The Syndicate

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:50 pm**

DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.

Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.

But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:51 pm**

Oh, and of course, WIFOM is a thing here, and the true enemy of the state.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:52 pm**

FZ. wrote:Okay Jack, for you I'll vote SVS

Thanks, FZ. You know what? You're okay.

I wanna call you Pillow Dude but it's a lousy nickname that takes longer to type.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:54 pm**

Switched my vote over.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:56 pm**

Marmot wrote:
FZ. wrote:Say it is SVS. Who would be bad with her?
Jack.

Do I need to find another potential teammate to justify my suspicion?

Only when I'm town.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:57 pm**

Marmot wrote:Oh, and of course, WIFOM is a thing here, and the true enemy of the state.

I agree that SVS has had strange behavior this game. I still think we should lynch the confirmed baddie though.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:03 pm**

@Llama

There's nothing bad about conservative values.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:10 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Llama

There's nothing bad about conservative values.

I don't think I said there was?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:18 pm**

Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.

Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:22 pm**

thellama73 wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Llama

There's nothing bad about conservative values.
I don't think I said there was?

I guess you are voting for Ted Cruz so...

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:22 pm**

DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.

What gives you that impression?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:22 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:I'm ok with this. It'll shed light on my DF suspicion anyways.

Oh I see, I didn't realize this was your vote intent post.

But you did have a precedence to suspect SVS, so I saw nothing wrong with your vote. I was more concerned with jack's.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:27 pm**

Marmot wrote:Oh, and of course, WIFOM is a thing here, and the true enemy of the state.

That's why I voted when I did.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:29 pm**

No one got any Hillary points in a while...

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:31 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?

Just DF's interaction with SVS.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:32 pm**

@Marmot

You should keep an eye on my vote it could go anywhere!

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:33 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Marmot

You should keep an eye on my vote it could go anywhere!

Me Jack me! Vote me!

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:34 pm**

Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Marmot

You should keep an eye on my vote it could go anywhere!

Just remember that your ballot won't be accepted if you punch a hole for each candidate.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:39 pm**

Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Marmot

You should keep an eye on my vote it could go anywhere!
Just remember that your ballot won't be accepted if you punch a hole for each candidate.

Something something hanging chads.

@Wigly

No.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:40 pm**

Marmot wrote:DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.

Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.

But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.

Sure he does, he makes it look like he's cool with lynching her. If she's his teammate, that WIFOMy bluffery can definitely be a gain.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:43 pm**

Long Con wrote:
Marmot wrote:DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.

Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.

But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.
Sure he does, he makes it look like he's cool with lynching her. If she's his teammate, that WIFOMy bluffery can definitely be a gain.

What if I really think SVS is bad?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:46 pm**

I don't care where Jack votes. I'm not reading into it one way or another. However, I would encourage the civilians to ensure that there is enough of a difference that his vote doesn't matter. Remember:

G-Man wrote:5) A tied lynch will result in no lynch. Votes matter.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:02 pm**

FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.

The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?

I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.

If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.

Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:04 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.

DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.

Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.

I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:11 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.

The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?

I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.

Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?

Not really.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:12 pm**

Marmot wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.

The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?

I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.

Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?
I also have to say not really.

Not really.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:12 pm**

Quote fail.

I also have to say not really.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:21 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.

DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.

Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?

I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:25 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.

DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.

Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.

Why is that more probable than wrong on both?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:47 pm**

Long Con wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.

DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.

Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.
Why is that more probable than wrong on both?

Simply because I want to be right.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:49 pm**

That sounds like something a Republican would say! You know, 'cause they're right wing.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:49 pm**

While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:51 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.

The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?

I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.

Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?

You've played with her more than I have. How many times have you seen her as a baddie not trying to look like she's looking for baddies?

