The Syndicate

Canucklehead wrote:Whoooooa nelly! I go for a nice (liquid) dinner with my manfriend and I come back to people throwing shade at me?! How did this happen??

Not cool.

Linki bajilon


Also. Phone posting is really sed when wearing gloves an drubk

Golden wrote:Hvnt drppd sspcn f mp. Wntd 2 vt 4 prsn wth mr trctn. Smd lk rbbt whn gldn vtd. Wd hv hld vt & vtd mp nw hd gldn known ntrnt wld b k & knwn mp nt rbbt wld gt vts.

Long Con wrote:Voting from work bathroom, I don't agree with people who think rabbit is being genuine. I think he's being overly dramatic in his posts in order to sway people. Also I trust MM, don't understand the votes for him.

Be back soon.

Golden wrote:Br gldn thks mp = rbbt. Wld hv vtd whchvr hd mr vts.

Long Con wrote:Voting from work bathroom, I don't agree with people who think rabbit is being genuine. I think he's being overly dramatic in his posts in order to sway people. Also I trust MM, don't understand the votes for him.

Be back soon.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I'm voting Canuck because her post really didn't read genuine to me.

MovingPictures07 wrote:FUCK. This sucks. I really hate this. Why do I have to die so early again, and as a civilian? This is so BS.

Black Rock wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:FUCK. This sucks. I really hate this. Why do I have to die so early again, and as a civilian? This is so BS.

I'm sorry if you are indeed civ. Sounds like you are.

Linki: I always vote first.

Zomberella12 wrote:

Long Con wrote:Voting from work bathroom, I don't agree with people who think rabbit is being genuine. I think he's being overly dramatic in his posts in order to sway people. Also I trust MM, don't understand the votes for him.

Be back soon.

Will you never learn? NO bathroom mafia. Also - vote Rabbit.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I need to catch up but I hate reading MP's long posts almost as much as I hate looking at pictures of hitler.

Sophie wrote:Im votin mp, no time to ellaborate rn, but imo theres still smthing fishy there

juliets wrote:I have been trying to decide between canuck, bea, MM, MP or possibly rabbit. I want to wait on making a decision on rabbit until Golden can talk normally. MM could very well be bad but I'm not quite ready to narrow him down to Dr. Doom. bea I'd like to wait until i have formed an opinion of rabbit. Canuck I want to see a little more from before I vote for her.

MP has had a lot to say though less than in previous games. What really pinged me today was when he caught up he imo threatened anyone who voted as Golden advised. Is that what a civ would do? I don't think so. I also liked the points that BF brought up in his analysis. It is time to vote, I am going with MP.

Black Rock wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:FUCK. This sucks. I really hate this. Why do I have to die so early again, and as a civilian? This is so BS.

I'm sorry if you are indeed civ. Sounds like you are.

Linki: I always vote first.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

What do you want me to say, guys?

- I get suspected if I talk a lot (especially when it is deemed to not have "enough content" even though I typically have thoughts about players more than most anyone else at any given time)
- I get suspected if I don't talk enough (a ridiculously high bar I've raised too high for myself to ever be anything other than top poster or top few posters)
- I get suspected if I throw out a lot of suspects
- I get suspected if I don't throw out many suspects
- I get suspected if I ask other players what their thoughts are
- I get suspected if people feel like I am not taking their thoughts into account
- I get suspected if I play and defend myself aggressively
- I get suspected if I play and defend myself passively
- I get suspected if I agree with other players too much
- I get suspected if I don't agree with other players enough, and people don't agree with my logic or what I say or my suspects
- I get suspected if people think I'm explaining or overclarifying my thoughts too much because people misunderstand me
- I get suspected if people think I'm not explaining my thoughts enough because people misunderstand me
- I get suspected if I actually ever vote a baddie because of my reputation for throwing teammates under the bus
- I get suspected if I vote civilians consistently because surely with such a track record then I must be bad

These are all reasons I've been suspected consistently the past year in games, with some popping up more often than others. I'm sure there are even reasons I failed to list. I have not gone one game in the past year (and probably the past two) without getting serious suspicion. I am NOT exaggerating.

