The Syndicate

Turnip Head wrote:DH why did you kill Sorsha?

Golden wrote:DH is an obvious baddie for NKing sorsha

So, to be extra clear, I won't be voting SVS today. I won't even be making any cases on SVS. I've come to the point on my own thought processes where I genuinely think I may have been wrong about her. I think I've done enough to explain why in previous posts, so I'm moving on.

I also think my annoyance at the lynch yesterday, was in part because I was able to recognise that I had let myself be too focussed on SVS. (It was also partly because the meme generators were hard work and pissing me off).

I recognise today may well be about lynching Glorfindel. If it is, I understand. I agree with Typhoony that lynching an inmate isn't a bad outcome, but I prefer to lynch someone who is really bad, and even more than that I feel as though Glorfindel is making genuine efforts to help the town, not playing both sides as some other people might do with that role. It's also possible that he is actually GCPD. I don't think Glorfindel is bad, and I can't vote that way.

But, I'm not going to focus on Glorfindel. I want to start looking at some new people. People who possibly haven't been looked at enough.

There are a number of people I feel like have flown under the radar this game. Perhaps I have been one until very recently. Typhoony, Dom, DF, DH, LoRab... remarkably even Matt to some extent. Some of these people have taken heat, but I don't really feel like I or any one else has analysed anything much about them. I'd throw me in there - I'd invite anyone to really investigate my game.

At this point, I think I have identified town-leaning roles for SVS, MP, TH and Mac. Unless anyone actually is any of the roles I think these people are and wants to state my theories as being wrong. I have probable town reads on Enrique, bullz and juliets.

That really leaves me looking in that group of six, plus the inactives, for where my vote would go today.

sprityo wrote:oh and here is that "crumb", for you all, that is my last words for this game

Spoiler: show

sprityo wrote:I mean we've already congratulated TH aplenty, but again, good job on that one!

it was so obscure that no one would notice. (this was following the death of the joker btw)

Golden wrote:Yeah, LoRab, that's not a criticism. I meant to say, but forgot, that by 'flying under the radar' I don't even mean post count. Dom, Matt, DH, these guys have high post counts. So do I.

Epignosis wrote:

sprityo wrote:oh and here is that "crumb", for you all, that is my last words for this game

Spoiler: show

sprityo wrote:I mean we've already congratulated TH aplenty, but again, good job on that one!

it was so obscure that no one would notice. (this was following the death of the joker btw)

sprityo, you cannot post on topic because you are dead. Please save your comments that are related to the game for the end.

Enrique wrote:dh who should we vote for

sprityo wrote:ive been waiting on this lynch for days now, and mafia feel im too suspicious to kill anyways. one of my main questions is through all the "i dont like sprityo" it's never gotten past that. Unless youre DFaraday or Bullzeye

I welcome death with open arms friends, or is that just me messing with you again?

oh and i guess i was on the block yesterday?

oh, and wait, im dead. yes? hmm let me check again

DharmaHelper wrote:

Enrique wrote:dh who should we vote for

Baddies.

Dom wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Enrique wrote:dh who should we vote for

Baddies.

Like who?

DharmaHelper wrote:

Enrique wrote:dh who should we vote for

Baddies.

Enrique wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Enrique wrote:dh who should we vote for

Baddies.

name 1

DharmaHelper wrote:I wonder what Matt will be afflicted with today.

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

Sorsha wrote:Thank you!

Glorfindel wrote:

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

There's a couple of things I'd like to re-assess but I certainly believe there is a case to be made for Typhoony. We are well in the mid-game now and after seven Day and Night phases, the core group of experienced and influential players from this site remains for all intents and purposes, intact. Some of you (e.g. yourself, DH, MP and many others) would've I thought, made first rate NK choices by a Mafia team and yet, they've not taken out any really vocal and as I say influential players - I think that is indicative and what Matt has been trying to tell us the last few Days. Having said that, I think I wouldn't be doing my job if I turned a blind eye to a player that I believe has been flying under the radar for the last seven days and nights.

I know a good many of you are suspicious of me and I'm yet to fully understand why but I have no intention of abandoning my brothers in arms to the Mafia in this game.

