Re: Arkham Mafia [Day 10]
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:56 pm
DH was also a pretty unanimous baddie read back on GTH day 6.
I'm the only person you labelled outright indy as opposed to a civ friendly indy, which implies you don't think I'm civ-friendly and have gone 10 full days without saying so.Matt wrote:Questions...Bullzeye wrote:Also there's one minute between her referring to LoRab as male and then apologising if she used the wrong pronoun.Golden wrote:S~V~S wrote:Bizarrely enough, I do.Enrique wrote:Does anyone think DH is good at all?
Linki @ Golden, once again, I am talking about her posts in this game. Not every game. Someone corrected her out of the thread about Lorabs gender, imo.![]()
I think you underestimate bubbles wildly if you think she is silly enough to have the gender corrected in btsc and then come in and post about it.
1) What did you mean when you said "This should be interesting" in response to my G2H'ing you Town/indy?
2) Can you please post your reads even if most are civ?
Yes, Matt. We already established that many times over, as per Dom pointing out rule 12 at the start of day 10.Matt wrote:WHOA
Light bulb.
Enrique/Bullzeye's back and forth on the low posters...
Since we established that the hosts let DF send in the kills while Floyd was alive (presumably), we can also assume that the hosts would also allow Falcone to send in the kills even if their theoretical no show partner was alive, as well, right?
Lol. Okey dokey, well consider me caught up then.Golden wrote:Yes, Matt. We already established that many times over, as per Dom pointing out rule 12 at the start of day 10.Matt wrote:WHOA
Light bulb.
Enrique/Bullzeye's back and forth on the low posters...
Since we established that the hosts let DF send in the kills while Floyd was alive (presumably), we can also assume that the hosts would also allow Falcone to send in the kills even if their theoretical no show partner was alive, as well, right?
Matt wrote:Lol. Okey dokey, well consider me caught up then.Golden wrote:Yes, Matt. We already established that many times over, as per Dom pointing out rule 12 at the start of day 10.Matt wrote:WHOA
Light bulb.
Enrique/Bullzeye's back and forth on the low posters...
Since we established that the hosts let DF send in the kills while Floyd was alive (presumably), we can also assume that the hosts would also allow Falcone to send in the kills even if their theoretical no show partner was alive, as well, right?
I don't really know what to say in response to this other than I wasn't putting on a display. I hate people going on about me "overreacting" to everything and it genuinely makes me want to just walk out for good if that's all people think of me.Matt wrote:Relax Bullz, lol, I labeled you as "Town/indy". And I didn't label you civ friendly because something in the back of my mind is hounding me, saying "Would Bullz put up that display of 'oh poor me' if he were bad?" and I keep coming back to "yes, yes he would" haha.
Um okay Bullz. You react weird to being called "town/indy", I'll tell you that.Bullzeye wrote:I don't really know what to say in response to this other than I wasn't putting on a display. I hate people going on about me "overreacting" to everything and it genuinely makes me want to just walk out for good if that's all people think of me.Matt wrote:Relax Bullz, lol, I labeled you as "Town/indy". And I didn't label you civ friendly because something in the back of my mind is hounding me, saying "Would Bullz put up that display of 'oh poor me' if he were bad?" and I keep coming back to "yes, yes he would" haha.
If you want some pure WIFOM, if I were bad I'd have just bitched about it in btsc and not had to say anything in the thread. Anyone who's ever had btsc with me knows how much I love a good bitching session.
That's not a reaction to being called town/indy, that's a reaction to your comment about would I act the way I did if I were bad. I should think it was obvious.Matt wrote:Um okay Bullz. You react weird to being called "town/indy", I'll tell you that.Bullzeye wrote:I don't really know what to say in response to this other than I wasn't putting on a display. I hate people going on about me "overreacting" to everything and it genuinely makes me want to just walk out for good if that's all people think of me.Matt wrote:Relax Bullz, lol, I labeled you as "Town/indy". And I didn't label you civ friendly because something in the back of my mind is hounding me, saying "Would Bullz put up that display of 'oh poor me' if he were bad?" and I keep coming back to "yes, yes he would" haha.
