The Syndicate

MovingPictures07 wrote:RIP Glorfindel.

Dom, I agree completely regarding seeing a GoC Matt. Who are your top 3 players you'd like to lynch at the moment, out of curiosity?

Matt wrote:Blah.

Dom, it's possible I'm wrong on TH. In fact, I thought perhaps I was until I saw him lying...again...on Day 7. But again, let's move on. Until somebody else susses TH, I'm happy to simply not talk about it anymore. I think it sucks because he's totes bad, but I'm not interested in getting lynched because you guys think I'm tunneling too hard on him.

What's your "new point", Dom? Tell me how GoC Matt and Arkham Matt are similar. Because of the "tunneling" ? Nah, I was all over Marmot's ass in that game and I would not let go, I hung on to him for dear life. This game, I've had opinions aplenty. Yeah, I do continue to bring up TH, but now that I see the tide is turning and I'm going to get mislynched if I don't shut the fuck up, I suppose I'll do so for my own sake.

Check it...I like Marmot. When Marmot died, I PMed the hosts and was like "Who killed Marmot?! ". Check it, bea is one of my favorite people of all time here. When I had no choice but to kill her in GoC, I was pretty darn sad over it and that's when I literally had no choice. And WIFOM or not, I simply would not go around joking about NKing Sorsha if I were on either Mafia team. As a civ, I have no problem making jokes of that nature, as a baddie, I'd be way too scared to do that, straight up.

Derp.

MacDougall wrote:TH answer Dom

Golden wrote:I don't think Matt is bad.

I don't think bubbles is bad. If Glorf had come back bad I would have.

Dom wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:RIP Glorfindel.

Dom, I agree completely regarding seeing a GoC Matt. Who are your top 3 players you'd like to lynch at the moment, out of curiosity?

Matt
Bubbles
Third one is tough.... maybe Golden? IDK. I need more infomration here.

Same question to you, Alex.

Matt wrote:Blah.

Dom, it's possible I'm wrong on TH. In fact, I thought perhaps I was until I saw him lying...again...on Day 7. But again, let's move on. Until somebody else susses TH, I'm happy to simply not talk about it anymore. I think it sucks because he's totes bad, but I'm not interested in getting lynched because you guys think I'm tunneling too hard on him.

What's your "new point", Dom? Tell me how GoC Matt and Arkham Matt are similar. Because of the "tunneling" ? Nah, I was all over Marmot's ass in that game and I would not let go, I hung on to him for dear life. This game, I've had opinions aplenty. Yeah, I do continue to bring up TH, but now that I see the tide is turning and I'm going to get mislynched if I don't shut the fuck up, I suppose I'll do so for my own sake.

Check it...I like Marmot. When Marmot died, I PMed the hosts and was like "Who killed Marmot?! ". Check it, bea is one of my favorite people of all time here. When I had no choice but to kill her in GoC, I was pretty darn sad over it and that's when I literally had no choice. And WIFOM or not, I simply would not go around joking about NKing Sorsha if I were on either Mafia team. As a civ, I have no problem making jokes of that nature, as a baddie, I'd be way too scared to do that, straight up.

Derp.

Because of the coasting.
You haven't had a new opinion or take on anything that isn't what you "want" to talk about in days. You are trying to push this narrative that you are super helpful and contribute a lot. You haven't been lately. You did at first.

MacDougall wrote:TH answer Dom

This.

Golden wrote:I don't think Matt is bad.

I don't think bubbles is bad. If Glorf had come back bad I would have.

Why?

MovingPictures07 wrote:Oh, you're not number 1 on my list, Matt, I listed you folks in no particular order. I'd probably vote for an inactive for Day 9 if I had to vote right now.

S~V~S wrote:Why do you keep insisting it is false? I think TH sounds more civ than you do in this case.

Matt wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Oh, you're not number 1 on my list, Matt, I listed you folks in no particular order. I'd probably vote for an inactive for Day 9 if I had to vote right now.

I'm not sure who I'm voting for. Probably Typh. He confirmed TH's false Riddler story, and if I can't get peeps on board with TH, then Typh seems like the next best thing.

What do you think of Typh?

S~V~S wrote:I have said repeatedly that I don't think he's bad. Indy maybe, but not bad.

And I am not after you, but repeatedly saying someone is lying in a Mafia game like that has any meaning whatsoever is pointless. We get it; you think TH is lying about his experience with the Riddler. But speaking about it like it is a *fact* that ALL of us can agree is a fact is somewhat hyperbole to me.