If any game cements in my mind that I should develop a new less talkative or less helpful playstyle, it's this game. Sad but true. Anyone who posts a lot inevitably attracts suspicion, and I recognize that and always have, but it's insane to think about the last year's worth of games and how much suspicion I come under every time, and usually right off the bat. I know it's a mafia game and that plenty of others attract suspicion as well, but it truly boggles my mind when I think about the fact that every game I essentially have a 100% chance of attracting attention to myself, and not just a vote or two, but serious cases and sometimes for days and days from many players, if I'm even lucky enough to last that long.

The only reason people have even been so lucky nabbing me as bad in the past (with a few exceptions where someone actually caught me doing something suspicious, usually Daisy, Epig, or BWT; don't get me wrong, I'll acknowledge those) is because I had such a long string of games where I was bad over and over and over again, and so people started picking up behaviors that I do and thereafter began thinking that they are an indication of my baddie game (like talking a lot and "not saying much", overexplaining my own viewpoints when people misinterpret them, etc.), but they're really just aspects of my personality that don't go away regardless of alignment. I would think that since I have played with so many of you so many times that at least some people would recognize this by now, but I suppose that's naive and unfair of me to expect in a game so characterized by complexities of circumstance, emotion, rationality, and deception.

That said, to be suspected so heavily so often is just disappointing. I'm not asking for sympathy, nor am I even mad or trying to whine with this or anything; it just is what it is. The only emotion I am only expressing disappointment.

And I want people to finally recognize the incredible standards that I always get held up to, and the inconsistencies I get suspected with. Some of it, hell even most of it probably, may be my own fault.

But even if it is, if I'm going to get continuously eyeballed game after game by practically everyone, and lynched on D1 or D2 about half the time I play anymore, then maybe it's about time I finally forced myself to play the game differently. Not just because it is disheartening, but also because whichever team (civilians or baddies) is depending on me loses an asset just because I never can seem to play a game anymore without attracting too much suspicion.

Well, good luck, civilians. Truly sorry I couldn't be of any more help than what little I did manage to accomplish with my role. I just have not been able to find much certainty in suspecting anyone this game quite yet. Pay close attention to how people handled the suspicion against me and I only hope that will help too.

Thanks for hosting, Mongoose.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm SUPER suspicious of Sophie, Canuck, and juliets's votes on me. All opportunistic.

I at least get BF and rabbit's votes, since they've explained their suspicion of me.

I bet at least one of Sophie, Canuck, and juliets is bad, if not two or all three of them even. They all voted me so opportunistically it's not even funny.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I think I'm actually going to vote for someone who's bandwagoning onto Golden's thoughts because I think that's the easiest way for a real teammate of Aces to hide today. Especially if that person has other reasons for me to be suspicious of them as an Aces teammate possibility.

Going to try my thread re-read now.

juliets wrote:This is the threat i was talking about. You're going to vote for anyone who "bandwagons" onto Goldens thoughts. So if we agree with Golden's suspects, any of them, and vote for them you will vote for us. Or do you mean you'll vote for the person who makes it a bandwagon...not only is it a threat it doesn't even really make sense. A senseless threat. And no, regardless of what you think I am not bad.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I think I'm actually going to vote for someone who's bandwagoning onto Golden's thoughts because I think that's the easiest way for a real teammate of Aces to hide today. Especially if that person has other reasons for me to be suspicious of them as an Aces teammate possibility.

Going to try my thread re-read now.

Canucklehead wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:Whoooooa nelly! I go for a nice (liquid) dinner with my manfriend and I come back to people throwing shade at me?! How did this happen??

Not cool.

Linki bajilon


Also. Phone posting is really sed when wearing gloves an drubk