Re: Tree Mafia [DAY 2]
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 7:13 pm
You asked me to summarize what I had already said, so I did.
Right, I don't mean to crap on your summary. I'm just giving the only answer I can give, so you can judge accordingly.a2thezebra wrote:You asked me to summarize what I had already said, so I did.
Hmmm ... it is a good look.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:motel room ISO
I mean no offense to motel room when I say that this question seems rather dense. Whether Wilgy is town or mafia, I think it's pretty clear what benefits he might potentially enjoy as a result of his lie. It looks a bit like filler.Spoiler: show
I think this post will be important later. Bookmark it.Spoiler: show
I'm mildly fond of these. I think this manner of a'ight bro well here's some suspicion out of the blue is within motel room's town boundaries.Spoiler: show
This is probably his worst post for me; I agree with Mac that it's not great. I could understand viewing Enrique's treatment of Doc and Diiny dubiously (I did), but I don't see why switching his vote between his suspects was a crime. Townies do this all the time. This might be a manufactured attack.Spoiler: show
Valid question.Spoiler: show
I like motel room adopting an "edgy" read because he's never been afraid to disagree with popular opinion -- it's one of his best town traits. His self-awareness is also appealing. My only question here is why motel room felt the need to announce the edgy read and its edginess.Spoiler: show
I told you the reader to bookmark the earlier post because I knew this one was coming. I think they combine to evidence a pretty solid town-inclined mindset for motel room. He had this distinct thought in mind: that MP pulled a fake red peek in [maybe] his first open setup with legal infodumping. Let's return to the bookmarked post:Spoiler: show
On Day 1, when confronted with Wilgy's fake red peek maneuver, motel room had the presence of mind to ask him this specific highlighted question: "have you played an infodumping-allowed game before?" This means that in this moment motel room was recalling what MP did in RYM #89 (faked a red peek as a vanilla townie) and applying that memory to Wilgy's move in this game. This looks like a very real effort to get a read on Wilgy based upon real data in motel room's personal Mafia arsenal. I love it.Spoiler: show
~~~
Overall, there are a few moments that I'd question but I think he looks good in light of the bookmarked point. I welcome any dissenting perspectives -- I'd really like to know what MP thinks of motel room in light of this. And Diiny, since he also played in RYM #89.
I know it can be hard to focus on things outside yourself and by all means if you're town you should be defending yourself when people vote for you, but you've still gotta find the scum after you save yourself. I need to see more of that, floyd, and I know it's hard (I remember my first game vividly) but you'll learn, and you'll learn by starting to question and interact with the content in the thread that doesn't necessarily concern you. Ask questions even if you're worried they'll make you look like an idiot, I definitely still do. I appreciate that paragraph, though. I had a similar moment... and I'm not going to say what that was until more people react to your paragraph.TheFloyd73 wrote: You actually make a very good point here. With my inexperienced and (self-confessed) awful Mafia skills, I do tend to focus on myself. I've done it on other games as well, I know. Epi's played in the same games as me a couple of times, so he's picked up the style of my generally awful play.
What I'm about to explain can prove Epi to be either town or scum, but what you decide it up to you.
(I'm a Floyd fan, what do you expect?)You've got to pick up the easy meat with your eyes closed.
If Epi is scum, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) to make a jump start on us.
If Epi is town, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) as he assumes I'm an easy scum target.
Anyway, thanks for the compliment Diiny.
Yes, pushing the easy button is something scum like to do. What about how obviously he's been doing it, though? How does that make you feel? I'll say how I feel about it after you answer, because I have a fear that you've been piggybacking opinions this game which isn't good.If Epi is scum, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) to make a jump start on us.
If Epi is town, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) as he assumes I'm an easy scum target.
I explain this, but yeah it's insincere and posts like that (oh man this game eh) have a history of netting scum. You don't agree? I also just recently saw FZ's "Wanna make a bet" post in an iso and that gives me the heebie jeebz hard.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why?Diiny wrote:TheFloyd73 wrote: Linki- I agree FZ, this game is getting pretty awful.How much do you want to bet that one or both of these posters are scumFZ. wrote:This game is getting worse by the minute![]()
I need to reread people, and I don't have time for it now.
I feel you, bad guyJaggedJimmyJay wrote:Right, I don't mean to crap on your summary. I'm just giving the only answer I can give, so you can judge accordingly.a2thezebra wrote:You asked me to summarize what I had already said, so I did.
