The Syndicate

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Kate wrote:

thellama73 wrote:The "Vompatti assumed MP has a partner, therefore he must be bad" line of attack is intensely confusing to me, as a casual glance at the role list indicates that the baddies come in teams of two. I'm wondering if this might be a diversionary tactic by people who want to get the Vomp out of the way for some reason.

He agreed he was bad and discussed his partner as though he was certain that he had one, thus he knew MP was bad. Make sense?

It doesn't actually make sense to me, but perhaps I am being dense.

I have much to think on.

His replies unsettle me. He seems evasive. Who do you suspect?

My problem is that I don't have anyone who is sticking out to me as a clear suspect. That is why I am asking what may appear to be dumb questions. I am afraid of accidentally lynching a civvie again, but I don't have a clear sense of who to vote for.

In all honesty, my top suspect is probably now Kate, as she voted for Boo when MP was on the chopping block, and she seems overly aggressive in her pursuit to lynch Vompatti, who has seemed (based purely on intuition) to be legit to me.

Kate? No one has suspected her yet vocally I think. But if he is civvie let him stand up for himself more and rid us of this doubt.

Snow Dog wrote:
Kate? No one has suspected her yet vocally I think.

What can I say? I just have to be different like that.

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Kate wrote:

thellama73 wrote:The "Vompatti assumed MP has a partner, therefore he must be bad" line of attack is intensely confusing to me, as a casual glance at the role list indicates that the baddies come in teams of two. I'm wondering if this might be a diversionary tactic by people who want to get the Vomp out of the way for some reason.

He agreed he was bad and discussed his partner as though he was certain that he had one, thus he knew MP was bad. Make sense?

It doesn't actually make sense to me, but perhaps I am being dense.

I have much to think on.

His replies unsettle me. He seems evasive. Who do you suspect?

My problem is that I don't have anyone who is sticking out to me as a clear suspect. That is why I am asking what may appear to be dumb questions. I am afraid of accidentally lynching a civvie again, but I don't have a clear sense of who to vote for.

In all honesty, my top suspect is probably now Kate, as she voted for Boo when MP was on the chopping block, and she seems overly aggressive in her pursuit to lynch Vompatti, who has seemed (based purely on intuition) to be legit to me.

מה זאת אומרת שאתה מפחד בטעות lynching של civvie שוב? אנחנו לא lynched של civvie עדיין. אני civvie הנטוי על בו, אך אנו יודעים בוודאות כי הוא civvie חוץ מזה הוא לא היה אפילו lynched.

לא נורא. שכחתי LT ולתלות על יום אחד.

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

thellama73 wrote:

Kate wrote:

thellama73 wrote:The "Vompatti assumed MP has a partner, therefore he must be bad" line of attack is intensely confusing to me, as a casual glance at the role list indicates that the baddies come in teams of two. I'm wondering if this might be a diversionary tactic by people who want to get the Vomp out of the way for some reason.

He agreed he was bad and discussed his partner as though he was certain that he had one, thus he knew MP was bad. Make sense?

It doesn't actually make sense to me, but perhaps I am being dense.

I have much to think on.

His replies unsettle me. He seems evasive. Who do you suspect?

My problem is that I don't have anyone who is sticking out to me as a clear suspect. That is why I am asking what may appear to be dumb questions. I am afraid of accidentally lynching a civvie again, but I don't have a clear sense of who to vote for.

In all honesty, my top suspect is probably now Kate, as she voted for Boo when MP was on the chopping block, and she seems overly aggressive in her pursuit to lynch Vompatti, who has seemed (based purely on intuition) to be legit to me.

I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

Well fine then, I'm happy to be the sole voice of dissent. Hopefully I will be proven wrong.

*Votes Kate*

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

Vote vomp

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

I'm beginning to suspect a target switch of some sort.

I can't tell if Vompatti is a baddie giving up, a frustrated civvie, or if something else entirely is happening. But seeing as he's my main suspicion, I'm sticking with my case and *voting Vompatti*

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

Are you collecting votes for a reason?

