The Syndicate

I'll go with Boomslang and see if 10 votes are enough to lynch him if he's a baddie k

Lizzy wrote:Matt, you're a woman???? All these years were a lie then?

I'm sorry that I've had to lie for so long. Can you ever forgive me?

I was the Pink Knight in my prior incarnation and I had like a billion lives. 20, I think.

They've only killed Mongoose 1.0 and Nev so far, right? I love that I was their first kill and now I'm back to keep hot on their little squirrelly tails. HA!

linki Lizzy - I wonder if Llama was right about Boomboxslang.
linki - Now you guys HAVE to stay together.

I am now more confused than usual

I am not confused about who I will be voting for, though. Away!

*votes Boomer*

A firm believer in The Llama Gambit, I will trust my friend's hirsute instincts and vote Boomslang.

* Votes Boom Boom Shaka Laka Laka Boomslang*

linki - UGH Dev. You beat me to it. Now I look less original.

Yours is better, though

A Person wrote:

Lizzy wrote:Matt, you're a woman???? All these years were a lie then?

I'm sorry that I've had to lie for so long. Can you ever forgive me?

Imma gonna have to think abaout it k

@ Goosey - I guess we'll see. :O

- actually mine is better

Devin the Omniscient wrote:
Also, Quiet Epi is a scary Epi

I'm not sure I agree. I'm not outright defending him, but I am leaning towards civ on him. He is still participating in in The Island over on Revolution Mafia. It makes me think he is putting all his effort there and may be a bit bored with this game (sorry MP) which makes me think he is civ. If he was bad, I definitely think he would be more active.

I'm inclined to agree with whoever (sorry I cannot remember) brought up A Person as a suspect. I suspected HIM in the beginning and I think it was Lizzy that defended him, I will have to go back and read to see. Something to think about.

But, even though I suspect A Person, I am sticking with a Boom vote today. I also agree with the suspicions on him and again, I think we need to keep our votes together as much as possible.

*votes Boomslang*

Hurry and vote, guys! Only 10 mins left!

I'll stick with boomslang.

Elohcin wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:
Also, Quiet Epi is a scary Epi

I'm not sure I agree. I'm not outright defending him, but I am leaning towards civ on him. He is still participating in in The Island over on Revolution Mafia. It makes me think he is putting all his effort there and may be a bit bored with this game (sorry MP) which makes me think he is civ. If he was bad, I definitely think he would be more active.

I'm inclined to agree with whoever (sorry I cannot remember) brought up A Person as a suspect. I suspected HIM in the beginning and I think it was Lizzy that defended him, I will have to go back and read to see. Something to think about.

But, even though I suspect A Person, I am sticking with a Boom vote today. I also agree with the suspicions on him and again, I think we need to keep our votes together as much as possible.

*votes Boomslang*

That makes sense Thanks!

Mongoose wrote:Hurry and vote, guys! Only 10 mins left!

I think we have another hour.

I voted boomslang, I think the hypothesis that baddies have less lives than goodies is logical, so hopefully it will be a deciding factor in what happens next.

I guess I'll stick with the suspicions against Boomslang and go in his direction.

I wouldn't mind taking another look at both A Person and Jigsaw tomorrow though. I could see one of them being bad.

Votes Boomslang

Interesting how today's vote has gone. Sure let's see who Boomslang is. We will definitely learn something from this lynch I'd think.

*votes Boom*

Okay now that I'm dead in the other game I should be able to focus easier. Since I have no time, I'll vote Boom.

Oh wow, way to win the game, Boomslang!

I felt so bad about lynching TOFU Boy, but then if you've won, I'm pretty stoked about that.

MovingPictures07 wrote:I will be busy tomorrow evening, so I have extended the period.

Night 6 will end at roughly 12:03PM EST on Saturday, November 23rd.

Enjoy your karaoke, mechanical bull riding, and cinnamon challenge undertaking!

Mongoose wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:Vomps is always really quiet. Which makes me very nervous around him and he is extra quiet this time...

I've been monitoring this conversation.

*votes self*

Vomps, how do you feel about desserts? Like blondies, do you like those? What about brownies?

The gril I love has a long black wavy hair.

Well congrats on winning, Boomslang! I guess?

Wow, go Boomslang! I'm actually a little surprised you didn't act even more suspicious to get lynched. Well played.

Mongoose wrote:Also, burnt tofu is awful. I directed James on making tofu jerky in the toaster oven. I instructed him to put it in there for 6 hours at 200F. He thought it would work out the same if he put it in at 400F for 3 hours (because he didn't have "all day").

It was charred to a crisp and wholly inedible and I still bring it up during arguments.

This story just made my entire day.

Vompatti wrote:

Mongoose wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:Vomps is always really quiet. Which makes me very nervous around him and he is extra quiet this time...

I've been monitoring this conversation.

*votes self*

Vomps, how do you feel about desserts? Like blondies, do you like those? What about brownies?

The gril I love has a long black wavy hair.

