Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Yes.Long Con wrote:Epig: Not sure how I feel about you being upset about S~V~S coming out with the facts of a situation. Did you want to see Made try, and perhaps fail, to find an example of S~V~S sarcasm?
Actually, i think she makes some good points. But the fact that yo snipped this out of her post makes me go, hmmm:Metalmarsh89 wrote:It's posts like these that make me think people don't read what I have to say.Canucklehead wrote:Ok. I just read this whole fucking thread, which is 99.9% centered on Made/llama/MP/Enrique with a dash of MP/SVS thrown in for good measure.
Okay, so you're not going to touch the Made debate, but rather you'll look around at the others who are doing the same thing you are to find a baddie?Canucklehead wrote:However, given the single mindedness of the thread so far, I'm much more inclined to believe that the baddies are using this insane Made-centric firestorm to stay out of the way and out of memory. This is like a Day 1 from heaven for them. For that reason, I think I will probably be spending some time looking at (and waiting to hear from) people who are conspicuously staying out of the Made debate, or (even more suspiciously) subtly egging it on while being sure to stay on the fringes. Before anyone gets their panties in a knot, no, I'm not advocating voting for low posters, and yes I recognize that this was a HUGE amount to catch up on and that is a likely reason why some people haven't been too involved (that is in fact my own rationale). BUT I'm hoping that when I do a re-read of the last few pages I will be able to spot some people that are doing some quiet fire feeding while staying out of the limelight, thus keeping the heat of them while providing excellent distractionary fodder for pages and pages and pages......
Linki: lol, what???
What was the point of cutting that out? You could have made the point you made between the two snippets before or after the post, without having any effect on your point.I really, really don't think Made is bad. But I also don't get the sense that his accusers are bad. If ANYONE from the group of SuperPosters is bad, my guess would be MP, simply because he seems like he's trying extra hard to not seem over the top and look reasonable and "fair" in his statements, particularly in his interactions with SVS (I think he began about 4billion response posts with the words "fair enough"). I also thought his super quick response to llama's (seemingly jokey?) mention of his disconcerting agreeability was a little ping worthy. So yes, I am moderately suspicious of MP.
Why? It's changeable this game, and if he feels it, he should back it up. How is it uncalled for? He has made his suspicion clear.Dana wrote:Also about the who would I vote for question I would have to say no one right now.
Linki- Nevermind probably llama now, that vote for made was kind of uncalled for. Especially when we still have so much time left to vote...
And this is where I came in. Made, you have been equally snarky. This is a game, fun, good timesEnrique wrote:One second... who taught you sarcastic orange???Made wrote:insert snarky insult of other's intelligence here
You didn't learn anything from The Hobbit, did you? Careful what you wish for and all that?MovingPictures07 wrote:but I haven't seen his usual civvie case-building self yet
Gladly.MovingPictures07 wrote:- I also think Epig suspects me for stupid reasons (because I made a joke post? and I read through the thread and I don't think I saw whether he answered my question about whether he still thinks that's the "most suspicious" post so far, but someone correct me if I'm wrong).
I do.MovingPictures07 wrote: If someone finds my behavior suspicious because of an interpretation of my intentions, so be it (as LoRab would say, eye me all you want),
Uh-uh. Pause.MovingPictures07 wrote:but OF COURSE I find Epig's suspicion odd because he said me joking about being bad often and being sick of it is the most suspicious post in the game.
Nah.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't really have an opinion of Epig being bad, but I haven't seen his usual civvie case-building self yet, so I'm curious about what he thinks about other items as well.
Generic player.Mongoose wrote:By "Person A" you mean like "Person X" or a generic player, right? Just checking since we have a player named "A Person" and wanted to ensure you weren't thinking of him but getting his name incorrect.Made wrote:That statement would imply, incase it's still not clear, that person A has extra knowledge for any variety of reason.
Probably not, but just checking.
linki - Usually a total pussycat, but I don't enjoy tangling up with him for sure when he's in spitting mode.
I was hoping he would flip out and post a two-mile long response complaining about being targeted for lynch on Day 1 in every single game and storm off in a huff. Then I was going to post "Just kidding. Switching back to Made. :P " and it was going to be really funny.S~V~S wrote: Now I have to see why Llama switched to MP
That makes a whole lot of sense.Made wrote:If myself and llama are civvie, mafia wouldn't care/ would let the arguements play out.
I have seen this very scenario~ people fighting over which civvie to lynch with the baddies chillin in the chat. So yeah, possible.Made wrote:Current theory...
If myself and llama are civvie, mafia wouldn't care/ would let the arguements play out. Would it be fair to say that those with the lighest opinin (this is not to be confused with those who post the least and especially not those who saw the arguement as a waste of time) are those who we should consider next?
Thoughts?
woah..... linki possibly relevant....
Don't think it hasn't crossed my mind as well.S~V~S wrote: I have seen this very scenario~ people fighting over which civvie to lynch with the baddies chillin in the chat. So yeah, possible.
Do what most people do. Vote near the deadline without having read anything.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Oh for the love of....
I'm just now checking back in since about 10:40 last night, and I have 6+ pages to catch up on I see. I'm going to try my best, but if the game continues at this rate, I will be getting replaced pretty quickly. I just don't think I have the time for a game that is this hectic right now, but I will give it an honest effort first.