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

Are you collecting votes for a reason?

Oops...double post somehow.

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

Are you collecting votes for a reason?

Possibly, but I really don't know what the reason is.

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:
I'm tempted to support this line of suspicion. Today, however, I'm voting for myself.

*votes Vompatti*

So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

Are you collecting votes for a reason?

Possibly, but I really don't know what the reason is.

I don't suppose you can answer this. Are you somehow being coerced into collecting votes?

thellama73 wrote:I'm beginning to suspect a target switch of some sort.

If so then Vompatti knows about it, yes?

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:So first you more or less admit you are MP's partner and then you vote for yourself. So you wanted these votes? What the hell is going on here?

I'm not MP's partner, I never said I was and I don't know why everyone keeps insisting that I did. As for this vote, there's only so much I can say about it.

Are you collecting votes for a reason?

Possibly, but I really don't know what the reason is.

I don't suppose you can answer this. Are you somehow being coerced into collecting votes?

I won't deny it, but I won't confirm it either.

^Well as I said, I didn't expect an answer. Don't know whether to believe you or not.

Okay. Vompatti voting for himself seems extremely odd to me. I feel like something else is going on that we don't know about.

Llama, the main reason I am suspicious of Vomps can be found back in the giant post I made a few pages back (it's the very last one on the bottom of the page, so it shouldn't be too hard to find). Basically, me re-reading him and pulling all those quotes is why I am so suspicious of him and think he is bad.

I guess there's no point in me holding my vote at this point though. So Vompatti it is.

Votes Vompatti

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Llama, the main reason I am suspicious of Vomps can be found back in the giant post I made a few pages back (it's the very last one on the bottom of the page, so it shouldn't be too hard to find). Basically, me re-reading him and pulling all those quotes is why I am so suspicious of him and think he is bad.

Yes, I just reread that. It was a very well put together argument, which is why I am much less suspicious of you than I used to be.

Everyone besides Llama seems very sure on Vompatti...why am I wavering?

Snow Dog wrote:Everyone besides Llama seems very sure on Vompatti...why am I wavering?

Maybe, like me, you just tend to rebel against consensus.

Every time I come in it seems like something strange has happened! This time vomps voted for himself, which for me kind of clinches it. I can't think of a lynch switch action that the person knows about before it occurs so I think Vompatti is just dancing around on those questions. Anyway, I'm going to go ahead and vote Vompatti based on the reasons I talked about earlier and what has happened since.

juliets wrote:Every time I come in it seems like something strange has happened! This time vomps voted for himself, which for me kind of clinches it. I can't think of a lynch switch action that the person knows about before it occurs so I think Vompatti is just dancing around on those questions. Anyway, I'm going to go ahead and vote Vompatti based on the reasons I talked about earlier and what has happened since.

I'm hoping this is indeed the case, and that Vomps voting for himself is just making me unnecessarily paranoid.

I for one will be very surprised if Vomp doesn't flip Ashton.

*votes Vompatti*

thellama73 wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Llama, the main reason I am suspicious of Vomps can be found back in the giant post I made a few pages back (it's the very last one on the bottom of the page, so it shouldn't be too hard to find). Basically, me re-reading him and pulling all those quotes is why I am so suspicious of him and think he is bad.

Yes, I just reread that. It was a very well put together argument, which is why I am much less suspicious of you than I used to be.

Yeah, I figured that. I just think you're off the mark in this instance is all.

Okay, I will follow along as I think that some compelling cases have been presented for Vomps being bad. However, I am concerned that the role hinting could be true.

Unfortunately, I have been snowed by so many baddies recently (MP!) that I find my overwhelming trust that people are being truthful to have been shattered... so let's see if Vomps is a lying baddie!

*vote Vomps*

I find it hard to read Vompatti. But if he is civ I feel he has done way too little to defend himself. Seems to be acting like a victim. I don't know. I have this nagging feeling we could be doing something someone else wants with these unknown baddie powers.

