Re: Phenon Mafia: Day 1 - And Into the Fire
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 8:20 pm
I think the more appropriate reaction isGolden wrote:Elohcin wrote:I'm going to vote before I forget. I'm trusting the people...Dyslexicon.
Spoiler: show
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
I think the more appropriate reaction isGolden wrote:Elohcin wrote:I'm going to vote before I forget. I'm trusting the people...Dyslexicon.
Do you suspect him? I've been focusing on other players; I thought you guys were just in disagreement on certain things.Golden wrote:I have to say, for me the most bothersome thing about remaining on sig is that Jay is also on it.
Jay isn't returning today, though, he made that clear.
It provides pressure, makes it so no one gets lynched with a small amount of town voting for themStrawhenge wrote:Man, this vote minimum thing, and the time we have left. I feel somewhat confident voting sig, but not as confident as voting Long Con.
At this point, this feels much safer than, say, switching it up to Eloh. I'd consider other options but a CFD with this soft lynch concept in play seems unhelpful. In some ways it doesn't feel much different to unchangeable votes.Strawhenge wrote:Man, this vote minimum thing, and the time we have left. I feel somewhat confident voting sig, but not as confident as voting Long Con.
This seems oddly defeatist. You aren't even that suspected. Do you expect to go through a game without anyone suspecting you?Fredwood wrote:Well I thought I was posting content and trying to be "helpful" and giving reads and pointing out posts that I did not like, but I guess they weren't or people are only going to take one post as the entire context for my participation as the basis for their argument so Fuck it. Not really sure what to say, if it isn't good enough, oh well was trying my best.
But yeah, I suck at mafia so it's all good.
So what does this say about the alignments of the people suspecting you or defending you?Fredwood wrote:Well either I'm not posting content or I am. Not really sure how to defend myself if I'm being accused of both with the later being used as as proof of a deviation of my meta.
You want to say I read scum and not helping fine, but I'm also being accused of trying to fit in and adapt to the playstyle here as proof of my scum...it's all very convenient.
Oh, don't get me wrong, it's a great idea! I'm just not used to it, and am feeling the effect of the pressure, that's all. No worries!sprityo wrote:It provides pressure, makes it so no one gets lynched with a small amount of town voting for themStrawhenge wrote:Man, this vote minimum thing, and the time we have left. I feel somewhat confident voting sig, but not as confident as voting Long Con.![]()
He was rarely bad on RYM as well. It's weird, it's like the universe knows to put one of its top scum hunters on town.Golden wrote:linki @Straw - no, I suspect him, for sure. It's not urgent right now but it's worth a look back to understand why when you get time. It would be useful to get the perspective of someone else who has a lot of play with Jay, especially since he's so rarely bad on the Syndicate.
Can you pull said posts up?Dyslexicon wrote:Would really like opinions on JJJ's glaring contradiction. The posts he pulled up on Sig and said he had a problem with - those are the exact same posts that when it happened in thread in realtime he commented "I feel okay about Sig". What changed?
Ok, I could see someone read it in a different way when looking back after Sig hasn't posted at all. But there were very specific things JJJ had a problem with. So the result is the initial comment that he felt okay about Sig reads phony.
What do you mean by this? We usually consider it a relatively good thing that if someone must flip civ they're a low poster so it's less of a loss to the cause. I guess it means we learn less about other players maybe, but I don't really get what you mean by "if they flip town it's pretty meh." And do you think they will? If so why?Dyslexicon wrote:In the process of catching up. Not loving either Wilgy or Sig lynch tbh, as they're such low posters that if the flip town it's pretty meh.
Quin wrote:You'll be bad this time. I can feel it in my body.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Transistor was the only recent example of a real, jan-yoo-wine, scum JJJ.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I'm still waiting for the day where you draw a scum role.
I've seen it twice I suppose. Once you were a sock and acted like S~V~S instead, the person you were playing as. The second was the last game on RYM where literally every player was mafia.
So yeah, just waiting on a game where you're a normal mafia player.
Iknowriiight.Golden wrote:Colour me surprised to see Dizzy is still in the lead for votes. I admit my opinions are not the be all and end all, but I just don't really get it.
But it's ok to lynch me in my first game...I'm confused as to wanting to lynch Dys so aggressively but now wanting to see more of them, and then voting for another person you haven't seen before.Quin wrote:I want to see more of Dys, and I can't justify leaving it there because of gut.