Dom wrote:I'm not sure how I feel about Typh. I never understood what Glorf was trying to accuse him of. Matt is someone I have felt uneasy about all game, and I think we might be seeing a GoC Matt. Went hard at first and leveled off when he established a civ-tinfoil hat persona.

What do you think of Golden's interactions with Mac?

Matt wrote:So you think Typh is a good lynch, yes? What do you think of Bullz?

Do you believe Mac is who he says he is, and the Mafia is just letting him live so a player like myself could point that out? I doubt it. I don't have very good feelings about Mac, either.

Elaborate on your feelings on Dom, please. He has come at me several times, each time I respond to his inquiries, then he's like "cool beans", only to go after me the next day again. At one point he even made a self admitted mistake coming after me, yet he still susses me. Weird.

Dom wrote:

MacDougall wrote:TH answer Dom

This.

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

Matt wrote:Can Dom and MP please explain why I'm number 1 on their list?

I have not been coasting in this game by any means. By "the last few days", if you mean because

a) nobody gave a jack about what I was saying so I've been quieter, yes

and

b) That Turf Wars just started and I was also quiet for a day or two when replacing into Rocky and Bullwinkle.

then k.

If anyone thinks I'm bad, please specify which team you think I'm on, and how that makes sense. Thank you. It's also very hard to defend against "this is GoC Matt", and again, it's not. GoC Matt did nothing but tunnel Marmot. Akrham Matt has lots of opinions, most of which nobody wants to entertain.

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

DF, why do you feel Lorab bears looking into? Did you see something that pinged you? She did a great job of asking Bubbles questions that we'll never get answers to but they show why there should be some suspicion on Bubbles - someone that you suspect too.

LoRab wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

I agree about Bubbles. I don't agree about me, but read my posts and ask me questions--I think you'll see that I'm a civ who has been really distracted IRL for most of the game.

Also, you say your main suspicion is Bubbles and then say that you don't think we should go after inactives. I mean, technically Bubbles has now posted, but I think she is still on the not-so-active list, no?

DFaraday wrote:

juliets wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

DF, why do you feel Lorab bears looking into? Did you see something that pinged you? She did a great job of asking Bubbles questions that we'll never get answers to but they show why there should be some suspicion on Bubbles - someone that you suspect too.

I mainly feel she bears looking into because pretty much nobody has this game. I can hardly remember Lorab being brought up by anyone, so I think she could use some scrutiny.

DFaraday wrote:

LoRab wrote:

DFaraday wrote:

Golden wrote:Scotty made a case in the early game on DFaraday that I really agreed with but now have entirely forgotten about.

Here it is. And here is my response.

I don't agree with the Matt suspicion. He's still coming off as an earnest civ to me.

My main suspicion at the moment is on Bubbles, because here vote was still shady to me, even without Glorf as a teammate. I also feel like Lorab merits looking into some more. I suspected her early on, so I may revisit that.

I still don't think going after inactives is a good idea, since the baddies are still sending in kills and so that limits the number of baddies inactives could be.

I agree about Bubbles. I don't agree about me, but read my posts and ask me questions--I think you'll see that I'm a civ who has been really distracted IRL for most of the game.

Also, you say your main suspicion is Bubbles and then say that you don't think we should go after inactives. I mean, technically Bubbles has now posted, but I think she is still on the not-so-active list, no?

Except Bubbles is generally present at least once each phase, so she could very well be sending in PMs. There's no evidence that Bass, ekeknat, or Equivocate have even remembered that this game exists in the last week or so.

Bubbles wrote:hi all! *waves* i'm picking wayne's manor because i'm a goodie and it sounds like a civ option

Bubbles wrote:

bea wrote:

Bubbles wrote:hi all! *waves* i'm picking wayne's manor because i'm a goodie and it sounds like a civ option

bubbles!! long time no see!! I didn't realize you were signed up for this! I hope all is well in your neck of the woods.

