Page 19 of 29
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:32 pm
by Turnip Head
Hedgeowl has remained on the poll ever since she died.
Host: Is the Hedgeowl option supposed to be on the poll? Are we allowed to vote for Hedgeowl?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:37 pm
by boo
Turnip Head wrote:Hedgeowl has remained on the poll ever since she died.
Host: Is the Hedgeowl option supposed to be on the poll? Are we allowed to vote for Hedgeowl?
Oops. No, she's dead.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:47 pm
by Mister Rearranger
I won a Hunger Games mafia once... 
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:59 pm
by insertnamehere
S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:19 pm
by Flyin' High
insertnamehere wrote:S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.
I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB. Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:25 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:insertnamehere wrote:S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.
I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB. Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
I didn't say anything for or against Aces, I just found Rey more suspicious.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:38 pm
by AceofSpaces
Flyin' High wrote:insertnamehere wrote:S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.
I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB. Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
I haven't said anything all day. I've been sick and didn't have the energy to put anything up.
If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:25 pm
by Flyin' High
@Aces: Arguing that INH's vote was forced to vote BWT didn't clear him at all. Rey voted BWT was well. And you mention INH quoting boo's PM as evidence for why you didn't suspect INH, except that happened after you voted for rey saying he was the only player who could be the PB. INH didn't make it 100% clear he was forced until a whole day phase after the BWT lynch (and after you voted rey).
Since quotes don't have timestamps or link back to the original post, I'll put times and links here.
Ace's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:54 am)
AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.
Again, this post implies he knew INH wasn't PB with certainty.
INH's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:20 pm)
insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
Again, why specifically were/are you so trustful of Aces, INH?
I called them out as being suspicious
here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:43 pm) [not quoting it because it's essentially what I am saying in this post, but you can check the link]
INH didn't spill the beans about being forced until
this post (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:03 pm)
insertnamehere wrote:I for one, got a PM telling me I had to vote BWT in the lynch. Other people were also acting odd about the lynch, which made me think that PB used his power. I was stating that in a humorous "pun" or joke.
Really, I already have 3 votes because I made a joke? This is Cards Against Humanity mafia, lighten up.
Then INH decided to actually quote boo's PM after S~V~S questioned him on admitting to being forced,
here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:26 pm).
AceofSpaces wrote:If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
In addition to the inconsistencies with your story that I just pointed out, I also have not insisted that you and INH were backing each other up. I asked a question and wondered why you were both so sure/trusting of the other.
I think Aces slipped up. The reasons he has given for ruling out INH as the PB happened after he and INH both voted rey yesterday meaning he cleared INH before INH told the thread his vote was forced. I think they are teammates.
And I will plan to vote one of them today.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:46 pm
by AceofSpaces
Well you are wrong FH. It's as simple as that.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:09 pm
by Epignosis
Flyin' High wrote:
I think Aces slipped up. The reasons he has given for ruling out INH as the PB happened after he and INH both voted rey yesterday meaning he cleared INH before INH told the thread his vote was forced. I think they are teammates.
And I will plan to vote one of them today.
Then it would seem the decision has been made for you.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:13 pm
by Flyin' High
I was trying to figure out what you were talking about, but then I looked at the poll and saw that it's been "tampered" with.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:15 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:@Aces: Arguing that INH's vote was forced to vote BWT didn't clear him at all. Rey voted BWT was well. And you mention INH quoting boo's PM as evidence for why you didn't suspect INH, except that happened after you voted for rey saying he was the only player who could be the PB. INH didn't make it 100% clear he was forced until a whole day phase after the BWT lynch (and after you voted rey).
Since quotes don't have timestamps or link back to the original post, I'll put times and links here.
Ace's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:54 am)
AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.
Again, this post implies he knew INH wasn't PB with certainty.
I think it's more likely that he just forgot about me.
INH's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:20 pm)
insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
Again, why specifically were/are you so trustful of Aces, INH?
Once again, it's not that I trusted him, I just trusted Rey less. If Rey was civ, I would of gone after him.
I called them out as being suspicious
here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:43 pm) [not quoting it because it's essentially what I am saying in this post, but you can check the link]
INH didn't spill the beans about being forced until
Nope, I was hinting at being forced by PB before I quoted boo. That's why I made all the PB innuendos.
this post (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:03 pm)
insertnamehere wrote:I for one, got a PM telling me I had to vote BWT in the lynch. Other people were also acting odd about the lynch, which made me think that PB used his power. I was stating that in a humorous "pun" or joke.
