Re: [NIGHT 7] Turf Wars: Battle of the Hosts
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:54 am
Okay then never mind.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Like what?Sloonei wrote:I don't think we should be content to assume that Turnip Head was not lynched for the obvious reason. There could be a number of possible explanations for yesterday's lack of results.
I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, it's not easy being you in this game right now. It'll take some time to get your footing.Elohcin wrote:Listen y'all. I see I am in the red on many of your lists. I'm not very good at keeping up in big games. In fact, if you are not already aware, I vowed not to play them anymore. However, as a favor to MP, because he is an awesome guy, I am here. I am here to give be another vote for the civs. So, please, tell me who I can vote for and I will. I am not a bad guy. I'm here to help.
Thank you.Black Rock wrote:I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, it's not easy being you in this game right now. It'll take some time to get your footing.Elohcin wrote:Listen y'all. I see I am in the red on many of your lists. I'm not very good at keeping up in big games. In fact, if you are not already aware, I vowed not to play them anymore. However, as a favor to MP, because he is an awesome guy, I am here. I am here to give be another vote for the civs. So, please, tell me who I can vote for and I will. I am not a bad guy. I'm here to help.
My first thought was that perhaps he's the warden and the warden can't be arrested. That role description is extremely vague and could entail just about anything. If not that, perhaps there is some other behind the scenes mechanic that can stop a lynch from happening. I'm not sure I believe either of these possibilities are what prevented the lynch, but I'm not ruling things out.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Like what?Sloonei wrote:I don't think we should be content to assume that Turnip Head was not lynched for the obvious reason. There could be a number of possible explanations for yesterday's lack of results.
I would like to hear more of his thoughts, etc. once he is more caught up. Looking at his vote history, it did not make me feel wonderful to have him push suspicion at BR. I would like to hear his opinions on the other people we have been suspecting.Sloonei wrote:My first thought was that perhaps he's the warden and the warden can't be arrested. That role description is extremely vague and could entail just about anything. If not that, perhaps there is some other behind the scenes mechanic that can stop a lynch from happening. I'm not sure I believe either of these possibilities are what prevented the lynch, but I'm not ruling things out.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Like what?Sloonei wrote:I don't think we should be content to assume that Turnip Head was not lynched for the obvious reason. There could be a number of possible explanations for yesterday's lack of results.
I think you're reading too much into it. It couldn't be the former, because if town loses the ability to kill, that would give the warden complete immunity and break the game. I think it was vague owing to to all of the parole stuff that went on. It could be the second, but there's nothing tangible to make any assumptions with. I think it's just what it is.Sloonei wrote:My first thought was that perhaps he's the warden and the warden can't be arrested. That role description is extremely vague and could entail just about anything. If not that, perhaps there is some other behind the scenes mechanic that can stop a lynch from happening. I'm not sure I believe either of these possibilities are what prevented the lynch, but I'm not ruling things out.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Like what?Sloonei wrote:I don't think we should be content to assume that Turnip Head was not lynched for the obvious reason. There could be a number of possible explanations for yesterday's lack of results.
And how did town win in said game with unlynchable baddies, hmm?S~V~S wrote:You saying that makes me more likely to think Sloonei may have a point.
We have had games with unlynchable baddies. It didn't break the game.
Yes, I think everybody knew that.S~V~S wrote:ebwop, I so don't trust you.
They got NKed.Quin wrote:And how did town win in said game with unlynchable baddies, hmm?S~V~S wrote:You saying that makes me more likely to think Sloonei may have a point.
We have had games with unlynchable baddies. It didn't break the game.
That was Quin's point though. If town loses its capacity for night killing, then eliminating the unlynchable baddie would become impossible. It might make more sense (barely, it sounds like a really bad practice for balance) in a game with multiple baddie teams, but this is no such thing.S~V~S wrote:They got NKed.Quin wrote:And how did town win in said game with unlynchable baddies, hmm?S~V~S wrote:You saying that makes me more likely to think Sloonei may have a point.