Makes an argument that makes sense for the first time, reasonable reactions to epi's assault.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand why this is Floyd's best post. Care to talk with me about this?Diiny wrote:this is floyd's best post.TheFloyd73 wrote: You put it on yourself, man. I have no idea what you've got against me, but whatever it is, just share it.
Am I not permitted to call you Epi? Give me a reason not to.
My statement refers to he fact that pointed out that Mac gone against his word but you still want me gone.
I wouldn't have been happy with anything but a similar response thing to Epi's comment about being called Epi, and he questions epi's stance on him as you'd expect. I'd like to see a bit more ferocity, but going on a per-post makes it better. Not that I'm condoning his low post count and that he seems to still be focusing almost entirely on himself. I doubt he'd have questioned epi if he wasn't crusading against him.
Still a scum read.
Lol why?a2thezebra wrote:ugh DrWilgy
You pretty much did the same thing on Day 1. "If y'all change to Enrique I'll do the same". FZ wants you dead just like Enrique did. What say you?DrWilgy wrote:Diiny would you be willing to change off me to FZ? I will as well
Gotta have somewhere to move it to Jimmy. There is time.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'd like more feedback on that motel room ISO. I think I found meaningful evidence that he is town. I made a similar point about bcornett in Talking Heads and nobody seemed to listen. It's nice to remove people from the pool.
I like the Mac was receptive to it despite his prior stated strong suspicions. He seems appropriately willing to re-assess, though his vote hasn't moved.
I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
Dude you are doing that thing where you a rude to a person for no reason then say "heh only joking lighten up". Don't be that guy. That guy sucks.Epignosis wrote:I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
Wilgy I don't think you are bad, but I'm not going to just vote a random to save you. I will vote for a person I think is bad. If you vote Faraday I will vote Faraday and he will be on 3 votes. But I also don't want you to self preservation vote yet. I want you to scum hunt and prove that my read is founded.DrWilgy wrote:Mac, bro, plz save me. I'm asking for a bro favor, I wouldn't propose that unless it was to save a civ, me. I swear.
Linki - Will that actually happen?
I don't agree that I was being rude. I don't use sarcastic orange because if you have to explain the joke, it isn't funny. Moreover, I find value in how seriously some people took what I said. Getting reactions over something that (to me) was obvious nonsense, I think, provides something to look back upon, no?MacDougall wrote:Dude you are doing that thing where you a rude to a person for no reason then say "heh only joking lighten up". Don't be that guy. That guy sucks.Epignosis wrote:I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
Still waiting for the follow up on this.DFaraday wrote:Alright, I've more or less caught up. Wilgy is looking pretty bad to me, as I can't see a good civ reason for his behavior. Epi is coming across as civ, and I think his JJJ case is sounding plausible, but tomorrow I'll read over JJJ to get a better handle on it.
I don't care about it, but I can understand why the person being told that -- particularly Floyd -- would respond the way he did. How the hell should he know whether you're being serious.Epignosis wrote:I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
I'd love to this, time permitting. Let me catch up and engage in current conversation first; if I can get to it, you got it.a2thezebra wrote:ISO me and Diiny MP, and I dare you to still have Diiny higher than me on your list when you're finished.
You sound like an unrepentant bully. Even if it was an attempt at humour it was mean spirited. You don't have to add to it with arrogance. It was only obvious nonsense to you. I think it's a good look for those who called you out on it and tbh it's a bad look for you.Epignosis wrote:I don't agree that I was being rude. I don't use sarcastic orange because if you have to explain the joke, it isn't funny. Moreover, I find value in how seriously some people took what I said. Getting reactions over something that (to me) was obvious nonsense, I think, provides something to look back upon, no?MacDougall wrote:Dude you are doing that thing where you a rude to a person for no reason then say "heh only joking lighten up". Don't be that guy. That guy sucks.Epignosis wrote:I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
If you think this, then what do you make of Diiny's read of Floyd on Day 1? I remember him expressing a mafia Floyd read before EoD D1.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Perhaps a better term than "strong desire to defend Floyd" would be "strong inclination to town read Floyd". Yes, I did defend Floyd to some degree because I didn't think his attacker could justify his attacks. I never called him a town read though. I never gave any actual read of him, because on Day 1 having a read on Floyd would have been bullshit.Epignosis wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's posturing. If Floyd goes down as bad, you would have already called dibs on the theory that I was throwing a teammate under the bus.