*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

At least it's not her birthday anymore.

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

At least it's not her birthday anymore.

Ugh! The first version of this got deleted. Shorter version:

No longer sure how to feel about Vomps. All the voting evidence says baddie, and a bandwagon is most likely civ-led since civs outnumber everyone. I also didn't like his role hint/out-poor form there.

On the other hand, his zany, quirky style has earned a certain respect from me, in a weird way. Though evidence overwhelmingly says baddie, my gut is saying no pretty strongly.

That said, this lynch is well decided, and I've spent so much time thinking about the Vomps thing I haven't come up with any better candidates. Snow Dog voting LT reminded me that she could still very well be bad, but I think that's a discussion for tomorrow; it's been a long day.

Tomorrow I want to look more at LT, and continue the short discussion I had with llama.

voting Vomps. I really hope the evidence is right and my gut is wrong.

thellama73 wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

At least it's not her birthday anymore.

Looks like we need a little 'Face' time today!

Why would Vompatti lay such a heavy role hint down then proceed to act like he wants all the votes? Even so far as voting himself?
I don't like the way this went down.

Two teams of 2 baddies. No one has even thought to bring up either
A) Recruitment
B) Merging of the teams

Too many baddie secrets to discount either.

Civvies should worry.

Mr. T wanted me to remind you all about his thoughts on llama and HeMan.

Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

I kinda understand this vote, I'm a bit worried about LT too. Not sure it's strong enough to vote her but I feel it too.

It's just she doesn't seem to have the civvie charge she had in recent games, although I don't know her alignment in our most recent game (and as its still going on I sharn't say anymore)... Yeah I like to think I know LT's civvie game, I've played a fair bit with her and she is a great civvie, and I felt LT 1.0 was civvie and she was, however saying that she does seem to be civvie a hell of a lot, in the games I have played with her, and this just doesn't feel like them games.I hope I'm wrong and I'm not saying she is defo bad, I have a big question mark over her right now.

Anyways they are my thoughts thought I would share.

Linki x2

I don't get the suspicion A team has of me, oh well. Hope I can change your mind soon mr T.

He-Man wrote:I don't get the suspicion A team has of me, oh well. Hope I can change your mind soon mr T.

Mr. T is full of jive turkey jibber-jabber. If he doesn't trust you, then I do!

He-Man wrote:

Snow Dog wrote:*Voted Little Tiger*

I think she's bad.

I kinda understand this vote, I'm a bit worried about LT too. Not sure it's strong enough to vote her but I feel it too.

It's just she doesn't seem to have the civvie charge she had in recent games, although I don't know her alignment in our most recent game (and as its still going on I sharn't say anymore)... Yeah I like to think I know LT's civvie game, I've played a fair bit with her and she is a great civvie, and I felt LT 1.0 was civvie and she was, however saying that she does seem to be civvie a hell of a lot, in the games I have played with her, and this just doesn't feel like them games.I hope I'm wrong and I'm not saying she is defo bad, I have a big question mark over her right now.

Anyways they are my thoughts thought I would share.

Linki x2

I am still civvie... not sure what you are on about here, tbqh - I got lynched ON MY BIRTHDAY for being a civvie. Then, I came back in another role that was laden with suspicion because of the person that had the role before me. Might I remind you that INH often does really oddball things before flaking out of games? Doesn't make him bad - although, I do admit that I always seem to fall for the "he must be a baddie" when he does that shit. So, what chance do I have of convincing the game that I am actually a civvie?

Personally, knowing that replacing INH makes me an easy lynch target... doesn't make me feel like bothering too much, ya know? I am just going to get lynched no matter what I do... (given that I was already lynched as a civvie once ON MY BIRTHDAY ) so ... yeah.