We have had games with unlynchable baddies. It didn't break the game.
Okay, and as we return to my point about players being able to NK potentially all being arrested, we come to the flaw in your claim.S~V~S wrote:They got NKed.Quin wrote:And how did town win in said game with unlynchable baddies, hmm?S~V~S wrote:You saying that makes me more likely to think Sloonei may have a point.
We have had games with unlynchable baddies. It didn't break the game.
Soo... what? You want to me just stop giving my input? Wait for everyone to mislynch me? Sounds reasonable. I mean, you're the experienced one here.S~V~S wrote:And people i don't trust discounting speculation on this topic makes me want to trust him less not more.
I never said I didn't like you. Frankly, I do not like the way you are playing this game, but that doesn't say anything about you as a person.S~V~S wrote:@Quin, if you could stop with the snark it might help. Apparently you don;t like me,and that is OK. but can you tone it back? It isn;t helping me read.
Yes.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Hosts:
If you're able/willing to answer: when the police chief's double-arrest ability takes effect, does he/she have free choice over who the second player arrested is?
I am playing it as a 100% civ. Sorry that is an issue for you.Quin wrote:I never said I didn't like you. Frankly, I do not like the way you are playing this game, but that doesn't say anything about you as a person.S~V~S wrote:@Quin, if you could stop with the snark it might help. Apparently you don;t like me,and that is OK. but can you tone it back? It isn;t helping me read.
Is that what we have to do?Sloonei wrote:Linki: I guess we have to lynch Boomslang today
I don't agree with your assumption. thellama73 vouched smugly for TH and without much reason. TH wasn't lynched. I'm flying with simple explanations and will not be voting for Turnip Head.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Assuming llama was specifically chosen for the kill by the chief, my immediate inclination is to assume it was intended to frame Quin, who has enough enemies remaining in the thread that him just killing a threat isn't a strategically viable solution as a baddie. indiglo being killed was likely the result of her being well out of lynch territory.
If you're a highly-trusted player and you're not dead, I recommend you re-calibrate your reads. Someone is probably letting you stick around because they expect you to do something detrimental to your team.
No, but he was supposed to be killed during the night but that didn't happen.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is that what we have to do?Sloonei wrote:Linki: I guess we have to lynch Boomslang today
True.Epignosis wrote:I don't agree with your assumption. thellama73 vouched smugly for TH and without much reason. TH wasn't lynched.
Agreed.Epignosis wrote:I'm flying with simple explanations and will not be voting for Turnip Head.
Likewise. At least baddies can question my role in this game, literally to include what my night actions might be if any or even what my alignment is. Why do you think you're still here? You don't often see Day 8.Epignosis wrote:Still amazed you're still around.
I think the daisy family is the only one that still has a hitman, so unless both the hitman and don were inactive, I think it's safe to say that the hitman is probably arrested. So, if we're relying on night kills, we've still got the crew assuming they can still complete their missions.Sloonei wrote:No, but he was supposed to be killed during the night but that didn't happen.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is that what we have to do?Sloonei wrote:Linki: I guess we have to lynch Boomslang today
You've been safe town trusted for a long while. Why do you think you've been left alive?Sloonei wrote:No, but he was supposed to be killed during the night but that didn't happen.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is that what we have to do?Sloonei wrote:Linki: I guess we have to lynch Boomslang today
Prisoner 509378 wrote:You've been safe town trusted for a long while. Why do you think you've been left alive?Sloonei wrote:No, but he was supposed to be killed during the night but that didn't happen.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is that what we have to do?Sloonei wrote:Linki: I guess we have to lynch Boomslang today
Good point. Why chaindeath?Quin wrote:I'm voting chaindeath as a secondary lynch option. I think it's important to have one.
