Elohcin wrote:
Bullzeye - LOTS of filler posts. He does agree with me on boogs. H said, "That said, I find it very suspicious that Boogs claimed he tried to help Sorsha when he didn't really do anything of the sort."
You do understand why there were a lot of filler posts right? Like, the same could be said of Epig. At least I didn't spam as much as he did
Keterman wrote:
I don't either, I'm glad someone else feels the same way. I find it a bit odd that you felt the need to defend yourself for making an RIP post, though. And I find it strange now that a few people also posted "RIP nutella" when nutella's alignment wasn't revealed either.
You call it defending if you like, but really I was adding my own point of view to your comment and explaining my perspective. Though you did kinda imply that making RIP posts to an unconfirmed role was bad.
Keterman wrote:Bussing, or, throwing a fellow baddie under the bus to make themselves look more town when their partner is revealed as scum. I've seen it used here already so you denying that it's a common term raises an eyebrow from me, but perhaps the particular word "bussing" didn't strike a bell for you. But with the context I used it in, it should have. I agree that trying to take credit that isn't yours for a lynch can be indicative of alignment, but not in Boogs' case
Well I've played mafia for four years this month and haven't seen throwing one's teammate under the bus referred to as bussing before. Perhaps I should have been able to infer but obviously I didn't.
Keterman wrote:Either our mafia playstyles are much more foreign than I thought, or you're playing dumb, because even without knowing exactly what a scumtell or towntell refers to, it should be pretty self-explanatory from the words themselves. A scumtell is when someone does something scummy, a towntell is when someone does something towny (or "civvie"). As I said however, I don't believe in towntells.
I don't need to
play dumb :P . I did sort of get what you were saying but I had two conflicting views on what you might mean so I thought it'd be best to ask for clarification.
Roxy wrote:
Bullzeye - I like Bullz and that he seems to be wanting to help. The only thing that gives me paws (I like saying paws vs pause bc they are cuter) is that he feels he needs someone around to post with when finding suspects. I do not understand why he can't just post his thoughts and then later when others are around they can comment on his thoughts.
I don't
need anyone. I could sit here in the future posting away to nobody playing mafia all by myself but it'd be no fun. The first time I asked if people had any thoughts about what I'd been saying re: Sorsha it was more because most people weren't posting at all at the time so I was trying to draw them out of the woodwork by actively inviting them to comment on something. I like having people around to bounce ideas off, that's why I tend to enjoy being bad (or generally having btsc) more, because there's someone I can throw all my stupid ideas at and get responses quickly. I can, do, and will continue to post my thoughts while I'm alone but I just enjoy actually being able to talk to someone as well!
Roxy wrote:
Dana - seems to be finding her feet on our site. I like the way she is thoughtful in her posts. I would like to know how she feels about everyone she does not have familiarity with. Also I would like to ask why do you think Made is hiding behind this gangsta posting style? If so what is he hiding? Is he afraid to be his normal self that you might find him out quicker if he posts normally?
DharmaHelper - Been fooled by you so many times its not even funny. I always trust you when I shouldn't. I hope I am not wrong to trust you this game. I feel like we have been on the same page a lot this game and that in and of itself makes me nervous LOL.
I thought your question to Dana was interesting, if she hasn't answered it yet I hope she does. Also I tend to feel the same way as you about DH - I always want to trust him, he has a way of getting around people and making them like him.
Roxy wrote:Keterman - You are very finger pointy after this last lynch of which you did not participate. Also not a surprise I disagree with a lot of your list. Idk if it has to with you telling us we do not know how to suss out baddies or just your tone. But my hackles are up and my nose is all twitchy like. Your defense of Boogs has given me my biggest nose twitch to date.
Made - I hate to tell others how to play so I will just request you make one post NOT in gangsta-speak so that I may understand what you are saying just once. I have found myself skipping your posts bc I do not understand them I will try and find a gansta translator and see if it will help me figure you out for the rest of the game.
Kman does seem quite quick to point fingers, but since I'm not familiar with his individual style I don't know what that tells me about him. I do agree with your comment to Made as well, I've found his 'gansta' posts difficult to read
(Also I felt like he was trying to get into character without realising that Misfits is a British show based on chavs who get superpowers. They have a whole different way of talking!).
Boogs wrote:I just get so frustrated when I'm civ and this happens to me. It seemed as if i was going to be vote out so I voted myself. I don't want to stop playing, I'm just frustrated I can't catch a break in these games and win as Civ.
As much as I bang on about loving being bad, I've literally never won as a living baddie. It will happen someday though! Took me forever to even live to the end of a game and win as a non-baddie.
Made wrote:
So apparently talking "lyke dis" is really fucking with people so i appologize, i figured my points were valid regardless of how i was saying them but i guess i was wrong.
Your input is valid and appreciated regardless of if you want to post in normal English, gangster, or Latin. It's just better for everyone if you post in a way we can understand. It sort of started to look like you were trying to hide something though. Roxy brought up that you could be trying to hide from Dana, but my thought was more that you were just trying to fly by as someone who acts in an unusual way so people would say "there's no way he can be bad, no baddie would ever try to draw that much attention to himself".
Made wrote:What really is fucking with me is that in such a close vote DH, Bullzeye, and nijuukyugou voted the OBJECTIVE wrong person given the circumstances.(Please note this is not the first time i've made this arguement, i'll be happy to trainslate when i made this argument earlier in slang if requested)
We may have voted for the wrong person, but nobody could know that at the time (Even if you take the argument we could be bad there's another baddie team). I definitely didn't think Sorsha could be anything but bad with the way she was posting. I strongly believed I was making the objectively right vote, though obviously I was wrong.
Canucklehead wrote:OK, I'm going to attempt to do a quick read and summary of what I'm seeing, then vote because I don't want to miss again and because I'm currently in a very brief lull before a storm and should take advantage of that.
Back in a fewsies.....
Let us know if that storm gave you any superpowers! :P
Roxy wrote:And you were not alone - Dana was right here too. Bullz also missed the vote.
Linky dana still posting.
I was having too much fun elsewhere. Won't happen again for the foreseeable future though!
Boogs wrote:Aw darn. Seemed I couldn't get the self vote to get you guys to play into not voting me. Darn. Told ya I wasn't bad though 
Yeah, sorry, SKs are bad. You were bad.
S~V~S wrote:
That's easy for him to say though, he's both immortal and Irish! :P
Made wrote:Do we know elohcin's role??? S/he did die during the day didn't they?
Kills like that tend to be classed more as NK type deaths where the role isn't revealed.
Made wrote:
It doesn't matter if you did or you didn't. In your situation, Mafia or otherwise, you should of voted Sorsha to keep yourselves in the game, as you know their own allignment.
If she'd voted Sorsha it would have been suicide. Tied votes don't mean no lynch. No player would ever vote for the only other suspect if they could save themselves. Actually I did that once in a game because I didn't think the other one was bad and it was probably the stupidest move ever since it actually killed me.
Made wrote:Not true. The basis for Sorsha's death is her(?) claim as an easy read, then. You, questioned myself in a hypocritical mannor, after voting Sorsha for Leader. Of course the arguments are now justified, but between the two of you at the time, Sorsha did less, and therefore should had been spared, and you instead should be dead.
This is an oversimplification. Sorsha was acting, in my opinion, as if she was an obvious and practically confirmed civ who nobody should ever doubt. So I doubted her. Then she overreacted to people being suspicious of her and I doubted her even more. Then she flat out gave up and that at the time told me I was right.
Wow, this post took me over an hour to make...
