S~V~S wrote:is it possible that I find this to be Matt baiting? Would you like to look up at the blue line above for reference here?
My initial interpretation was similar. I'm working it out with Epi now so I'll see how I feel.
S~V~S wrote:Would it be acceptable to you that I agree fully with this point? Odd that Epi is blowing off my meta reasoning, but he is totally ignoring Matts Meta, isn't it?
I keep feeling the instinct to answer your questions even when I know they aren't meant to be questions.
One of Epi's earliest posts was to suggest that he cannot know Matt's alignment without lynching him, an acknowledgement of Matt's skill for consistent cross-alignment behavior. That being the starting point of Epi's mindset on Matt probably made it more significant to me that Epi ended up pursuing him as a "top" suspect, based upon a point that doesn't strike me as powerful enough to overcome that original admission -- that who the hell really knows what's up with Matt.
S~V~S wrote:This point was one in which I did not toally agree with you, and thought Epi had a good point, can you say hallelujah? Did I find Wilgys point odd, that if these people were not on the same team, that they had to be on opposing bad teams? Why couldn't some of them be civs? Just becasue Wilgy came up civ does not mean Epi did not really think him bad regardless of his own alignment, does it? I kind of thought he was bad, too, did you know that?
I agreed with Wilgy frequently on Day 1 as I was catching up, and that could create bias for me when I observe other people treating him like he wasn't making sense.
S~V~S wrote:Can you see prior answer I just gave, and can you also see blue question before your quoted Post re italics? But you will understand if I totally agree with you re Epi not wasting space x1,000, correct? WOuld you consider this a meta point? Would you agree that we are 50/50 on this point?
This bit along with the post count gripe were the least important among those I brought up.
S~V~S wrote:How do you feel about me agreeing with you on mostly meta reasoning? If I say that I a zillion percent agree that I think Epi is saying stuff to say stuff, would you see my point? If I say that I think you sometimes put too much emphasis on dead interactions, would you be hurt? Can I say that sometimes, in two team games, especially, especially early, those are not as relevant as in one team games? Do you agree that hindsight is 20/20?
Would you please accept this womans request to expand on this when she does not sound either fawning or confrontational in turn via use of this format?
About 3% of the Mafia games I have ever played have featured more than one baddie team, so I'd be open to your perspective. Is this such a game?