Re: Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2016 7:02 pm
why r u bad mr sloonei
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
It'll be a sad day if we are both civ DiinyDiiny wrote:If I die pursue wilgy and gleam. Gleam's vote for me was bad.
Then make my day and flip scumDrWilgy wrote:It'll be a sad day if we are both civ DiinyDiiny wrote:If I die pursue wilgy and gleam. Gleam's vote for me was bad.
Well there's a 0% chance for that oneDiiny wrote:Then make my day and flip scumDrWilgy wrote:It'll be a sad day if we are both civ DiinyDiiny wrote:If I die pursue wilgy and gleam. Gleam's vote for me was bad.
Is that because you are the Undercover Cop?DrWilgy wrote:Well there's a 0% chance for that oneDiiny wrote:Then make my day and flip scumDrWilgy wrote:It'll be a sad day if we are both civ DiinyDiiny wrote:If I die pursue wilgy and gleam. Gleam's vote for me was bad.
Nah, it's because I'm most definitely a doctor!Golden wrote:Is that because you are the Undercover Cop?DrWilgy wrote:Well there's a 0% chance for that oneDiiny wrote:Then make my day and flip scumDrWilgy wrote:It'll be a sad day if we are both civ DiinyDiiny wrote:If I die pursue wilgy and gleam. Gleam's vote for me was bad.
Enrique wrote:Well on the flip side that's a pretty funny turn of events.
What you said was in the same territory as saying 'I think x is mafia' but not explaining yourself. I want to know, from you, why Wilgy's plan was such a bad idea. I want to know why Diiny is so suspicious. Information drives this game and you provided nothing.Enrique wrote:I ignored the situation? I said it was a terrible idea that each Don would try to avoid at all costs anyway.Quin wrote:I've decided to change my vote to Enrique. I'm going to take sig's word for it that ika's actions are simply a cultural thing, but I've got myon him.
How much information we have determines who wins a game. That's one of my philosophies. That, and ask a shitload of questions and assume everything until proven otherwise. Enrique hasn't been able to provide the amount of information that I'd expect from a townie. The accusation I made of ika on how he ignored the traitor/don situation completely without justifying himself applies to Enrique in the same manner. On top of that, I found one of his latest posts (I'll find it as soon as I post this and explain myself) extremely scummy.
Bright-eyed and bushy-tailed? I haven't heard that one before. What do you mean by that?Scotty wrote:Wow. Everyone checked in. I'm impressed.
Of the low posters, Tranq's only post here seems very bright-eyed and bushy-tailed. Will continue to scan the thread but he's going to get my vote right now.Tranq wrote:No-shows could get replaced. I see no harm in trying Wilgy's plan. For science!Scotty wrote:I will bet my [hopefully] unborn child that the 30 person coordinated vote will not work out. There will be too many no-shows. There always is in these games.
We essentially lynched the Daisy traitor, if you think about it.MovingPictures07 wrote:How dare you all lynch one of my family?You will be avenged, Diiny!
Thankfully, you were my Traitor, and it seems I have gained a new member. All in all, not too bad of a day.![]()
But I did address both of those points... one of them more or less indirectly in the post you quotes. The host would avoid making one of his team members defect, wouldn't he? And I thought Diiny was bad for his overeagerness in going after people who were barely even here, as well as jumping on every wagon that looked like it had a chance to take off.Quin wrote:What you said was in the same territory as saying 'I think x is mafia' but not explaining yourself. I want to know, from you, why Wilgy's plan was such a bad idea. I want to know why Diiny is so suspicious. Information drives this game and you provided nothing.Enrique wrote:I ignored the situation? I said it was a terrible idea that each Don would try to avoid at all costs anyway.Quin wrote:I've decided to change my vote to Enrique. I'm going to take sig's word for it that ika's actions are simply a cultural thing, but I've got myon him.
How much information we have determines who wins a game. That's one of my philosophies. That, and ask a shitload of questions and assume everything until proven otherwise. Enrique hasn't been able to provide the amount of information that I'd expect from a townie. The accusation I made of ika on how he ignored the traitor/don situation completely without justifying himself applies to Enrique in the same manner. On top of that, I found one of his latest posts (I'll find it as soon as I post this and explain myself) extremely scummy.
I don't know what you mean about the host wanting the avoid defection. The host isn't the one who triggered it. Can you elaborate on what you meant? Maybe it's just too early in the morning for me.Enrique wrote:But I did address both of those points... one of them more or less indirectly in the post you quotes. The host would avoid making one of his team members defect, wouldn't he? And I thought Diiny was bad for his overeagerness in going after people who were barely even here, as well as jumping on every wagon that looked like it had a chance to take off.Quin wrote:What you said was in the same territory as saying 'I think x is mafia' but not explaining yourself. I want to know, from you, why Wilgy's plan was such a bad idea. I want to know why Diiny is so suspicious. Information drives this game and you provided nothing.Enrique wrote:I ignored the situation? I said it was a terrible idea that each Don would try to avoid at all costs anyway.Quin wrote:I've decided to change my vote to Enrique. I'm going to take sig's word for it that ika's actions are simply a cultural thing, but I've got myon him.
How much information we have determines who wins a game. That's one of my philosophies. That, and ask a shitload of questions and assume everything until proven otherwise. Enrique hasn't been able to provide the amount of information that I'd expect from a townie. The accusation I made of ika on how he ignored the traitor/don situation completely without justifying himself applies to Enrique in the same manner. On top of that, I found one of his latest posts (I'll find it as soon as I post this and explain myself) extremely scummy.
