The Syndicate

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:08 pm**

And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.

Where are you going for Night 1?

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:08 pm**

Epignosis wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:This Includes Content
I get your whole schtick for this game, but are you planning on incorporating any actual content in at some point?
If I Don't, Will You Punish Me?

I mean I'll spank you and wear leather get all kinky and whatnot.

But in terms of this game, not yet. But I would like to hear more from you that's more substantive is all.

Linki: Yes. That result is pretty lame indeed. But I would be fooling myself if I didn't admit that I was probably voting for INH.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:09 pm**

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:10 pm**

Sloonei wrote:I am being pulled away by social obligations with 15 minutes to go before the deadline. Oh well. I'm comfortable enough with my vote on INH. I endorse his lynch. I do not endorse lynching Epi. Do good and hope for a bad flip, townies.

You are bad.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:11 pm**

Scotty wrote:I think you and JJJ are Spanish inquisitioning this game and I can't help but think there's a ton of manipulation there.

What do you mean by "Spanish inquisitioning this game"?

Scotty wrote:IvE got a lot on my plate right now;I still love the game of mafia but I'm very close to subbing out. Something I told myself I would never do. But I don't have time to answer appropriately to McCarthy right now. I just don't need it in my life

Do only as much as you feel up to doing, you don't have to answer to every single sentence. I hope you'll be able to stick around.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:12 pm**

I have no idea what these night poll options are, but "Esquimalt" is a fun word.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:15 pm**

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I am less thrilled with the Epi wagon. It seems lazy or worse to get through this thick pile of posts from Day 0 to now and arrive there. I also think "hiding behind a gimmick/roleplay" is a weak accusation that comes from baddies more often ghan the average accusation.

I've been criticized for this opinion before but I don't think lynching people who are purposely being useless is a terrible choice, even if they flip town.

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Sloonei wrote:Epi is way more town than INH. For instance, he is currently arguing against the strongest bandwagon competing against his own. Why would scum Epignosis be calling us dinguses for lynching somebody that's not him right now?

I moved my vote to INH because the drive-bys seem to be coming in now.
An astute point.

I feel a bit worse about trice and Wilgy.

FYI I was the the first vote for epi, hardly a driveby. You could make the exact same point about late voters for INH too (who as we know now was civvie)

Epi has also brought up a_person twice in response to me voting for him, but I've always considered it poor sportsmanship to vote for somebody who hasn't been around to defend themselves (on that note, if a_person isn't able to play, maybe we need to look at replacements? he knows the game has started now so that excuse is gone)

Epignosis wrote:I'm Also Suspicious of the People Who Think This is Some Gimmick to Hide Behind, Because the Whole Point of the Joke is That You Can Take Anything And Make it a Convincing Title of a Post-Rock Track, Suckas.

I did explicitly ask if you were going to start writing serious posts in that style and you didn't answer

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:16 pm**

But epi has made 2-3 on topic posts now so if he wants to actually play the game I'll leave him be until I have stronger reason to suspect him

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:20 pm**

triceratopzeuhl wrote:But epi has made 2-3 on topic posts now so if he wants to actually play the game I'll leave him be until I have stronger reason to suspect him

I Won't Be Leaving You Be

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:21 pm**

OK epi, I'd rather you try to make cases at least even if they're against me (but I'd be looking at the people who just lynched a civ)

All the night poll options are real places that are mentioned in GY!BE song as far as I can tell

ardmore is also a pretty good whisky

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:30 pm**

Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I am being pulled away by social obligations with 15 minutes to go before the deadline. Oh well. I'm comfortable enough with my vote on INH. I endorse his lynch. I do not endorse lynching Epi. Do good and hope for a bad flip, townies.
You are bad.

Explain this thought.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:36 pm**

just realized my board settings said it was daylight savings time which is why the poll ended an hour earlier than I expected

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:49 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:- MP is still my strongest civ read so far which is a bit weird. Dude, when do we get to the point where we start butting heads? :P
It'll happen, I'm sure.

Counting on it.

Also I am now drunk/buzzed mafia-ing. So not sure how this will go.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:50 pm**

Sloonei wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: I think Sloonei said she put a vote on me as a way to remember to read up on me later and to see what else I discussed afterwards.
Spoiler: show
(i'm a boy)

Oops! Sorry about that one!

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:51 pm**

Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?

I would not k.

What makes you think that?

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:03 pm**

Scotty wrote:And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.
Where are you going for Night 1?

I have things to do and time to spend with the wife.

And I'm super burnt out with this game at the moment.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:04 pm**

Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.

