I was old when I was 29.MacDougall wrote:Yeah whatever dude.
Epi do you really think I'm old.

Moderator: Community Team
I was old when I was 29.MacDougall wrote:Yeah whatever dude.
Epi do you really think I'm old.
Well that's a reaction. A crock of shit? I think it's a pretty rational tinfoily argument tbh. Epignosis when I say it is what I expect, it is because it is what I would imagine two faceless experienced Mafia players would do. Not a personal read.Epignosis wrote:What a crock of shit. You don't know what you would expect of me if I was on a Mafia team with them. You aren't qualified to say that, because you've never even seen me play as Mafia.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.
If I were on a team with a new or inexperienced person, I would not throw that person under the bus for credibility. That's unsportsmanlike. My goal, especially in a skirmish with no banner or GoC qualification, would be to help the player refine his skills and enjoy the BTSC company. I wouldn't give a damn about winning a game like this at the expense of helping someone gain experience and nurture a potential future relationship. Inexperienced players would be less likely to want to continue playing if their experienced team uses them as fodder and doesn't let them experience the game.
And, just to drive home the point that you know stuff-all about me as Mafia: In all the games I have ever been in from the beginning, having been Mafia many many times, how many times did I throw a teammate under the bus before, say, Day 4?
I'll see if you know the answer to that.
Floyd, which do you think is happening here? Are you reading Epi as more likely sincere or insincere, and why?TheFloyd73 wrote:You actually make a very good point here. With my inexperienced and (self-confessed) awful Mafia skills, I do tend to focus on myself. I've done it on other games as well, I know. Epi's played in the same games as me a couple of times, so he's picked up the style of my generally awful play.Diiny wrote:this is floyd's best post.TheFloyd73 wrote: You put it on yourself, man. I have no idea what you've got against me, but whatever it is, just share it.
Am I not permitted to call you Epi? Give me a reason not to.
My statement refers to he fact that pointed out that Mac gone against his word but you still want me gone.
I wouldn't have been happy with anything but a similar response thing to Epi's comment about being called Epi, and he questions epi's stance on him as you'd expect. I'd like to see a bit more ferocity, but going on a per-post makes it better. Not that I'm condoning his low post count and that he seems to still be focusing almost entirely on himself. I doubt he'd have questioned epi if he wasn't crusading against him.
Still a scum read.
What I'm about to explain can prove Epi to be either town or scum, but what you decide it up to you.
(I'm a Floyd fan, what do you expect?)You've got to pick up the easy meat with your eyes closed.
If Epi is scum, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) to make a jump start on us.
If Epi is town, he's trying to rid of the easy meat (AKA me) as he assumes I'm an easy scum target.
Anyway, thanks for the compliment Diiny.
Epi your actions are the reason most are town reading Floyd whether or not it's obvious. Floyd has not been town in isolation and yet many are reading him town. He's not attracting votes because people are piqued by your reckless attacking of him early on day 1 for no apparent reason. If I did that to Floyd before you would you vote for Floyd? Would you think I was up to no good? Honest questions.Epignosis wrote:I literally did not do that. I am not to blame for people saying Floyd is good. They are.MacDougall wrote:You literally did that though. The question is whether you did it as town by accident despite being genuine about him or as scum for some ulterior reason.
MacDougall wrote:Epignosis wrote:What a crock of shit. You don't know what you would expect of me if I was on a Mafia team with them. You aren't qualified to say that, because you've never even seen me play as Mafia.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.
If I were on a team with a new or inexperienced person, I would not throw that person under the bus for credibility. That's unsportsmanlike. My goal, especially in a skirmish with no banner or GoC qualification, would be to help the player refine his skills and enjoy the BTSC company. I wouldn't give a damn about winning a game like this at the expense of helping someone gain experience and nurture a potential future relationship. Inexperienced players would be less likely to want to continue playing if their experienced team uses them as fodder and doesn't let them experience the game.
