The Syndicate

Wilgy, did I miss why you voted for yourself?

I'm just gonna have to vote Scotty it seems since I've got nothing on Wilgy or Eloh

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here.

Can you elaborate?

Atm, I feel pretty good about eloh and epi. Definitely won't vote eloh. Blooper, Sorsha and svs feel pretty on the up and up to me.

Everyone else is kinda in the ?? Spot for me. I thought I was starting to see bad mo, but I don't feel comfy voting for Matt till he's had a chance.

sprityo wrote:I'm just gonna have to vote Scotty it seems since I've got nothing on Wilgy or Eloh

Do you have any other suspects?

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here.

Can you elaborate?

It is hard to explain; he just *feels* jabbier to me when he's bad, not unlike how I view LC when he's bad; he makes little one liner pokes at people for reasons I don't fathom. Which isn't to say *I* have to fathom everyone elses thoughts. But in LOST Again I read Scottys posts with my forehead scrinched up and one eyebrow almost in my hairline. In LOST Again, I could pretty much pull him out of a hat after a few posts. I am not seeing it as much here. He danced around it a bit more, IMO. Here he is pretty much sticking to his guns. He looks totally different to me than he looked in that game, and more like he does in the games I have seen him mislynched.

BUT God knows I could be wrong, though; see the last 2 lynches. My civ game always goes off the rails when I have to defend before I get a chance to settle in to the thread.

@Bea, yeah I kinda agree. But even if Llama were to allow votes for Matt (and in the past he has not cut replacements slack iirc) I would feel better letting him settle in. Replacing into a role taking suspish is not easy.

Which reminds me, I don't know about anyone else, but I thought Suspish-Gate in GOC was hilarious.

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here.

Can you elaborate?

It is hard to explain; he just *feels* jabbier to me when he's bad, not unlike how I view LC when he's bad; he makes little one liner pokes at people for reasons I don't fathom. Which isn't to say *I* have to fathom everyone elses thoughts. But in LOST Again I read Scottys posts with my forehead scrinched up and one eyebrow almost in my hairline. In LOST Again, I could pretty much pull him out of a hat after a few posts. I am not seeing it as much here. He danced around it a bit more, IMO. Here he is pretty much sticking to his guns. He looks totally different to me than he looked in that game, and more like he does in the games I have seen him mislynched.

BUT God knows I could be wrong, though; see the last 2 lynches. My civ game always goes off the rails when I have to defend before I get a chance to settle in to the thread.

@Bea, yeah I kinda agree. But even if Llama were to allow votes for Matt (and in the past he has not cut replacements slack iirc) I would feel better letting him settle in. Replacing into a role taking suspish is not easy.

Which reminds me, I don't know about anyone else, but I thought Suspish-Gate in GOC was hilarious.

And see, I thought his response to Eloh was snippy and dismissive. That's something I don't associate with a civilian Scotty.

Hmmm... I feel like moving my vote off wilgy over to Scotty. I think Scotty did respond strangly to eloh and my vote on wilgy didn't get a response out of him that i expected from bad wilgy. He's coming off as just uninterested imo.

I was thinking more in term of his suspicions and original unprovoked thoughts than his responses. I have a high tolerance for people making pissy responses since I can be Queen Piss of Pissy Mountain myself. I am not, and never have been, one to judge people for that kind of thing.

Linki, ha ha, and I am going to vote for Wilgy. I think HE has been acting off, and I think if he were a civ he would have actled LESS disinterested, not more.

Also did not love Sprits voting cause I'm voting vote.

This kinda reminds me of wilgy from world reborn... Just not really into the game. I thought putting some heat on him would make him show his baddie side if it's there but it just looks like he's bored. Wilgy, are you bored?

I was thinking of Wilgy from Recruitment, my benchmark for good Wilgy. In light of the last few pages of thread, I am also not sure why he voted for Eloh.

Scotty won't vote to save himself?

I'll just leave it. See if anyone pulls any last minute hijinx. Looks like quite a few no shoes again

Ok two is not quite a few. Bea and LC are the only two missing.