Really, I already have 3 votes because I made a joke? This is Cards Against Humanity mafia, lighten up.
Then INH decided to actually quote boo's PM after S~V~S questioned him on admitting to being forced,
here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:26 pm).
AceofSpaces wrote:If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
In addition to the inconsistencies with your story that I just pointed out, I also have not insisted that you and INH were backing each other up. I asked a question and wondered why you were both so sure/trusting of the other.
I think Aces slipped up. The reasons he has given for ruling out INH as the PB happened after he and INH both voted rey yesterday meaning he cleared INH before INH told the thread his vote was forced. I think they are teammates.
And I will plan to vote one of them today.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:17 pm
by Flyin' High
You may have been hinting, a lot of people were, but the fact remains rey also voted BWT so wasn't cleared from being forced. And Aces clearly stated in his response to me that it was you stating you were forced and posting boo's PM that made him trust you over rey, which clearly isn't true since that happened after he voted for rey.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:18 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:
AceofSpaces wrote:If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
In addition to the inconsistencies with your story that I just pointed out,
I also have not insisted that you and INH were backing each other up.
lol wut
Flyin' High wrote:insertnamehere wrote:S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.
I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB.
Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:24 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:I am considering a vote for rey but am wondering why Aces and INH are getting passes as they are also on my list. And I've noticed
today they are backing each other up.
This post in particular stood out to me:
AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.
Why is rey the last person on the list who could be PB? Did something happen to clear INH that I missed or forgot about?
And same question to INH
insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
Why do you trust Aces over rey?
I agree that rey is playing a more quiet game and I feel like when he's a civvie he's more talkative, but the stuff between Aces and INH is making me a little nervous.
Found another one
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:25 pm
by DharmaHelper
This whole exchange is just too fascinating.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:25 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:Well I'm pleasantly surprised!
I am still curious about INH and Aces backing each other up, but at least we know neither is the PB now.
It's like Where's Waldo
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:26 pm
by Epignosis
Flyin' High wrote:I was trying to figure out what you were talking about, but then I looked at the poll and saw that it's been "tampered" with.
Or, perhaps, the poll is running as it has been since Day 1.
boo wrote:While a player is the card Czar (they are selected during the night the previous Czar was picking the winner, and will be told they will be the next Card Czar), they cannot be lynched (as in, they will be off the poll).
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:30 pm
by Turnip Head
S~V~S wrote:My point was WHY BWT? With that combo of powers, they could have lynched just about anyone, every single one of those roles has a manipulation. BWT was a good choice because they could pin the lynch on someone else. Like, let's say you are a civ, TH. This would be the perfect opportunity for them to get rid of BOTH of us (if PB was still alive). Were you lynchable they could have made everyone vote for YOU, then they would all turn on ME when you turned up civ (if you were one, which I sadly doubt). This would be a smart way to use their powers, turning very little suspicion on themselves. That whole disingenuous "Now who was it that first brought up the case on BWT??" remark, well, lets just say i could visualize Dom putting his finger on his chin, rolling his eyes up and batting his eyelashes when i read it, lol. dom knew, he just did not want to be the one to say it. The perfect plot
The answer to "Why BWT" is because people already suspected him, so his lynch would lead to more finger pointing than a more random lynch would. But you're putting intentions into Dom's words that are not accurate. His "Who brought BWT up first" question may have been leading, and maybe he already knew the answer and was hoping it would prompt some discussion... but I think a baddie Dom - who would be aware of his team's plan - would be much sneakier about how he would bring that up if it was a baddie ploy he wanted to enact. I don't think he'd make others do the work for him. A baddie Dom, in my opinion, would have started twisting the events to his benefit right away. He would have had the advantage of knowing that Rey was Bukkake before the rest of us and he would have used that advantage more cleanly. But that's just conjecture based on the fact that I know he didn't have a baddie role. He was very much playing his own game. His game just happened to run through the crosshairs of some baddie plans.
Regarding INH and Ace, I have gone back and forth between looking at their actions through a civvie lens and through a baddie lens. I can see how their votes were controlled by the baddies, but I can also see how they could be baddies pretending to be controlled to gain some cred. I'm not particularly good at reading either of them. But I notice Ace isn't on the poll.
linki: Who is our Card Czar today? Is it Ace? I didn't see it mentioned in a post.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:32 pm
by boo
Yes, Ace is the card czar.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:34 pm
by AceofSpaces
I am indeed the Czar.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:37 pm
by Flyin' High
Asking a question and theorizing as to why two people are behaving a certain way is not the same as insisting. Regardless, neither one of you are saying anything to change my mind. You're just arguging semantics with me which isn't changing my opinion at all.