Is she going to California?

Elohcin wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:
Also, Quiet Epi is a scary Epi

I'm not sure I agree. I'm not outright defending him, but I am leaning towards civ on him. He is still participating in in The Island over on Revolution Mafia. It makes me think he is putting all his effort there and may be a bit bored with this game (sorry MP) which makes me think he is civ. If he was bad, I definitely think he would be more active.

I'm inclined to agree with whoever (sorry I cannot remember) brought up A Person as a suspect. I suspected HIM in the beginning and I think it was Lizzy that defended him, I will have to go back and read to see. Something to think about.

But, even though I suspect A Person, I am sticking with a Boom vote today. I also agree with the suspicions on him and again, I think we need to keep our votes together as much as possible.

*votes Boomslang*

No madam.

I am bored because:

1. I was killed Night 1 and brought back. I have no need to defend myself. Which means I may die at any moment.

2. I have no suspicion on anyone given the nature of this game.

3. Replacements should be lynched, given that from my experience, such people replace bad guys.

Mongoose wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:I will be busy tomorrow evening, so I have extended the period.

Night 6 will end at roughly 12:03PM EST on Saturday, November 23rd.

Enjoy your karaoke, mechanical bull riding, and cinnamon challenge undertaking!

we want pictures this time Devin!!

Wow, congrats Tofuslang! Yeah...that doesn't work as well as Baddieslang. Well played sir, well played. I am quite surprised that you even defended yourself so much. Hmm, will have to ponder what this means for tomorrow.

I am picking level 4!

Mister Rearranger wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Mongoose wrote:

Vompatti wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:Vomps is always really quiet. Which makes me very nervous around him and he is extra quiet this time...

I've been monitoring this conversation.

*votes self*

Vomps, how do you feel about desserts? Like blondies, do you like those? What about brownies?

The gril I love has a long black wavy hair.

Is she going to California?

I dunnno k

Congrats/RIP Boom-fu Not sure how that helps, but yeah...

So umm, what's the hizzaps for the next day?

DP, now that we have your undivided attention, what are your thoughts on the game thus far?

Congrats Boomer!! That was wholly unexpected despite you basically saying it to my face. Paraphrasing: Lynch votes would benefit a suicidal role
Way to manipulate the votes, man!!

Epignosis wrote: No madam.

I am bored because:

1. I was killed Night 1 and brought back. I have no need to defend myself. Which means I may die at any moment.

2. I have no suspicion on anyone given the nature of this game.

3. Replacements should be lynched, given that from my experience, such people replace bad guys.

From my experience, I would say #3 is usually the exact opposite. I've replaced into many games before, and only once was it with a baddie team.

(I'm basing this off of games I had already been in, died, and came back as a replacement. So it might not be the strongest sample size.)

It's just not something I see being very common. I think if it happens too much, it can give the baddies an advantage. Especially if it's civvies who were NKed.

I don't know my thoughts really.

Epi, replacements replace anyone. Not just baddies. At basically a rate normal with initially getting the role. Not sure why your experience led you to believe otherwise.

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:I don't know my thoughts really.

Epi, replacements replace anyone. Not just baddies. At basically a rate normal with initially getting the role. Not sure why your experience led you to believe otherwise.

Perhaps his teammate was replaced...

Epignosis wrote:
No madam.

I am bored because:

1. I was killed Night 1 and brought back. I have no need to defend myself. Which means I may die at any moment.

2. I have no suspicion on anyone given the nature of this game.

3. Replacements should be lynched, given that from my experience, such people replace bad guys.

two and three contradict one another, don't they?

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:I don't know my thoughts really.

Epi, replacements replace anyone. Not just baddies. At basically a rate normal with initially getting the role. Not sure why your experience led you to believe otherwise.

As a replacement, I obviously have strong personal feelings against Epi's 3rd point. I also agree with the objections DP and Elo raised about it from a theoretical perspective.

I went through the polls and did a little tabulating to see how the patterns are forming. Some interesting stuff here for sure.

