Page 17 of 34

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:49 pm
by Epignosis
Listen, I'm still not voting for Jack. If he gets lynched today, so be it. But most of the votes S~V~S took were civilian votes. And I told you FZ. was good. :meany:

I need to reread Day 2 and consider how everyone handled that rather unique circumstance. I'm happy Scotty revealed him rather than killed him.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:50 pm
by Epignosis
Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:50 pm
by Epignosis
Thank God we're on another page. That last page for some reason kept screwing with my browser.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:13 am
by Quin
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:15 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:16 am
by Quin
DrWilgy wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
One of these 4 are bad.
This is why we needed to lynch Jack yesterday. People are reading into the WIFOM of the confirmed baddie. Its different to reading into suspects.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:17 am
by Quin
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?
He would. Did he though?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:19 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
One of these 4 are bad.
This is why we needed to lynch Jack yesterday. People are reading into the WIFOM of the confirmed baddie. Its different to reading into suspects.
All it takes is the presence of mind to
Spoiler: show
FUCKING IGNORE HIM

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:21 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?
He would. Did he though?
I would? What evidence do you have to suggest I would ever recommend murdering my own teammate?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:24 am
by Quin
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?
He would. Did he though?
I would? What evidence do you have to suggest I would ever recommend murdering my own teammate?
Not your actual teammate :sigh:

My point is, FZ. was town, and if you're bad, I don't think it's unrealistic that you'd kill her to put me at ease after I considered you two might have BTSC.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:25 am
by Epignosis
This chickenshit attempt to put "pressure" on me is pitiful.

I didn't kill Eloh Night 1, and I didn't kill my own fucking teammate.

Now put on your big boy pants and find the mafia. Unless you are the mafia, then take off the big boy pants, because my foot's a-comin.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:26 am
by Quin
Today is, probably, not my best, day in terms of, basic punctuation skills.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:28 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?
He would. Did he though?
I would? What evidence do you have to suggest I would ever recommend murdering my own teammate?
Not your actual teammate :sigh:

My point is, FZ. was town, and if you're bad, I don't think it's unrealistic that you'd kill her to put me at ease after I considered you two might have BTSC.
Oh.

I would have killed FZ. except for the fact that I was the one vouching for her. Nobody else was, so I might've left her alone and tried to get her lynched (tough to do, by the way, but I like the challenge). But yeah, I would've killed her, sure.

But none of that would be to try to put you at ease. I fear you not.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:29 am
by Quin
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Quin raised the idea that I was partners with FZ. for defending her. I don't think Quin would do that and then kill FZ. For that and other reasons, I think Quin is a civilian.
But would Epignosis kill the potential teammate I pointed out to get me off his back? :ponder:
Would he?
He would. Did he though?
I would? What evidence do you have to suggest I would ever recommend murdering my own teammate?
Not your actual teammate :sigh:

My point is, FZ. was town, and if you're bad, I don't think it's unrealistic that you'd kill her to put me at ease after I considered you two might have BTSC.
Oh.

I would have killed FZ. except for the fact that I was the one vouching for her. Nobody else was, so I might've left her alone and tried to get her lynched (tough to do, by the way, but I like the challenge). But yeah, I would've killed her, sure.

But none of that would be to try to put you at ease. I fear you not.
Not even once I've put on my big boy pants?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:29 am
by Jackofhearts2005
DrWilgy wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
One of these 4 are bad.
Fuck fickle fuck fuck fuck,

ONAMA!!!!!!!! Fuck ABAMA!

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:30 am
by Jackofhearts2005
I can't post straight. Bootstrap. Go Jesus. Go Heidi. I am the zodiac!

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:32 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote: Not even once I've put on my big boy pants?
You need a better avatar. Look at mine.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:33 am
by Quin
Epignosis wrote:
Quin wrote: Not even once I've put on my big boy pants?
You need a better avatar. Look at mine.
I've been considering it, but then how would people know what I look like?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:35 am
by Quin
That was a serious question, by the way. I don't think you'd strategise your mafia game around how to appease me. I don't have much influence and I might be the only one who saw what I saw.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:51 am
by Epignosis
Quin wrote:That was a serious question, by the way. I don't think you'd strategise your mafia game around how to appease me. I don't have much influence and I might be the only one who saw what I saw.
So it was a serious question?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:08 am
by Jackofhearts2005
DrWilgy wrote:
thellama73 wrote:I agree with this. My second choice would be Wilgy, who I already suspected, and whose vote for SVS has done him no favors in my estimation.
Now you are just assuming things Llama. My vote for SVS has done wonders for me. We confirmed she was civ.

What I would like is some opinions from Faraday following her lynch.

I have a tonal bad read of Epi following his recent posts. What does admitting how civvie you are do for us other than WIFOM defense to LC's suspicion? I've killed Wilgette n1 several times when I play with her and some friends around a table.
What's a wifrllete?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:09 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Like a girl Wigly? Right?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:16 am
by Jackofhearts2005
Epignosis wrote:Listen, I'm still not voting for Jack. If he gets lynched today, so be it. But most of the votes S~V~S took were civilian votes. And I told you FZ. was good. :meany:

I need to reread Day 2 and consider how everyone handled that rather unique circumstance. I'm happy Scotty revealed him rather than killed him.
Thanks, Epi.

