The Syndicate

Epignosis wrote:Nobody wants to lynch Bullzeye?

perhaps tomorrow.

Choutas wrote:Nah the other post is the same post where you quote yourself. It isn't another person. My response covers both since it's the same post with one additional post. You seriously need to start using logic and not accuse me why I quoted one post and not the other when my response covers both since it's the same quote pyramid with one additional quote with the same goddamn question. You must be horrible playing this game. I can't attribute it to any other reason.
I told you I thought I was targeted. You ask me why. You want proof. Do you want me to give you my role pm? Seriously do you want me to screenshot and post? Do you? I don't use another's material to make that point, I use mine. You have to take my word for it. But you clearly won't. Until apparently I break into MP's mod and uncover all the pms regarding the case and post them online I'll forever be your suspect. Again you're really bad at playing this game. You can't call a bullshit when someone says he knows something that can not be proved by any lawful means.

Seriously if you're scum golden raspberry of the year.

What are you responding to here? What exactly is making you flustered? As far as I'm concerned I can call bullsuit on what I want.

WHO IS GETTIN LYNCHED IN MY HOUSE?


































Seriously, I need to know so I can make arrangements with the family to clean the carpet afterwards.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Bullzeye for right now.

I'm reading your Bullzeye post now.

How about RadicalFuzz?

Linki: Russ, I didn't intend to call Epignosis stupid. I was taking a popular idiom and inserting Epignosis's name into it.

Yeah, I know. I meant you were trolling me by agreeing with him. Unless you actually do....which would be weird, given my point that he didn't actually say anything to indicate a suspicion, and then waited 3.5 hours, 13 posts, and 1 case against Mac to saying anything further about him.

Linki: Right, sorry, I forgot to give you your proper due for arguing in circles with him on Day 6 and then claiming you got him lynched.

I said in my post at 8-ish pm that Tuesday that he, and I quote, "look[ed] really bad to me". Doesn't preclude me having other suspects as well. I would hope you have more than one suspect so far, and I certainly do. You sure as shit didn't convince me of anything regarding Macdougall, and you should stop parading that around like you're God's gift to civs. That's only in your head, where you ARE God. If anyone is spinning this, it's you, and you're doing it to get civ cred that you aren't due.

Epignosis wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Russtifinko wrote:Linki: Epi, regardless, facts are facts. I got there first; stop saying you did.

I didn't say I got there first. I said I got the job done.

Also false, though. I cast the last vote on Mac, and he "won" the lynch 7-6. Stop trying to take sole credit when numerous other people contributed. It makes you look far more civ than you deserve to.

You, can't ever be wrong, can you? It's a pretty unfortunate trait.

I'm not wrong.

Stop saying things that aren't true and spinning the narrative. I'm the one who engaged MacDougall head to head. I'm the one he accused of being the serial killer. Day 6, you said this:

Russtifinko wrote:Placeholder on BR for now. Could be convinced to go with Mac today, or, to a lesser extent, Epi.

You needed convincing, which means you weren't convinced at that point. And you could have voted for me if the train was big enough. Don't come up in my house telling me you saw him first. "Saw him first" doesn't mean diddly shit in my house.

I didn't realize he placeheld a vote on Black Rock that day. Didn't he also go after fingersplints for suspecting BR that same day?

Let's please not forget these rules:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

GAMEPLAY & RULES

4. No role outing of yourself or anyone else. This includes all statements of fact that any player may see and thereafter deduct your or someone else's role, such as "I am Making Flippy Floppy", "Sloonei is Psycho Killer", etc. This game is open setup and incompatible with role outing, thus making it not fun when players engage in it. Absolutely don't do it.
5. No dumping information you received from the Host (whether role-related or not) into the thread. This includes statements that more often are seen as implications, rather than statements of fact (role outing). An example would be declaring that "I have reasons to believe Sloonei is Psycho Killer" without elaborating. If you suspect someone to be a certain role or alignment, use in-thread reasons to back up your assertion or speculation, even if your reasons are sourced from information you gained outside of the thread. If you are unsure if what you are about to say constitutes info dumping, please PM the hosts first before making the post. If you fail to do this and your post does violate information dumping, then you and your faction will be punished.

There have been some posts the past few cycles that have violated rule number 5. Don't do it any further.