Ah, they never ruin my fun. But they can sure ruin a win.S~V~S wrote:And Epi, it is what it is. I try not to let non participants ruin my fun
Last time i answered this with a name i got shit for it not being a sound arguement.....So let's do it again!S~V~S wrote:I have seen this very scenario~ people fighting over which civvie to lynch with the baddies chillin in the chat. So yeah, possible.Made wrote:Current theory...
If myself and llama are civvie, mafia wouldn't care/ would let the arguements play out. Would it be fair to say that those with the lighest opinin (this is not to be confused with those who post the least and especially not those who saw the arguement as a waste of time) are those who we should consider next?
Thoughts?
woah..... linki possibly relevant....
Other than Llama, who catches your eye, Made?
Now who is trying to squash discussion?birdwithteeth11 wrote:Oh for the love of....
I'm just now checking back in since about 10:40 last night, and I have 6+ pages to catch up on I see. I'm going to try my best, but if the game continues at this rate, I will be getting replaced pretty quickly. I just don't think I have the time for a game that is this hectic right now, but I will give it an honest effort first.
Are you being serious? I can never tell when you're kidding.thellama73 wrote:I was hoping he would flip out and post a two-mile long response complaining about being targeted for lynch on Day 1 in every single game and storm off in a huff. Then I was going to post "Just kidding. Switching back to Made. :P " and it was going to be really funny.S~V~S wrote: Now I have to see why Llama switched to MP
He didn't take the bait though.
That is legitimately why I changed my vote, yes.Mongoose wrote:Are you being serious? I can never tell when you're kidding.thellama73 wrote:I was hoping he would flip out and post a two-mile long response complaining about being targeted for lynch on Day 1 in every single game and storm off in a huff. Then I was going to post "Just kidding. Switching back to Made. :P " and it was going to be really funny.S~V~S wrote: Now I have to see why Llama switched to MP
He didn't take the bait though.
Hells bells, can never tell when anyone is kidding.
But seriously, were you kidding?
I did not ask for a case, just a ping. And I do agree with you, I tried to pin down MMs position in the argument between you and me & llama & some other people, and he seems to be on all sides of the fence. A surreal, Daliesque fence as it were.With like 23 sides.Made wrote:Last time i answered this with a name i got shit for it not being a sound arguement.....So let's do it again!S~V~S wrote:I have seen this very scenario~ people fighting over which civvie to lynch with the baddies chillin in the chat. So yeah, possible.Made wrote:Current theory...
If myself and llama are civvie, mafia wouldn't care/ would let the arguements play out. Would it be fair to say that those with the lighest opinin (this is not to be confused with those who post the least and especially not those who saw the arguement as a waste of time) are those who we should consider next?
Thoughts?
woah..... linki possibly relevant....
Other than Llama, who catches your eye, Made?
you pointed out the possiblity of someone sliding by. I just reread MM. I hesitate to say s/he(i'm sorry what is your gender MM?) is sliding by in the Made V llama debate.
Stating that he feels Llama's arguement is the most consistant and my answer seemed to change seems to be the strongest point s/he brought up.
Do you have an opinion on Metalmarsh?Epignosis wrote:I'll vote to save llama if any should go that route.
Yes.S~V~S wrote:Do you have an opinion on Metalmarsh?Epignosis wrote:I'll vote to save llama if any should go that route.
I don't know. I don't know if it's something that happened when I was there at the time or not. My head's been trying to fight the current since this game started, and it's getting harder and harder as time goes on. And what's worse is I have to vote for somebody before I go to bed tonight, and the only person I'm even remotely, minutely suspicious of is Made. So I don't know if I'm going there or going to see if I can find a better option.Enrique wrote:No, I get that. That's definitely an inconsistency on llama's part, and it's really weird that Juliets can't remember anything.
Still weird that there was no one around to vouch for you tho? BWT, do you remember any o this? It's basically Made's word vs llama's at this point.
Right back at ya, buddy. This is the civviest game I've seen you play in a while.Epignosis wrote:I'll vote to save llama if any should go that route.
Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
I bet it's about how handsome and wonderful I am.Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
That is a pretty magnificant mustache.....thellama73 wrote:I bet it's about how handsome and wonderful I am.Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
Thank you. I am quite proud of it.Made wrote:That is a pretty magnificant mustache.....thellama73 wrote:I bet it's about how handsome and wonderful I am.Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
Wasn't this video Kumbaya a minute ago?Enrique wrote:Made wrote:Llama, Do you by any chance know what i'm thinking right now?
???
Lots of things you like suck. Like Communism. They don't suck just because you like them though.S~V~S wrote:Linki~ thanks for saying things I like suck
Nope. I'm not giving up yet dammit! :PEpignosis wrote:Do what most people do. Vote near the deadline without having read anything.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Oh for the love of....
I'm just now checking back in since about 10:40 last night, and I have 6+ pages to catch up on I see. I'm going to try my best, but if the game continues at this rate, I will be getting replaced pretty quickly. I just don't think I have the time for a game that is this hectic right now, but I will give it an honest effort first.
Out of curiosity, what are you referring to here? Because I'm lost.S~V~S wrote: Linki~ I bet BWT doesn't like what Made says about him
I'm not sure yet on her either. like not the suspicious not sure, just no clue yet.thellama73 wrote:I am intrigued by Dana. I agree with SVS's assessment. Her behavior seems strange to me. Not necessarily suspicious, but strange. Possibly New Person Syndrome, where I can't read her. But she intrigues me and I want to hear more from her.