As for dibs, you're damned right. You said the same thing about me. If he's bad, see you then.
Floyd, sorry, I'm confused. What do you mean by inconsistent chat?TheFloyd73 wrote:Voted Enrique, inconsistent chat (my reason for voting on day one is an example).MovingPictures07 wrote:Floyd, I don't recall any thoughts you've made on Diiny to explain your vote here or previously. Care to provide some insight?TheFloyd73 wrote:What is wrong with you? Seriously, tell me.Epignosis wrote:Why "can't?"Diiny wrote:Me too. Why can't you talk about the potential baddie influence on lynching the cop AND be interested in floyd?
Is there some restriction on me?
I'll talk about what I like. I have nothing to say about it.
I want to lynch FLOYD.
Anyway, another needless "last minute lynch switch" (it's got another name, I know, I can't be bothered remembering it). Diiny
Linki- I agree FZ, this game is getting pretty awful.
Elaborate.MacDougall wrote:Tinfoil hat on...
Jimmy, Epi and Floyd are the bad guys.
What would you expect the in game play to look like with this team wearing the black hats?MovingPictures07 wrote:Elaborate.MacDougall wrote:Tinfoil hat on...
Jimmy, Epi and Floyd are the bad guys.
You may or may not have a new player in his place come Day 3.MacDougall wrote:Metalmarsh where are you currently at with mod killing DFaraday for not voting/posting? Can you find a replacement? This game is too short for him to be not contributing. 3 posts in this game so far is not good enough. I checked and he has not been online since at all, so he's clearly just got life in the way. Can you find a replacement quickly? Anyone observing want in?
So motel room ain't working out for you, so you've got to go to "unrepentant bully" angle, eh, old man?MacDougall wrote:You sound like an unrepentant bully. Even if it was an attempt at humour it was mean spirited. You don't have to add to it with arrogance. It was only obvious nonsense to you. I think it's a good look for those who called you out on it and tbh it's a bad look for you.Epignosis wrote:I don't agree that I was being rude. I don't use sarcastic orange because if you have to explain the joke, it isn't funny. Moreover, I find value in how seriously some people took what I said. Getting reactions over something that (to me) was obvious nonsense, I think, provides something to look back upon, no?MacDougall wrote:Dude you are doing that thing where you a rude to a person for no reason then say "heh only joking lighten up". Don't be that guy. That guy sucks.Epignosis wrote:I'm still chuckling that many are taking the "Epi" part of my post so seriously.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm no longer concerned about the dramatic language at least when he's talking to/about Epignosis. The "Epi" thing is a reasonable inspiration for dramatic language.Spoiler: show
I can see where Jimmy is getting the idea that you and Floyd are teammies. You came straight out of the gate with what can be construed as strong distancing, and your inability to understand that it appeared hurtful is possibly coming from the fact that you know full well that he isn't upset by it because you've talked in BTSC. You've also managed to get Floyd top town read by a range of players by putting him in the position of the victim.
I'm ISOing Diiny right now and just commented on this. You'll see it shortly.MovingPictures07 wrote:If you think this, then what do you make of Diiny's read of Floyd on Day 1? I remember him expressing a mafia Floyd read before EoD D1.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Perhaps a better term than "strong desire to defend Floyd" would be "strong inclination to town read Floyd". Yes, I did defend Floyd to some degree because I didn't think his attacker could justify his attacks. I never called him a town read though. I never gave any actual read of him, because on Day 1 having a read on Floyd would have been bullshit.Epignosis wrote:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's posturing. If Floyd goes down as bad, you would have already called dibs on the theory that I was throwing a teammate under the bus.
As for dibs, you're damned right. You said the same thing about me. If he's bad, see you then.
I see... that's a good point. :PJaggedJimmyJay wrote:The one post I made imploring him to follow through on his pledge to catch up and comment was my DFaraday ISO. There are three posts in there, I can't do anything with that read unfortunately. He'll be dead neutral until I have more.MovingPictures07 wrote:If you're still taking requests for ISOs, JJJ... DFaraday...
I could GTH him -- it'd be town. Only because town is more likely than mafia and he has a history of lurking.
What a crock of shit. You don't know what you would expect of me if I was on a Mafia team with them. You aren't qualified to say that, because you've never even seen me play as Mafia.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.
I literally did not do that. I am not to blame for people saying Floyd is good. They are.MacDougall wrote:You literally did that though. The question is whether you did it as town by accident despite being genuine about him or as scum for some ulterior reason.