And, just to drive home the point that you know stuff-all about me as Mafia: In all the games I have ever been in from the beginning, having been Mafia many many times, how many times did I throw a teammate under the bus before, say, Day 4?
I'll see if you know the answer to that.
Goody.MacDougall wrote:Well that's a reaction. A crock of shit? I think it's a pretty rational tinfoily argument tbh. Epignosis when I say it is what I expect, it is because it is what I would imagine two faceless experienced Mafia players would do. Not a personal read.
I have never seen someone bus a teammate for credibility. That is a new one for me.MacDougall wrote:Second point is bizarre because you are saying that you would be friendly and hospitable to your scum buddy not throwing them under the bus for cred. Well I actually said you threw him under the bus to give him cred so that would fall into that category. Also why would you exclusively be kind to a new player if they were your teammates? If you were bad you'd be a dick to the new guy if he wasn't your teammate?
The answer is one.MacDougall wrote:Of course I have no idea. My argument is tinfoil and also it's more about what I'd expect from an expert scum player than you personally. I don't know you from a bar of soap.
I'm not making an argument. You are.MacDougall wrote:So your entire argument is strawman.
Reckless attacking early? What about reckless attacking late?MacDougall wrote:Epi your actions are the reason most are town reading Floyd whether or not it's obvious. Floyd has not been town in isolation and yet many are reading him town. He's not attracting votes because people are piqued by your reckless attacking of him early on day 1 for no apparent reason. If I did that to Floyd before you would you vote for Floyd? Would you think I was up to no good? Honest questions.Epignosis wrote:I literally did not do that. I am not to blame for people saying Floyd is good. They are.MacDougall wrote:You literally did that though. The question is whether you did it as town by accident despite being genuine about him or as scum for some ulterior reason.
Thanks for telling me. I can sleep better tonight knowing I've been corrected by the rhetorical expertise of Mr. Tinfoil Strawman, ESQ.MacDougall wrote:But for an English teacher you have a pretty sketchy definition of the word argument if you think your reaction post to my statement isn't one.
Pfft okay mate.Epignosis wrote:Thanks for telling me. I can sleep better tonight knowing I've been corrected by the rhetorical expertise of Mr. Tinfoil Strawman, ESQ.MacDougall wrote:But for an English teacher you have a pretty sketchy definition of the word argument if you think your reaction post to my statement isn't one.
A mighty risky move...MacDougall wrote:Epi tell me do you think what I did in regards to the enrique lynch is the action of a scum? Contributing to a late game swing against a civ is a mightily risky move for a scum to make and it infers there is something to be gained from it. What would I have had to gain from it considering there is no way for me to have known he was the cop.
From what I can recall of my experience, I'd say it depends with regards to both "oh man this game" and "wanna make a bet"... too tough to say whether they are general town or mafia indicators. I try not to put any stock in such statements.Diiny wrote:I explain this, but yeah it's insincere and posts like that (oh man this game eh) have a history of netting scum. You don't agree? I also just recently saw FZ's "Wanna make a bet" post in an iso and that gives me the heebie jeebz hard.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why?Diiny wrote:TheFloyd73 wrote: Linki- I agree FZ, this game is getting pretty awful.How much do you want to bet that one or both of these posters are scumFZ. wrote:This game is getting worse by the minute![]()
I need to reread people, and I don't have time for it now.
Why do you see his reactions as reasonable, and how does this affect your read of him?Diiny wrote:Makes an argument that makes sense for the first time, reasonable reactions to epi's assault.MovingPictures07 wrote:I don't understand why this is Floyd's best post. Care to talk with me about this?Diiny wrote:this is floyd's best post.TheFloyd73 wrote: You put it on yourself, man. I have no idea what you've got against me, but whatever it is, just share it.
Am I not permitted to call you Epi? Give me a reason not to.
My statement refers to he fact that pointed out that Mac gone against his word but you still want me gone.
I wouldn't have been happy with anything but a similar response thing to Epi's comment about being called Epi, and he questions epi's stance on him as you'd expect. I'd like to see a bit more ferocity, but going on a per-post makes it better. Not that I'm condoning his low post count and that he seems to still be focusing almost entirely on himself. I doubt he'd have questioned epi if he wasn't crusading against him.
