Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 9]
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 6:38 pm
I have no read on LoRab at all.
I have a slight baddie read on df.
I have a slight baddie read on df.
Matt = Inmate confirmed.S~V~S wrote:Golden wrote:OK, SVS. Lets see if you can do anything like what TH did.
Please repeat after me.
Yes
No
Suspicious
Agree
Disagree
Town
Mafia
Inmate![]()
YES
NO
COMFORTABLENESS
GOD
FATHERED
WOG
OHM
MAT
Is it for the same reason I do? His Mac voters thing kinda seemed like feigned involvement to me. Maybe I just felt like that because he called me out for it though. I mean I did spend a significant portion of this game suspicious of Mac and tried to get him lynched maybe three times.Typhoony wrote:I have no read on LoRab at all.
I have a slight baddie read on df.
I think she's generally an awesomely fabulous person.Bullzeye wrote:I would agree with this but I don't think Bubbles is bad. I think DF looks slightly sketchy but I'm not sure if he's sketchy enough to vote for. I doubt Bass, Ekeknat, or Equivocate have been sending in anything. What do you think of LoRab? I don't have any opinion at all on her.Typhoony wrote:I'm willing to vote a low poster that has been able to send in the kills. Who are the possibilities then?
And humble too!LoRab wrote:I think she's generally an awesomely fabulous person.Bullzeye wrote:I would agree with this but I don't think Bubbles is bad. I think DF looks slightly sketchy but I'm not sure if he's sketchy enough to vote for. I doubt Bass, Ekeknat, or Equivocate have been sending in anything. What do you think of LoRab? I don't have any opinion at all on her.Typhoony wrote:I'm willing to vote a low poster that has been able to send in the kills. Who are the possibilities then?
Also, I think you don't want to lynch me because I'm civ.
Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
I try to point out what looks like a save, and everyone thinks I'm just doing it for show.Bullzeye wrote:Is it for the same reason I do? His Mac voters thing kinda seemed like feigned involvement to me. Maybe I just felt like that because he called me out for it though. I mean I did spend a significant portion of this game suspicious of Mac and tried to get him lynched maybe three times.Typhoony wrote:I have no read on LoRab at all.
I have a slight baddie read on df.
S~V~S wrote:MATT
DH
WHY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BAREFACEDNESSES
MOONROOF
TOG
GO
MEL
I totally get it. As I said to someone yesterday-ish, I'd be looking at me too. I know I'm civ, but I don't expect that others know that. And I realize I've been quieter than usual this game.Bullzeye wrote:And humble too!LoRab wrote:I think she's generally an awesomely fabulous person.Bullzeye wrote:I would agree with this but I don't think Bubbles is bad. I think DF looks slightly sketchy but I'm not sure if he's sketchy enough to vote for. I doubt Bass, Ekeknat, or Equivocate have been sending in anything. What do you think of LoRab? I don't have any opinion at all on her.Typhoony wrote:I'm willing to vote a low poster that has been able to send in the kills. Who are the possibilities then?
Also, I think you don't want to lynch me because I'm civ.
I don't want to lynch you, I just mentioned you as a low-ish poster who'd be able to send in kills since you've been around. I don't know if I want to lynch a low poster at all, I don't particularly know what I want to do. I just know I need to do it soon.
It's not like the Mac suspicion came out of nowhere. He had to out himself to get away from it after all. I don't see why it looks shady that some people voted for a guy who'd been getting heat all game. Not everything is a save attempt.DFaraday wrote:I try to point out what looks like a save, and everyone thinks I'm just doing it for show.Bullzeye wrote:Is it for the same reason I do? His Mac voters thing kinda seemed like feigned involvement to me. Maybe I just felt like that because he called me out for it though. I mean I did spend a significant portion of this game suspicious of Mac and tried to get him lynched maybe three times.Typhoony wrote:I have no read on LoRab at all.
I have a slight baddie read on df.I still think it looked shady, but I don't find your posts suspicious, so that was the end of that.