Your a good scumbro. :beer:

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:19 am
by MacDougall
Voting for Faraday who is bad

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:22 am
by Jackofhearts2005
MacDougall wrote:Voting for Faraday who is bad
Me too.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:34 am
by Quin
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Voting for Faraday who is bad
Me too.
Delete your account.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:38 am
by Epignosis
I'm voting MacDougall.

I might have a careless oversight and leave it there.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:38 am
by DrWilgy
Epi, what are your current thoughts on DF?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:38 am
by Marmot
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:39 am
by DrWilgy
Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?
But we've been teammates! That's all you need right???

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:41 am
by Marmot
DrWilgy wrote:
Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?
But we've been teammates! That's all you need right???
All you need is love love!

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:41 am
by Epignosis
DrWilgy wrote:Epi, what are your current thoughts on DF?
That he needs to speak more.

But I'd call him a civilian at this moment.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:41 am
by Marmot
Wow, I botched that line. :haha:

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:41 am
by Marmot
Epignosis wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Epi, what are your current thoughts on DF?
That he needs to speak more.

But I'd call him a civilian at this moment.
Why?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:42 am
by Marmot
Why do you think he's civilian that is?

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:42 am
by Epignosis
Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?
Really?

I need to host something and make us bad together.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:44 am
by Marmot
Epignosis wrote:
Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?
Really?

I need to host something and make us bad together.
Beats me. Been playing here for three years and I don't think I've had BTSC with you once.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:45 am
by Epignosis
Marmot wrote:Why do you think he's civilian that is?
Chickenshit stuff. He gave a full assessment when under pressure to do so, but a lot of what he said didn't make any sense. He came in cool with lynching S~V~S as long as he wasn't getting the rope.

I see textbook DF is all.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:47 am
by Marmot
Marmot wrote:Beats me. Been playing here for three years and I don't think I've had BTSC with you once.
Or Sockface. And you guys are the only two players who have more posts on this site than I do!

I'd like to file a complaint with the admin team.

Linki: Alrighty then.

Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:52 am
by DrWilgy
Epignosis wrote:
Marmot wrote:Why do you think he's civilian that is?
Chickenshit stuff. He gave a full assessment when under pressure to do so, but a lot of what he said didn't make any sense. He came in cool with lynching S~V~S as long as he wasn't getting the rope.

I see textbook DF is all.
Epignosis wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I won't be able to catch up on the thread until tonight, so I randomized Sawyer. I hate randomizing, but I haven't read since page 3 and literally have no suspicions yet.
This was Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:13 pm EST. I note that there were only seven pages, which means DF was only four pages behind. Surely he could have skimmed and made a more informed decision in that time, could he not?
DFaraday wrote:Finally caught up. Good result, all! RIP Elo.

I agree that there's no rush to lynch Jack, we just need to be careful about how close lynches are or he could tip the scales. Then again, I doubt he'd use that to save a teammate, but rather frame a civ.

To Sawyer: I have no suspicion of you. I randomized from everybody besides myself and it was you. That's all.
This next post is Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:15 am EST, over 36 hours later. In it, DF did nothing but talk about Jack- no mention of suspects, whom he would have voted had he been caught up, no ideas on who is a civilian- nada.

I'm voting DFaraday.
So you 180'd on DF?

Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:02 am
by DFaraday
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Marmot wrote:Why do you think he's civilian that is?
Chickenshit stuff. He gave a full assessment when under pressure to do so, but a lot of what he said didn't make any sense. He came in cool with lynching S~V~S as long as he wasn't getting the rope.

I see textbook DF is all.
Epignosis wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I won't be able to catch up on the thread until tonight, so I randomized Sawyer. I hate randomizing, but I haven't read since page 3 and literally have no suspicions yet.
This was Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:13 pm EST. I note that there were only seven pages, which means DF was only four pages behind. Surely he could have skimmed and made a more informed decision in that time, could he not?
DFaraday wrote:Finally caught up. Good result, all! RIP Elo.

I agree that there's no rush to lynch Jack, we just need to be careful about how close lynches are or he could tip the scales. Then again, I doubt he'd use that to save a teammate, but rather frame a civ.

To Sawyer: I have no suspicion of you. I randomized from everybody besides myself and it was you. That's all.
This next post is Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:15 am EST, over 36 hours later. In it, DF did nothing but talk about Jack- no mention of suspects, whom he would have voted had he been caught up, no ideas on who is a civilian- nada.

I'm voting DFaraday.
So you 180'd on DF?
No, he just recognized my usual poor gameplay.

