations on different nights though

I wouldn't call 'any night' determinative. They probably would want to obfuscate a little. Lots of overlap would be less likely.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:32 am**

Having everyone search through people who suspected you for scum is like getting a sponge bath. Feels great.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:37 am**

I think I fucked up and Matt shouldn't be on that list so it's just LoRab and SVS.

Which is funny.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:37 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:I think I fucked up and Matt shouldn't be on that list so it's just LoRab and SVS.

Which is funny.

Do you mean Loran?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:38 am**

Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Golden wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Turns out that was a short list.

LoRab
Matt
SVS
SVS and Matt also voted Mac. SVS at a particularly suspicion time.

I'll admit I already came into today with my eye firmly on SVS, but if I get the chance I am going to be seriously checking her out for a possible sabie teamie.
My list was based on who voted Mac/sprityo *AND* also never visited a location on the same night as sabie. I haven't yet checked to ee if they visited the same locations on different nights though
I wouldn't call 'any night' determinative. They probably would want to obfuscate a little. Lots of overlap would be less likely.

Maybe. Also the recruit didn't join the team til after the first 3 polls.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:42 am**

SVS
1. GCPD (N1)
2. Wayne Enterprises
3. Fish Mooney
4. The Docks
5. Wayne Enterprises

LoRab
1. GCPD (N1)
2. Wayne Enterprises
3. Gotham General
4. Arkham Asylum
5. Fish Mooney

----
sabie
1. Arkham Asylum (N2)
2. GCPD (N3)
3. Park Row (N4)
4. Blackgate (N5)

Overlap:
N1 - Lorab and SVS @ GCPD
N2 - Lorab and SVS @ Wayne Enterprises
N3 - None
N4 - None
N5 - None

Someone feel free to check my math.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:47 am**

When you say Night 1 do you mean Night 0?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:47 am**

Oh yeah I Guess. Should have labeled it "Poll #" instead. It is like 1am.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:49 am**

From that analysis, just looking through who has gone what on every day, I'd say SVS and LoRab are not teammates with each other but either could be teammates with sabie.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:57 am**

Hmmm I dunno bout this cross analysis tbh. Surely the Mafia would have realised at some point that if they keep going to different locations it'd become really easy to just cross reference everybody? I would say this is fairly unlikely to net scum, but have at it.

In the meantime, gee I'm having a lovely day.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:03 am**

I think they at least could have double backed in the early going to confirm that the info didn't change. Can't remember when someone confirmed that it was static.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:09 am**

We literally had players in the thread say they went to the same place two nights in a row, like, if they are Mafia are you just excluding them or what?

It's all a bit like, are we really going to lynch someone based on this?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:10 am**

MacDougall wrote:We literally had players in the thread say they went to the same place two nights in a row, like, if they are Mafia are you just excluding them or what?

It's all a bit like, are we really going to lynch someone based on this?

Just looking for leads bro chill out

Who are you looking at?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:11 am**

MacDougall wrote:We literally had players in the thread say they went to the same place two nights in a row, like, if they are Mafia are you just excluding them or what?

It's all a bit like, are we really going to lynch someone based on this?

Ay thats a pretty sick glass house you got there but you might wanna put that stone down.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:14 am**

DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:We literally had players in the thread say they went to the same place two nights in a row, like, if they are Mafia are you just excluding them or what?

It's all a bit like, are we really going to lynch someone based on this?
Ay thats a pretty sick glass house you got there but you might wanna put that stone down.

What's that supposed to be chump?

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:15 am**

MacDougall wrote:We literally had players in the thread say they went to the same place two nights in a row, like, if they are Mafia are you just excluding them or what?

It's all a bit like, are we really going to lynch someone based on this?

I think you misunderstand that I'm taking people who voted for the other trains as a baseline for this, and working under the assumption that a mafia team would have little motivation to vote together in location polls in order to narrow that pool down.

Dunno maybe I'm off base but I don't think it is as bad a course of action as you're making it out to be.

Posted: **Thu Mar 03, 2016 2:16 am**

I'm not saying it's terribad or dire... just doing my due diligence and playing Devil's Advocate son.

The Syndicate

Arkham Mafia [ENDGAME]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 5]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 5]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 5]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Night 5]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]

Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 6]