I'm not voting him because he had to go to work. I'm possibly voting him because he did not let DH respond before he voted him. That's common mafia courtesy. I think since SVS has shown up DH is probably silenced (Enrique is a possibility but I doubt it since he said he would be declining in participation).I haven't made a definite decision though and probably won't do until late.DFaraday wrote:Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
Linki: I had like 6 other tabs open and when I looked back, Typh voted me.![]()
As far as my reads right now go, I'd put Matt, Golden, Mac, and MP as strong civ reads, with Enrique up there too. Typh, Bullz, Dom, snd SVS are middling for me, as well as the inactives. I think there could be something to the DH case, I'm still looking over Lorab, and I didn't like Juliets' reasoning for her suspicion of Matt, but otherwise haven't been pinged by her.
Do you really not see that Matt couldn't wait for DH because he had to go to work?juliets wrote:I'm not voting him because he had to go to work. I'm possibly voting him because he did not let DH respond before he voted him. That's common mafia courtesy. I think since SVS has shown up DH is probably silenced (Enrique is a possibility but I doubt it since he said he would be declining in participation).I haven't made a definite decision though and probably won't do until late.DFaraday wrote:Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
Linki: I had like 6 other tabs open and when I looked back, Typh voted me.![]()
As far as my reads right now go, I'd put Matt, Golden, Mac, and MP as strong civ reads, with Enrique up there too. Typh, Bullz, Dom, snd SVS are middling for me, as well as the inactives. I think there could be something to the DH case, I'm still looking over Lorab, and I didn't like Juliets' reasoning for her suspicion of Matt, but otherwise haven't been pinged by her.
S~V~S wrote:MATT
DH
WHY?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BAREFACEDNESSES
MOONROOF
TOG
GO
MEL
That's fair. I think it was the timing that stood out to me the most, I think. Sabie took 2 votes, then Mac took two. Then more votes on Sabie, more votes on Mac. I just felt like someone in there didn't want Sabie lynched.Bullzeye wrote:It's not like the Mac suspicion came out of nowhere. He had to out himself to get away from it after all. I don't see why it looks shady that some people voted for a guy who'd been getting heat all game. Not everything is a save attempt.DFaraday wrote:I try to point out what looks like a save, and everyone thinks I'm just doing it for show.Bullzeye wrote:Is it for the same reason I do? His Mac voters thing kinda seemed like feigned involvement to me. Maybe I just felt like that because he called me out for it though. I mean I did spend a significant portion of this game suspicious of Mac and tried to get him lynched maybe three times.Typhoony wrote:I have no read on LoRab at all.
I have a slight baddie read on df.I still think it looked shady, but I don't find your posts suspicious, so that was the end of that.
I guess if it were me I would have voted someone else and given DH another day. But if you think that is too much to expect maybe I'm getting clouded by my dislike of the vote with no response. And it was a small suspicion anyway, and it's getting blown up into much more than I meant. So, I will look for somebody else. Where are you on who to vote for?Bullzeye wrote:Do you really not see that Matt couldn't wait for DH because he had to go to work?juliets wrote:I'm not voting him because he had to go to work. I'm possibly voting him because he did not let DH respond before he voted him. That's common mafia courtesy. I think since SVS has shown up DH is probably silenced (Enrique is a possibility but I doubt it since he said he would be declining in participation).I haven't made a definite decision though and probably won't do until late.DFaraday wrote:Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
Linki: I had like 6 other tabs open and when I looked back, Typh voted me.![]()
As far as my reads right now go, I'd put Matt, Golden, Mac, and MP as strong civ reads, with Enrique up there too. Typh, Bullz, Dom, snd SVS are middling for me, as well as the inactives. I think there could be something to the DH case, I'm still looking over Lorab, and I didn't like Juliets' reasoning for her suspicion of Matt, but otherwise haven't been pinged by her.
