The Syndicate

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh

Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.

Made wrote:
But didn't realize this was a clarification of the hypocritical thing till MP pointed it out to me.

The really shitty thing is I felt that Juliet's lynch was absolute bullshit. Simple phrasing change was a cardinal sin but everything that everyone else did, including but not limited to:
Mr's vote
SVS's removedness
Mp's stunt
Enrique's supatown
Elo's vote
Epi's Suicidalness

While i personally don't think any of these were vote worthy (Beside maybe Elo's vote), the fact that the above were acknowledge and deemed insignificant but juliet wasn't is bothering me.


Also, SVS, start playing better already, like real talk .

DFaraday 5
Snow Dog 5
Bass_the_Clever 4
nijuukyugou 4
Nikki908 4
thellama73 4
Black Rock 2
Boogs 2
Elohcin 2
reywaS 2
Ambray 1
Gotrees 1
Long Con 1
Mongoose 1

Dom wrote:

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh

Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.

Please tell me how you know this.
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh

Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.

Please tell me how you know this.
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.

You use a randomizer for four options? How very dilligent.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Your hosts are still waiting on contest entries! We have received a grand total of zero so far. Of course, that also tells us none of you actually read the night post that well. And there could be dire consequences for not doing so in the future.

MovingPictures07 wrote:zeek, I have to admit it's refreshing to be playing the game with someone who truly takes the spirit of the game to levels it should be taken.

I hope the Valeyard is not a role. I think it's wise to entertain the possibility, BUT given there are only 3 hidden roles and we don't have any reason to believe there is a Seemer role (a role that appears as something else when lynched), if god forbid we lynch the Doctor, then I would think it's incredibly likely that person is the Doctor. Can the Valeyard regenerate?

Also, I look forward to your elaboration regarding Enrique.

Welcome, Chris!

zeek wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:zeek, I have to admit it's refreshing to be playing the game with someone who truly takes the spirit of the game to levels it should be taken.

I hope the Valeyard is not a role. I think it's wise to entertain the possibility, BUT given there are only 3 hidden roles and we don't have any reason to believe there is a Seemer role (a role that appears as something else when lynched), if god forbid we lynch the Doctor, then I would think it's incredibly likely that person is the Doctor. Can the Valeyard regenerate?

Also, I look forward to your elaboration regarding Enrique.

Welcome, Chris!

I not sure on the Valeyard's regeneration, but I'll plump for no. From what I remember of his story he is trying to kill the Doctor to be free of his influence (as they are both the same person essentially) and steal his regenerations.

I'm not sure I can elaborate on enrique

Dom wrote:

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh

Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.

Please tell me how you know this.
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.

Enrique wrote:

Dom wrote:

zeek wrote:

Dom wrote:I voted for a random planet tbh

Doubt it. And even if you were voting randomly you wouldn't have voted Alfava Metraxis and then changed.

Please tell me how you know this.
I was faithful to my randomizer. I read four, accidentally voted one, and then changed my vote.

He has info on the poll, and is assuming that everybody else does.

Enrique wrote:Well of course you'd want me to change it to your option, but why should I trust you? It's not like the one I voted for is winning anyway.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Rox, I'm glad you find it "hilarious" that I find Enrique suspicious. If you'd pay attention closely, I've almost all abandoned my suspicion of Enrique after letting the facts sink in. Even still, he did NOT do the same thing as me. Wow, Enrique and I both questioned something totally different in zeek's posts, we must both be doing the same thing!!! Except not at all. Enrique didn't even say zeek was bad. The situations are so totally different it's not even funny. Why are you trying to say they are?

Okay, well I may have been "riding the fence" but I already said I was trying to get people talking because that's how you catch baddies. What have you done? You still don't even say if you think ANYONE is bad, you're just "oh, we have time". So don't criticize me for my methods please. I'll play my way and you can play yours.

fingersplints wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

zeek wrote:Re: MP's ruse.

If every player had agreed with him, I'd be getting lynched and there would be nothing he could have done to change that. It's irresponsible play if he's a townie because I did nothing to deserve a target on my back.

Zeek, my case was totally bogus, which you obviously pointed out. AND I clearly said MULTIPLE TIMES that I wasn't crusading you as bad nor did I even really find you bad. There was no way that was going to blow up to anything.

The minute anyone seriously believed to me I was going to turn it onto them for agreeing with a bullshit case.

It's not irresponsible play. You tell me this: How many people think you're bad right now? In fact, I probably helped your reputation more than anyone else in this thread right now. Am I not right?

But, people get lynched for nothing Day 1 all the time. I don't think there is anyway you could have predicted the thread would swing this way. I think I am more surprised at your choice of target then anything. If it was nothing and not something you were seriously trying to point out, why not pick on someone not new to the site and returning to mafia after years of not playing? I don't know. Just seems a bit of a weird way to welcome someone.

