Re: Dr. Who Mafia! - Day 1
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:32 pm
I'm voting for Alzarius. It sounds the most pleasant out of the four, with the first planet sounding least pleasant, IMO.
This.juliets wrote:After the lynch is over Epi is going to say he is not sorry because, he will say, I did baddie things. Or made mistakes that couldn't be corrected. Keep in mind people make mistakes like posting in the wrong thread all the time - civs and baddies It sure would be nice to know what those baddie things are that I did. Please the rest of you, hound Epi when he says something is so and make him explain himself. This is what happens when you let him get away with thinking things are one way and no one challenges him. Remember if you are civ it could be you next. He and someone else votes for you, people come in the thread who are tired and just take the easy way.
I thought the master was the evil doctor? I guess I haven't followed the show as well as I thought I did. Thank you for the information and links!zeek wrote:I'm going to bed. I'll look at the fallout from this tomorrow.
Clearly the Valeyard is a role in this game. He is the evil version of the Doctor, quite literally.
In regard to the night poll, it may effect the game so here's some links. I'll look at these closer tomorrow as well but I recall Alzarius having some connection to healing but I can't remember what.
Alfava Metraxis has a fucking army of Weeping Angels on so lets avoid that option.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Alfava_Metraxis
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Arkheon
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Alzarius
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Azure
That they're misguidedS~V~S wrote:So now that you know they were not trying to save juliets, what do you make of those people who voted you, Enrique?
Weeping Angels aren't good, right? I only know the name from the Doctor Who theme in BGOAlfava Metraxis (aka. Alfalfa Metraxis) is a planet in the Dundra System, once home to the extinct Aplans, and colonised by humans sometime in the 51st century. It is home to more than one "Maze of the dead", mass tombs where the dead are supposedly buried in the walls and represented with statues. However, all of the statues are revealed to be Weeping Angels. The Doctor, Amy and River Song landed on this planet in The Time of Angels after following the path of the spaceship, Byzantium. Alfalfa Metraxis is the 7th planet in the Dundra System and has 11 hour days.
Alzarius is Adric's homeworld, located in E-Space. It appeared in the serial Full Circle. Its galactic coordinates are identical to those of Gallifrey—except they were negative.[1] Alzarius is covered in lush, dense forests and marshlands. Every 50 years, the planet is dragged further away from its sun by a larger planet, causing a phenomenon known as "Mistfall".
Sounds spooky, except not really if they're not actually ghosts. Reminds me of the opening scene of Guardians of the Galaxy. Are we gonna find any orbs in here?Arkheon, also known as the Planet of Ghosts, is a planet located near the Crab Nebula, just past the Pleiades, left at the Blue Star Worlds. Temporal echoes resembling ghosts roamed the surface due to a temporal fissure in the planet's core. The world was virtually destroyed by the Daleks, but the remains were visited in Prisoner of the Daleks.
Well OK that's specific.Azure is a blue planet seen from the ships in the Fourth Doctor story Nightmare of Eden.
Bullshit it did and I'm sorry I wavered.Enrique wrote:Oh apparently Alzarius is the consensus then... the third one sounded cool to me.
It didn't mean you were bad. It meant you were suspicious.juliets wrote:Just keep telling yourself that that reworded post meant I was bad. Keep telling yourself.
This is every possible option?MovingPictures07 wrote:I wonder: Baddies could have taken three strategies here, really, (1) avoided the juliets lynch and voted elsewhere, (2) bandwagoned onto the juliets lynch, or (3) missed the vote.
Of (2), Elo, sabie, and Bullz's votes struck me as most suspicious.
Of (1) and (3), I'm not sure yet. Requires further analysis. But I have my eye on a few players, that's for sure.
Linki with Enrique: Thanks for clarifying and making the list of the 11. I was about to do it myself, but you just saved me like a minute or two.
LOL, that was my point, I am trying to think of every different angle and come up with my top suspects within each possibility. Really just to help me more than anything.Made wrote:This is every possible option?MovingPictures07 wrote:I wonder: Baddies could have taken three strategies here, really, (1) avoided the juliets lynch and voted elsewhere, (2) bandwagoned onto the juliets lynch, or (3) missed the vote.
Of (2), Elo, sabie, and Bullz's votes struck me as most suspicious.
Of (1) and (3), I'm not sure yet. Requires further analysis. But I have my eye on a few players, that's for sure.
Linki with Enrique: Thanks for clarifying and making the list of the 11. I was about to do it myself, but you just saved me like a minute or two.
Either vote Juliet, not vote Juliet or not vote.
OK, this is bothering me, SVS, what the fuck game are you playing?S~V~S wrote:Everyone took one of those strategies, bad or not.
shhhEnrique wrote:... what?
I absolutely clarified this.Made wrote:Does anyone know how this post is suppose to be read, he never clarified what exact he felt was hypocritical.Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.Seriously?MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
Explain to me how you "misread" my post. Explain to me that "misreading" my post would cause you to think I NEVER clarified on a post that I had made earlier.Made wrote: Also, thanks, misread Dom's post.
Give everyone a chance to vote the way they want...Epignosis wrote:Bullshit it did and I'm sorry I wavered.Enrique wrote:Oh apparently Alzarius is the consensus then... the third one sounded cool to me.
I skipped the quotes when i read you. So i read:Dom wrote:Hi everyone! I had a rather exhausting night and just caught up. I will do my best to comment appropriately.