Still a scum read.
This will interest me greatly.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I guess that's my last ISO, not enough time for another. Time to decide where Mr. Vote goes.
Wilgy, you still around?DrWilgy wrote:My FZ suspicion hasn't faded. Recent events have me suspish of Diiny, FZ > JJJ > Dfaraday, Epi > everyone else
This is plausible.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.
I buy this. It's consistent with what I've heard from and seen from Epi for years.Epignosis wrote:What a crock of shit. You don't know what you would expect of me if I was on a Mafia team with them. You aren't qualified to say that, because you've never even seen me play as Mafia.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.
If I were on a team with a new or inexperienced person, I would not throw that person under the bus for credibility. That's unsportsmanlike. My goal, especially in a skirmish with no banner or GoC qualification, would be to help the player refine his skills and enjoy the BTSC company. I wouldn't give a damn about winning a game like this at the expense of helping someone gain experience and nurture a potential future relationship. Inexperienced players would be less likely to want to continue playing if their experienced team uses them as fodder and doesn't let them experience the game.
And, just to drive home the point that you know stuff-all about me as Mafia: In all the games I have ever been in from the beginning, having been Mafia many many times, how many times did I throw a teammate under the bus before, say, Day 4?
I'll see if you know the answer to that.
You would say that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Building entire mafia teams before any of them has died is almost always pointless. Matt F Dougall
Correct me if I am wrong, but the scum team didn't get to communicate with each other until after Epignosis had already made that move on Floyd. So the idea that their BTSC makes it implausible is irrelevant because hypothetically they hadn't communicated yet.MovingPictures07 wrote:This is plausible.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.![]()
I don't find myself thinking it's unreasonable...
That said, I think this is incredibly thorough and specific. I've come up with theories like this in past games and I was never exactly right, usually I wasn't even remotely right. I wouldn't seriously consider it unless we had already lynched at least one of them and gotten a mafia flip, probably two.
Taking each part separately, I think I'm more so considering the Epi -- JJJ connection and the JJJ -- Floyd connection than the Epi -- Floyd connection. Epi seems too be too harsh on Floyd for them to be teammates; I think if they had BTSC that interaction seems less believable.
No offense intended if you're reading Matt.MacDougall wrote:You would say that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Building entire mafia teams before any of them has died is almost always pointless. Matt F Dougall
You're the second person to call me Matt F today. I think it's pretty conniving tbh.
Jimmy let's lynch Epignosis then and reassess.
I am not playing like Matt F at all. I have multiple cases running simultaneously, am being measured and not tunneling anyone. Jimmy's post is a swipe at my credibility and it's unfounded.MovingPictures07 wrote:Matt F Dougall.
Oh, this is a good point. Mafia wouldn't get to talk until Night 1, I would imagine.MacDougall wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but the scum team didn't get to communicate with each other until after Epignosis had already made that move on Floyd. So the idea that their BTSC makes it implausible is irrelevant because hypothetically they hadn't communicated yet.MovingPictures07 wrote:This is plausible.MacDougall wrote:Epignosis and Jimmy are very good players and Floyd is very inexperienced. What better way to get the heat off Floyd than by attacking him with unfounded suspicion. Nobody is going to just railroad the poor kid on day 1 or day 2 because Epi comes at him caseless and baseless. And if you don't make a play like that to help Floyd he naturally attracts suspicion like nobody's business. Epignosis has effectively completely achieved the opposite of his stated initial objective, he has made Floyd a town read for most. Do you think that is by accident?
Jimmy took the opposite approach. He's distancing by killing with kindness and at the same time distancing from Epignosis by going hard at him for the weak Floyd read. If Floyd manages to get killed then Jimmy can play the "well if I was a teammate I would never have defended him that much card" and if Epi gets killed Jimmy looks million buck for being his main adversary.