And of course, Aces as the card czar makes sense. I wasn't thinking about that.
Epignosis, would you care to join the discussion rather than continue to make snarky, non-helpful remarks?
Anyway, I've voted, I'm sick. Be back later.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:43 pm
by Epignosis
Flyin' High wrote:Epignosis, would you care to join the discussion rather than continue to make snarky, non-helpful remarks?
Well I was going for a snarky,
helpful remark.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:47 pm
by Turnip Head
What do you think Epi? Ace or INH as a Bukkake buddy, are you buying it? I can see it, but I'm not sure I'm convinced.
Also Epi, what's your opinion of Elo so far this game? I don't think she's posted since I joined, I'll have to go back to her earlier posts and see if I can get a read on her.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:49 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:Asking a question and theorizing as to why two people are behaving a certain way is not the same as insisting. Regardless, neither one of you are saying anything to change my mind. You're just arguging semantics with me which isn't changing my opinion at all.
Your entire fucking case is based on semantics.
Let's recap: You think me and Aces are teammates because we both voted for Rey, and suspected him instead of each other. Forget that Rey actually was bad, and we were both right to suspect him.
You pull all of these little things out of your ass, like how Aces said that he began to trust me when I posted boo's PM, but he voted before I posted the PM which must mean we're teammates, somehow?
Also stuff like "INH makes jokes about PB, HE MUST BE PB!", "Aces said that Rey is the last person on the list, he must not of made a mistake, he clearly meant that he and INH are teammates!!!!11!!!"
Wait, by your own logic, if Aces didn't mention you being on the list, you must be teammates with us!
It's this kind of bullshit I'm talking about.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:52 pm
by insertnamehere
Flyin' High wrote:Asking a question and theorizing as to why two people are behaving a certain way is not the same as insisting.
Flyin' High wrote:
I am still curious about INH and Aces backing each other up
Flyin' High wrote:today they are backing each other up.
Those don't sound like questions, they sound like assumptions.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:52 pm
by insertnamehere
Or shall I say, insistence?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:04 pm
by DharmaHelper
Reading over this thing it looks to me as though FH has done a lot of reaching and INH has called her on it. I will probably vote FH as I'm not overly comfortable with her responses.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:16 pm
by Epignosis
Turnip Head wrote:What do you think Epi? Ace or INH as a Bukkake buddy, are you buying it? I can see it, but I'm not sure I'm convinced.
No, I'm not. I didn't grab the damn poll again, but looking back at the relevant posts, both INH and Aces voted rey. There were other candidates with votes at the time and Mr. Nasty could have been saved.
However, my understanding is that FH was (after the lynch) suggesting that Aces and INH were on the other team, not the one with rey.
But that's really weird to me. She votes INH while Aces and INH vote rey, and out of the gate she talks about them being behind-the-scenes bosom buddies? Smell raunchy to me.
I think she's on the other team. I have voted accordingly. So it goes.
Turnip Head wrote:Also Epi, what's your opinion of Elo so far this game? I don't think she's posted since I joined, I'll have to go back to her earlier posts and see if I can get a read on her.
She's good.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:20 pm
by birdwithteeth11
I was willing to believe FH, but given that INH has called her out on it and it looks like she's been reaching, I will be voting her today.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:23 pm
by insertnamehere
Going with FH for now
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:24 pm
by insertnamehere
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:33 pm
by AceofSpaces
I've voted for FH too. I don't see how a civie could in good conscience push such a weak theory so feverishly.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:39 pm
by Turnip Head
In FH's vote count manipulation analysis, in
this post that inevitably led to the Rey lynch, is there a reason the Trump Cards weren't mentioned as a possible factor? Couldn't they have just as easily caused the non-tie between Sorsha and JJ as the PB? FH only focused on the Bukkake team as the ones to blame. While FH was right, it's weird that the Trump Card roles were omitted from the discussion. Unless I missed something that explains why. They have vote manipulation abilities too that could have affected the outcome of that lynch.
Epignosis wrote:Turnip Head wrote:Also Epi, what's your opinion of Elo so far this game? I don't think she's posted since I joined, I'll have to go back to her earlier posts and see if I can get a read on her.