This one feels weird to me. Almost like a throwaway vote.

nijuukyugou wrote:My apologies - I've been busier/more tired than I thought the past two days, and am currently out enjoying tasty Mediterranean, so haven't had time to do the insightful investigation I wanted, nor do I have it now. Gonna vote JJJ because he's tricky and reactions to said vote may give me good insight/info. May the reactions commence!

Back to foods now.

This one too. But I look forward to hearing more from the both of you on your reasonings.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:09 pm**

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?
I would not k.

What makes you think that?

Why else would they have voted for a civilian?

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:12 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.
Where are you going for Night 1?
I have things to do and time to spend with the wife.

And I'm super burnt out with this game at the moment.

Stop Posting 250 Times in One Phase...It Isn't Necessary or Helpful (to Me or the Ghost of my Grandfather)

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:19 pm**

Scotty wrote:Shit sorry guys I'm like 8 pages behind, but Epi is still hiding behind his crutch and I wanna vote for something that matters.

I've gotta go but I will respond later to those that are on my ass

Epi

Forgot to mention this, but I would like to call bullsuit on this one.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:20 pm**

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Looks like I missed a lot.

Hopefully you guys are right! I have no idea why inh is being lynched tbh.

You can't give us any more than this? Because you've certainly been really substantive so far.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:23 pm**

Vompatti wrote:
birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you all the INH voters are bad?
I would not k.

What makes you think that?
Why else would they have voted for a civilian?

In hindsight, I still think he was the best choice for a Day 1 vote. Nobody else convinced me otherwise, but Scotty came close for me.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 9:24 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.
Where are you going for Night 1?
I have things to do and time to spend with the wife.

And I'm super burnt out with this game at the moment.

Understandable. Well I hope you come back refreshed and ready to tackle some baddies!

And say hi to SD for me!

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:09 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:And there ya go.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

That's utter crap. I need a break. See you all on Day 2.
Where are you going for Night 1?
I have things to do and time to spend with the wife.

And I'm super burnt out with this game at the moment.

he means which option do you want to vote in the day poll

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:09 pm**

er I mean night poll

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:12 pm**

actually maybe that's not even what he meant idk

anyway I voted for The Ardmore

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:34 pm**

I am physically going to TD Garden this week, so I feel compelled to vote for it.

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:32 pm**

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Epignosis wrote:It's a Sin to Kill a Bird With Teeth on the First Day.

What do you feel about the cases against me so far?

I mean... what do you think he feels given that post he made?
I don't understand why this is a question that needs asking.
Is someone nervous?

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Dom wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Dom wrote:What would be a better answer?
An answer which details a reasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which bears the appearance of being genuine. I don't know what that'd be, but I'd imagine it's plausible for it to exist.

Dom wrote:What would be a worse answer?
An answer which details an unreasonable perspective you have/had about what I might be doing as a baddie when I poked MP on Day 0 which does not bear the appearance of being genuine. I thought you might be shading me for opportunism re: MP via implication without directly stating it, which would be a dubious assertion given the fuller context of my dialogue with MP.

To your credit, you didn't go there. You didn't provide a "reasonable perspective" either; you left your answer at its most basic: "I thought your accusation was b/s and it was a ping". It's not a thorough explanation, but it's also not one that looks made up. I can on some level appreciate the take-it-or-leave-it frankness.
This is a good point. I can believe that a baddie Dom would have engaged in the latter.
There are three options here.
Wich one?
Lol, my bad, I should have been clearer. I meant specifically I could believe a baddie Dom that would have engaged in the orange possibility, so I think it's a good look that you didn't.

Do you think baddie Dom is unreasonable?

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:45 pm**

Scotty wrote:Shit sorry guys I'm like 8 pages behind, but Epi is still hiding behind his crutch and I wanna vote for something that matters.

I've gotta go but I will respond later to those that are on my ass

Epi

This is mighty suspicious tbh

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I am less thrilled with the Epi wagon. It seems lazy or worse to get through this thick pile of posts from Day 0 to now and arrive there. I also think "hiding behind a gimmick/roleplay" is a weak accusation that comes from baddies more often ghan the average accusation.

consistent jay is consistent

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:46 pm**

I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.

@ Dom, 2 posts ago. Phone posting is hard

Posted: **Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:59 pm**

Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.

It Was a Dumb Question.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:04 am**

Scotty wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:I don't trust several people on this lynch and I don't think Inh will flip bad.

And JJJ: I'm sorry you hate that post.

I still stand by my first post of this game
You're bad.
That is basically my first post, yes.

But I was referring to JJJ.

I think you and JJJ are Spanish inquisitioning this game and I can't help but think there's a ton of manipulation there.