I'm not sure I can decode your second part but here is what Matt said about DH:S~V~S wrote:S~V~S wrote:MATT
DH
WHY?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BAREFACEDNESSES
MOONROOF
TOG
GO
MEL
FEELS~V~S wrote:S~V~S wrote:MATT
DH
WHY?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BAREFACEDNESSES
MOONROOF
TOG
GO
MEL
juliets wrote:I'm not sure I can decode your second part but here is what Matt said about DH:S~V~S wrote:S~V~S wrote:MATT
DH
WHY?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BAREFACEDNESSES
MOONROOF
TOG
GO
MEL
Spoiler: show
If Glorfindel was your link to Bubbles, if that was what could make her bad-- then why not vote Glorfindel in the first place?Golden wrote:OK, Dom, you read bubbles as bad. But I've somewhat made a career out of defending bubbles when she is civ. There's only been one time Bubbles has been bad that I've played and remember... when she was the Beuatiful Beast in World Reborn... and I was nailing her to the wall from about day 2.
I wouldn't ask you to trust my instincts on many people, but I would ask you to trust them on Bubbles. Yeah, I voted for her yesterday, but it was because I had a moment of doubt where I wondered if I'd been reading things badly wrong, her and glorfindel. But, glorfindel was civ, it gives me more confidence in my initial read on bubbles and makes me feel silly for doubting it.
I agree that Matt was cleared after that lynch for reasons that are unclear. What I'll say is that Matt has very much coasted since the attention has been off of him. And that's the attitude I thought he had in GoC.Golden wrote:Don't you think that seems like Matt, though?juliets wrote:Typh regarding you asking who i would vote, I just made a post re: how i feel like I have no body to vote. I won't vote you or Dom or Golden at this time. The only person I have any small inkling to vote would be Matt for not letting DH respond to accusations before voting him but thats a mighty slim reason. This is really just a condensed version of the post I made. Maybe you missed it.
I felt like people were far too hasty to clear Matt after the Nerolunar lynch. Back then, I felt he could well be bad. But, over time, for example his unflinching suspicion of people like TH and MP despite all evidence to the contrary. I just came out of all of that feeling like this is normal Matt.
I could see Matt as inmate though.
Bubbles?Typhoony wrote:I'm willing to vote a low poster that has been able to send in the kills. Who are the possibilities then?
If you want to vote for Matt, be my guest. I just don't see a problem with him voting how he did. Still no idea what I'm doing. Maybe DF. Maybe not.juliets wrote:I guess if it were me I would have voted someone else and given DH another day. But if you think that is too much to expect maybe I'm getting clouded by my dislike of the vote with no response. And it was a small suspicion anyway, and it's getting blown up into much more than I meant. So, I will look for somebody else. Where are you on who to vote for?Bullzeye wrote:Do you really not see that Matt couldn't wait for DH because he had to go to work?juliets wrote:I'm not voting him because he had to go to work. I'm possibly voting him because he did not let DH respond before he voted him. That's common mafia courtesy. I think since SVS has shown up DH is probably silenced (Enrique is a possibility but I doubt it since he said he would be declining in participation).I haven't made a definite decision though and probably won't do until late.DFaraday wrote:Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
Linki: I had like 6 other tabs open and when I looked back, Typh voted me.![]()
As far as my reads right now go, I'd put Matt, Golden, Mac, and MP as strong civ reads, with Enrique up there too. Typh, Bullz, Dom, snd SVS are middling for me, as well as the inactives. I think there could be something to the DH case, I'm still looking over Lorab, and I didn't like Juliets' reasoning for her suspicion of Matt, but otherwise haven't been pinged by her.