Is your continued survival meaningful to you?Sloonei wrote:
It is.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is your continued survival meaningful to you?Sloonei wrote:
How?Sloonei wrote:It is.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is your continued survival meaningful to you?Sloonei wrote:
Quin thinks chaindeath has ridden coattails throughout the entire game. A quick ISO of chaindeath allowed Quin to realise that he has not provided a single piece of evidence to justify scum or civ reads for any player, yet he has given reads on almost everybody at this point. Nerolunar is the exception, and his is only a very weak case that he keeps coming back to, but does not build upon. Quin feels as though chaindeaths posts are activity for activities sake. He has provided a few hypotheticals which are so outrageous that Quin is struggling to see any legitimate thought in them. Quin ultimately feels like chaindeath is just making up his game as he goes along.Sloonei wrote:Good point. Why chaindeath?Quin wrote:I'm voting chaindeath as a secondary lynch option. I think it's important to have one.
The cops aren't trying to arrest me. They're targeting other people.Prisoner 509378 wrote:How?Sloonei wrote:It is.Prisoner 509378 wrote:Is your continued survival meaningful to you?Sloonei wrote:
I don't get the impression you're even thinking about this.Sloonei wrote:The cops aren't trying to arrest me. They're targeting other people.
I can see all of this being the signs of a townie who's just behind on the thread and unfamiliar with the environment. Of course, you'd be in those same shoes yourself, and I don't think anyone, chaindeath included, would argue that you haven't been more active than he has. I see a lot of "unfamiliar townie" hallmarks in the case against chaindeath, my own case included.Quin wrote:Quin thinks chaindeath has ridden coattails throughout the entire game. A quick ISO of chaindeath allowed Quin to realise that he has not provided a single piece of evidence to justify scum or civ reads for any player, yet he has given reads on almost everybody at this point. Nerolunar is the exception, and his is only a very weak case that he keeps coming back to, but does not build upon. Quin feels as though chaindeaths posts are activity for activities sake. He has provided a few hypotheticals which are so outrageous that Quin is struggling to see any legitimate thought in them. Quin ultimately feels like chaindeath is just making up his game as he goes along.Sloonei wrote:Good point. Why chaindeath?Quin wrote:I'm voting chaindeath as a secondary lynch option. I think it's important to have one.
I am.Prisoner 509378 wrote:I don't get the impression you're even thinking about this.Sloonei wrote:The cops aren't trying to arrest me. They're targeting other people.
I can understand that way of thinking, but I feel better thinking about him being scum than civ.Sloonei wrote:I can see all of this being the signs of a townie who's just behind on the thread and unfamiliar with the environment. Of course, you'd be in those same shoes yourself, and I don't think anyone, chaindeath included, would argue that you haven't been more active than he has. I see a lot of "unfamiliar townie" hallmarks in the case against chaindeath, my own case included.Quin wrote:Quin thinks chaindeath has ridden coattails throughout the entire game. A quick ISO of chaindeath allowed Quin to realise that he has not provided a single piece of evidence to justify scum or civ reads for any player, yet he has given reads on almost everybody at this point. Nerolunar is the exception, and his is only a very weak case that he keeps coming back to, but does not build upon. Quin feels as though chaindeaths posts are activity for activities sake. He has provided a few hypotheticals which are so outrageous that Quin is struggling to see any legitimate thought in them. Quin ultimately feels like chaindeath is just making up his game as he goes along.Sloonei wrote:Good point. Why chaindeath?Quin wrote:I'm voting chaindeath as a secondary lynch option. I think it's important to have one.
Not in speed games, no, but I last a long time in full games. In all the full games I've played, I've made it past Day 8 in well over half of them. I've only won once as a civilian in a full game- all other wins were Mafia. I'd prefer such statistics not be used against me.Prisoner 509378 wrote:True.Epignosis wrote:I don't agree with your assumption. thellama73 vouched smugly for TH and without much reason. TH wasn't lynched.
Agreed.Epignosis wrote:I'm flying with simple explanations and will not be voting for Turnip Head.
Likewise. At least baddies can question my role in this game, literally to include what my night actions might be if any or even what my alignment is. Why do you think you're still here? You don't often see Day 8.Epignosis wrote:Still amazed you're still around.