The Syndicate

RIH DF

DH - I thought I had a solid case on you, turns out I didn't. And if you're implying that I'm bad by saying "Thanks for being this game's Dr Wilgy", you're wrong.

juliets - You were wondering who brought up the Wayne Manor/Bubbles thing. That was me. Also, yes, I typically like to wait for an exchange before voting someone, but I had no time today. You say I should've voted for someone else. Tell me, who should I have voted for? I was going to have to leave anyway, so whoever I voted for would've had no time to respond. In that position, what is better? Vote for DH, who shot up to my top suspect last night when ISOing him? Vote for a random other player for no reason? Just not vote?

Lorab - Yeah, Enrique was target painting the fuck out of me by claiming I was Batman. I also refuted being Batman several times and asked Enrique to stop. It doesn't mean I'm Batman. Tell ya what, earlier I said "Please don't Glorfindel me", you can take that as a role hint.

Dom - This guy. I'm not even sure why I'm suspicious to you Dom. Because I've been "coasting" ? Are you kidding? Every day, I read the thread, and try to contribute best I can. If you don't like what I have to say, fine, but that does not mean I've been coasting.

Enrique - Please explain why you think I'm bad. You haven't, I don't think.

Personally, I think Dom giving me a suss face because DH was silenced is absolute baloney. I had no idea the guy was silenced. I ISO'd him last night, thought I landed on a pretty swell case, posted it, came back earlier today after about 12 hours, to which he did not respond. Had to go to work, he was my top suss, voted him. I even apologized that I had to vote for him (because I know it's good mafia manners to usually not do that, Lorab) but what else should I have done?

Anyway, great result today town. I didn't have shiz to do with it, but great result nonetheless. Lynching me may get rid of an annoyance in your eyes, but you won't be lynching a bad guy.

Looking over the polls again, I said this before, but on Nights 0 and 1, I had voted Arkham Asylum. I went back because I wasn't sure if there would be a different message but there wasn't. On Night 1, sabie also voted Arkham Asylum.

I just noticed this, as well. On Night 2, I voted Park Row. On Night 3, sabie voted Park Row.

Sure, someone could make an argument that Sabie and I voted the same places to throw people off track, but nah. If I was mafia, I'd figure there's so many players to keep track of, just vote different places and try to find out what's goin' on with the messages. Straight up.

It's harder to defend against being an indy, but I'm not. If you think I am, please explain why. And if it's Dom doing the explaining by saying "Matt's coasting", I'd like examples.

I believe you, Matt.

Thanks Golden.

DFaraday wrote:For posterity, my suspects are LoRab, DH, and Bubbles, in that order.

Wanted to comment that just because he was Mafia, doesn't mean these aren't legit susses. DF also wanted the Falcone family gone.

Also, man I feel bad for DF kinda. I'm guessing their kill didn't happen on Night 2 because Floyd wasn't around to send it ("the bought cop inherits the kill first") and then when Floyd didn't show up by Night 4, surely our super hosts decided it wasn't fair and let DF send in the kill lulz. However, DF destroyed bea and Marmot so he's dead to me.

Long Con wrote:

DFaraday has been lynched. He was Maroni.

GOOD

Matt wrote: However, DF destroyed bea and Marmot so he's dead to me.

FERROMANGANESES
WHOLEFOODS
BY
HMM
TACT
ET

Matt wrote:RIH DF

DH - I thought I had a solid case on you, turns out I didn't. And if you're implying that I'm bad by saying "Thanks for being this game's Dr Wilgy", you're wrong.

juliets - You were wondering who brought up the Wayne Manor/Bubbles thing. That was me. Also, yes, I typically like to wait for an exchange before voting someone, but I had no time today. You say I should've voted for someone else. Tell me, who should I have voted for? I was going to have to leave anyway, so whoever I voted for would've had no time to respond. In that position, what is better? Vote for DH, who shot up to my top suspect last night when ISOing him? Vote for a random other player for no reason? Just not vote?