LoRab wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

There's a couple of things I'd like to re-assess but I certainly believe there is a case to be made for Typhoony. We are well in the mid-game now and after seven Day and Night phases, the core group of experienced and influential players from this site remains for all intents and purposes, intact. Some of you (e.g. yourself, DH, MP and many others) would've I thought, made first rate NK choices by a Mafia team and yet, they've not taken out any really vocal and as I say influential players - I think that is indicative and what Matt has been trying to tell us the last few Days. Having said that, I think I wouldn't be doing my job if I turned a blind eye to a player that I believe has been flying under the radar for the last seven days and nights.

I know a good many of you are suspicious of me and I'm yet to fully understand why but I have no intention of abandoning my brothers in arms to the Mafia in this game.

I'm confused by this post. Are you saying that the mafia hasn't made good kill choices? And how are you defining what good choices would be? You seem to be indicating that experienced players would take out vocal/influencial players? But I don't think that's how experienced mafia usually chooses kills, so I'm not sure. Like I said, I'm confused. Could you clarify?

Enrique wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

There's a couple of things I'd like to re-assess but I certainly believe there is a case to be made for Typhoony. We are well in the mid-game now and after seven Day and Night phases, the core group of experienced and influential players from this site remains for all intents and purposes, intact. Some of you (e.g. yourself, DH, MP and many others) would've I thought, made first rate NK choices by a Mafia team and yet, they've not taken out any really vocal and as I say influential players - I think that is indicative and what Matt has been trying to tell us the last few Days. Having said that, I think I wouldn't be doing my job if I turned a blind eye to a player that I believe has been flying under the radar for the last seven days and nights.

I know a good many of you are suspicious of me and I'm yet to fully understand why but I have no intention of abandoning my brothers in arms to the Mafia in this game.

I'm confused by this post. Are you saying that the mafia hasn't made good kill choices? And how are you defining what good choices would be? You seem to be indicating that experienced players would take out vocal/influencial players? But I don't think that's how experienced mafia usually chooses kills, so I'm not sure. Like I said, I'm confused. Could you clarify?

Well, surely it tells us he couldn't have made those kills.

LoRab wrote:

Glorfindel wrote:

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

There's a couple of things I'd like to re-assess but I certainly believe there is a case to be made for Typhoony. We are well in the mid-game now and after seven Day and Night phases, the core group of experienced and influential players from this site remains for all intents and purposes, intact. Some of you (e.g. yourself, DH, MP and many others) would've I thought, made first rate NK choices by a Mafia team and yet, they've not taken out any really vocal and as I say influential players - I think that is indicative and what Matt has been trying to tell us the last few Days. Having said that, I think I wouldn't be doing my job if I turned a blind eye to a player that I believe has been flying under the radar for the last seven days and nights.

I know a good many of you are suspicious of me and I'm yet to fully understand why but I have no intention of abandoning my brothers in arms to the Mafia in this game.

I'm confused by this post. Are you saying that the mafia hasn't made good kill choices? And how are you defining what good choices would be? You seem to be indicating that experienced players would take out vocal/influencial players? But I don't think that's how experienced mafia usually chooses kills, so I'm not sure. Like I said, I'm confused. Could you clarify?

DharmaHelper wrote:As frustrating as it was to basically be told I am an affliction I don't like that Sorsha was NKed.

Glorfindel wrote:

Dom wrote:RIP Sorsh.

Glorfindel, are you still looking at a Typhoony lynch?

There's a couple of things I'd like to re-assess but I certainly believe there is a case to be made for Typhoony. We are well in the mid-game now and after seven Day and Night phases, the core group of experienced and influential players from this site remains for all intents and purposes, intact. Some of you (e.g. yourself, DH, MP and many others) would've I thought, made first rate NK choices by a Mafia team and yet, they've not taken out any really vocal and as I say influential players - I think that is indicative and what Matt has been trying to tell us the last few Days. Having said that, I think I wouldn't be doing my job if I turned a blind eye to a player that I believe has been flying under the radar for the last seven days and nights.

I know a good many of you are suspicious of me and I'm yet to fully understand why but I have no intention of abandoning my brothers in arms to the Mafia in this game.