And I still suspect llamaboy

@LT: For me my suspicion of INH was a minor thing and something I was just going to keep in the back of my mind. What surprised me was how quickly you jumped on me (and rey) for mentioning that INH was suspicious after your return--really felt like a classic baddie switcheroo. Especially considering that of course you'd say INH was civvie upon subbing in for him!

Here's my initial post (note this was the first post I made after quickly reading the entire thread upon subbing in for AATB):

Flyin' High wrote:Okay, I have mostly gotten caught up on this game. For a speed game ya'll sure post a lot!

@Russ: Yes I do have a nice spreadsheet template, it is similar to the one MP posted, but has a few more categories. I'll upload it in a bit when I have some time tonight.

I am torn on LT 2.0 because INH screamed baddie to me while doing my read-through and I was all set to quote him and why I thought he was a baddie mcbadderson until I got to the part where LT replaced in for him... But I read very fast and need to probably do a more thorough thread read when I have a bit more time to absorb it all.

Gonna vote Ratt for no real reason other than that's the poll choice that sounds the coolest to me.

And yay on getting a baddie.

And here's LT's OTT (in my opinion) response:

LittleTiger wrote:Well, I can see how this next day is going to go down....

I do think the actual baddies will be actively pushing for me to be lynched...since they obviously will know that I am, in fact a civve... right FH, reywaS?

To me this just seems like an overreaction to my post especially considering I said I was way suspicious of INH during my read until I got to the part where you subbed in for him. But I ask, just because you say INH is definitely civvie, why does that make what you're saying true?

However, the quandry I'm facing is that I don't necessarily trust you or llama. But I don't see how you can both be bad since you appear to heavily suspect llama. Some of this will depend on if Vompatti turns out to be MP's teammate like I think he is.

Awesome result.

Yippee! Excellent result everyone! He was just who we thought he was.

All of those songs ARE the 80's! Tough decision! I think I'll go with Hungry Like the Wolf because that song is pure awesome.

Billie jean, but it was a tough decision between that and when doves cry.

Flyin' High wrote:@LT: For me my suspicion of INH was a minor thing and something I was just going to keep in the back of my mind. What surprised me was how quickly you jumped on me (and rey) for mentioning that INH was suspicious after your return--really felt like a classic baddie switcheroo. Especially considering that of course you'd say INH was civvie upon subbing in for him!

Here's my initial post (note this was the first post I made after quickly reading the entire thread upon subbing in for AATB):

Flyin' High wrote:Okay, I have mostly gotten caught up on this game. For a speed game ya'll sure post a lot!

@Russ: Yes I do have a nice spreadsheet template, it is similar to the one MP posted, but has a few more categories. I'll upload it in a bit when I have some time tonight.

I am torn on LT 2.0 because INH screamed baddie to me while doing my read-through and I was all set to quote him and why I thought he was a baddie mcbadderson until I got to the part where LT replaced in for him... But I read very fast and need to probably do a more thorough thread read when I have a bit more time to absorb it all.

Gonna vote Ratt for no real reason other than that's the poll choice that sounds the coolest to me.

And yay on getting a baddie.

And here's LT's OTT (in my opinion) response:

LittleTiger wrote:Well, I can see how this next day is going to go down....

I do think the actual baddies will be actively pushing for me to be lynched...since they obviously will know that I am, in fact a civve... right FH, reywaS?

To me this just seems like an overreaction to my post especially considering I said I was way suspicious of INH during my read until I got to the part where you subbed in for him. But I ask, just because you say INH is definitely civvie, why does that make what you're saying true?

However, the quandry I'm facing is that I don't necessarily trust you or llama. But I don't see how you can both be bad since you appear to heavily suspect llama. Some of this will depend on if Vompatti turns out to be MP's teammate like I think he is.

If you read the post I made shortly after that you will see that I was under the assumption that there was ONE baddie team... I was wrong.

Excellent result!!!!!!

Also, voted Hungry like the Wolf... still LOVE LOVE that song!

Wow! Good job everyone. I don't know how you were so certain, but I guess experience pays in this game.

Also, hooray for Mitchell and Webb!