Lorab - Yeah, Enrique was target painting the fuck out of me by claiming I was Batman. I also refuted being Batman several times and asked Enrique to stop. It doesn't mean I'm Batman. Tell ya what, earlier I said "Please don't Glorfindel me", you can take that as a role hint.

Dom - This guy. I'm not even sure why I'm suspicious to you Dom. Because I've been "coasting" ? Are you kidding? Every day, I read the thread, and try to contribute best I can. If you don't like what I have to say, fine, but that does not mean I've been coasting.

Enrique - Please explain why you think I'm bad. You haven't, I don't think.

Personally, I think Dom giving me a suss face because DH was silenced is absolute baloney. I had no idea the guy was silenced. I ISO'd him last night, thought I landed on a pretty swell case, posted it, came back earlier today after about 12 hours, to which he did not respond. Had to go to work, he was my top suss, voted him. I even apologized that I had to vote for him (because I know it's good mafia manners to usually not do that, Lorab) but what else should I have done?

Anyway, great result today town. I didn't have shiz to do with it, but great result nonetheless. Lynching me may get rid of an annoyance in your eyes, but you won't be lynching a bad guy.

I never said you were annoying. I said I didn't think you were good.

Woot! One mafia down.

So I was wrong on the sabie part but right overall on him. Others doubting the suspicion was making me start to doubt myself.

This game is easy as piss.

Well I was wrong about DF being good or friendly inmate. Thank goodness there were people who saw through his tactics and voted for him. Goodbye DF, I thought you did a good job playing a baddie. After my appointment this morning I will start taking a look at people, though maybe not aloud yet because it's night. I don't want to go through the same thing I went through with this lynch.

Juliets I look forward to your thoughts.

Matt I only meant that your case was just as effective as his was in the previous game, which is to say not at all.

Nice result!

I wonder if Bubbles is on sabie's team.

Let's lynch her and find out.

Dom wrote:Let's lynch her and find out.

I'm cool with that.

I think it's about time we lynched all the inactives anyway. Death to inactives!

MP what do you think of this post that Golden made?

Golden wrote:I think the best point against Bubbles is that she actually has continued to turn up despite the fact she mostly isn't checking in on the lynches. So, if bubbles is lynched, I do have some hope. I just feel like she always gets lynched and comes back town for basically the same reasons.

Dom wrote:MP what do you think of this post that Golden made?

Golden wrote:I think the best point against Bubbles is that she actually has continued to turn up despite the fact she mostly isn't checking in on the lynches. So, if bubbles is lynched, I do have some hope. I just feel like she always gets lynched and comes back town for basically the same reasons.

I'd agree with that sentiment. What really pinged me the most about Bubbles is that she gives the impression that she's engaged but she's giving nothing to really work with regards to understanding her thought process.

I do recognize she often gets mislynched, but I think that's worth the risk at this stage.

What do you think?

EBWOP: Like, who checks in after a week of not showing up and acts like they know what's going on in the game by casting an informed vote? She gave no sentiment like "I have no idea what's going on" or anything; rather, she seemed to have a clear agenda.

I don't know about any of you, but after not posting for a week in a game, there's no way I'd feel informed enough to make a vote, especially as town.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Dom wrote:MP what do you think of this post that Golden made?

Golden wrote:I think the best point against Bubbles is that she actually has continued to turn up despite the fact she mostly isn't checking in on the lynches. So, if bubbles is lynched, I do have some hope. I just feel like she always gets lynched and comes back town for basically the same reasons.

I'd agree with that sentiment. What really pinged me the most about Bubbles is that she gives the impression that she's engaged but she's giving nothing to really work with regards to understanding her thought process.

I do recognize she often gets mislynched, but I think that's worth the risk at this stage.

What do you think?

I think it's weird that he posted it RIGHT after voting for DFaraday.

MovingPictures07 wrote:EBWOP: Like, who checks in after a week of not showing up and acts like they know what's going on in the game by casting an informed vote? She gave no sentiment like "I have no idea what's going on" or anything; rather, she seemed to have a clear agenda.

I don't know about any of you, but after not posting for a week in a game, there's no way I'd feel informed enough to make a vote, especially as town.

This. This. a million times.