I see Juliets' point, though. He made a brand new case on DH and then voted him before allowing for a response. It goes against mafia manners. Also, not allowing for a response also means a civ can't rightly defend themselves (in general--I'm undecided on DH in particular). Even if he had to vote early, he could have voted for someone else he found suspicious.Bullzeye wrote:Do you really not see that Matt couldn't wait for DH because he had to go to work?juliets wrote:I'm not voting him because he had to go to work. I'm possibly voting him because he did not let DH respond before he voted him. That's common mafia courtesy. I think since SVS has shown up DH is probably silenced (Enrique is a possibility but I doubt it since he said he would be declining in participation).I haven't made a definite decision though and probably won't do until late.DFaraday wrote:Matt said he had to go to work, so it seems odd that you were considering voting him for that.juliets wrote:You didn't even let him respond.Matt wrote:Sorry to do this, but I have to get ready for work and jet.
I'm voting DH. Don't think he genuinely wanted Nero lynched, and it shows.
Good luck town!
Linki: I had like 6 other tabs open and when I looked back, Typh voted me.![]()
As far as my reads right now go, I'd put Matt, Golden, Mac, and MP as strong civ reads, with Enrique up there too. Typh, Bullz, Dom, snd SVS are middling for me, as well as the inactives. I think there could be something to the DH case, I'm still looking over Lorab, and I didn't like Juliets' reasoning for her suspicion of Matt, but otherwise haven't been pinged by her.
WASjuliets wrote:uh oh - maybe thats not what you wanted.
So, you thought if Glorfindel was bad then Bubbles was surely bad.Golden wrote:@dom - Because I felt Bubbles was a more acceptable loss than Glorfindel if the theory was wrong. For all the criticism of Glorfindel, I felt he was really contributing. For example, his case on MM and his point about how lower posters were being killed off, perhaps because some killers are higher posters that didn't want to isolate themselves, were really unique thoughts that he brought to the table.
Bubbles, on the other hand, just started a new job (I know because she had to ask for a replacement in Zodiac) and so I know she is having a tough time contributing.
Personally, just read her last few posts. Felt a scummy vibe from them.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
Define 'few' as a percentage of nine :P The worst thing about her is that super shady SVS vote and the following defense of it. But still, I can see parallels between that vote and her incredibly frustrating votes for me in Star Wars where she was a civ. So I dunno about her.Dom wrote:Personally, just read her last few posts. Felt a scummy vibe from them.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
She had an early post that said that Dom seemed to be posting more than usual, which was odd, and felt like she was getting information from elsewhere. Also, in what games has Dom not been a high poster. I've been asking about that since she made the post and have yet to get an answer.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
Dom, I just gave you a very clear and rational and logical reason for my choice and your response is to throw it right out the window?Dom wrote:So, you thought if Glorfindel was bad then Bubbles was surely bad.Golden wrote:@dom - Because I felt Bubbles was a more acceptable loss than Glorfindel if the theory was wrong. For all the criticism of Glorfindel, I felt he was really contributing. For example, his case on MM and his point about how lower posters were being killed off, perhaps because some killers are higher posters that didn't want to isolate themselves, were really unique thoughts that he brought to the table.
Bubbles, on the other hand, just started a new job (I know because she had to ask for a replacement in Zodiac) and so I know she is having a tough time contributing.
So you voted Bubbles because logic went out the window.
Hmm this is true, I definitely can't remember a game where Dom was anything but talkative. I'd be surprised if he was ever quiet.LoRab wrote:She had an early post that said that Dom seemed to be posting more than usual, which was odd, and felt like she was getting information from elsewhere. Also, in what games has Dom not been a high poster. I've been asking about that since she made the post and have yet to get an answer.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
I can actually kinda see that.LoRab wrote:Her post last lynch came out of nowhere and seemed like had been coached, or at least that she had been pushed towards the thread.
It has been pointed out that she's quite busy this time around, tbf. I can relate.LoRab wrote:Also, to me, she usually posts about once around, and this time has barely been posting at all. Yet has been online (several folks have commented that they've seen her online and she's had posts), so could have been around to send in kills, even if she's not posting in the thread.
I don't mean stop asking people to read her. I mean stop using that as a proxy for explaining your suspicion.Dom wrote:Golden, I read them as baddie in tone. I'm sorry we disagree. I don't think we have a "normal town" Bubbles.