Aw thanks miss bea, glad you're here too! havent played mafia for a while feels like i'm starting over

Bubbles wrote:city hall sounds like an interesting location so i'm voting that. also sorry for missing the last vote and the lack of thread-related posts, i haven't been keeping up with the thread
but for now dom seems more vocal than usual

Bubbles wrote:soo i looked over matt's posts since he is the most voted right now, and i don't see it, don't think he is bad. suspicious of people who voted for him, gonna throw my own vote in for nero

Bubbles wrote:good job on sabie everyone, probably wouldve voted her (he?) as well if i'd been in time for the vote. i feel like im barely in this game but ive been trying to keep up with reading.
anyway voting wayne's manor cause it sounds cozy

Bubbles wrote:i agree with golden don't think glorfindel is bad, seems genuine to me. voting S~V~S on his behalf

on a side note what is your username based upon glorfindel? it reminds me of lord of the rings

Bubbles wrote:wow i didnt expect to get a response so quick! no im not attempted to save glorfindel (i assume thats where you guys are going?) and i HAVE been on the thread the last week just not posting, i have been busy, trying to not be totally absent from the thread. hope that explains it. i doubt it will but oh well

Bubbles wrote:also im getting off now cause partner needs to use computer,cheers all

Bubbles wrote:voting wayne's manor

and RIP Glorfindel Hope your break gives you a little peace of mind! You have my sympathies I know what it's like to feel unsupported, but please try not to take it to heart its not personal I often make that mistake too its just the nature of the game! would love to get to know you better in the future, enjoy your break & take care

MacDougall wrote:If you are still going on about the riddler thing, he didn't lie about that Matt. His explanation of the Riddler matches my experience, not yours.

Matt wrote:

MacDougall wrote:If you are still going on about the riddler thing, he didn't lie about that Matt. His explanation of the Riddler matches my experience, not yours.

I've actually come around myself on MP being who he says he is.

MacDougall wrote:

Matt wrote:

MacDougall wrote:If you are still going on about the riddler thing, he didn't lie about that Matt. His explanation of the Riddler matches my experience, not yours.

I've actually come around myself on MP being who he says he is.

This never happens. You are bad.

Turnip Head wrote: I have no read on Bullz, and he tends to overreact when pressured

Bullzeye wrote:

Turnip Head wrote: I have no read on Bullz, and he tends to overreact when pressured

MacDougall wrote:10/10 would lynch Lorab or DharmaHelper.

Matt wrote:

MacDougall wrote:If you are still going on about the riddler thing, he didn't lie about that Matt. His explanation of the Riddler matches my experience, not yours.

Well, I can't very well argue with that then. Maybe a fake Riddler targeted me.

If most are agreeing with Turnip's version of events, then I don't really suss Typh any more. Most agree Mac is who he says he is. I've actually come around myself on MP being who he says he is.

@Dom - Ummm no I didn't stop trying to find baddies. I don't know where that came from?

Lorab - Do you think Bubbles is a good lynch? Or DF? Your questions towards him lead me to believe you suss him somehow, and I'm wondering if you believe they are both mafia or just one. Also, I think you arguing with him over his comment on Bubbles still being around is...kinda interesting. I understood his point, Bubbles is still around so she can still send in kills, not exactly an inactive the likes of eke, Equiv, and Bass.

MacDougall wrote:10/10 would lynch Lorab or DharmaHelper.

LoRab wrote:

Matt wrote:

MacDougall wrote:If you are still going on about the riddler thing, he didn't lie about that Matt. His explanation of the Riddler matches my experience, not yours.

Well, I can't very well argue with that then. Maybe a fake Riddler targeted me.

If most are agreeing with Turnip's version of events, then I don't really suss Typh any more. Most agree Mac is who he says he is. I've actually come around myself on MP being who he says he is.

@Dom - Ummm no I didn't stop trying to find baddies. I don't know where that came from?

Lorab - Do you think Bubbles is a good lynch? Or DF? Your questions towards him lead me to believe you suss him somehow, and I'm wondering if you believe they are both mafia or just one. Also, I think you arguing with him over his comment on Bubbles still being around is...kinda interesting. I understood his point, Bubbles is still around so she can still send in kills, not exactly an inactive the likes of eke, Equiv, and Bass.

I am going back and forth on bubbles. I think she has been very suspish, and I'm frustrated that she hasn't answered questions that I started asking ages ago. I'm uncomfortable with how she suddenly popped up last cycle. But she's also an easy lynch and I fear that we will lynch another civ.

I am starting to suspect df. And he did not say hey she is still around. He said she's been around consistently in each cycle. That is simply inaccurate. I think they both may be bad.

MacDougall wrote:10/10 would lynch Lorab or DharmaHelper.

I wouldn't lynch me. DH I don't know about.