I just got here, chill. I don't appreciate being told I'm not putting in the work when the game just started.
I still read your posts and look at your avatar and laugh heartily.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
don't be rude. that's my natural expression.Epignosis wrote:I still read your posts and look at your avatar and laugh heartily.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
Bitch, I'm Skeletor.Golden wrote:Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
I did notice there was some synchronicity between the roles and the site titles.
Skeletor: Each night, you may bone a player of your choosing.Epignosis wrote:Bitch, I'm Skeletor.Golden wrote:Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
I did notice there was some synchronicity between the roles and the site titles.
Could be a secret role.
That would be quite the turn around from Zodiac Epi.Quin wrote:Skeletor: Each night, you may bone a player of your choosing.Epignosis wrote:Bitch, I'm Skeletor.Golden wrote:Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
I did notice there was some synchronicity between the roles and the site titles.
Could be a secret role.
I will target Elohcin tonight.Quin wrote:Skeletor: Each night, you may bone a player of your choosing.Epignosis wrote:Bitch, I'm Skeletor.Golden wrote:Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
I did notice there was some synchronicity between the roles and the site titles.
Could be a secret role.
im starting to think it might be too unbalanced a role.Golden wrote:That would be quite the turn around from Zodiac Epi.Quin wrote:Skeletor: Each night, you may bone a player of your choosing.Epignosis wrote:Bitch, I'm Skeletor.Golden wrote:Going by that, I'm a Hitman.Quin wrote:hey im a stool pigeon now
no, that was not a role claim. that's my post count title.
I did notice there was some synchronicity between the roles and the site titles.
Could be a secret role.
Wasn't ever in front of me.Long Con wrote:Cool result for the Sockfaces, and though it wasn't a Cop, at least that puts all the Traitor discussion firmly behind us.
The general rule here is that you can talk game at night. Unless the rules specify otherwise.ika wrote:Ok im home i will be reading shorty.
Can someone tell me if we are allowed to talk game or not? im not used to being able to talk at night
Sweet!Golden wrote:The general rule here is that you can talk game at night. Unless the rules specify otherwise.ika wrote:Ok im home i will be reading shorty.
Can someone tell me if we are allowed to talk game or not? im not used to being able to talk at night
ISO me Ika.ika wrote:Sweet!Golden wrote:The general rule here is that you can talk game at night. Unless the rules specify otherwise.ika wrote:Ok im home i will be reading shorty.
Can someone tell me if we are allowed to talk game or not? im not used to being able to talk at night
Im gonna try to do some isoing does anyone have anyone spcific thatthey want em to see
mkay one minDrWilgy wrote:ISO me Ika.ika wrote:Sweet!Golden wrote:The general rule here is that you can talk game at night. Unless the rules specify otherwise.ika wrote:Ok im home i will be reading shorty.
Can someone tell me if we are allowed to talk game or not? im not used to being able to talk at night
Im gonna try to do some isoing does anyone have anyone spcific thatthey want em to see
Bullzeye wrote:Also based on how fast today has been I'm gonna be asking to be replaced
I thought you were considering a vote for Gleam earlier in the day? When did this change into a town read?Sloonei wrote:If anyone wants an explanation for my vote, I was at work and didn't have time to read or really do anything, but I checked the poll just before the deadline and saw a four way tie between Diiny, Golden, Gleam, and Wilgy. I had town reads on the first three, so I elected to try and save all three by putting a vote on the one null read of the bunch, Wilgy. He was not my first choice, but among the four who had votes he was my favorite option.
(1 PM)Sloonei wrote:I am also considering putting a vote on Gleam for similar reasons.S~V~S wrote:
I am going to drop a vote on Gleam for now, he made a lot of assumptions based on incorrect role reads, then backtracked them, and if you cancel all that out, he made a lot of posts comparative to others at this early stage, but did not say much.
(2;34)Sloonei wrote:Right now I think gleam is most likely to receive my vote unless something changes. We've still got four hours, but I've only got two until I have to leave for work.
(2:57, Your Vote)Sloonei wrote:@ gleam, Sorry but I fundamentally disagree with the thought that lynching no one is a better option than lynching someone. If no one is lynched, town gains no information. Town can only win by gaining information.
Epi explains it well:(granted he was scum in this game, but)Epignosis wrote:No lynches are terrible. Civilians control the lynches. By forfeiting a lynch, you forfeit the civilians' attempt to bag Mafia. I would never vote such a thing if it existed.
What changed here? When did Gleam become a town read? He did not post between your 2:34 post (he had been posting fairly regularly up to that point, but his last post was right before yours) and when you voted. I change my mind all the time, especially on Day One, but someone you had mentioned as being suspicious sometime before, why wouldn't you make note of it when you started seeing him as a toen read? Since he was taking votes. I read through your posts, and could not find that point, and I would like to know what it was since I still find him suspect, and if there is a reason I should reconsider, I wouldlike toknow what it is.Sloonei wrote:I guess we're trading places on the poll. I'm voting for Ika and going to work. I'll check in if I can but I definitely won't be able to make any big contributions or read everything while I'm there.Nerolunar wrote:Thanks. I read it completely different.Sloonei wrote:agleaminranksNerolunar wrote:Who is Gleam? I dont see anyone with that name.![]()
@ Sig To me its not "highly pingy" to call out lurking.
I am going to change my vote. Losing Ika now will eradicate all meta reads that he can give us on Silverwolf. I don“t like that uncertainty.
Im going to check up un Gleam and see if thats whgere my vote will be.