She's good.
Cool. Cool cool cool.
Epignosis wrote:So it goes.
+1
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:42 pm
by S~V~S
All that everyone is saying makes a lot of sense, but i don't see FH pushing a theory so feverishly if she is bad, either,tbh. She is a lot blendier when she is bad, IMO.
I am waffled on both sides of this issue. So I doubt i will vote for either INH or FH. i might vote for Epi or DH for playing such atypical games. I know you are both busy elsewhere gamewise, but I expect a bit more naked aggression from both of you, and so far I am disappoint. Whatever vote i make it will be late enough that no one can accuse me of trying to save anyone else

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:45 pm
by Elohcin
voted FH. No reason to go against the flow right now.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:57 pm
by Flyin' High
Welp, the baddies have done an excellent job of manipulating.
The fact that not one person sees that Aces claimed something that simply isn't true boggles my mind. Whatever, I'm sick so one less game to play is fine with me.
Good luck to my fellow civvies.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:58 pm
by Flyin' High
For what it's worth, MR said he'd be voting Epignosis if he survived the night so in addition to Aces and INH, Epig might be a good place to look to. Especially considering he has been snarky and done more taunting/teasing than actual baddie hunting this game.
Okay, I'm really leaving this time.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:07 pm
by Hedgeowl
boo wrote:Turnip Head wrote:Hedgeowl has remained on the poll ever since she died.
Host: Is the Hedgeowl option supposed to be on the poll? Are we allowed to vote for Hedgeowl?
Oops. No, she's dead.
Hedgeowl wrote:Mister Rearranger wrote:Ebwop: Why is Hedgie on the poll?

maybe if you all had voted for me I would have been rezzed. 
No rezz pls? 
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:27 pm
by boo
We're using http://us11.chatzy.com/83680684108635 for anyone who may join late because the chat on the site kind of sucks (for most of us).
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:11 pm
by Sorsha
I'm so confused.

Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:36 pm
by kneel4justice
Flyin' High wrote:Welp, the baddies have done an excellent job of manipulating.
Yep! I agree with this.
While some of your logic, I don't agree with (such as Ace and INH being teammates), I think you have been very genuine in your scum hunting and am having trouble understanding how a few contradictions, which in my opinion (some) have been quoted without the correct interpretations have spiraled a lynch against you. It looks to me like INH is very desperate to turn things against you, when in reality you could just be a wrong civ. Why aren't we giving this thought? I don't understand how making a compelling case/analysis is a guaranteed forcing of suspicion. So I am voting INH.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:38 pm
by kneel4justice
Sorsha wrote:I'm so confused.

Lol same. Too many people are acting scummy for me to believe they're all scum.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:59 pm
by Bass_the_Clever
I believe FH is really trying to find scum thats why I am voting INH because out of FH and INH I rather see FH because is seem genuine .
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:08 pm
by boo
For those not there: Turnip Head won (well, I won, but TH got second. SUCK IT LOSERS), so he got 2 Awesome Points. There will probably be a second live game next week, on saturday this time, and probably an hour earlier, so starting at 6pm est, going until 8 or 9 as people are available.
Edit: And eloh is like 1000000% more perverted than you would expect. So that was... enlightening?
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:20 pm
by Sorsha
I voted INH also. I can understand that all of FH's case might not be correct but I really doubt she is bad and turning the lynch on her just because her whole case doesn't line up 100% just stinks to me.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:28 pm
by S~V~S
Sorsha wrote:I voted INH also. I can understand that all of FH's case might not be correct but I really doubt she is bad and turning the lynch on her just because her whole case doesn't line up 100% just stinks to me.
This tbh. More than anything I wanted to lynch Turnip Dom today but no such luck. I think Sorsha makes sense, and I thought FH felt sincere before.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:35 pm
by Turnip Head
I find myself trusting the INH voters more than the FH voters. I still don't really see a case on INH though, at least not one that makes sense from front to finish. I haven't gotten positive vibes from him but I also haven't played with him much so I don't know what I'm talking about.
But I think if I vote for INH it will end in a tie, which seems fun.
So I'ma vote INH.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:38 pm
by boo
I'll wait to end it even though all the votes are in since people may want to use extra votes and not all white cards are in.
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Posted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:39 pm
by Turnip Head
Wow, everyone voted. Is that a Syndicate record?