Hedge1 = hedge voted Day 1 for example
A Person - inh6 (1)
birdwithteeth11 -hedge 2 (1)
Boomslang -- Tofu Boy -- Lynched - Day 6 -- WINNER - epi4, llama5, devin5, elo5, mong(2.0)5, mata5, lizzy6, devin6, mong(2.0)6, elo6, mata6, ap6, bwt6, hedge6, dp6 (15)
Devin the Omniscient - jig1, nev1, hedge1, jig2, jig3, jig4 (6)
DisgruntledPorcupine - russti3 (1)
Elohcin - russti6, inh6 (2)
Epignosis -- Killed by Lil' Slugger - Night 1 -- Resurrected - Night 2 - no votes
Hedgeowl - llama2, lizzy2, elo2, mr2 (4)
insertnamehere - llama1, llama3, mr3 (3)
Jigsaw - devin1, devin2, devin3, devin4, llama4, elohcin4, mata4, boom6 (8)
Lizzy - lizzy1, nev3, epi3, lizzy4, mr5 (5)
Matahari -- [Replaced Dom - Night 2] - no votes
Mister Rearranger -- [Replaced wrathofgod - Day 2] - lizzy3, ap3, lizzy5, vomps5, ap5 (5)
Mongoose -- Pink Knight -- Killed by C.H.A.D. - Night 2 - vomps1, nev2
Mongoose 2.0 -- [Replaced Rose - Day 5] -- [Replaced Flyin' High - Day 2] - no votes
Nevinera -- Killed by C.H.A.D. - Night 3 - inh1
Russtifinko -- [Replaced Degobunny - Night 2] - no votes
thellama73 -- Goo Ball -- Lynched - Day 5 - ap1, epi1, elo1, bwt2, inh2, dp2, elo3, mata3, bwt3, dp3, boom4, russti4, hedge4, boom5, hedge5 (16)
Vompatti - mongoose1, vomps2, vomps3, epi5, vomps6, russti6 (6)

I need to look at this more, but currently not feeling great about DP. Need to reread him and looking at AP as well this time.

Well shucks. Maybe you fellas are right after all about #3. That notion sure was a stretch. What was I even thinking, bringing up such a thing?

Wouldn't it be weird, though, if I brought it up to see who'd react to it and how?

The llama gambit

Dun dun DAAAHHHH!!!!!

Devin the Omniscient wrote:The llama gambit

Dun dun DAAAHHHH!!!!!

That is not the llama gambit, I'll have you know. I fish for reactions all the time.

thellama73 wrote:Now that all the votes have been cast, I can reveal the patented "Llama Gambit."

Knowing that most of the time baddies try to act helpful and logical to blend in with the civvies, I decided to act crazy and illogical. A baddie would have to be nuts to act the way I've been acting, and I was counting on the civs realizing that. Therefore, civs would be unlikely to vote for me, but baddies would see an opportunity. They could vote for a civ and when my affiliation is revealed excuse themselevs by saying "well, he was acting really crazy."

However, by revealing my strategy in the thread, one of two things will happen: Either I get lynched, in which case the civvies have good info on who the baddies are based on who voted for me, or I survive and still have good info based on the votes for me. Either way, my team is aided substantially towards victory.

This is the "Llama Gambit." I hope you are sa impressed with it as I was when I came up with it.

Epignosis wrote:Well shucks. Maybe you fellas are right after all about #3. That notion sure was a stretch. What was I even thinking, bringing up such a thing?

Wouldn't it be weird, though, if I brought it up to see who'd react to it and how?

Less weird than the theory I had where you had worded it poorly, despite being an English teacher.

A Person wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Well shucks. Maybe you fellas are right after all about #3. That notion sure was a stretch. What was I even thinking, bringing up such a thing?

Wouldn't it be weird, though, if I brought it up to see who'd react to it and how?

Less weird than the theory I had where you had worded it poorly, despite being an English teacher.

How so?

Epignosis wrote:

A Person wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Well shucks. Maybe you fellas are right after all about #3. That notion sure was a stretch. What was I even thinking, bringing up such a thing?

Wouldn't it be weird, though, if I brought it up to see who'd react to it and how?

Less weird than the theory I had where you had worded it poorly, despite being an English teacher.

How so?

I assumed #3 was you saying that we shouldn't excuse replacements, it seemed more logical than just lynching them because they're replacements.

A Person wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

A Person wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Well shucks. Maybe you fellas are right after all about #3. That notion sure was a stretch. What was I even thinking, bringing up such a thing?

Wouldn't it be weird, though, if I brought it up to see who'd react to it and how?

Less weird than the theory I had where you had worded it poorly, despite being an English teacher.

How so?

I assumed #3 was you saying that we shouldn't excuse replacements, it seemed more logical than just lynching them because they're replacements.

Nah, I meant what I said there.

But I don't necessarily mean what I said there.

2+2=5

Epignosis wrote:

Devin the Omniscient wrote:The llama gambit

Dun dun DAAAHHHH!!!!!

That is not the llama gambit, I'll have you know. I fish for reactions all the time.

thellama73 wrote:Now that all the votes have been cast, I can reveal the patented "Llama Gambit."

Knowing that most of the time baddies try to act helpful and logical to blend in with the civvies, I decided to act crazy and illogical. A baddie would have to be nuts to act the way I've been acting, and I was counting on the civs realizing that. Therefore, civs would be unlikely to vote for me, but baddies would see an opportunity. They could vote for a civ and when my affiliation is revealed excuse themselevs by saying "well, he was acting really crazy."

However, by revealing my strategy in the thread, one of two things will happen: Either I get lynched, in which case the civvies have good info on who the baddies are based on who voted for me, or I survive and still have good info based on the votes for me. Either way, my team is aided substantially towards victory.

This is the "Llama Gambit." I hope you are sa impressed with it as I was when I came up with it.

Affect/Effect