If you have questions about what you're about to post and whether it violates rule number 5, ask me and Sloonei.

Russtifinko wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Bullzeye for right now.

I'm reading your Bullzeye post now.

How about RadicalFuzz?

Linki: Russ, I didn't intend to call Epignosis stupid. I was taking a popular idiom and inserting Epignosis's name into it.

Yeah, I know. I meant you were trolling me by agreeing with him. Unless you actually do....which would be weird, given my point that he didn't actually say anything to indicate a suspicion, and then waited 3.5 hours, 13 posts, and 1 case against Mac to saying anything further about him.

Linki: Right, sorry, I forgot to give you your proper due for arguing in circles with him on Day 6 and then claiming you got him lynched.

I said in my post at 8-ish pm that Tuesday that he, and I quote, "look[ed] really bad to me". Doesn't preclude me having other suspects as well. I would hope you have more than one suspect so far, and I certainly do. You sure as shit didn't convince me of anything regarding Macdougall, and you should stop parading that around like you're God's gift to civs. That's only in your head, where you ARE God. If anyone is spinning this, it's you, and you're doing it to get civ cred that you aren't due.

Maybe you should listen to me more.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't realize he placeheld a vote on Black Rock that day. Didn't he also go after fingersplints for suspecting BR that same day?

I didn't go after fingers for going after BR; I went after fingers for doing nothing but say "Roxy is civ; BR is bad," which I wasn't finding very useful after about the 10th time.

Russtifinko wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I didn't realize he placeheld a vote on Black Rock that day. Didn't he also go after fingersplints for suspecting BR that same day?

I didn't go after fingers for going after BR; I went after fingers for doing nothing but say "Roxy is civ; BR is bad," which I wasn't finding very useful after about the 10th time.

Fair deuce.

I am making flippy-floppy.

Hi, I'm home and I have 7 minutes.

I was able to follow along at work a bit, but I cannot sign in to this site on work computers due to blockers. I am underwhelmed by Fuzz's responses to my cases: he has discredited them based upon the circumstance of their coming into existence and not on their actual merit. I don't think it's hard to understand why my case came when it did -- I reviewed the Floyd interactions when Floyd died and came to my conclusions.

He's also addressed [arguably] the most significant point -- that he waited two day phases to acknowledge that Floyd scumslipped in a conversation with him -- by claiming that he knew it was bad but didn't say anything as a gesture of niceness to the new guy.

I have my doubts.

Matt, if you are here, help me save Fuzz. I think you know why.

Oh god, four more minutes. I'd rather deserve to die...

Doc, you keep making veiled references to things and I have no idea what they are. You're going to need to engage me directly or I don't know how we can ever field a productive dialogue.

DrWilgy wrote:Matt, if you are here, help me save Fuzz. I think you know why.

Didn't I predict he'll waste his vote on me?

Anyone want to break this tie here?

DrWilgy wrote:

Choutas wrote:Nah the other post is the same post where you quote yourself. It isn't another person. My response covers both since it's the same post with one additional post. You seriously need to start using logic and not accuse me why I quoted one post and not the other when my response covers both since it's the same quote pyramid with one additional quote with the same goddamn question. You must be horrible playing this game. I can't attribute it to any other reason.
I told you I thought I was targeted. You ask me why. You want proof. Do you want me to give you my role pm? Seriously do you want me to screenshot and post? Do you? I don't use another's material to make that point, I use mine. You have to take my word for it. But you clearly won't. Until apparently I break into MP's mod and uncover all the pms regarding the case and post them online I'll forever be your suspect. Again you're really bad at playing this game. You can't call a bullshit when someone says he knows something that can not be proved by any lawful means.

Seriously if you're scum golden raspberry of the year.

What are you responding to here? What exactly is making you flustered? As far as I'm concerned I can call bullsuit on what I want.