I'm not bad but I fear that I will be vigi shot at some point. It's whatever. I get it. I'll work to address stuff like 12 pages back about semantics but I dot even remember what I've been talking about.

IvE got a lot on my plate right now;I still love the game of mafia but I'm very close to subbing out. Something I told myself I would never do. But I don't have time to answer appropriately to McCarthy right now. I just don't need it in my life

ok like
i get the metaphor
I think a Ben Brantley quote really delivers the message here best.
[quote="Ben Brantley of the New York Times]As a parable of fascism and freedom, ''Wicked'' so overplays its hand that it seriously dilutes its power to disturb[/quote]

being heavy handed for no reason is something to

u 4.

Scotty wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I am being pulled away by social obligations with 15 minutes to go before the deadline. Oh well. I'm comfortable enough with my vote on INH. I endorse his lynch. I do not endorse lynching Epi. Do good and hope for a bad flip, townies.
You are bad.

why

triceratopzeuhl wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I am less thrilled with the Epi wagon. It seems lazy or worse to get through this thick pile of posts from Day 0 to now and arrive there. I also think "hiding behind a gimmick/roleplay" is a weak accusation that comes from baddies more often ghan the average accusation.
I've been criticized for this opinion before but I don't think lynching people who are purposely being useless is a terrible choice, even if they flip town.

go through each of epi's posts and show me the useless ones.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:05 am**

RIP INH

Sorry I missed teh vote. I ran out of data this month and forgot to vote before I went to work.

Anyways, the question was not going to yield a meaningful answer.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:06 am**

I don't really have time to do a full catch up, just enough to see that (I assume) inh was good.

I don't much like the epi votes. Except maybe trice's one.

I also really don't like scotty basically being like 'told you guys'. Calling your shot on someone being civilian is the easiest thing to do in the world since a) most people are and b) all baddies have an even higher percentage shot of being right (in this case 15/16); but

c) bragging about it afterwards is the equivalent of discrediting a load of people, even when at least half of them are town, and d) not only does it discredit, but it also puts the focus squarely on 'who voted for a civilian to die' instead of 'who is bad' which are not necessarily the same thing.

I'll be all for looking to see if any inh votes are uninspired. But when I last looked, there were four and all of them felt fair and well explained in the thread to me.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:15 am**

i fucked up those tags.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:47 am**

Frig. Totally thought the vote ended tomorrow. I seriously need to get my head in this game. Also frig to the result. Didn't really get the INH case, and probably woudn't have voted there (especially after being so wrong about him last game)--not a judgement necessarily against those who voted him, just my own opinion of him. He's an easy false case. So, yeah. Meh.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:53 am**

Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.

Maybe you have something to say about one of the people who made a case against BWT.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:54 am**

LoRab wrote:Frig. Totally thought the vote ended tomorrow. I seriously need to get my head in this game. Also frig to the result. Didn't really get the INH case, and probably woudn't have voted there (especially after being so wrong about him last game)--not a judgement necessarily against those who voted him, just my own opinion of him. He's an easy false case. So, yeah. Meh.

What did you dislike about the case?

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:55 am**

That's a sucky result, sorry INH.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:40 am**

i was away from home most of today; I was lead to believe I would have access to wi-fi, which turned out to be non-functional

as you can imagine, there are a lot of things i'd like to respond to, things that I said that I'd like to take back, and negative ideas about how I play mafia I would like to refute.

but hey.

that's all over now.

I adored the little bit of Godspeed You Black Emperor that I heard. now that i have access to the Internet, I'm probably gonna work my way through their discography. Thanks to Rico for showing me this band through the medium of mafia, and for all the effort you put into hosting this game.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:05 am**

Sloonei wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Sloonei wrote:I don't think it is unreasonable for BWT to ask Epi that question.
It Was a Dumb Question.
Maybe you have something to say about one of the people who made a case against BWT.

That wasn't really the question asked.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:07 am**

birdwithteeth11 wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:Looks like I missed a lot.

Hopefully you guys are right! I have no idea why inh is being lynched tbh.
You can't give us any more than this? Because you've certainly been really substantive so far.

Are you trying to provoke me? I don't feel I deserve this attitude.

I'm trying to keep up here. Instead of just remaining silent, I opted to post my thoughts and status. You got a problem with that?

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:18 am**

Sloonei wrote:
LoRab wrote:Frig. Totally thought the vote ended tomorrow. I seriously need to get my head in this game. Also frig to the result. Didn't really get the INH case, and probably woudn't have voted there (especially after being so wrong about him last game)--not a judgement necessarily against those who voted him, just my own opinion of him. He's an easy false case. So, yeah. Meh.
What did you dislike about the case?

