Re: Disney Cars Mafia [Day 3]
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:06 pm
Voting Snow Dog.
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
I didn't know who was targeted . I said MP's name because he had votes and was being talked about. That's why I bought him up. I said he could be the civvie role that can survive night kills. I also went on to say I didn't want to see either Mp or Df get lynched because of that.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
The last part of this message is misleading. After being confronted, you stated this, not before the issue was brought up.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I didn't know who was targeted . I said MP's name because he had votes and was being talked about. That's why I bought him up. I said he could be the civvie role that can survive night kills. I also went on to say I didn't want to see either Mp or Df get lynched because of that.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
MP even directly asked you how you felt about DF, to which you said:Bass_the_Clever wrote:You are reading way to much into my post .I wouldn't lynch you or DF because of last nights post.MovingPictures07 wrote:I really don't understand why someone would conclude I was the one targeted.
Bass and FZ.'s most recent posts really don't make me reconsider my perception of my observation.
Bass, the thing is: It was not made public whether DF or I survived the NK. So why would you say you think I'm civvie SOLELY based on the NK survival and you have no opinion of DF, even though it was not made public which one of us was the target?
FZ., I have NEVER seen a game on this site where there was a possibility of two different targets for the NK survival. It's certainly an interesting way to write it. But I can't recall anyone doing this, let alone Epig or Elo. And don't worry, you didn't offend me, but now that you're implying I'm either paranoid or baddie, instead of logically refuting my observation, makes me wonder. Especially so since you haven't said a word about my Bass observations.
Either you didn't have a read, or you didn't plan to vote for him because of the night post. Claiming both is a contradiction.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I really don't have a read on him yet. What do you think of him?MovingPictures07 wrote:Bass, what do you think of DFaraday?
Ok well I not going in circles about this again. Df didn't have votes and besides the maybe night kill survival I had no read on him.Made wrote:The last part of this message is misleading. After being confronted, you stated this, not before the issue was brought up.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I didn't know who was targeted . I said MP's name because he had votes and was being talked about. That's why I bought him up. I said he could be the civvie role that can survive night kills. I also went on to say I didn't want to see either Mp or Df get lynched because of that.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.MP even directly asked you how you felt about DF, to which you said:Bass_the_Clever wrote:You are reading way to much into my post .I wouldn't lynch you or DF because of last nights post.MovingPictures07 wrote:I really don't understand why someone would conclude I was the one targeted.
Bass and FZ.'s most recent posts really don't make me reconsider my perception of my observation.
Bass, the thing is: It was not made public whether DF or I survived the NK. So why would you say you think I'm civvie SOLELY based on the NK survival and you have no opinion of DF, even though it was not made public which one of us was the target?
FZ., I have NEVER seen a game on this site where there was a possibility of two different targets for the NK survival. It's certainly an interesting way to write it. But I can't recall anyone doing this, let alone Epig or Elo. And don't worry, you didn't offend me, but now that you're implying I'm either paranoid or baddie, instead of logically refuting my observation, makes me wonder. Especially so since you haven't said a word about my Bass observations.Either you didn't have a read, or you didn't plan to vote for him because of the night post. Claiming both is a contradiction.Bass_the_Clever wrote:I really don't have a read on him yet. What do you think of him?MovingPictures07 wrote:Bass, what do you think of DFaraday?
I'm not going to pretend that the argument against you is air-tight- the best argument evar (or that you're better than me). It's just this is the strongest argument against anyone in the game right now. I think the first thing we do night3/day 4 is to give reads on all players to figure out where we are, what names are slipping through the cracks, so that more meaningful discussion can occur.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Made if I do get lynched for this and come back civ you can put
"Bass > Made" in your sig .
Like this post.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
I read through that dizzying number of posts yesterday only once, due to the massive volume in a short time. Although I could remember a number of people, including yourself, calling out Bass for an explanation, I couldn't remember if he had given one before the lynch just turned on FZ.MovingPictures07 wrote:Like this post.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
I already went back and forth on this with Bass for like thirty minutes yesterday.
What does this add? Nothing. Bass just can say whatever he wants to now, it doesn't change how he originally posted.
Oh, okay. Fair enough. I suppose going back and trying to find it would be difficult, though one could just search Bass's posts. But I get it.Long Con wrote:I read through that dizzying number of posts yesterday only once, due to the massive volume in a short time. Although I could remember a number of people, including yourself, calling out Bass for an explanation, I couldn't remember if he had given one before the lynch just turned on FZ.MovingPictures07 wrote:Like this post.Long Con wrote:Did you speak at all about the accusation MP gave to you? I think you did, but please refresh me: did you know it was MP who was targeted? Did you know DFaraday could have been the target?Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
I already went back and forth on this with Bass for like thirty minutes yesterday.
What does this add? Nothing. Bass just can say whatever he wants to now, it doesn't change how he originally posted.
I'm not trying to "add" anything, I was trying to decide how I felt about your case on Bass when I knew his side.