I have to agree with Wilgy on DF and SVS not being together. It felt like he had absolutely no problem voting her. At this stage, I would try harder to lynch a civ and not one of my own. And he could easily go with the Jack option if all of them were bad.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:55 pm**

MacDougall wrote:While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:31 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
MacDougall wrote:While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?

How is that suspicious? Also answer my question. You aren't even a civ read of mine so I'm super interested in how you can justify your wagon creation here as well as this arrogant single smiley post response to a very fair question. The vote is too close now to not lynch Jack.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:32 pm**

And you didn't vote.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:33 pm**

Epignosis wrote:And you didn't vote.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:34 pm**

Epignosis wrote:And you didn't vote.

So I totes still thought there was an hour to go.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:34 pm**

Tell me how this makes me suspicious though?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:39 pm**

I gotta go anyway so here is a pic that shows my phone time as 7.30am and the poll ending at 8.30am so meh.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:39 pm**

Shit, that's an earlier ending time than I'm used to.

I was kinda thinking S~V~S might have something to say before it was over.

Linki: Mac that's ugly.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:42 pm**

What's ugly?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:46 pm**

Mac's like your regular Conservative, making things far bigger than they need to be.

Disclaimer: I'm just trying to get Hillary points, I don't actually think this way about Conservatives, and think they're wonderful people.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:50 pm**

Go figure.

Sorry SVS.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:52 pm**

Erm, what?

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:54 pm**

Marmot is bad. Womp womp.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:00 pm**

DrWilgy wrote:Marmot is bad. Womp womp.

That's not what the host post said.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:01 pm**

I THINK LIFE IS SACRED
(SUNDAY, JANUARY 22, 2017)

GREG: Thank you for watching the Greg Gutfeld Show this crazy Sunday evening, folks. The burning question of the night is this: can the Clinton Administration possibly do anything right? I mean, my God, it's the second full day that she's been President and it's been one embarrassing disaster after another. WikiLeaks, the inauguration video, secret power grab documents- have we ever had such a disastrous start to a Presidency?

And now today, it looks like it's all repeating itself. Not long after the Clinton Administration held a press conference and blamed Russia for the shocking video of Pamela Brown- who nobody know the whereabouts of I might add- Florida Congresswoman and disgraced ex-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz showed up at FBI headquarters and confessed to being involved with this Operation Cobalt mission designed to sabotage the Trump campaign. Schultz looked ragged, like she hadn't eaten or slept in a couple of days, and begged for protective custody. God only knows what's going to come from this but if the ex-DNC chair, who was in charge of the DNC while this secret operation was underway, was part of this conspiracy, is it such a stretch to assume that Hillary Clinton might have known about this?

And now you've got someone leaking information out of the White House. I don't know if it's a whistle-blower or just a pissed off employee, but dear Lord is this a bombshell. Last Fall, Julian Assange promised to dish out some dirt on Clinton. The morning of the inauguration, he does, by way of the Podesta emails. The next day, Assange dies in a freak explosion. Today, documents were leaked showing that Hillary Clinton's Vice President, Tim Kaine, ordered a stealth drone strike on the Ecuadorian embassy in London to take Assange out. He's the Vice President! He doesn't have the authority to make that call. Either someone with real power made the final decision (and there's only one person higher on in the food chain) or Kaine is guilty of an insane level of overreach.

Is Hillary Clinton's presidency already in a death spiral? If not, what on earth could happen next?

---------------------------------------

S~V~S has been lynched. She was...

Spoiler: show

It is now Night 2.
You have until 3:30 p.m. EST Friday to send me your role PM's.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:01 pm**

Go figure.

Sorry SVS.

Posted: **Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:02 pm**

YO

WAIT ONE GODDAMNED SECOND

MM YOUR NAME IS ACTUALLY MARMOT NOW

linki - I'm pretty sure that was a slip considering SVS was civ Marmot friend.

The Syndicate

GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: BLUE vs. RED [pre-game]

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Day 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED

Re: Night 2- BLUE vs. RED