The Syndicate

Hey rabbit, I heard your "bank" might need a bailout.

With the recent trend (excluding bea), I think it would be more effective if we were to place our suspicion on those suspecting people. Of course, this makes me guilty, but I think some people are pulling our stings.

We're doing a bang up job routing the evil, aren't we?

I think we need to rethink our approach. I know I do. Droop was on my list, and that was not correct. Going to watch Chef Ramsay yell at n00bs in the kitchen, and I'll think it over.

I think Kate in particular has been as I said, very agressive in terms of getting people to suspect who she thinks they should suspect :P

Hi everyone - I know some of you from other forums and then there are others that I'm not familiar with but look forward to playing with. Please give me a little bit of time to catch-up. Are there lynch records somewhere or should I create them as i read? Also, anything else i should know as I start this? Anything you're looking for an opinion from people on right now that I can keep in mind as I read?

I think i can be completely caught up by tomorrow though it looks like a daunting task. Thanks for any help you can give me!

juliets wrote:Hi everyone - I know some of you from other forums and then there are others that I'm not familiar with but look forward to playing with. Please give me a little bit of time to catch-up. Are there lynch records somewhere or should I create them as i read? Also, anything else i should know as I start this? Anything you're looking for an opinion from people on right now that I can keep in mind as I read?

I think i can be completely caught up by tomorrow though it looks like a daunting task. Thanks for any help you can give me!

Hello juliets, I don't think we've met. Glad you're playing though.

Chaindeath extends his hand in warm welcome to our new friend juliets. So that she is aware chaindeath has taken a liking to talking in the third person.

RIP poor droopy, or pieces as it were, what with all the intestine pulling strangling kicking going on. This is chaindeath's take on things, everyone needs to be a little bit more cautious as we have lost some of our civi allies and this game is teaming with teams that are out for blood.

Welcome JC.

Vompatti wrote:This certainly sheds a new light on things!

Yes it does. We should have lynched you~

S~V~S wrote:

Vompatti wrote:This certainly sheds a new light on things!

Yes it does. We should have lynched you~

I thought I was supposed to be his teammate?

I never said that

Also, I was kidding, I know who juliets is.

juliets wrote:Hi everyone - I know some of you from other forums and then there are others that I'm not familiar with but look forward to playing with. Please give me a little bit of time to catch-up. Are there lynch records somewhere or should I create them as i read? Also, anything else i should know as I start this? Anything you're looking for an opinion from people on right now that I can keep in mind as I read?

I think i can be completely caught up by tomorrow though it looks like a daunting task. Thanks for any help you can give me!

IIRC somebody will have posted the voting from each lynch shortly after the hostposts

Like I said, I am not looking and FH and The Truth, for their statements leading up to the lynch.

Do you mean "now looking at" ?

DharmaHelper wrote:Do you mean "now looking at" ?

Yeah. I mean "now looking at". Sorry, I have my table light off and I can't see the keys well right now.

I am now looking at FH and The Truth.

juliets wrote:Hi everyone - I know some of you from other forums and then there are others that I'm not familiar with but look forward to playing with. Please give me a little bit of time to catch-up. Are there lynch records somewhere or should I create them as i read? Also, anything else i should know as I start this? Anything you're looking for an opinion from people on right now that I can keep in mind as I read?

I think i can be completely caught up by tomorrow though it looks like a daunting task. Thanks for any help you can give me!

JC <3

And Welcome JC!

DharmaHelper wrote:I think Kate in particular has been as I said, very agressive in terms of getting people to suspect who she thinks they should suspect :P

Irony.

RIPIWG Droopy, I still think that he could be bad, but that's just a theory.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Day 3: 'Cause In This Lifetime... You've Got My Droopy Gets Me Blues

Yet another victim's fate had been decided by the masses, the whole ordeal smelling similarly to Leech's implosion. "Droopy! Droopy!", the mob chanted with angry eyes and violent accusations, as they advanced on poor Mr. Droopy Cash. He argued with them his absolute hardest but it didn't seem to matter. He panicked. "Rabbit8, I'm voting for rabbit8!" The players were unconvinced.

insertnamehere went straight up to Mr. Droopy Cash with a butcher knife and cut deep into his skin. Droopy let out a piercing scream and promptly bled to death. insertnamehere consequently took out Droopy's large intestine and wrapped it around Droopy's neck and began choking him. Droopy's body fell to the ground. Everyone (well, everyone who was closest in the mob circle and who could reach Droopy's mangled corpse anyway) gave it a few kicks.