Stop telling people to read her? What on earth is that post Golden? Why? I'm encouraging people to make their own decision. I have discussed and will continue to discuss other suspects as well. What is your angle here?
Golden wrote:SVS, as much as you can, and maybe you've already done this, but what are your thoughts on dom?
THAT ^^LoRab wrote:She had an early post that said that Dom seemed to be posting more than usual, which was odd, and felt like she was getting information from elsewhere. Also, in what games has Dom not been a high poster. I've been asking about that since she made the post and have yet to get an answer.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
Her post last lynch came out of nowhere and seemed like had been coached, or at least that she had been pushed towards the thread.
Also, to me, she usually posts about once around, and this time has barely been posting at all. Yet has been online (several folks have commented that they've seen her online and she's had posts), so could have been around to send in kills, even if she's not posting in the thread.
S~V~S wrote:Golden wrote:SVS, as much as you can, and maybe you've already done this, but what are your thoughts on dom?![]()
THAT ^^LoRab wrote:She had an early post that said that Dom seemed to be posting more than usual, which was odd, and felt like she was getting information from elsewhere. Also, in what games has Dom not been a high poster. I've been asking about that since she made the post and have yet to get an answer.Bullzeye wrote:Can someone remind me of the arguments against Bubbles?
Her post last lynch came out of nowhere and seemed like had been coached, or at least that she had been pushed towards the thread.
Also, to me, she usually posts about once around, and this time has barely been posting at all. Yet has been online (several folks have commented that they've seen her online and she's had posts), so could have been around to send in kills, even if she's not posting in the thread.
COMFORTABLENESS
FORESHADOWED
GOY
MENG
MO
I'm not as sure as you are. And I did go back and read her posts in that game. But I'm not seeing that her posts match with her civ game in other games, either.Golden wrote:Seriously guys. Lorab. Bullzeye. SVS.
Bubbles is civilian.
Nope. He'd have to be a cop if he was civ. Of course my list could be all wrong.LoRab wrote:@Golden: Do I recall correctly that you have names penciled in for all the named civ roles? Is Matt in that list?
Any of our lists could be wrong.Golden wrote:Nope. He'd have to be a cop if he was civ. Of course my list could be all wrong.LoRab wrote:@Golden: Do I recall correctly that you have names penciled in for all the named civ roles? Is Matt in that list?
I actually wondered if it was a deliberate role hint.juliets wrote:The one thing about Bubbles that stops me in my tracks when I start thinking she's bad is she voted 4 times for Waynes Manor (wish I could remember who pointed this out). Seems like a mafia teammate would have said "hey, what are you doing you already have the message from there" or they would be involved in a bts discussion on where to vote. This doesn't mean she can't be an inmate though.
Oh right good point. It's hard to think of any reason why she would do it unless it was something like that. She can't have missed all those pms from the hosts with the links to the messages.Golden wrote:I actually wondered if it was a deliberate role hint.juliets wrote:The one thing about Bubbles that stops me in my tracks when I start thinking she's bad is she voted 4 times for Waynes Manor (wish I could remember who pointed this out). Seems like a mafia teammate would have said "hey, what are you doing you already have the message from there" or they would be involved in a bts discussion on where to vote. This doesn't mean she can't be an inmate though.
Metalmarsh did the same thing for five nights, strangely enough.juliets wrote:Oh right good point. It's hard to think of any reason why she would do it unless it was something like that. She can't have missed all those pms from the hosts with the links to the messages.Golden wrote:I actually wondered if it was a deliberate role hint.juliets wrote:The one thing about Bubbles that stops me in my tracks when I start thinking she's bad is she voted 4 times for Waynes Manor (wish I could remember who pointed this out). Seems like a mafia teammate would have said "hey, what are you doing you already have the message from there" or they would be involved in a bts discussion on where to vote. This doesn't mean she can't be an inmate though.