Epignosis and Jimmy's shit slinging match has been exhaustive, and as Zebra pointed out much of what they have pointed out about one another has been inconsistent play, not necessarily alignment indicative stuff. Jimmy has dialed back his read to Epi as wrong, not manipulative at one point and yet still has his vote on him.
They have played exactly as I would expect them to if they were a scum team.![]()
I don't find myself thinking it's unreasonable...
That said, I think this is incredibly thorough and specific. I've come up with theories like this in past games and I was never exactly right, usually I wasn't even remotely right. I wouldn't seriously consider it unless we had already lynched at least one of them and gotten a mafia flip, probably two.
Taking each part separately, I think I'm more so considering the Epi -- JJJ connection and the JJJ -- Floyd connection than the Epi -- Floyd connection. Epi seems too be too harsh on Floyd for them to be teammates; I think if they had BTSC that interaction seems less believable.
I kind of cut it short at the end. I honestly ran out of things to say, and I don't blame you. I think I'm too tired to keep ISOing right now and you were just the last one I did.Diiny wrote:Jay, I feel like your iso of me is missing some content. I don't even know what it is, I just went through and felt like I posted more relevant stuff than you commented on. I also feel like we just disagree on floyd.
JJJ, refer to this question from my response post to your FZ. ISO.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:No offense intended if you're reading Matt.MacDougall wrote:You would say that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Building entire mafia teams before any of them has died is almost always pointless. Matt F Dougall
You're the second person to call me Matt F today. I think it's pretty conniving tbh.
Jimmy let's lynch Epignosis then and reassess.Sometimes wild theories make the person generating them look more town, so it's a positive even if the theories are wrong.
My vote's still there. I do admit that this one is a difficult choice. I didn't find any slam dunk baddies in my reviews.
Thoughts?MovingPictures07 wrote:JJJ, thanks for this ISO of FZ.
Third, I'm intrigued that you called your analysis a "mixed bag", because it seemed to me like you gave her significantly more negative points than positive ones. What's making you hesitate to declare her a stronger read?
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply offense to either of you, nor agreement. I just thought it was a funny portmanteau.MacDougall wrote:I am not playing like Matt F at all. I have multiple cases running simultaneously, am being measured and not tunneling anyone. Jimmy's post is a swipe at my credibility and it's unfounded.MovingPictures07 wrote:Matt F Dougall.
If you were Mafia, would you take the easy road and "just let things play out?"MacDougall wrote:Epi my vote was already cast. As scum if my vote was already on a civilian the safe play is to just let things play out. For me to change it to another player at the last minute means there must have been a reason. Do you think it was because I felt that he was behaving scum or do you think I did it for nefarious reasons? If the latter what reasons would they be?
Why am I more town than Sorsha?MacDougall wrote:I will be pushing for Epignosis's lynch unless something occurs to make it impossible at which point DFaraday would be a possible vote.
a2thezebra
MovingPictures07
Sorsha
Diiny
DrWilgy
FZ.
JaggedJimmyJay
DFaraday
motel room
TheFloyd73
Epignosis
This is where I am at right this second.
48 hours to reach a decision and your best move is to follow 3J again at the last minute?MacDougall wrote:I will be pushing for Epignosis's lynch unless something occurs to make it impossible at which point DFaraday would be a possible vote.
a2thezebra
MovingPictures07
Sorsha
Diiny
DrWilgy
FZ.
JaggedJimmyJay
DFaraday
motel room
TheFloyd73
Epignosis
This is where I am at right this second.
I'm not offended, I just don't agree and I don't think Jimmy would be making jokes at me if he was a civilian tbh. Civilian Jimmy in this situation would be using this emoticon a lot.MovingPictures07 wrote:I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply offense to either of you, nor agreement. I just thought it was a funny portmanteau.MacDougall wrote:I am not playing like Matt F at all. I have multiple cases running simultaneously, am being measured and not tunneling anyone. Jimmy's post is a swipe at my credibility and it's unfounded.MovingPictures07 wrote:Matt F Dougall.