Anyways, I voted Bass because there was one minute left and he already has the majority of the votes. His explanation sounds reasonable, but it also sounds like what a baddie would say if he slipped up. So I guess we'll find out.
Yeah, I agree re: Snowy.Long Con wrote:I don't really see the case on Snow Dog. Is it just that he was "hopping around" on Day One? I think a lot of people were having fun on Day One, and I don't see that as making him seem particularly bad.
Made's analysis of Dom was interesting. I find that Dom can be aloof and impassioned in the same game, both those traits seem like familiar Dom to me.
Not only that, but I (and BR) have made it pretty clear that the last week or so was very busy for us, and neither of us have been able to "bring our A game" to this one yet.MovingPictures07 wrote:I suppose it's unfair that I'm holding you to a slightly higher standard than most of the rest of the players (I think I am anyway), but I just have expected you to have opinions on more players by now. I'm the only person you've really been talking about. But I know you're playing another game too.
MovingPictures07 wrote:LOL, that's funny, I had no idea! I just thought, 'Wow, he responded to that FAST!'
Just wanted to point this out.Made wrote:It's sticking out like a sore thumb in my head that simple doesn't make sense. Why do we care so much that Ambray was the first to vote FZ? Is there more background or context that i'm just overlooking? It isn't arguable that Mp was the driving force behind FZ's lynch. Are people who are throwing Ambray's name around contesting that?
Current reads, I'm really mixed on MP, It's interesting, how now that i have actually have bases to make an argument against him, he seems civvie. As DF described, he seems like his eccentric self. I think it's too early to lynch him if there's an alternative.
My lead going into this day was Llama, so
I'm not seeing a solid case against Bass due to how much that weighed on FZ being mafia.
Dom is reading Civvie, which is terrifying because normally he reads blank. He's far more helpful and seemingly rational than normal imo.
Hedgie and BWT should say more words
Good point. Like I said, it's very possible I'm just expecting more from you because you have lots of civvie insight when you're civvie.Long Con wrote:Not only that, but I (and BR) have made it pretty clear that the last week or so was very busy for us, and neither of us have been able to "bring our A game" to this one yet.MovingPictures07 wrote:I suppose it's unfair that I'm holding you to a slightly higher standard than most of the rest of the players (I think I am anyway), but I just have expected you to have opinions on more players by now. I'm the only person you've really been talking about. But I know you're playing another game too.
MovingPictures07 wrote:LOL, that's funny, I had no idea! I just thought, 'Wow, he responded to that FAST!'
Why wouldn't I be?Simon wrote:Are you telling the truth about being suspicious of Bass?birdwithteeth11 wrote:Alright. I guess I'm not looking at Made anymore. And while I still think Snow Dog is potentially bad, I think a Bass vote will tell us a lot more. If he's bad, we lynch a baddie. If he's civ, then I might start questioning what side of the fence MP is on.
Votes Bass
I mean voting first for 3 civvies is worth looking into.MovingPictures07 wrote:Bass, you said to look at Ambray as well as Made, right? Why Ambray?
^ main reason I changed my tune. I thought they had to be linked honestly because everyone was voting for FZ. The key's in my phrasing, "i'm not seeing". When Ambray pointed this out, I reread to confirm my understanding was correct, and it wasn't.Ambray wrote:I read a few things earlier by DF that cricked my brow, but...and I hate to say it....it would rely on Bass coming back bad.![]()
I'm going to put my vote there, because I do think that MP was genuinely onto something and I didn't think the case on Bass was connected to FZ honestly, the case on Bass was that it looked like he slipped up by knowing who was targeted for the NK.
or just not participating, with the lack of discussion in general, that's not shocking.Roxy wrote:I am sure I do not understand the following:
Not one person mentioned me being quiet - ergo - silenced.
Having only found one baddie in my entire mafia career, I'm not very shocked. It feels normal. what is normal for mafia lynches anyways?Why you would follow anything Ambray, MP or Snow say since they have led or helped lynch 3 consecutive civs. After the FZ fiasco I am quite literally shocked that you all went after Bass.
It wasn't a defense, it was a genuine question that no one answered ._.Why no one thought it was weird how Made out of the blue defended Ambray from accusations that only one person mentioned and not one vote her way. Very strange considering it was unsolicited and she was not the topic of discussion.
To be fair, what other arguments were there yesterday? Snow? He changed opinions and so people wanted his head. By the time my name was even mentioned, we were 6 votes deep on Bass. If we're going to catch mafia, we need more discussion and more names. At this point I at least kinda trust Ambray, Mp, and Snow. What i think instead is going on is a quiet mafia, or at least passive one. I mean It's hard to find and kill people when new ideas are immediately rejected, by all active voices. that's what I feel happened yesterday.Open your eyes civvies - do not follow people who only have led lynches against civvies this game.