Again, difference in game philosophy, I guess. There's less information to go off of if they flip town as they've had few interactions. I mean, that shouldn't exclude them from the lynch pool, it's just less to go off of if we lynch a lurker and they flip town (actually, even if they flip scum, but then at least the wagon can be telling). However, Sig and Wilgy just dropping the ball is not amusing me.nutella wrote:What do you mean by this? We usually consider it a relatively good thing that if someone must flip civ they're a low poster so it's less of a loss to the cause. I guess it means we learn less about other players maybe, but I don't really get what you mean by "if they flip town it's pretty meh." And do you think they will? If so why?Dyslexicon wrote:In the process of catching up. Not loving either Wilgy or Sig lynch tbh, as they're such low posters that if the flip town it's pretty meh.
Interesting point about jay though. I don't think he'll be here to respond until d2, but it's sketchy and could be a teammate tell since he made that post after I and some others already started going after a sig lynch. Idk his vote might be too risky in that case but I could see it.
Linki @quin he just did before that post, read up a lil
Do you mean earlier?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I thought the day ended later. I'm back though.
I changed my mind. sig does well to play the game loosely, and my initial take was to appreciate that he looked the part. What he also does though is contribute to the effort, often making reads against the grain with no concern for appearances. A lot of time has passed since that initial take and I am not inclined to feel like I did before. Reassessment yields different perspectives.Dyslexicon wrote:And this is giving me serious problems.
This is what you said immediately after the exchange you're bringing in here:
So why is this exchange giving you problems now? What changed? Iirc Sig hasn't posted after this. Explain.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I feel okay about sig.
Yeah, derp. I thought it ended around 7 EST. I think I was confusing it with the NF game I was in.Golden wrote:Do you mean earlier?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I thought the day ended later. I'm back though.
I have a pretty good history with reading Elohcin both ways. I can't say the same about DFaraday. DFaraday is also a very common low poster, Elohcin not so much. She low posts sometimes and is active sometimes, and I think her mafia-aligned games trend more in the direction of the former.Dyslexicon wrote:Again, difference in game philosophy, I guess. There's less information to go off of if they flip town as they've had few interactions. I mean, that shouldn't exclude them from the lynch pool, it's just less to go off of if we lynch a lurker and they flip town (actually, even if they flip scum, but then at least the wagon can be telling). However, Sig and Wilgy just dropping the ball is not amusing me.nutella wrote:What do you mean by this? We usually consider it a relatively good thing that if someone must flip civ they're a low poster so it's less of a loss to the cause. I guess it means we learn less about other players maybe, but I don't really get what you mean by "if they flip town it's pretty meh." And do you think they will? If so why?Dyslexicon wrote:In the process of catching up. Not loving either Wilgy or Sig lynch tbh, as they're such low posters that if the flip town it's pretty meh.
Interesting point about jay though. I don't think he'll be here to respond until d2, but it's sketchy and could be a teammate tell since he made that post after I and some others already started going after a sig lynch. Idk his vote might be too risky in that case but I could see it.
Linki @quin he just did before that post, read up a lil
If Sig is scum that is certainly possible. I also remember JJJ having Eloh as a slight suspicion in his read list, and I remember it being a bit weird since Eloh had barely posted anything, much like Dfray (or whatever his name is), but the latter was a full null read. Why give a read to Eloh? With Eloh's sudden pop in to vote me I could see a world of Sig, JJJ and Eloh.
Probably ambitious with a world building already, but that's where my mind is going.
It wasn't defeatist, and I went into a few posts later about my reads. I was basically saying if what I'm doing isn't contributing I don't know what else to do because people were either accusing me either not contributing or trying too hard to blend in with the way games are played here, which are two completely different accusations so wasn't exactly sure how to address it. Then people did ISO's and appeared to be appeased.Dyslexicon wrote:This seems oddly defeatist. You aren't even that suspected. Do you expect to go through a game without anyone suspecting you?Fredwood wrote:Well I thought I was posting content and trying to be "helpful" and giving reads and pointing out posts that I did not like, but I guess they weren't or people are only going to take one post as the entire context for my participation as the basis for their argument so Fuck it. Not really sure what to say, if it isn't good enough, oh well was trying my best.
But yeah, I suck at mafia so it's all good.
So what does this say about the alignments of the people suspecting you or defending you?Fredwood wrote:Well either I'm not posting content or I am. Not really sure how to defend myself if I'm being accused of both with the later being used as as proof of a deviation of my meta.
You want to say I read scum and not helping fine, but I'm also being accused of trying to fit in and adapt to the playstyle here as proof of my scum...it's all very convenient.