Matt wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:As frustrating as it was to basically be told I am an affliction I don't like that Sorsha was NKed.

Seeing as how you and Sorsha seemed to have some kind of real off topic probs, I don't think you killed her btw. Unless you're just a total dick.

Dom wrote:Golden maybe flown under the radar isn't the best way to put it. Do you mean avoided scrutiny? Because I don't feel like neither Matt nor myself have exactly flown under the radar.

Golden wrote:

Dom wrote:Golden maybe flown under the radar isn't the best way to put it. Do you mean avoided scrutiny? Because I don't feel like neither Matt nor myself have exactly flown under the radar.

Maybe avoided scrutiny is right. Not avoided suspicion, just... Avoided meaningful analysis, maybe.

Matt wrote:Chillin'. You?

DFaraday wrote:I kind of get what Glorfindel is saying. Players like Mac, Golden, and MP are typically the most vocal players, and tend to spearhead lynches and the general direction of the thread. If a baddie team wants to manipulate the thread it would make sense to take out players who might lead a lynch on them. I don't think that's a reason to suspect any of those players are bad though.

Glorf, why do you suspect Typh? I feel like he hasn't been trying to help the civ cause very much, but I haven't seen anything specifically suspicious about him.

I still think one of the Mac voters is probably bad. Aside from SVS, whom I still think could be bad, I'll look over the others tomorrow.

Matt wrote:I'm tryin' to get things done, Dom. I'm tryin'.

You still like Turnips? I've never seen such a bad and/or indy player shove in my face how bad and/or indy they are, yet nobody wants to get behind a Turnips lynch. Does everyone still think he's Alfred or something?

Going back to another "confirmed civ", why isn't Mac dead? Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense for him to still be breathing. Derp.

Dom wrote:

Matt wrote:Chillin'. You?

Wondering why you haven't been doing much lately.

DFaraday wrote:I kind of get what Glorfindel is saying. Players like Mac, Golden, and MP are typically the most vocal players, and tend to spearhead lynches and the general direction of the thread. If a baddie team wants to manipulate the thread it would make sense to take out players who might lead a lynch on them. I don't think that's a reason to suspect any of those players are bad though.

Glorf, why do you suspect Typh? I feel like he hasn't been trying to help the civ cause very much, but I haven't seen anything specifically suspicious about him.

I still think one of the Mac voters is probably bad. Aside from SVS, whom I still think could be bad, I'll look over the others tomorrow.

Well two of the three players you named there outed themselves or gave strong enough role hints that they've dropped off the face of discussion.

Dom wrote:

Matt wrote:I'm tryin' to get things done, Dom. I'm tryin'.

You still like Turnips? I've never seen such a bad and/or indy player shove in my face how bad and/or indy they are, yet nobody wants to get behind a Turnips lynch. Does everyone still think he's Alfred or something?

Going back to another "confirmed civ", why isn't Mac dead? Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense for him to still be breathing. Derp.

Why do you think TH is bad and who thinks he is Alfred? The case was that he wasn't Alfred.

Dom wrote:

Matt wrote:I'm tryin' to get things done, Dom. I'm tryin'.

You still like Turnips? I've never seen such a bad and/or indy player shove in my face how bad and/or indy they are, yet nobody wants to get behind a Turnips lynch. Does everyone still think he's Alfred or something?

Going back to another "confirmed civ", why isn't Mac dead? Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense for him to still be breathing. Derp.

Why do you think TH is bad and who thinks he is Alfred? The case was that he wasn't Alfred.

DFaraday wrote:I kind of get what Glorfindel is saying. Players like Mac, Golden, and MP are typically the most vocal players, and tend to spearhead lynches and the general direction of the thread. If a baddie team wants to manipulate the thread it would make sense to take out players who might lead a lynch on them. I don't think that's a reason to suspect any of those players are bad though.

Glorf, why do you suspect Typh? I feel like he hasn't been trying to help the civ cause very much, but I haven't seen anything specifically suspicious about him.

I still think one of the Mac voters is probably bad. Aside from SVS, whom I still think could be bad, I'll look over the others tomorrow.