Unfortunately for them, the body never shapeshifted to the evil they were all expecting. The Truth inquired, "....Is it just me or does Droopy strongly reek of rotten fish heads?"


Mr. Droopy Cash has been lynched. He was Captain Beefheart.

It is now Night 3. You have 24 hours to send in your night PMs and finish the ultimate challenge on a high note!

What am I, Mola Ram?

Oh, and welcome JC!

DharmaHelper wrote:Aw man go figure. It's almost like I was all "Hold up guys I don't think voting for Droopy is a good idea" and then you know, it wasn't.

Agreed. I know you're not a civvie. RIP Droopy.

Welcome Juliets.

DharmaHelper wrote:Hey rabbit, I heard your "bank" might need a bailout.

Agreed. I know you're not a civvie. RIP Droopy.

Welcome Juliets.

OK..........

DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.

DH, Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

DharmaHelper wrote:As for INH:


His eagerness to complete the first challenge bugged me, as I've said a million times. What more can I say that I haven't already? Rabbit defended INH's actions and poked at Epig for something less suspect IMO, which pinged me again, and since then INH's posts have been very non-participatory for the most part, mostly joking around etc etc, and his vote for bea was odd as well. Uhh, how? And I'm not exactly sure how my posts are non-participatory at all.

He mentions Epig and axxon's early vote as freaking him out, then jumps on the bea vote with one post saying that bea is his "strongest suspicion" but not giving specifics. Since then it's been mostly the jokey aloof posts I mentioned.

The Bea case came up fairly late in the day, and it made more sense to me. Also, what do you want me to do, restate the obvious reasons that everyone was talking about at the time. Shame on me for trying to keep things light.

Lol INH :P

rabbit8 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Aw man go figure. It's almost like I was all "Hold up guys I don't think voting for Droopy is a good idea" and then you know, it wasn't.

Agreed. I know you're not a civvie. RIP Droopy.

Welcome Juliets.

You don't know jack then :P

DharmaHelper wrote:Lol INH :P

Wow, what a jokey aloof post.

insertnamehere wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

Dunno, as I said I'm not quite willing to buy into the impending Droopwagon, probably exclusively because you seem so determined to get people on board.

DH, Maybe I'm just put off by how incredibly agressive you've been all game, but I am hesitant to trust anything you say as genuine in nature. You seem to be very strong arm-ish, which I usually associate with baddies.

insertnamehere wrote:RIPIWG Droopy, I still think that he could be bad, but that's just a theory.

Please share this theory. Theories are good.

I think he just doesn't much care for Trout Mast Replica

Mask damnit

reywaS wrote:

insertnamehere wrote:RIPIWG Droopy, I still think that he could be bad, but that's just a theory.

Please share this theory. Theories are good.

He could have a role that shows up as good when checked/voted out.

triceratopzeuhl wrote:I think he just doesn't much care for Trout Mast Replica

Tsk tsk tsk.

That's sad, I like Beefheart. Now I feel bad.

Aww maaaaaaaaaan. I love Captain Beefheart, so it makes me sad to know that Droopy was him. RIP Droopy.

I suspect I am going to have to look elsewhere for upcoming lynches. Also, since I will be out most of tomorrow with the gf and her family, I think our Sockian host should go ahead and award me one of the 3 participation prizes. Just sayin'.

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Aww maaaaaaaaaan. I love Captain Beefheart, so it makes me sad to know that Droopy was him. RIP Droopy.

I suspect I am going to have to look elsewhere for upcoming lynches. Also, since I will be out most of tomorrow with the gf and her family, I think our Sockian host should go ahead and award me one of the 3 participation prizes. Just sayin'.

"elsewhere" as in "not the guy we already killed" ? Good idea

I'm just gonna be voting vompatti again, unless he NKs me first

triceratopzeuhl wrote:

birdwithteeth11 wrote:Aww maaaaaaaaaan. I love Captain Beefheart, so it makes me sad to know that Droopy was him. RIP Droopy.