Νο you want me to break the rules and say to you info that are privy to me. On the other hand only about 5 people have asked you to explain the percentages on the LC lynch and you never responded. You're being ridiculous and ask questions that their answers should be taken for what they are. I never said my action was an algorithm like your chart. I said I did a bait post based on a real suspicion that I was targeted at night. You say that was disingenuous and you say I must prove it to you. If you flip that around can you prove my guiltiness? Can you? Build a case around that if you think you have something but you don't. You're posting empty posts based around wild conjuncture.
All you have to say is that I didn't spend a day asking people around when I did leave it enough and only two guys bother to respond to me and for that they look townier because of it. You're clutching at straws man. Seriously Motel Room has accused me of some things that could look scummy if I wasn't town as fuck. You pick a post almost randomly from my post history and make wild assumptions.
You're free to say whatever you want but when you drive me nuts with shitty stuff like "why didn't you take a day to wait for responses" I won't sit idly and listen to your bad accusations.

Who is a teammate of Floyd?

Poll ended at Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:42:17 pm


bcornett24
0
No votes
Bullzeye
1
Epignosis (20) 4%
Choutas
0
No votes
Diiny
0
No votes
DrWilgy
0
No votes
Elohcin
0
No votes
Epignosis
0
No votes
JaggedJimmyJay
0
No votes
Matt F
0
No votes
Metalmarsh89
1
Strawhenge (17) 4%
motel room
2
sig (16), Russtifinko (19) 8%
RadicalFuzz
4
Metalmarsh89 (8), JaggedJimmyJay (10), Elohcin (11), Diiny (23) 17%
Ricochet
2
Matt F (13), bcornett24 (15) 8%
Roxy
0
No votes
Russtifinko
1
Bullzeye (18) 4%
sig
5
Choutas (5), motel room (12), RadicalFuzz (21), DrWilgy (22), Ricochet (24) 21%
Strawhenge
0
No votes
Pink (hosts, deadies, non-players)
8
MovingPictures07 (1), HamburgerBoy (2), Sloonei (3), MacDougall (4), TheFloyd73 (6), Sorsha (7), juliets (9), a2thezebra (14) 33%
Total votes : 24

Rico, you got gumption.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Anyone want to break this tie here?

Who else?

Day 9 has ended. Elohcin has been killed by ?????. She was Animals.

sig has been lynched. He was Houses in Motion.

It is now Night 9. You have 23 hours to send in your PMs.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Day 9 has ended. Elohcin has been killed by ?????. She was Animals.

No surprise there. RIP Elohcin.

I am dead and shouldn't post anything that isn't strictly off-topic.

well, shit

I'm sorry sig and civs.

I maintain that Ricochet's voting record is objectively horrific. :P

edit I meant conjecture I always mix it with conjuncture. It's after midnight so bear with all my shit.

Mac, even a single laugh emoticon has the potential to influence the game. Shoo.

RIP sig/Elo.

I'm not going to shit on your head immediately, Rico. Just explain your decision.

Sausage fest now.

Holy shit. Sorry sig I'd have bet my wanking hand you were scum.

I had reads on motel, fuzz and sig almost written, but not ready to be posted in time, with pretty much all three getting bad marks from the Floyd interaction, but the one on sig doesn't even matter now, given that I've fucked it up. I went with sig because it had strengthened my suspicions on him.

Anyway, I've been a failure today (and toDay) and I have no real words for it.

Ricochet wrote:I had reads on motel, fuzz and sig almost written, but not ready to be posted in time, with pretty much all three getting bad marks from the Floyd interaction, but the one on sig doesn't even matter now, given that I've fucked it up. I went with sig because it had strengthened my suspicions on him.

Anyway, I've been a failure today (and toDay) and I have no real words for it.

Were you not moved by the notion of a Fuzz lynch?

JJJ there's a relationship between you, and several other players. Some are dead now, but I'm pretty sure you established that relationship. I want to know from you why those players.

Coutas, there's no bad accusations there, nor would I want someone to break the rules. Kind of insulted that you think I would do that. Breaking game rules is something I wouldn't do. It hurts the game for everyone, and that's not why we play. Let's think "logically" as you would like. If you were really wanting to bait mafia. Why reveal the bait as bait? If there was actual purpose behind it that could've been used as scumbait, why revoke it? I see it as you going "Oh sheet, this was a bad Idea, so lol jk it was bait." Also, I still don't know what makes those two responses townier. I don't know what about responding to that bait makes them look townier. Elaborate on that. I think this is the 4th time I've asked you that specifically and you haven't answered.

You seem to be overly worried about the case itself. I don't know half of what your previous post is referencing, and I would just like some direction as to what you are responding to.