I didn't think it was indicitive of a baddie INH? I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 9:50 am**

LoRab wrote:
Sloonei wrote:
LoRab wrote:Frig. Totally thought the vote ended tomorrow. I seriously need to get my head in this game. Also frig to the result. Didn't really get the INH case, and probably woudn't have voted there (especially after being so wrong about him last game)--not a judgement necessarily against those who voted him, just my own opinion of him. He's an easy false case. So, yeah. Meh.
What did you dislike about the case?
I didn't think it was indicitive of a baddie INH? I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.

You said you would not have vote for him; why not?

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 10:43 am**

I'm going to be away for most of the night phase attending the next depressing Bengals game.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:31 pm**

RIP, INH. Honestly, I hadn't spent much time looking at you or your case. I apologize for not further substantiating my thoughts on MM, but JJJ's explanation is pretty much my train of thought. Using a weak, time-based rationale that would've made the most sense for a timmer vote to vote me. I'll have to look at MM more closely in the next day phase.

Sloonei wrote:
Boomslang wrote:Been out all Saturday. Alas. But the thing that pinged me most all day was MM jumping down my/timmer's throat for a timing thing that would've been way too clumsy for baddie move. Voting there.
What are you thoughts on Epi, Scotty, and INH?

As I've said before, Epi's gimmick renders him pretty much impossible to read at this point. I lean town for the sheer reason that he's not actively attempting to mislead the town's efforts in thread. Scotty seems authentically annoyed, and I like him avoiding the INH vote. I also like his challenges to BWT. Stronger town read than on Epi. And INH is, unfortunately, irrelevant at this point.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 2:58 pm**

Dom wrote: go through each of epi's posts and show me the useless ones.

At the time I voted for him, this was 100% of his posts:

Spoiler: show

The third one could potentially be interpreted as him saying he doesn't like MP's POE strategy, and the last one is saying he thinks BWT is good. The rest? compost

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:01 pm**

MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Scotty wrote: You are just as bad as me if you think I am bad without elaboration.

Also I haven't looked at my role card yet. I'll do that when the game actually starts.

I'm interested in why MP is the self-proclaimed Mother Theresa this game, and is getting a pass for listing off civs.

And where are you getting that impression about me? Do you think my behavior has been suspicious? If so, what's your beef with me, man?
You made a series of posts back in 1996 (aka the first few pages of this game) where you expressed your lack of confidence in calling out people for being bad so you instead would resort to calling people good.

Anyone can call anyone good. You may be an idiot savant with calling people good correctly more often, but this isn't alignment indicative and I feel like it's an easy cop out for scum hunting.

Not to say you aren't scumhunting, but that pinged me hard.
Does not compute.

Both the orange statements and yellow statements seem contradictory within colors. Try me again.

Ah I see what you mean- yep that was a stream of consciousness post that made sense when I wrote it. What I meant was that it wasn't a good example of being civ. I thought I was clear at the time but I can see where you might have thought I was changing my opinions in the same breath. Does that clear things up for you?

And Golden: wow. I just read your analysis of my playing personality and found it hilarious, so I shared it with my girlfriend. Her response? "I don't care, get this out of my face" hahahaha what s kidder I love her.

I'm spoilering your post and coloring my responses:

Spoiler: show

Golden wrote:OK, so I may not get back before deadline, so I may as well put my thoughts on scotty out there.

I do not believe scotty didn't look at his PM. It's possible he just said he didn't for playful fun, but his tone is not one of playful fun. But Scotty takes his team duty seriously and wouldn't not check in my opinion.

Thats fine. You don't have to believe me, and I would be naive to think you would.i made reads without any context and it was quite freeing. I do take my team duty seriously, but I also don't mean getting civ cred if I call them out early. As soon as Day 1 started, I did look at my role, which, again, you don't have to believe. I didn't check in Psych (not mad max like I thought- thanks for clarifying, JJJ- until somewhere in day 2. This time I figured I wanted to be involved more in the case that I was bad and was pissing off my teammates. Still not bad.