I absolutely clarified this.Made wrote:Does anyone know how this post is suppose to be read, he never clarified what exact he felt was hypocritical.Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.Seriously?MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
There, however, IS something else I didn't clarify. Why did you get the two confused?Explain to me how you "misread" my post. Explain to me that "misreading" my post would cause you to think I NEVER clarified on a post that I had made earlier.Made wrote: Also, thanks, misread Dom's post.
But didn't realize this was a clarification of the hypocritical thing till MP pointed it out to me.Dom wrote:What makes me furrow my brow is that you seem to be looking at Enrique (who I believe to be suspicious) partially because he is changing stance on you. However, you are doing a similar kind of waffling on him. It doesn't make sense to me
Didn't read the properly at first.Enrique wrote:tbh I feel like the secret roles would be indies or maybe another baddie team, as opposed to civs and hidden Daleks/Cybermen. Plenty of roles in the list already have *secret* powers, what would be the point of adding more secrets to those teams?
It does not remain in cache. You possibly forgot to click the reset button at the bottom of the page before you logged back out and in again. I bet if you go back in, it still says "Hidden". If that is NOT the case, let me know.zeek wrote:You've been online for quite a while and not really posted. I'm not even saying it is suspicious, it was only meant as a retort to your comment on my hiddenness. (I've logged out, unchecked hidden and logged back in, but I'm still hidden for some reason. Must be cache or some shit.)
This wasn't directed at me, but I and many people stay invisible precisely to avoid questions like this:Enrique wrote:Is there a particular reason why you have set yourself to appear as invisible on the forum? It makes it hard to tell whether I should expect a response at any given time.
I often leave myself logged in all day and know that if I was visible there'd be at least one person per game who brought up the fact that I seem to be on a lot more than I post.zeek wrote:You've been online for quite a while and not really posted. I'm not even saying it is suspicious, it was only meant as a retort to your comment on my hiddenness. (I've logged out, unchecked hidden and logged back in, but I'm still hidden for some reason. Must be cache or some shit.)
Made, why were you more concerned with something I did clarify rather than the thing I did not actually clarify?Made wrote:I skipped the quotes when i read you. So i read:Dom wrote:Hi everyone! I had a rather exhausting night and just caught up. I will do my best to comment appropriately.
I absolutely clarified this.Made wrote:Does anyone know how this post is suppose to be read, he never clarified what exact he felt was hypocritical.Dom wrote:I find some of the points on Enrique to be valid. I do. However, I couldn't help but notice how hypocritical MP is being.
So you agree-- Enrique is your greatest suspect.MovingPictures07 wrote:Wow, I actually agree here.Epignosis wrote:I waited until Day 1. But you, sir, are my greatest suspect.Enrique wrote:No. It's suspicious that he used it without any indication that he was around when it was used.MovingPictures07 wrote: Fair, I don't feel very strongly about this Enrique suspicion, but I do believe in it, and I do think he very well could be bad. I wouldn't have voted him if we couldn't change votes, but since we can, thought I might as well.Seriously?MovingPictures07 wrote: So now here you go trying to subtly push that my behavior was really forced and over the top, just like Dana, yet you're "not making any accusations"?
I don't buy it.
Am I bad or not, Enri?
There, however, IS something else I didn't clarify. Why did you get the two confused?Explain to me how you "misread" my post. Explain to me that "misreading" my post would cause you to think I NEVER clarified on a post that I had made earlier.Made wrote: Also, thanks, misread Dom's post.But didn't realize this was a clarification of the hypocritical thing till MP pointed it out to me.Dom wrote:What makes me furrow my brow is that you seem to be looking at Enrique (who I believe to be suspicious) partially because he is changing stance on you. However, you are doing a similar kind of waffling on him. It doesn't make sense to me
The really shitty thing is I felt that Juliet's lynch was absolute bullshit. Simple phrasing change was a cardinal sin but everything that everyone else did, including but not limited to:
Mr's vote
SVS's removedness
Mp's stunt
Enrique's supatown
Elo's vote
Epi's Suicidalness
While i personally don't think any of these were vote worthy (Beside maybe Elo's vote), the fact that the above were acknowledge and deemed insignificant but juliet wasn't is bothering me.
Also, SVS, start playing better already, like real talk.
zeek wrote:Okay, so the Valeyard. He must be an Indy. One possibility we must consider is that should he be lynched he could appear as the Doctor. They are genetically the same, the Valeyard being the accidental result of an experiment to try to break the limit on regenerations.
That leave two roles unaccounted for. One could be indy and one civ, or they could be an extra mafia member for each team.
I see Davros, creator of the Daleks, as a possibility. But others fit better with the hidden element of the roles. Obviously the Silence have been mentioned and a lone Weeping Angel is possible. The Beast, a Zygon or Slitheen. Even the Vashda Narada, which are essentially flesh-eating shadows.
What's signficiant is that he was completely wrong about what I didn't clarify. Why?Enrique wrote:Dom, I'm afraid I don't really understand you right now. What's so terrible about Made missing your clarification? What about it makes him worthy of your eye?
zeek, I personally appreciate these contributions. I actually spent a bit reading the Doctor Who wiki today, and for the first time in my life considered watching the showThose last few possible roles you mention, what do you think they could be?
tbh I feel like the secret roles would be indies or maybe another baddie team, as opposed to civs and hidden Daleks/Cybermen. Plenty of roles in the list already have *secret* powers, what would be the point of adding more secrets to those teams?
Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh