Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
So if you are bad, we are better off voting off another player we think is bad instead?Golden wrote:Why are people narrowing their votes to just me, bass or MP?
There is still the opportunity to take out someone else if you think they are bad.
if this in reference to my post, that is in no way how i wished to be interpreted. I was just comparing the case of Bass to the other vote-recipients, who I see as the current leaders in the tally. Everyone is still a suspect, hence hanging on to my vote, I was more just making a topical remark about the state of the thread.Golden wrote:Why are people narrowing their votes to just me, bass or MP?
There is still the opportunity to take out someone else if you think they are bad.
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden, Epignosis, and MovingPictures are waffling.
???
73?thellama73 wrote:Hostly reminder: The poll ends in 63 minutes.
thellama73Metalmarsh89 wrote:73?thellama73 wrote:Hostly reminder: The poll ends in 63 minutes.
Oh I see, you cannot decide who to vote between those three players.G-Man wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:Golden, Epignosis, and MovingPictures are waffling.
???
73 is also a prime number.thellama73 wrote:thellama73Metalmarsh89 wrote:73?thellama73 wrote:Hostly reminder: The poll ends in 63 minutes.
First of all, sorry for not answering that earlier. I thought it was a mostly rethorical question, and didn't put much importance on it because it was just one of the various examples I was using to build my case that you were not being much productive.Golden wrote:You say I write 'stories about past games', but I ask you what you think the function of them was and you ignore me.
Here's the thing. I don't think your playstyle, as you describe it, is bad. Staying in the sidelines and waiting for the right moment to point something out is a perfectly valid strategy.Golden wrote:DDL - I have a reputation for being one of the best baddie hunters around. You haven't seen me play yet, so I don't know why you would judge my meta based on a description of it.
No, I didn't find a lot to be suspicious of in the walls of text. Honestly I find this game exhausting for how little content there is in the walls of text, and anything I might have found had already been talked out ad nauseum. Each to their own methods - I'm not finding others suspicious just because of their play style. If you don't like the way I play, too bad. You aren't the first, and you won't be the last.
Let me make one thing very clear - I'm not going to play a different way because you find me suspicious. I play my way.
Also, Epi just triggered my bullshit alarm, literally.
g-man waffles on golden, epignosis, mp07 4 vote?G-Man wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:
picture a wood vaccum?G-Man wrote:
I mentioned them all in one go actually:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I don't think it's indicative of any alignment. I just think they prefer familiarity, so there is a good chance they are not reading as deeply into any of the newer players posts as they are into some of the regulars here. I find I have to put more effort into reading the newer players, because I don't know your styles, and y'all are foreign to me (with the exception of Dragon D. Luffy and TinyBubbles). So, if this is the case, I don't think it is good for several players to ignore the existance of half a dozen other players.Sloonei wrote:Do you think it's more likely they're scum just not sure what to say about us, or townies just not sure what to think about us?
This was just a little while ago. I haven't gotten a chance to reread them since then and likely won't be able to this day period.fingersplints wrote:The other thing that bothered me about MP was his line about TinyBubbles setting off "ALARM BELLS OF RAGE" for wanting to randomize despite that a lot has happened. Not that much has happened tbh. Some of these long posts are long for the sake of being long tbh
Why is it that crazy for a new person to want to randomize that it would make you rage? That bit seemed weird and forced
Linki - I gotta reread them one at a time. Those guys were mashing together for me a bit there. I don't do well with walls of textI'm not surprised by their reads although I don't agree seem to agree with most of them.
This is just what has stuck out to me so far. I haven't even given my read on Rox yet!I second this opinion, but I do think it's convenient for someone to hide behind a veil of familiarity rather than to attempt to issue opinions on new players.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I don't think it's indicative of any alignment. I just think they prefer familiarity, so there is a good chance they are not reading as deeply into any of the newer players posts as they are into some of the regulars here. I find I have to put more effort into reading the newer players, because I don't know your styles, and y'all are foreign to me (with the exception of Dragon D. Luffy and TinyBubbles). So, if this is the case, I don't think it is good for several players to ignore the existance of half a dozen other players.Sloonei wrote:Do you think it's more likely they're scum just not sure what to say about us, or townies just not sure what to think about us?
Shoot dawg! I don't remember calling you a liar MP. I just said Epi may be on to something. I said I have SEEN people lie about RL before and ask me to do the same.MovingPictures07 wrote:What in the fucking world gives you reason to believe I'm lying about my RL and that no one else is?Elohcin wrote:Maybe the "new MP" is the kind of player that unreservedly defends his partners on day 1 instead of throwing them under the bus on day 1 like he used toJaggedJimmyJay wrote:
it's important i think that MP has ranked DDL as his #1 town read (more than once). he hasn't just defended DDL blankly with very vague comments like Bass and others did. he made a bold Day 1 assertion that the thread's Public Enemy #1 was his biggest town read. and those of you who criticized MP for raising the possibility of a WIFOM gambit re: G-Man, i ask this:
what does a mafia MP07 gain from taking this strong town stance on DDL throughout this phase? it's an important distinction -- vague or soft defenses are legitimately suspicious, but MP's hasn't been that at all. one might assert that he is protecting a mafia team mate, but then the theory immediately becomes more far-fetched (because two players are being called mafia together before either of them has flipped). if someone feels MP OR DDL is mafia, then that player must grant that a mafia MP would then be making every effort to prevent the lynch of a townie on Day 1. and that would be definitive WIFOM.
I have seen Epi catch people on timing issues/RL lies before. I have seen players lie to me about RL issues and lie to the thread about RL issues. IN BTSC in other games, I have been encouraged to lie about RL issues in order to make myself appear more civ. I do think that is wrong. Unlike Epi, I will bring up RL. I can't separate it so easily. I love my family, my kids, and I want to share them with whoever will care to listen. BUT, I will not lie about them or my RL issues in order to appear more civ. Okay...off my soap box. So I do think Epi could be on to something. And b/c of that, maybe I was onto something too with MP's cheerful attitude. Maybe he was very excited to be a baddie in his first game back on the syndicate
I WAS TALKING WITH MY FIANCE AND EATING. I DON'T LIVE ON THE SITE.
I am not fabricating anything about DDL. I don't fucking understand this.
I never lie about RL. EVER.
There was ONE time I made this big dramatic, emotional scene when people started eyeing me. It was SOOOO fun! I was laughing with my team BTS and it worked! I didn't get lynched. I don't remember if that was a game I won, but I think it was.Golden wrote:This is exactly how I read epi's line of questioning. I know MP has used emotional blackmail against people in the recent past.MovingPictures07 wrote:Third, and most importantly, Roger Rabbit I relied heavily on RL as a last resort defense against an onslaught of accusations, never prompted. Here, I responded to something you said, and you inquired why it took me 20 minutes to respond. I therefore asked your question, which inevitably relied on RL, to provide context. I'm not relying on RL aggressively as a defense. These are two completely different circumstances that I can't believe you don't recognize. Either you recognize it and you're trying to get me riled up or you don't recognize it and you're trying to get an easy lynch out of me, which every regular on this site knows could happen.
And, it's not getting any better this morning.
I feel I need to hold my vote for now, but Epi is certainly my preferred vote.
It's a tough call, probably some from column A and some from column B.Sloonei wrote:We're approaching that Final Hour thing and still only a few players have voted, and even fewer are actually here right now. Should we expect an increase in thread traffic in this time, or we nearing some "drive-by" voting as was warned about earlier? I feel this has been a fairly productive Day 1, but nowhere near enough for discussion to be wrapped up at this point. Anyone else have anything to throw out?
splints is one of a couple players i'd like to hear more from before i decide whether they're worth voting for at this point. I don't honestly remember the names of the others at the moment, I think Black Rock was one of them. And any of the people metalmarsh mentioned as not having mentioned any of us newbies.MovingPictures07 wrote:After mulling specifically over Golden, I'm more unsure what to think of him. I do think it's easy for him to defend me over Epi in the RL debate, but I think he'd do that regardless of alignment.
Honestly, as much as I still have Bass in the same position I did, I think I'd rather lynch someone who doesn't have any votes at the moment, namely splints.
Curious to hear your opinions more fleshed out when you have the time.Roxy wrote:I am torn betwixt TH and Metalspammer.
I have not previously spoken about the Spamming Newt so I will be laying a vote on TH. I did not like his vote or reasoning he later expressed.
I have zero time til. I am home
Seriously dude? So what if I voted for you? Would I stay green?MovingPictures07 wrote:And here comes Elo with a vote for Golden, despite the fact that her suspicion of ME increased.
Elo falls way down the list for me.
Did you even read my post?You and bass have votes.MovingPictures07 wrote:5 votes for Golden? What the sodding hell?
Yes, I read it, and it's precisely why I no longer think you're a civilian.Elohcin wrote:Seriously dude? So what if I voted for you? Would I stay green?MovingPictures07 wrote:And here comes Elo with a vote for Golden, despite the fact that her suspicion of ME increased.
Elo falls way down the list for me.
So you did! But to be fair, that is a generalization, and not broken down at all. But you have at least acknowleged them, and stated you will get there.fingersplints wrote:I mentioned them all in one go actually:Metalmarsh89 wrote:I don't think it's indicative of any alignment. I just think they prefer familiarity, so there is a good chance they are not reading as deeply into any of the newer players posts as they are into some of the regulars here. I find I have to put more effort into reading the newer players, because I don't know your styles, and y'all are foreign to me (with the exception of Dragon D. Luffy and TinyBubbles). So, if this is the case, I don't think it is good for several players to ignore the existance of half a dozen other players.Sloonei wrote:Do you think it's more likely they're scum just not sure what to say about us, or townies just not sure what to think about us?
This was just a little while ago. I haven't gotten a chance to reread them since then and likely won't be able to this day period.fingersplints wrote:The other thing that bothered me about MP was his line about TinyBubbles setting off "ALARM BELLS OF RAGE" for wanting to randomize despite that a lot has happened. Not that much has happened tbh. Some of these long posts are long for the sake of being long tbh
Why is it that crazy for a new person to want to randomize that it would make you rage? That bit seemed weird and forced
Linki - I gotta reread them one at a time. Those guys were mashing together for me a bit there. I don't do well with walls of text
I don't prefer familiarity. You know I am in a bunch of games with players I don't know atm
MovingPictures07 wrote:5 votes for Golden? What the sodding hell?
I don't understand.Epignosis wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:5 votes for Golden? What the sodding hell?
I am work doing stuff until 8pm. Real life.MovingPictures07 wrote:He didn't post it in thread. Terrible form.
Golden wrote:Keeler mafia. TH and I were indy teammates. Day 0 poll again, this time you got items you voted for. I noted Bullzeye had opted for key and epignosis for safe. I also found epi's thread content deliberately obtuse. I called them both out as bad on day one. Both were bad. I also called out Dom for getting emotional. I was wrong about Dom (his play style had changed significantly in three years to what I remembered).
Golden wrote:Epignosis. He reminds me of Keeler Epi, and that's the only person I can fit plum into a previous experience of them being bad.
It's somewhat contradictory, but I am also still somewhat suspicious of MP. I definitely think that conflict could be civ/bad one way or the other.
How is what I'm doing here similar to how I interacted with BF? Golden never says.Golden wrote:I actually think he could be bad, but I'm not going to vote for him after that. I think I'll likely vote for you, your attitude reminds me a lot of the way you took to Blindfaeth in keeler.
I am now chopping off Epi's head with a chainsaw. RINGINGINGING.Epignosis wrote:I am work doing stuff until 8pm. Real life.MovingPictures07 wrote:He didn't post it in thread. Terrible form.
Liar.MovingPictures07 wrote:I am now chopping off Epi's head with a chainsaw. RINGINGINGING.Epignosis wrote:I am work doing stuff until 8pm. Real life.MovingPictures07 wrote:He didn't post it in thread. Terrible form.
Real life. :P
What two alternate bandwagons? You mean me and Bass?Epignosis wrote:I voted for Golden.
He keeps mentioning Keeler, but doesn't elaborate on it. He keeps wanting to vote me but won't say why others should.
Golden wrote:Keeler mafia. TH and I were indy teammates. Day 0 poll again, this time you got items you voted for. I noted Bullzeye had opted for key and epignosis for safe. I also found epi's thread content deliberately obtuse. I called them both out as bad on day one. Both were bad. I also called out Dom for getting emotional. I was wrong about Dom (his play style had changed significantly in three years to what I remembered).Golden wrote:Epignosis. He reminds me of Keeler Epi, and that's the only person I can fit plum into a previous experience of them being bad.
It's somewhat contradictory, but I am also still somewhat suspicious of MP. I definitely think that conflict could be civ/bad one way or the other.How is what I'm doing here similar to how I interacted with BF? Golden never says.Golden wrote:I actually think he could be bad, but I'm not going to vote for him after that. I think I'll likely vote for you, your attitude reminds me a lot of the way you took to Blindfaeth in keeler.
And those two alternate bandwagons forming when they did looked fishy.
Epignosis wrote:I am AT work doing stuff until 8pm. Real life.MovingPictures07 wrote:He didn't post it in thread. Terrible form.
So I've mulled over my thoughts on you, by the way, and I just wanted to stress I profusely apologize for mixing up the NO U with you and BR. I can't believe I messed that up.fingersplints wrote:Wasn't golden warning about drive by voting earlier? :P