MovingPictures07 wrote:EBWOP: Like, who checks in after a week of not showing up and acts like they know what's going on in the game by casting an informed vote? She gave no sentiment like "I have no idea what's going on" or anything; rather, she seemed to have a clear agenda.

I don't know about any of you, but after not posting for a week in a game, there's no way I'd feel informed enough to make a vote, especially as town.

Also, her post right after Sabie's lynch:

Bubbles wrote:good job on sabie everyone, probably wouldve voted her (he?) as well if i'd been in time for the vote. i feel like im barely in this game but ive been trying to keep up with reading.
anyway voting wayne's manor cause it sounds cozy

was after 10 days of not having posted in the game. It seems a little to much like a coincidence to suddenly show up after dropping away, in order to make a post about a lynch result...

Dom asks MP about literally the only post I made against Bubbles.

I do NOT think we should be lynching bubbles tomorrow.

MP, explain... what do you see about bubbles that is different from her normal civilian game?

Maybe we should lynch Matt.

DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe we should lynch Matt.

To be clear in case Matt asks this is an endorsement of a Matt lynch. This is what an endorsement of a lynch looks like. When you endorse a lynch, saying "Lets lynch this person" is a good first step.

Although maybe we should not lynch Matt.

This would constitute not endorsing a Matt lynch. If I were to say the words "Maybe not lynching this person is better," that would be me not endorsing a lynch.

I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

Did I say I didn't think you were bad?

Lol. Guess not, DH. I was talking about the following quote, but that doesn't specify whether you think I'm bad or not. Apologies.

DharmaHelper wrote:Matt I only meant that your case was just as effective as his was in the previous game, which is to say not at all.

Golden wrote:Dom asks MP about literally the only post I made against Bubbles.

I do NOT think we should be lynching bubbles tomorrow.

MP, explain... what do you see about bubbles that is different from her normal civilian game?

Yeah because it was weird that you made a post against her right after you voted to save her.

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

Your ISO is literally 2 pages from days 5-9.
Your ISO is literally 10 pages long from days 1-5.

Additionally, you have brought up significantly less points as of late. You harped on TH being bad, refused anyone else's input, and didn't want to lynch Glorf. You haven't had a cohesive suspect lists since Day 6 or 7. I have asked for your input on multiple occasions and you only are defensive about me doing so.
I think you're coasting. I think you established a civ persona in thread and are riding it to the end like you did in GoC.

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I apologize Matt I don't remember seeing a question. Would you repeat it and I will answer?

Dom wrote:Your ISO is literally 2 pages from days 5-9.
Your ISO is literally 10 pages long from days 1-5.

Additionally, you have brought up significantly less points as of late. You harped on TH being bad, refused anyone else's input, and didn't want to lynch Glorf. You haven't had a cohesive suspect lists since Day 6 or 7. I have asked for your input on multiple occasions and you only are defensive about me doing so.
I think you're coasting. I think you established a civ persona in thread and are riding it to the end like you did in GoC.

Dom, you seem to forget on March 3rd, another game started (Turf Wars) and I was asked to replace into Rocky and Bullwinkle. Turf Wars has been just about as busy as this game was when it first started, and I had to catch up on 20 or so pages of R&B when replacing in.

You have asked me questions and "my input" on several occasions, each time I answer, and you're like "oh okay cool beans". Then next day, you got something else.

A "civ persona" ? Lol. Can I expect this in every game going forward? "Remember that one time Matt faked his own civ meta to win a mafia game, he must be doing that all the time now!!" Bwahahaha.

Anyway, let me ask you...do you think I'm mafia or an inmate? I'm not either, but this is an important question I want an answer on.

juliets wrote:

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I apologize Matt I don't remember seeing a question. Would you repeat it and I will answer?

Yeah, here you go...

Matt wrote:juliets - You were wondering who brought up the Wayne Manor/Bubbles thing. That was me. Also, yes, I typically like to wait for an exchange before voting someone, but I had no time today. You say I should've voted for someone else. Tell me, who should I have voted for? I was going to have to leave anyway, so whoever I voted for would've had no time to respond. In that position, what is better? Vote for DH, who shot up to my top suspect last night when ISOing him? Vote for a random other player for no reason? Just not vote?

