Re: Assassin's Creed Mafia (D1)
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:55 pm
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
You have confused me warrior.
I made an explanation on why I asked you three, go check it out. Furthermore, I thought the DP ended in a few hours not 24.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
Yes he has. LC's made some really high effort analysis. It's totally new LC territory. What game are you reading? Your read on him demonstrates you haven't read the last several pages. Perhaps do so.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
This wouldn't be Dragomir hoisting someone on their own petard again would it? Her LC thought is demonstrably not good at worst, completely judgemental at best. You are a snake in the grass young man.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:42 pmThese are some good thoughts, especially that LC one. I'll go deep on why I think the same soon.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
Is there a way to do isoes easily on mobile? My computer has blocked this site.
Yo don't crawl into his pocket.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:44 pm sloonei could you explain your th read imo there ain't enough to read him yet
also thanks dragomir![]()
No I will not crawl into your pocket you snake in the grass.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:57 pmI made an explanation on why I asked you three, go check it out. Furthermore, I thought the DP ended in a few hours not 24.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
1. What is the problem with me compliment his post? I thought it was splendid so I said it. Do you want to tell me that it was wrong to do that?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:53 pmWhat the fuckDragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:51 pmWhat the fuckMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:43 pmWhy does this post exist? That is such a trivial thing to get caught up on. His 12 posts absolutely are forgettable. It doesn't take a great deal of imagination to see why FG would have made this post? I don't know what's worse, your silly gotcha or Dragomir telling you it was splendis.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:04 pmTony has twelve posts. Why do they need to be memorable? You can read them in under sixty seconds. Why does this post exist?Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 2:24 pm tsp's posts have been forgettable to me but we're on the same wagon so sure i guess i can hold off on reading him for now
I think Dragomir because I think it's just a bunch of bs half trying to butter up to Epi half taking the opportunity to build some negative energy towards FG.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:08 pmA splendid post from you. I'm wondering the same thing.Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:04 pmTony has twelve posts. Why do they need to be memorable? You can read them in under sixty seconds. Why does this post exist?Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 2:24 pm tsp's posts have been forgettable to me but we're on the same wagon so sure i guess i can hold off on reading him for now
[VOTE: Dragomir] aubergine
Use your words Dragomir
Just go read the damn post bro.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:04 pmNo I will not crawl into your pocket you snake in the grass.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:57 pmI made an explanation on why I asked you three, go check it out. Furthermore, I thought the DP ended in a few hours not 24.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
You thinking that her post was on LC bad has literally nothing to do with me.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:02 pmThis wouldn't be Dragomir hoisting someone on their own petard again would it? Her LC thought is demonstrably not good at worst, completely judgemental at best. You are a snake in the grass young man.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:42 pmThese are some good thoughts, especially that LC one. I'll go deep on why I think the same soon.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
Is there a way to do isoes easily on mobile? My computer has blocked this site.
iirc he mentioned making a huge wall of analysis or some broken up equivalent and I haven't seen it. it's not that he's done nothing but it didnt live up to what I expected he would doMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:00 pmYes he has. LC's made some really high effort analysis. It's totally new LC territory. What game are you reading? Your read on him demonstrates you haven't read the last several pages. Perhaps do so.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
First of all, if you didn't see it then why are you judging his effort when you haven't read all his posts? That's not fair. What also isn't fair is putting up expectations for him to meet and saying that he failed to meet them means lack of effort, furthermore, did you tell him your expectations?Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:11 pmiirc he mentioned making a huge wall of analysis or some broken up equivalent and I haven't seen it. it's not that he's done nothing but it didnt live up to what I expected he would doMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:00 pmYes he has. LC's made some really high effort analysis. It's totally new LC territory. What game are you reading? Your read on him demonstrates you haven't read the last several pages. Perhaps do so.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
i dont mean it in a condescending way.
also I won't be pocketed I GOT THIS
First of all, if you didn't see it then why are you judging his effort when you haven't read all his posts? That's not fair. What also isn't fair is putting up expectations for him to meet and saying that he failed to meet them means lack of effort, furthermore, did you tell him your expectations?Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:11 pmiirc he mentioned making a huge wall of analysis or some broken up equivalent and I haven't seen it. it's not that he's done nothing but it didnt live up to what I expected he would doMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:00 pmYes he has. LC's made some really high effort analysis. It's totally new LC territory. What game are you reading? Your read on him demonstrates you haven't read the last several pages. Perhaps do so.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:40 pmI dont have any strong wolf reads, but I'm suspicious of lc, leetic, and epi.tedxtr wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:59 pmWhat are your scum reads and why?
lcs promised a stronger performance and hasn't delivered, instead choosing to quip in thread with a few people. looks more like damage control than a willingness to solve
leetic doesn't look like he's sincerely wolf hunting, still
ive said this before but idk hasn't done much and literally just copied my tsp read
radish looks good I think Ted vs radish is more likely tvt than not
i dont mean it in a condescending way.
also I won't be pocketed I GOT THIS
I am glad I did not share my reasoning for thinking Long Con could be a teammate with dragomir, because now I get to solidify my town read of MacDougall with a mindmeld. Rule of three or whatever you would like to call it, it is plausible Dragomir calls out to two townies and a scumbud here, and Long Con feels out of place. It is bad on my part, and was not a thought worth sharing, but now it is relevant to solving a slot.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
Do you have another reason for why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:13 pm Okay Dragomir you win this skirmish, but I still think you're bad.