At worst Scotty can tie it.

Scotty is not in the house. I hope you guys are right. He looks very different to me than he did in LOST Again, but that is my only basis for comparison.

Beeeeea... Why u no vote?

LC must have been scrooched

Just got to work running late. Making an unsure trust vote for Scotty if you guys think it's best.

Gah!! I thought had more time! sorry. I will be back after hell friday.

bea wrote:Just got to work running late. Making an unsure trust vote for Scotty if you guys think it's best.

I don't think you will be.

bea wrote:Just got to work running late. Making an unsure trust vote for Scotty if you guys think it's best.

Mmm hmm.

no one died. time to reread the roles.

Elohcin wrote:no one died. time to reread the roles.

You do just that and then tell us what you find.

Does this mean the narrator directs the lynch vote without the person knowing? Like, he PMs Llama and says, "Hey, I know Eloh voted Scotty, but I really want it to be that her vote goes on Wilgy"?

"Narrator - Can direct either a lynch vote, or a night action of another player."

Are you being mean, Epi

Elohcin wrote:Are you being mean, Epi

Not at all.

S~V~S wrote:Scotty is not in the house. I hope you guys are right. He looks very different to me than he did in LOST Again, but that is my only basis for comparison.

SCUUUUUUMMMMM!!!!! SVS IS SCUUUUUUUUUMMMM!!!!

Also I was triple teamed by three lovely women yesterday *blushes*

Well that happened.

That was a weird lynch. Ideally I would have voted for to save myself in the wake of another weak round of voting for me, but I wasn't around since intermission of my show last night to defend against those stragglers.

sprityo wrote:Oh, hur dur I can't read.

Okay, I can just believe people vote fornscotty just for being Scotty

sprityo wrote:my conclusion, scotty is the mafia and congratulating himself on killing low posters since he knows it will benefit the game as whole, it's just after like the 2nd or 3rd time he said it is when i really noticed. someone said somewhere in Arkham i think it was "mafia love to talk about themselves" or something akin to that. maybe it was "power roles" v instead of "mafia." idk, maybe you can correct me scotty, but why is wilgy suspicious to you. Wilgy has like, nothing of product except maybe a few comments?

Your tune changed mighty fast. You were suspicious of me as of day 2 followed by 'well he's probably just Scotty being Scotty' and immediately 'he's scum! Let's hang im!' Hmmmph.

Why the hell would I congratulate myself? Yes, I believe in lynching no-posters because imo it benefits town if the Mafia starts killing the vocal ones early on, leaving ghosts to talk. Mafia killing no-posters helps town even more, and if I were Mafia, I would be completely against killing off no-posters. Strategically that's a ridiculous, albeit kind, strategy for Mafia.

"Mafia love to talk about themselves" ok. I don't remember anyone saying that, but that's a very generalized statement that doesn't apply to everyone. I've known many a Mafia just keep to themselves and cruise on through the whole game. I just love to talk. It's what I do, and I usually die because of it.

Why is Wilgy suspicious to me? You just re-said exactly why Wilgy was suspicious to me: "nothing of product". And he has still brushed off my suspicion of him.


Sprityo, I don't think you are good, and had I not had majority I would have voted you based solely on this comment. It tells me you didn't read my previous posts and are reaching for the moon.

S~V~S wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Of the people with votes, I think Scotty DOES have a baddie game. I am not sure I am seeing it here.

Can you elaborate?

It is hard to explain; he just *feels* jabbier to me when he's bad, not unlike how I view LC when he's bad; he makes little one liner pokes at people for reasons I don't fathom. Which isn't to say *I* have to fathom everyone elses thoughts. But in LOST Again I read Scottys posts with my forehead scrinched up and one eyebrow almost in my hairline. In LOST Again, I could pretty much pull him out of a hat after a few posts. I am not seeing it as much here. He danced around it a bit more, IMO. Here he is pretty much sticking to his guns. He looks totally different to me than he looked in that game, and more like he does in the games I have seen him mislynched.