I'd like to know exactly what you think I should've done in my position.

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I'm deciding if I believe your role hint or not.

Matt wrote:

Dom wrote:Your ISO is literally 2 pages from days 5-9.
Your ISO is literally 10 pages long from days 1-5.

Additionally, you have brought up significantly less points as of late. You harped on TH being bad, refused anyone else's input, and didn't want to lynch Glorf. You haven't had a cohesive suspect lists since Day 6 or 7. I have asked for your input on multiple occasions and you only are defensive about me doing so.
I think you're coasting. I think you established a civ persona in thread and are riding it to the end like you did in GoC.

Dom, you seem to forget on March 3rd, another game started (Turf Wars) and I was asked to replace into Rocky and Bullwinkle. Turf Wars has been just about as busy as this game was when it first started, and I had to catch up on 20 or so pages of R&B when replacing in.

You have asked me questions and "my input" on several occasions, each time I answer, and you're like "oh okay cool beans". Then next day, you got something else.

A "civ persona" ? Lol. Can I expect this in every game going forward? "Remember that one time Matt faked his own civ meta to win a mafia game, he must be doing that all the time now!!" Bwahahaha.

Anyway, let me ask you...do you think I'm mafia or an inmate? I'm not either, but this is an important question I want an answer on.

juliets wrote:

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I apologize Matt I don't remember seeing a question. Would you repeat it and I will answer?

Yeah, here you go...

Matt wrote:juliets - You were wondering who brought up the Wayne Manor/Bubbles thing. That was me. Also, yes, I typically like to wait for an exchange before voting someone, but I had no time today. You say I should've voted for someone else. Tell me, who should I have voted for? I was going to have to leave anyway, so whoever I voted for would've had no time to respond. In that position, what is better? Vote for DH, who shot up to my top suspect last night when ISOing him? Vote for a random other player for no reason? Just not vote?

I'd like to know exactly what you think I should've done in my position.

I'm not sure who you should have voted for - whoever was second on your list is what I would have expected. I think I would have voted Bubbles instead but if you believe her to be good you couldn't do that. If person second on your list hadn't had time to respond to the reasons you were voting them then I guess voting DH is all you could do. I just know the first thing I did since it was on day 2 of our two day game day was to look at DH's iso and see that he hadn't spoken since Friday leading me to believe he was likely silenced. Others convinced me though there was nothing else you could do since you had to leave for work and so I didn't vote for you.

LoRab wrote:

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I'm deciding if I believe your role hint or not.

While you're debating, can you respond to this then...

Matt wrote:Lorab - Yeah, Enrique was target painting the fuck out of me by claiming I was Batman. I also refuted being Batman several times and asked Enrique to stop. It doesn't mean I'm Batman.

You sussed me because you thought I was faking being an important role (umm no btw, I've been pretty clear I don't since Enrique accused me of targeting the Joker), but as I pointed out, I never faked such a thing. However, Enrique was target painting me. It's irrelevant whether he was correct or not (he wasn't), the point still stands that's what he was doing. I just want to know if you still suss me because of that.

juliets - Okey dokey. I think it's pretty curious you went after me for that, but maybe you're on the real.

A few things before I head out...

DH - My case on you was wrong. Still, why'd you wait until Night 8 to go to Arkham Asylum?

Dom - Why did you suss me for voting DH when he was silenced? I had no idea he was, and even if I did have an idea that he was, that would make me totes civ, so what's up on that front?

Anywho, I'm out. Good luck tonight town!

@Matt Cuz I felt like it.

MAtt I don't think you knew he was silenced, I think you didn't care if he was silenced. Everyone else had a sense of caution about that but you.

Additionally, I don't think you're civ. I don't think qualifying that suspicion further is helpful.

Did I miss/forget a Matt role hint?

Dom wrote:MAtt I don't think you knew he was silenced, I think you didn't care if he was silenced. Everyone else had a sense of caution about that but you.