I'm not sure why Epi voted Mac, but I just glanced over Mac's posts and was surprised to see he's at 64. Most of them are pretty short and devoid of substance. Before analyzing his posts more, I'd put him down as a mild suspicion.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:05 am
by DFaraday
Also his SVS suspicion feels more forced than some others. He didn't even acknowledge Epi's case or reasons for thinking she might be bad until after the lynch.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:55 am
by MacDougall
How surprising that the guy who has his vote on you is suspicious to you.

How very surprising.

My suspicion of SVS was pretty much non existent actually. I just agreed with the logic of the cases against her.

Surprising suspicion from the suspicious one.

Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 8:57 am
by MacDougall
DFaraday wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Marmot wrote:Why do you think he's civilian that is?
Chickenshit stuff. He gave a full assessment when under pressure to do so, but a lot of what he said didn't make any sense. He came in cool with lynching S~V~S as long as he wasn't getting the rope.

I see textbook DF is all.
Epignosis wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I won't be able to catch up on the thread until tonight, so I randomized Sawyer. I hate randomizing, but I haven't read since page 3 and literally have no suspicions yet.
This was Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:13 pm EST. I note that there were only seven pages, which means DF was only four pages behind. Surely he could have skimmed and made a more informed decision in that time, could he not?
DFaraday wrote:Finally caught up. Good result, all! RIP Elo.

I agree that there's no rush to lynch Jack, we just need to be careful about how close lynches are or he could tip the scales. Then again, I doubt he'd use that to save a teammate, but rather frame a civ.

To Sawyer: I have no suspicion of you. I randomized from everybody besides myself and it was you. That's all.
This next post is Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:15 am EST, over 36 hours later. In it, DF did nothing but talk about Jack- no mention of suspects, whom he would have voted had he been caught up, no ideas on who is a civilian- nada.

I'm voting DFaraday.
So you 180'd on DF?
No, he just recognized my usual poor gameplay.

I'm not sure why Epi voted Mac, but I just glanced over Mac's posts and was surprised to see he's at 64. Most of them are pretty short and devoid of substance. Before analyzing his posts more, I'd put him down as a mild suspicion.
And how is that not '180ing' on you? Interesting defence of Epi there. Interesting and suspicious stuff from the suspicious one.

Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:09 am
by Epignosis
DrWilgy wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Marmot wrote:Why do you think he's civilian that is?
Chickenshit stuff. He gave a full assessment when under pressure to do so, but a lot of what he said didn't make any sense. He came in cool with lynching S~V~S as long as he wasn't getting the rope.

I see textbook DF is all.
Epignosis wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I won't be able to catch up on the thread until tonight, so I randomized Sawyer. I hate randomizing, but I haven't read since page 3 and literally have no suspicions yet.
This was Mon Feb 27, 2017 3:13 pm EST. I note that there were only seven pages, which means DF was only four pages behind. Surely he could have skimmed and made a more informed decision in that time, could he not?
DFaraday wrote:Finally caught up. Good result, all! RIP Elo.

I agree that there's no rush to lynch Jack, we just need to be careful about how close lynches are or he could tip the scales. Then again, I doubt he'd use that to save a teammate, but rather frame a civ.

To Sawyer: I have no suspicion of you. I randomized from everybody besides myself and it was you. That's all.
This next post is Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:15 am EST, over 36 hours later. In it, DF did nothing but talk about Jack- no mention of suspects, whom he would have voted had he been caught up, no ideas on who is a civilian- nada.

I'm voting DFaraday.
So you 180'd on DF?
:eek:

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:17 am
by thellama73
Epignosis wrote:This chickenshit attempt to put "pressure" on me is pitiful.

I didn't kill Eloh Night 1, and I didn't kill my own fucking teammate.

Now put on your big boy pants and find the mafia. Unless you are the mafia, then take off the big boy pants, because my foot's a-comin.
Epi, FZ's role has been revealed. We know she was civ. "I didn't kill my own teammate" is meaningless in this context, since obviously FZ wasn't on the same team as the people who killed her.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 am
by thellama73
Marmot wrote:
Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Also, my team is Epi, LC, Marmot and Quin.
I've never been mafia with Epignosis though. :pout:

Or llama, or Sockface. How the hell does that happen?
That's because I'm never mafia. I am always good.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:22 am
by thellama73
Despite Epi's apparent mental lapse above, I don't think he is bad. I don't give credence to the "oh I would never kill Eloh because I love her so much" play (also known as The Ika Defense), but I don't think he would have pushed so hard, and continue to push so hard, against lynching the outed baddie. I won't be voting for Epi today.

I could be persuaded to vote for Wilgy or Sawyer, but I'd really rather lynch Jack and get it over with. At least it will put an end to having to have this argument every day.

Re: Day 3- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:22 am
by thellama73
(I'm putting my vote on Wilgy for now, just because I like the way the vote spread visually looks, but I intend to move it later).

Re: Day 1- BLUE vs. RED

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:40 am
by Long Con
G-Man wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I appreciate you making it easier for me to know whom to lynch next.

S~V~S is dead meat. :feb:
-1 Hillary Points for using Hillary Points in any way relevant to the game. :p
Does Epi lose more Hillary Points for actually going through with it?