AND ANOTHER THINGMade wrote:or just not participating, with the lack of discussion in general, that's not shocking.Roxy wrote:I am sure I do not understand the following:
Not one person mentioned me being quiet - ergo - silenced.Having only found one baddie in my entire mafia career, I'm not very shocked. It feels normal. what is normal for mafia lynches anyways?Why you would follow anything Ambray, MP or Snow say since they have led or helped lynch 3 consecutive civs. After the FZ fiasco I am quite literally shocked that you all went after Bass.It wasn't a defense, it was a genuine question that no one answered ._.Why no one thought it was weird how Made out of the blue defended Ambray from accusations that only one person mentioned and not one vote her way. Very strange considering it was unsolicited and she was not the topic of discussion.
Not you, but in general this game due to real life circumstances has be relatively quiet. I wasn't sure if something came up and you (or anyone for that matter) couldn't play today because of that.Roxy wrote:So you think I've had a lack of participation this game?
Don't understand what you are asking here.
And it was a defense of Ambray from you.
So you trust the 3 people who have lynched civvies gtk.
What no u's???
the first part of this one isn't a no you, but a save. The second part, however i'd consider a no u.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
Boogs wrote:I've expressed I would be busy this week being out of town already Sockman. I will swap my vote to you also in returnMovingPictures07 wrote:Switched my vote to Boogs for now since BWT showed up. Here's hoping it gets Boogs to talk.
not a no u, but imo fits the spirit of no u: voting for even considering that someone is mafia.DFaraday wrote:I'm not going to be back before the poll closes, so I'll just go ahead and vote Made because his comment about Dom was both inaccurate and seemed like he was attempting to instigate suspicion of Dom.
I wasn't voting you for considering that Dom might be Mafia. He may very well be for all I know. The reason I thought it was suspicious is because it struck me as trying to push suspicion on Dom based on a shaky premise (Dom being aloof). I wasn't trying to get you lynched, but what you said just pinged me more than anything Bass had done, especially given that FZ turned out to be civvie.Made wrote:the first part of this one isn't a no you, but a save. The second part, however i'd consider a no u.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Well I guess I voting snow dog. I think everyone who is voting for me needs to be looked at next lynch.
Boogs wrote:I've expressed I would be busy this week being out of town already Sockman. I will swap my vote to you also in returnMovingPictures07 wrote:Switched my vote to Boogs for now since BWT showed up. Here's hoping it gets Boogs to talk.not a no u, but imo fits the spirit of no u: voting for even considering that someone is mafia.DFaraday wrote:I'm not going to be back before the poll closes, so I'll just go ahead and vote Made because his comment about Dom was both inaccurate and seemed like he was attempting to instigate suspicion of Dom.
Alright, really tho gtg, night y'all
No.Long Con wrote:Was it confirmed to be MP and not DF?Dom wrote:I thought my conversation with myself made it pretty clear why I'm likely wrong about MP -- he was targeted for a NK
I agree on MAde-- not sure on SoFiBass_the_Clever wrote:Ok well before I get lynched and when I flip civ I want everyone to really look at Made and Ambray.
You might be onto something here, but I need more on this. I disagree that he's trying to force suspicion on you.MovingPictures07 wrote:I have had pings from LC though. The way he keeps asking questions that otherwise have been answered multiple times and how he keeps trying to force subtle suspicion onto me without talking about anyone else doesn't strike me as genuine civvie LC baddie hunting.
Let's lynch made!Roxy wrote:I am sure I do not understand the following:
Not one person mentioned me being quiet - ergo - silenced.
Why you would follow anything Ambray, MP or Snow say since they have led or helped lynch 3 consecutive civs. After the FZ fiasco I am quite literally shocked that you all went after Bass.
Why no one thought it was weird how Made out of the blue defended Ambray from accusations that only one person mentioned and not one vote her way. Very strange considering it was unsolicited and she was not the topic of discussion.
Open your eyes civvies - do not follow people who only have led lynches against civvies this game.
whatDFaraday wrote:Ambray, what exactly was it about me that pinged you? I'd be happy to respond to any charges against me.
Earlier she said I "cricked her brow" without saying why. I was just lazy and didn't quote her post.Dom wrote:whatDFaraday wrote:Ambray, what exactly was it about me that pinged you? I'd be happy to respond to any charges against me.
That was very confusing to me.DFaraday wrote:Earlier she said I "cricked her brow" without saying why. I was just lazy and didn't quote her post.Dom wrote:whatDFaraday wrote:Ambray, what exactly was it about me that pinged you? I'd be happy to respond to any charges against me.
Bass would seem to be the most helpful to bring back, given that Mack protects the awesome Lightning McQueen... although I'm actually a bit suspicious of the role he came back as. There are roles that the Seemer (Miles Axelrod) would choose to appear as, and roles that it wouldn't be as beneficial to appear as.Made wrote:If i'm correct, this is a rezzie poll, as the number of people dead equals the number of racers/options.
Assuming there based on order, who would be the most helpful to bring back?