Additionally, I don't think you're civ. I don't think qualifying that suspicion further is helpful.

Did I miss/forget a Matt role hint?

The first word he said in the game was Batman. Some people think that that was a role hint, as opposed to a statement about the theme of the game.

Personally I think the theory has as much validity as the idea that Glorfindel was hinting at Two-Face because he said a few things that are synonyms of the word two.

Lynch Matt.

Man Bat!

Matt wrote:

LoRab wrote:

Matt wrote:I see Dom replied, but didn't give me any examples of coasting.

DH said he didn't think I was bad and is now making jokes (?) about lynching me.

Lorab and juliets didn't respond to my post at all.

K.

I'm deciding if I believe your role hint or not.

While you're debating, can you respond to this then...

Matt wrote:Lorab - Yeah, Enrique was target painting the fuck out of me by claiming I was Batman. I also refuted being Batman several times and asked Enrique to stop. It doesn't mean I'm Batman.

You sussed me because you thought I was faking being an important role (umm no btw, I've been pretty clear I don't since Enrique accused me of targeting the Joker), but as I pointed out, I never faked such a thing. However, Enrique was target painting me. It's irrelevant whether he was correct or not (he wasn't), the point still stands that's what he was doing. I just want to know if you still suss me because of that.

juliets - Okey dokey. I think it's pretty curious you went after me for that, but maybe you're on the real.

A few things before I head out...

DH - My case on you was wrong. Still, why'd you wait until Night 8 to go to Arkham Asylum?

Dom - Why did you suss me for voting DH when he was silenced? I had no idea he was, and even if I did have an idea that he was, that would make me totes civ, so what's up on that front?

Anywho, I'm out. Good luck tonight town!

I don't think you were role claiming an important role then--I think that your reactions then don't make a lot of sense if you are a vanilla role that doesn't need to be alive to win the game. I also don't think that he was painting a target on you by saying you might be a role that also doesn't need to be alive to win and is more of a threat to indies than to mafia. I also think that his overall point was that you were civ, not that you were a particular role. My point is not that you were role claiming. My point is that your reaction implies that you are a role that really doesn't want to be killed--and has a lot on the line. I don't see your reaction as being consistent with the role you now claim.

That said, I don't often understand where your thoughts come from (not a criticism, just an observation), so I'm taking that into consideration.

Dom wrote:MAtt I don't think you knew he was silenced, I think you didn't care if he was silenced. Everyone else had a sense of caution about that but you.

Additionally, I don't think you're civ. I don't think qualifying that suspicion further is helpful.

Did I miss/forget a Matt role hint?

In his long response post last night/this morning he claimed to be a cop.

Nubs

Hey guys anyone wanna tell me what's at City Hall just cause they're nice

I'll exchange it for any other piece of info.

Is that so?

Who's dying?

Where ya goin'?

You may select 1 option

Arkham Asylum
0
No votes

Wayne Manor
3
Dom (4), S~V~S (6), Matt (9)
18%

Wayne Enterprises
1
DharmaHelper (2)
6%

Fish Mooney's
0
No votes

The Docks
3
Bullzeye (10), LoRab (13), Golden (14)
18%

Gotham City Police Department
1
MovingPictures07 (5)
6%

City Hall
1
Enrique (7)
6%

Park Row
1
Typhoony (11)
6%

Blackgate Penitentiary
0
No votes

Gotham City General Hospital
1
juliets (15)
6%

Amusement Mile
6
Long Con (1), Metalmarsh89 (3), sig (8), Scotty (12), sprityo (16), Epignosis (17)
35%


Total votes : 17

Golden wrote:Who's dying?

Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Oh, I even checked the EST on my computer and thought we had another hour.

Guess it doesn't matter because I'm alive, but I thought I might wind up dead and wanted to strongly encourage people to look at Dom before casting their vote today.

I think he is pushing agendas. I also note that both Wilgy and Scotty had him on their radar before being killed by team Falcone.

I think Dom is Falcone himself, rather than a corrupt cop.

Also, for all the theories about Bubbles... her last visit to the site was not within the last 48 hours.