I suspect I am going to have to look elsewhere for upcoming lynches. Also, since I will be out most of tomorrow with the gf and her family, I think our Sockian host should go ahead and award me one of the 3 participation prizes. Just sayin'.

"elsewhere" as in "not the guy we already killed" ? Good idea

I'm just gonna be voting vompatti again, unless he NKs me first

I. Lol'd!

AceofSpaces wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Do you mean "now looking at" ?

Yeah. I mean "now looking at". Sorry, I have my table light off and I can't see the keys well right now.

I am now looking at FH and The Truth.

So as you say, you are looking at me because I was wishy-washy on Mr. Droopy.

And to that I say, that is how I play! As I showed yesterday, I often talk myself in large circles as a civvie. And as someone who has played many games with me before, I'm surprised you've either a) not called me out on it before or b) don't remember that is something I do all the time when I play.

If I was just jumping on the Mr. Droopy bandwagon and being wishy-washy, maybe I could see you being pinged by me--but I took the time to analyze votes, build a case from thread evidence, and listen to his responses before making a decision.

I forgot to add, welcome Juliet! And goodbye benthayer.

DharmaHelper wrote:

rabbit8 wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:Aw man go figure. It's almost like I was all "Hold up guys I don't think voting for Droopy is a good idea" and then you know, it wasn't.

Agreed. I know you're not a civvie. RIP Droopy.

Welcome Juliets.

You don't know jack then :P

Never met the man.

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:With the recent trend (excluding bea), I think it would be more effective if we were to place our suspicion on those suspecting people. Of course, this makes me guilty, but I think some people are pulling our stings.

In all fairness, Droopy really did sound coached. I know that there is civ BTS in this game, and that Cap'n Beefheart is one of the roles with potential for it. I guess it is possible that Zappa found him already. Although the coached sounding things Droopy was saying were baddie sounding things, lol, things I don't see a civvie partner couching him to say.

I will say that with more experience under his belt, Droopy will be an awesome player (Leech as well), he had me wondering at the end; I hope he keeps playing. Sometimes if you are convinced someone is bad (and I was convinced he was bad, and since there was no question he would be lynched, I voted for the other person i am pretty convinced was bad, Vomp) it can be easy to read everything they say in that light. It is a common mistake, and i don;t really suspect anyone for doing it in this case.

Unless there is an outing or some astonishing development, I intend on voting for Vomp. When I reread Day One (something I would advise doing) I realized i had forgotten how suspicious Vomp really was during Day One. And the fact that there was this incredibly suspicious character that seemed to be everyones second choice for a lynch floating around when Bea needed saving, and that the Residents did not try to lynch him, but Rabbit instead who is not an easy person to lynch, really makes me think he is quite possibly a Resident himself.

S~V~S wrote:

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:With the recent trend (excluding bea), I think it would be more effective if we were to place our suspicion on those suspecting people. Of course, this makes me guilty, but I think some people are pulling our stings.

In all fairness, Droopy really did sound coached. I know that there is civ BTS in this game, and that Cap'n Beefheart is one of the roles with potential for it. I guess it is possible that Zappa found him already. Although the coached sounding things Droopy was saying were baddie sounding things, lol, things I don't see a civvie partner couching him to say.

I will say that with more experience under his belt, Droopy will be an awesome player (Leech as well), he had me wondering at the end; I hope he keeps playing. Sometimes if you are convinced someone is bad (and I was convinced he was bad, and since there was no question he would be lynched, I voted for the other person i am pretty convinced was bad, Vomp) it can be easy to read everything they say in that light. It is a common mistake, and i don;t really suspect anyone for doing it in this case.

Unless there is an outing or some astonishing development, I intend on voting for Vomp. When I reread Day One (something I would advise doing) I realized i had forgotten how suspicious Vomp really was during Day One. And the fact that there was this incredibly suspicious character that seemed to be everyones second choice for a lynch floating around when Bea needed saving, and that the Residents did not try to lynch him, but Rabbit instead who is not an easy person to lynch, really makes me think he is quite possibly a Resident himself.

I agree with this.

I think I can trust DH at this point, so his suspicion of INH is noted. I think we need to lynch Vomp next though. There is way too much there to ignore.

I should clarify that last post...I agree with the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of your post.