True, I had absolutely no way of knowing how the thread would take it, but I already explained my thought process.

WTF I was not "picking on" anyone, and you act like I gave it a TON of thought. I wasn't looking for a way to screw with someone. I just read zeek's post, I was REALLY excited to start discussion, and then came up with the gambit thinking it would be an effective way to gauge people's reactions and get people talking, which was way better than everyone just posting on Day 1 "Well I have no idea who to vote for because nothing significant has happened so I'm just going to randomize!!" That tells us nothing almost all of the time.

Go ahead and disagree with my playstyle. People disagree with me ALL the time. I don't care. But it does not make me bad.

I'm not here to hold everyone's hand and welcome them all to a game of mafia. This is mafia. It's not personal. I see something worth discussing, I discuss it. I don't hold back. I'm sick of people holding back all the time because that's how baddies win; I've seen it so many times. Civvies just fly through the game too afraid to make accusations or start discussion because they're afraid of being wrong. I don't play that way, ever, and I never will. Other people can if they want; I'm not telling anyone else how to play, but I play my way.

I play this way all the time. So anyone insinuating that just because I am PLAYING THE GAME that it makes me bad and because they don't understand my perspective, well, sorry, I am not a wordsmith, I am an accountant. I can't explain things super well all the time. I come up with crazy theories and gambits because I'm paranoid as fuck and I love playing the game. If you don't understand me or you disagree with my methods, fine, but I'm sick of being eyeballed just because I'm intense and I did something to get people talking.

How else are we supposed to uncover baddie behavior?

I'm sorry if my tone comes across defensive but I'm sick of people insinuating my playstyle is "hilarious" or "irresponsible" just because they think differently than I do. Honestly it comes across as insulting. If you disagree with me, just say it, don't try to lynch me because you think I'm nuts or whatever.

zeek wrote:Did anyone else actually read the lynch post? We're choosing where WE are going.

zeek wrote:Did anyone else actually read the lynch post? We're choosing where WE are going.

Enrique wrote:

zeek wrote:Did anyone else actually read the lynch post? We're choosing where WE are going.

Well good thing option 1 is definitely not winning then.

Roxy wrote:MP - I did mean to hurt your feeling or upset you in anyway. I do think what you and Enrique did to zeek was the same in that you both punced on something insignifigant and tried to turn it into something it never was. You both tried to start suspicion rolling on him for an easy lynch vote reasoning for Day 1. I am sorry your posts you made do not read as a gambit nor did it seem like you just wanted discussion they seemed like you genuinely were suspicious of him enough to state you would vote for him day 1. Does that seem like who just wanted discussion?

zeek wrote:Metalmarsh, the planet you've is one in which the Doctor fights an army of Weeping Angels. That's not a good option.

DFaraday wrote:

zeek wrote:Metalmarsh, the planet you've is one in which the Doctor fights an army of Weeping Angels. That's not a good option.

To be fair, we don't know that what happened on the show corresponds to the options in the game. Sometimes when I have polls I make what seems like a baddie option beneficial to civvies and vice versa; if they're just aligned with what you'd expect it would be boring.

Anyway, I voted Azure because a blue planet sounds lovely.

zeek wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

zeek wrote:Metalmarsh, the planet you've is one in which the Doctor fights an army of Weeping Angels. That's not a good option.

To be fair, we don't know that what happened on the show corresponds to the options in the game. Sometimes when I have polls I make what seems like a baddie option beneficial to civvies and vice versa; if they're just aligned with what you'd expect it would be boring.

Anyway, I voted Azure because a blue planet sounds lovely.

And by that logic Azure won't be a blue planet.

DFaraday wrote:I'm not saying it will be blue in the game when we arrive there, just that I liked the thought of a blue planet, so I'll just go with that one. I'm pretty sure I don't think about these polls as much as you do.

zeek wrote:Metalmarsh, the planet you've is one in which the Doctor fights an army of Weeping Angels. That's not a good option.

Dr. Who Wikia wrote:The Doctor stopped the feeding frenzy by using a crack in time and the failing artificial gravity in the Byzantium to send the Angels tumbling into the crack and out of existence.

zeek wrote:Yeah cause it makes perfect sense to include options in which stuff happened in the past but they're fine now. More likely we'll be walking into that storyline.

I'm keen because I am. If you want to really know, change your vote.

zeek wrote: http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Alfava_Metraxis
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Arkheon
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Alzarius
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Azure

zeek wrote:

Enrique wrote:

zeek wrote:Did anyone else actually read the lynch post? We're choosing where WE are going.

Well good thing option 1 is definitely not winning then.

Please continue to endanger us.