Any reason to not CFD Eloh here?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have a pretty good history with reading Elohcin both ways. I can't say the same about DFaraday. DFaraday is also a very common low poster, Elohcin not so much. She low posts sometimes and is active sometimes, and I think her mafia-aligned games trend more in the direction of the former.
Civil Frontier Department?Dyslexicon wrote:Any reason to not CFD Eloh here?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have a pretty good history with reading Elohcin both ways. I can't say the same about DFaraday. DFaraday is also a very common low poster, Elohcin not so much. She low posts sometimes and is active sometimes, and I think her mafia-aligned games trend more in the direction of the former.
I'd call her lynchable. I don't really know what to do with her recent vote for you. There's potential for opportunism and potential for "whatever I'm not reading all this shit". Either way it's not a great vote, since I think you're actually one of the stronger town reads in the game at this point.Dyslexicon wrote:Any reason to not CFD Eloh here?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I have a pretty good history with reading Elohcin both ways. I can't say the same about DFaraday. DFaraday is also a very common low poster, Elohcin not so much. She low posts sometimes and is active sometimes, and I think her mafia-aligned games trend more in the direction of the former.
Don't use 'it's my first game here' as a crutch. It's poor sportsmanship.Fredwood wrote:But it's ok to lynch me in my first game...I'm confused as to wanting to lynch Dys so aggressively but now wanting to see more of them, and then voting for another person you haven't seen before.Quin wrote:I want to see more of Dys, and I can't justify leaving it there because of gut.
You still haven't given any reason for a read, or your "gut" feeling, as amorphous as that terminology is, so there really isn't much chance for one to respond. Really, it all originated from an aside I made publicly stating my tempered reservations of your playstyle. Which I have explained twice, once to you specifically and once as a clarification to someone else that the concern was from general experience from being mislead before and not a statement about you specifically, and yet you still haven't made a rebuttal to further the discussion.
So either you're not paying attention and still taking a confrontational approach or you are now playing the "My gut" card just trying to sway the vote in the 11th hour to an unlikely lynch target. Feels a bit like CYA after pushing so hard on DYS, and now that it has soured and people are starting to get annoyed at people who are still voting for Dys, you're scrambling to get off the train you started.
Now you're just pissing me off...I fucking didn't use it as a crutch... In your own explanation for switching off Dys you said you were switching off because you want to see more of her to make a judgment and couldn't justify it with just a gut feeling, then switched to someone who you have just as little experience with and only have expressed a fucking gut feeling.Quin wrote:Don't use 'it's my first game here' as a crutch. It's poor sportsmanship.Fredwood wrote:But it's ok to lynch me in my first game...I'm confused as to wanting to lynch Dys so aggressively but now wanting to see more of them, and then voting for another person you haven't seen before.Quin wrote:I want to see more of Dys, and I can't justify leaving it there because of gut.
You still haven't given any reason for a read, or your "gut" feeling, as amorphous as that terminology is, so there really isn't much chance for one to respond. Really, it all originated from an aside I made publicly stating my tempered reservations of your playstyle. Which I have explained twice, once to you specifically and once as a clarification to someone else that the concern was from general experience from being mislead before and not a statement about you specifically, and yet you still haven't made a rebuttal to further the discussion.
So either you're not paying attention and still taking a confrontational approach or you are now playing the "My gut" card just trying to sway the vote in the 11th hour to an unlikely lynch target. Feels a bit like CYA after pushing so hard on DYS, and now that it has soured and people are starting to get annoyed at people who are still voting for Dys, you're scrambling to get off the train you started.
I'm busy. I can't update my reads, read back through the thread and keep up as I'd like. So my suspicion of you might be outdated or rebutted, but it's not going anywhere for as long as I'm doing my own thing. Sorry.
Right click on the "new tab" button. You might be able to retrieve it with "reopen closed tab". That's Chrome at least. Keep trying until you find it, if you can. Props to LC teaching me this in some game a while back.Dyslexicon wrote:Fuck. Was writing a read list post and then accidentally x-ed out of the tab lol.
Apparently their gut is still pinging you, so I don't think that's what was meant. There hasn't been any indication that he views you as more "town"Quin wrote:I want to see more of Dys, and I can't justify leaving it there because of gut.
Maybe I've misunderstood you, and I think it's because you misunderstood me. Dys is correct in her assumption. I want to see more of her because I'm uncertain about her and a gut bad read isn't enough for me to leave a vote there. It's got nothing to do with being a new player.Fredwood wrote:Again I do apologize for blowing up, but felt the accusation strayed too personal. If that isn't the intention and misunderstood the statement, I feel even more foolish then I do currently.