BUT God knows I could be wrong, though; see the last 2 lynches. My civ game always goes off the rails when I have to defend before I get a chance to settle in to the thread.

@Bea, yeah I kinda agree. But even if Llama were to allow votes for Matt (and in the past he has not cut replacements slack iirc) I would feel better letting him settle in. Replacing into a role taking suspish is not easy.

Which reminds me, I don't know about anyone else, but I thought Suspish-Gate in GOC was hilarious.

I appreciate you breaking down my baddie game dynamics. I legit wouldn't know since I've only ever been Mafia twice, but I'm sure next time I'm Mafia I'll mix it up. I am not Mafia this game, but love that my "baddie game" meta is being referenced as a reasoning to vote and not vote for me.

Scotty wrote:Well that happened.

bea wrote:Just got to work running late. Making an unsure trust vote for Scotty if you guys think it's best.

What makes you trust the thread more than just your reads? This reads pretty weak, IMO. I thought you had some good observations going before you came in.

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Scotty is not in the house. I hope you guys are right. He looks very different to me than he did in LOST Again, but that is my only basis for comparison.

SCUUUUUUMMMMM!!!!! SVS IS SCUUUUUUUUUMMMM!!!!

Also I was triple teamed by three lovely women yesterday *blushes*

Why? Why is that particular post so damning for SVS? A friend wants to know.

Scotty wrote:

DrWilgy wrote:

S~V~S wrote:Scotty is not in the house. I hope you guys are right. He looks very different to me than he did in LOST Again, but that is my only basis for comparison.

SCUUUUUUMMMMM!!!!! SVS IS SCUUUUUUUUUMMMM!!!!

Also I was triple teamed by three lovely women yesterday *blushes*

Why? Why is that particular post so damning for SVS? A friend wants to know.

Cuz she's a silly goose!

Nell

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Oh I like this game!

Bell

It is a swell game, if I must tell

Sloonei wrote:It is a swell game, if I must tell

Oh hell, what's the smell?

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

Scotty wrote:

Sloonei wrote:It is a swell game, if I must tell

Oh hell, what's the smell?

And Matt is the reason thw game fell...

Matt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

I guess we can lynch you and find out.

DrWilgy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Sloonei wrote:It is a swell game, if I must tell

Oh hell, what's the smell?

And Matt is the reason thw game fell...

Hi Dr Wilgy!

DrWilgy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Sloonei wrote:It is a swell game, if I must tell

Oh hell, what's the smell?

And Matt is the reason thw game fell...

Matt dropped the ball like the Bernie voters in Massachusettes dropped the ball showing up to the polls.

Scotty wrote:

Matt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

I guess we can lynch you and find out.

Or we can lynch you on a 50% chance of you being bad. With little to no consequence if you aren't.

...OR!!! We could lynch SVS

Hi Matt!!!! We are one the same team. I feel it in my fibia.

Scotty wrote:

Matt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

I guess we can lynch you and find out.

That was defensive. I wasn't saying you definitely were Fearless Leader, just don't know why da Sloon jumped to Nell.

Linki - Wilgy, agree on everything you've said. Everything.

Yo Llama mama - You should do that thing in the first post where every player name links to their ISO.

Totes.

DrWilgy wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Matt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

I guess we can lynch you and find out.

Or we can lynch you on a 50% chance of you being bad. With little to no consequence if you aren't.

...OR!!! We could lynch SVS

Hi Matt!!!! We are one the same team. I feel it in my fibia.

The consequence is another day gone without catching a baddie if you are wrong.

Matt wrote:

Scotty wrote:

Matt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:Nell

Why can't he be Fearless Leader?

Unless you think MP was Fearless Leader

I guess we can lynch you and find out.

That was defensive. I wasn't saying you definitely were Fearless Leader, just don't know why da Sloon jumped to Nell.

Linki - Wilgy, agree on everything you've said. Everything.

I mean, it's no secret I've wanted your doppelgänger lynched.