Also, why do you keep backtracking? I thought I had responded to all inquiry, but I KNOW for a fact that I asked for everyone to use my name in a post if they had questions to ask me questions or if I missed something. How are percentages on the LC lynch relevant to this conversation?

DrWilgy wrote:JJJ there's a relationship between you, and several other players. Some are dead now, but I'm pretty sure you established that relationship. I want to know from you why those players.

What players are you talking about? I don't understand the cloak and dagger.

Choutas wrote:Holy shit. Sorry sig I'd have bet my wanking hand you were scum.

Better learn how to jerk off with your other hand mate.
Thanks Sloonie and MP for hosting and the time you put into it I enjoyed this game alot.
I also am looking forward to playing with you RYM peeps more even if y'all post to much and Sloonie was the one to hunt me down when I was mafia.

You, me, Fuzz, Matt F, Floyd, and Mac.

You and I are different from the others though.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Ricochet wrote:I had reads on motel, fuzz and sig almost written, but not ready to be posted in time, with pretty much all three getting bad marks from the Floyd interaction, but the one on sig doesn't even matter now, given that I've fucked it up. I went with sig because it had strengthened my suspicions on him.

Anyway, I've been a failure today (and toDay) and I have no real words for it.

Were you not moved by the notion of a Fuzz lynch?

I honestly didn't manage to process it all, especially the late phase talks, Fuzz's rebuttals, this kind of stuff. I had him written down with a few undoubtedly bad looking stuff from the Floyd interaction, but nothing else - plus overall, I still felt more neutral about him than the sig or motel.

DrWilgy wrote:You, me, Fuzz, Matt F, Floyd, and Mac.

You and I are different from the others though.

Ok, you seem to be referencing CEO assistant stuff that you and JJJ should be aware about, but FYI, I don't think us normies can pick up on anything from this. At least I know I can't pick up shit from it.

DrWilgy wrote:You, me, Fuzz, Matt F, Floyd, and Mac.

You and I are different from the others though.

I still don't understand. Why have you highlighted those names with respect to me? If this is CEO-related, you know we can't talk about it here.

Ricochet wrote:I had reads on motel, fuzz and sig almost written, but not ready to be posted in time, with pretty much all three getting bad marks from the Floyd interaction, but the one on sig doesn't even matter now, given that I've fucked it up. I went with sig because it had strengthened my suspicions on him.

Anyway, I've been a failure today (and toDay) and I have no real words for it.

Just curious. You said on Day 7 you wouldn't vote for Jay (when he was leading the lynch) because your thoughts were not complete on him. Is this similar or different to that scenario?

It's game related, I want to know why these players have something in common, not what they have in common. I wouldn't ask for something that's top secret.

DrWilgy wrote:I want to know why these players have something in common, not what they have in common.

I seriously have no idea what you're talking about. I don't even know how to differentiate these two sentences. You're being incredibly vague, give me something I can understand please.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:I had reads on motel, fuzz and sig almost written, but not ready to be posted in time, with pretty much all three getting bad marks from the Floyd interaction, but the one on sig doesn't even matter now, given that I've fucked it up. I went with sig because it had strengthened my suspicions on him.

Anyway, I've been a failure today (and toDay) and I have no real words for it.

Just curious. You said on Day 7 you wouldn't vote for Jay (when he was leading the lynch) because your thoughts were not complete on him. Is this similar or different to that scenario?

Different. Being around 10-15 minutes too late to fully post such reads is not the same thing as never getting to compile any reads on JJJ. Here it was a matter of going with my strongest vibe (even if it proved wrong as fark). Then it would have meant voting either way with an empty tank of knowledge and assertion.

inb4 J3 spins this as a scum counter wagon save "but mine was civs"

Apologies sig, your legacy will be honored in the coming empire.

RadicalFuzz wrote:inb4 J3 spins this as a scum counter wagon save "but mine was civs"

Apologies sig, your legacy will be honored in the coming empire.

I have already had plenty of time to say that, and I haven't done so. I don't jump to conclusions. What are you worried about?

Can I just say that, despite the laughing line in her role being so obvious, I nevertheless totally had someone else in mind for Eloh?

I'm at maximum derp, that's for sure.