If you want some pure WIFOM, if I were bad I'd have just bitched about it in btsc and not had to say anything in the thread. Anyone who's ever had btsc with me knows how much I love a good bitching session.
Who is your top suss today? DH?
Convince me DH is Scarecrow. I already think he's probably an inmate. What makes him one of your top candidates?Enrique wrote:Voting DharmaHelper because I really got more important shit to do and I wanna get this out of the way ASAP. He is one of my top Scarecrow candidates, has a vote already, and only SVS has a civvie read on him. Good enough for me.
How do you know he didn't target you and he was blocked or you were protected?S~V~S wrote:I don't have a civ read onhim, I don't think he is Scarecrow. When DH thinks I am bad, and he thought so for some portion of the game, he targets me. I am untargeted by Scarecrow. I don't think he is Scarecrow.
Process of elimination pretty much. Could also see it being Typh but I don't really have time to overthink this atm.Bullzeye wrote:Convince me DH is Scarecrow. I already think he's probably an inmate. What makes him one of your top candidates?Enrique wrote:Voting DharmaHelper because I really got more important shit to do and I wanna get this out of the way ASAP. He is one of my top Scarecrow candidates, has a vote already, and only SVS has a civvie read on him. Good enough for me.
Why?Golden wrote:Lets vote Dom?
Where's Dom been? Don't tell me he's been silenced today.Golden wrote:Lets vote Dom?
NopeMatt wrote:Where's Dom been? Don't tell me he's been silenced today.Golden wrote:Lets vote Dom?
Dom has posted today. He asked me who was bad and I told him he was.Matt wrote:Where's Dom been? Don't tell me he's been silenced today.Golden wrote:Lets vote Dom?
I don't see how the alignment of the blockers influences whether or not they blocked DH and/or Scarecrow.S~V~S wrote: Linki, well, I think there are only baddie blockers, but secrets, true. I guess it is possible. But I honestly think he would have targeted me Night One.
I think DH would have just as easily targetted me night one. I feel like he is one of the more likely candidates in that regard.S~V~S wrote:Good point. I never think of bad blockers blocking bad people
But totally based on my knowledge of DH, I don't think he would have targeted Golden night one, I thinkit would have been me or maybe Typh. Based on history.
Well, how do you feel about a Dom lynch?DharmaHelper wrote:Guess I'm voting for whoever has the better chance of beating me in a lynch lol
Matt thought I was Maroni and he was wrong. Wouldn't it be pants-shittingly fantastic if Dom was Scarecrow.Golden wrote:Well, how do you feel about a Dom lynch?DharmaHelper wrote:Guess I'm voting for whoever has the better chance of beating me in a lynch lol
And Matt, how do you feel about a Dom lynch?
It would be pretty hilarious.DharmaHelper wrote:Matt thought I was Maroni and he was wrong. Wouldn't it be pants-shittingly fantastic if Dom was Scarecrow.Golden wrote:Well, how do you feel about a Dom lynch?DharmaHelper wrote:Guess I'm voting for whoever has the better chance of beating me in a lynch lol
And Matt, how do you feel about a Dom lynch?
But she hasn't been arrested/lynched in the Sockface game.S~V~S wrote:Looking at the Bubbles voters from last time, I would guess it is Juliets
Her & I both have a talent for sockpuppet crossposting
Please don't vote for me. I said please.Golden wrote:I hate it when people sound so sure, like SVS. Makes me think their case is a cover for info, and so makes me paranoid, and wonder if I am just being too stubborn and not listening.
I think the case on Bubbles is poor. But SVS being so certain and writing it in capitals makes me think I could be wrong.
I don't have info. I did not make a crappy case. I just really really believe it just like I really don't believe it about DH being Scarecrow.Golden wrote:I hate it when people sound so sure, like SVS. Makes me think their case is a cover for info, and so makes me paranoid, and wonder if I am just being too stubborn and not listening.
I think the case on Bubbles is poor. But SVS being so certain and writing it in capitals makes me think I could be wrong.
I do. You and I are alike that way.S~V~S wrote:Sometimes I just really believe things to be true in my gut that I can't prove. You know this to be true.