Add to that, I have a tonal issue with scotty. Trice just described him as 'arrogant', but no, this is not normal scotty. The scotty I'm used to is a town force who maintains a certain level of 'tipping his hat' to everyone else. Arrogance is not something I associate with him in the slightest.

thanks, m'lady! *tips fedora*

What's more, from my perspective, Scotty has a habit of getting himself into early trouble when bad. I don't agree with whoever said he is a 'bullseye', because I don't think scotty gets lynched early very often. But I can recall twice he got himself into early trouble - red vs blue and Lost Again season 1. In each of these games my perception is that he was playing a pretty decent game (and trying to replicate town scotty) but got himself caught up in contradictions.

i also tend to get myself in trouble early when good. I'd be remiss to think I could get through a day 1 without a vote towards me. I think the past few times I got in trouble when bad were circumstantial and not a direct correlation. Just unlucky. My "getting caught up in contradictions" as you say, is just an unfortunate side effect of either posting while commuting or between scenes in my show. I'm actually feeling depressed right now in the sense that I've got a lot of personal things I'm deadline with but still committing to 4 games at once. So sue me if I contradict myself sometimes. If that's suspicious by itself, then lynch me. I've got enough on my plate as is.

The Scotty I see at the start of this game is not a scotty I've seen before. But Scotty has no need to mix up a town game that serves him well. On the other hand, he seems to get caught early as a baddie. My impression is that this 'distant' scotty (my read of what Trice is seeing as slightly arrogant, I think) is his attempt to mix up his baddie game and not get caught.

you haven't seen this day 0 Scotty before? How absolutely obvious, because I was just a neutral party making reads.

Add to that, he's getting caught in contradictions again.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Having said all of that about scotty, my vote for inh was more than a 'no u'. I do apologise for my mini meltdown, but to me there is only so many times that you can criticise everyone else for 'not creating meaningful content' while doing nothing yourself.

Jay pointed out that inh 'described mafia' when criticising what others were doing. I agree.

He does things like call out the sig votes as having 'no thread basis' despite criticising the things people are trying to do to establish a thread basis for their votes.

I see it being very plausible that inh is bad and someone... probably not sig... is taking heat for what inh considers to be bullsuit reasons.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'm genuinely torn between which to vote for. Scotty is generally the one of these two I find easiest to read long term, and I do feel as though he has lacked opportunity to contribute so far. On the other hand, he seems like the much more likely place to get some sort of vague consensus, which means my vote has a higher chance of relevance.

Woof, im easiest to read long term, am I? Guess I should change it up.

On the other hand, I find inh potentially much more insidious as I do not really know if he ever creates content, and so I don't know what I would hang him on later if he is bad. I also feel as though inh flipping bad would tell us more than scotty would, because I get the sense inh is old school and that defending teammates by implication on day one is definitely something he would do. But he is much less likely to be lynched.

So, with that dilemma in mind....

I'm going to leave my vote on inh, because I have more conviction about him, and if I happen to get some time in the morning I'll revisit it then.

I think deep down you voted for INH and not me because you know you're throwing mud at me for unsubstantiated reasons and even you don't believe it. INH was still a nothing case, and such is why day 1 lynches are generally hogwash. This little diatribe poses as a criminal breakdown from a warped psychologist. I think I'd leave the doctor stuff to the real Wilgy in this game.

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:03 pm**

Do you think anybody has been given info on this vote?

Posted: **Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:12 pm**

Golden wrote:I don't really have time to do a full catch up, just enough to see that (I assume) inh was good.

I don't much like the epi votes. Except maybe trice's one.

I also really don't like scotty basically being like 'told you guys'. Calling your shot on someone being civilian is the easiest thing to do in the world since a) most people are and b) all baddies have an even higher percentage shot of being right (in this case 15/16); but

c) bragging about it afterwards is the equivalent of discrediting a load of people, even when at least half of them are town, and d) not only does it discredit, but it also puts the focus squarely on 'who voted for a civilian to die' instead of 'who is bad' which are not necessarily the same thing.

I'll be all for looking to see if any inh votes are uninspired. But when I last looked, there were four and all of them felt fair and well explained in the thread to me.

What??! How is "well there ya go" in any way "I told you guys"? How is that bragging about it? Show me where I bragged about you all being wrong.

Now you're just putting words in my mouth and manipulating this away from you and the other INH voters so you don't have to take responsibility for your votes. Yes, civs make the wrong votes all the time. Of course they do. But I already feel like you, JJJ, Sloonei and Mp have all come after me on day 1 for bullsuit reasons and I find it manipulative. Couple that with the fact that I don't trust you guys, makes me think at least 1 or a couple of you might be bad. Just because I haven't had a tennis match where I've spewed 5028 posts in the matter of 24 hours doesn't mean I can't make reads off of votes.

I didn't know INH was gonna flip good, but I definitely didn't think he would flip bad. So get off your high horse, golden.

Love, Scotty

The Syndicate

GY!BE Mafia [E.N.D.]

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

GY!BE Polls

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Day 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia

Re: [Night 1] GY!BE Mafia