You find out what he has done by reading his posts which you have refused to do.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:13 pm I haven't forgotten what tsp has done but it's just what has he done you know? and that's not a good way to think about someone two days into the game
I need an explanation as to how I called out two townies and a scum bud. There has yet to be a single one and it's infuriating.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:15 pmI am glad I did not share my reasoning for thinking Long Con could be a teammate with dragomir, because now I get to solidify my town read of MacDougall with a mindmeld. Rule of three or whatever you would like to call it, it is plausible Dragomir calls out to two townies and a scumbud here, and Long Con feels out of place. It is bad on my part, and was not a thought worth sharing, but now it is relevant to solving a slot.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
MacDougall is comfortably my top town.
Sure, but first tell me who your top 2 town reads are and your bottom 2 reads are?Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:15 pmDo you have another reason for why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:13 pm Okay Dragomir you win this skirmish, but I still think you're bad.
Really? But you're my top town? This is uncharted waters here. I have this deep desire to not town read you now stemming from my broken home upbringing instilling me a deep seated sense of self worthlessness and subsequent learned self sabotage behaviours.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:15 pmI am glad I did not share my reasoning for thinking Long Con could be a teammate with dragomir, because now I get to solidify my town read of MacDougall with a mindmeld. Rule of three or whatever you would like to call it, it is plausible Dragomir calls out to two townies and a scumbud here, and Long Con feels out of place. It is bad on my part, and was not a thought worth sharing, but now it is relevant to solving a slot.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 6:52 pmThe request kinda backfired huh.
But for real I hate this post. The implication that the three leading wagons (3 votes) are somehow the only that qualify as getting hands dirty seems loaded in a "none of them are scum and I am" kinda way. Bears the question why he asked us three though. Two townies and one teammate?
MacDougall is comfortably my top town.
RelatableMacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:21 pm Really? But you're my top town? This is uncharted waters here. I have this deep desire to not town read you now stemming from my broken home upbringing instilling me a deep seated sense of self worthlessness and subsequent learned self sabotage behaviours.
But I'll work past that.
Sloonei and Ted.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:20 pmSure, but first tell me who your top 2 town reads are and your bottom 2 reads are?Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:15 pmDo you have another reason for why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:13 pm Okay Dragomir you win this skirmish, but I still think you're bad.
Go ahead.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:20 pmWould you like me to pull out the big imaginary book of mafia again?
You don't want to read tsp because he's voting for someone you're voting. I want to find out as to why that should stop you.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm ... am I speaking english or what y'all? what is the difference between what I have said about TSP and what epi said? rn its just the person who said it.
Would you consider voting for him?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
I have TSP as a pretty solid town read. Why you hate him?Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:23 pmSloonei and Ted.MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:20 pmSure, but first tell me who your top 2 town reads are and your bottom 2 reads are?Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:15 pmDo you have another reason for why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:13 pm Okay Dragomir you win this skirmish, but I still think you're bad.
LC and TSP.
Well, there is a chapter or two dedicated to a rather nebulous concept that I have seen various facets of all referenced as "rule of three" or "rule of thirds". For a multitude of complementary reasons, a wolf will list three players (because groups of three are inherently more satisfying), one of which will be a scumbud, two of which will be townies. This scumtell mostly goes over my head on paper, but it is one of those things that you intuitively understand better than one could explain it to you, like WIFOM. It also refers to the tendency to put two thirds of one's scumbuds into their town reads, and one third into their null/scum reads. Googling this concept does not fetch me any suitable results, either. So, in this instance, you calling out three players specifically is slightly more likely to come from scum, and it is likely that exactly one of the three is a scumbud of yours given you are scum.Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pmGo ahead.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:20 pmWould you like me to pull out the big imaginary book of mafia again?
Yeah but does it make him scum?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
Can you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
I'm mostly just confusedDragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:26 pmWould you consider voting for him?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
Maybe when I'm not on mobile and can find good examplests account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
I would like to see these posts as well.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
Did you ever get back to me on a satisfactory breakdown of the false dichotomy? I may have missed some of the thread somehow.Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:37 pmI would like to see these posts as well.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
I don't like Drago's tone here, reads like he's more focused on building wagons than anything else. And yes I am working on that postDragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:26 pmWould you consider voting for him?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
Why?Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:37 pmI would like to see these posts as well.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
because right now we're agreeing on something and I'd prefer to wait for more information. like, guys...Dragomir wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:25 pmYou don't want to read tsp because he's voting for someone you're voting. I want to find out as to why that should stop you.Funnygurl555 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm ... am I speaking english or what y'all? what is the difference between what I have said about TSP and what epi said? rn its just the person who said it.
Because I always just play how I play, I don't try to play differently, or the same, I just do whatever comes to mind. I thought I'd see what Drago was saying about you held up, but it was really just a trap he was setting, and I was the idiot who fell for it. After I said I don't dance. Shameful.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:39 pmWhy?Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:37 pmI would like to see these posts as well.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it
because of something you've said in thread apologizing for not playing much but having something to give
Yes, right here.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:38 pmDid you ever get back to me on a satisfactory breakdown of the false dichotomy? I may have missed some of the thread somehow.Long Con wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:37 pmI would like to see these posts as well.ts account wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:34 pmCan you quote some posts that highlight this difference, for those of us who aren't familiar with them?Turnip Head wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:24 pm Something is wrong with Long Con. He doesn't usually play with this tight of a grip. Like a rattlesnake getting all coiled up. He often gets suspected early and I'm one of the first to rush to his defense because I recognize his town game but this is off-meta for him and I think he knows it