The Syndicate

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Ricochet wrote:Thanks, MP, the only answer that doesn't fully adress the question is the ACEO one. I meant which players were chosen, targeted by the song choices and when? Again, JJJ only told me about the first four Nights.

Night 1 - "Cities" -- a2thezebra -- Never got to use, was supposed to track N2, but N2 didn't happen
Night 2 - "Girls..." -- N/A -- Night 2 skipped
Night 3 - "Moon Rocks" -- Matt F -- checked whether Golden was Uh-Oh
Night 4 - "The Overload" -- Macdougall, Matt F, RadicalFuzz, TheFloyd73, Golden
Night 5 - "Radio Head" -- Russtifinko -- passive unbeknownst insanification
Night 7 - "Mr. Jones" -- JaggedJimmyJay -- Never got to use, Jay had no night role power to double
Night 9 - "The Overload" -- Ricochet, Strawhenge, Matt F, DrWilgy, JaggedJimmyJay
Night 10 - "Cities" -- RadicalFuzz -- Never got to use, since he died
Night 11 - "Radio Head" -- Ricochet -- passive unbeknownst insanification
Night 12 - "Girls..." -- N/A
Night 13 - "Stay Up Late"
Night 14 - "Mr. Jones"

Note that these were the songs selected, not the effects from those songs (since they were mismatched).

There's those. With regards to Moon Rocks...

Matt F used one against MacDougall on Night 5.
Strawhenge used one against JaggedJimmyJay on Night 10.
DrWilgy used one against JaggedJimmyJay on Night 10.
JJJ used one against MM on Night 11.

What, how this did work? The recipients were randomly chosen?

Night 11 - "Radio Head" -- Ricochet -- passive unbeknownst insanification

Que-ce que c'est?

I never received this.

Ricochet wrote:What, how this did work? The recipients were randomly chosen?

Night 11 - "Radio Head" -- Ricochet -- passive unbeknownst insanification

Que-ce que c'est?

I never received this.

"Radio Head" was the effect of the "The Overload".

People who were afflicted with insanity (you, Russ) were not made aware.

Game
Votes
The LC interaction spectrum analysis

And as a special feature, the writing in-character quotes I compiled. Interestingly, I never checked the last two TH albums (got lazy), except for remembering at one point the "I wish I had a lawnmower" line from (Nothing But) Flowers, off of Naked.

Ricochet wrote:Game
Votes
The LC interaction spectrum analysis

And as a special feature, the writing in-character quotes I compiled. Interestingly, I never checked the last two TH albums (got lazy), except for remembering at one point the "I wish I had a lawnmower" line from (Nothing But) Flowers, off of Naked.

As always, is necessary.

This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

And at least you didn't explode randomly this time.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

And at least you didn't explode randomly this time.

Yes, these are the kinds of roles I land in your games, aren't they . I think its a good role though, the laughing one not the exploding one. It just needed to be made objective. For instance, anytime a player made someone else respond with a ' ' would have worked.

Elohcin wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

And at least you didn't explode randomly this time.

Yes, these are the kinds of roles I land in your games, aren't they . I think its a good role though, the laughing one not the exploding one. It just needed to be made objective. For instance, anytime a player made someone else respond with a ' ' would have worked.

Your husband did that long ago.

Elohcin wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

And at least you didn't explode randomly this time.

Yes, these are the kinds of roles I land in your games, aren't they . I think its a good role though, the laughing one not the exploding one. It just needed to be made objective. For instance, anytime a player made someone else respond with a ' ' would have worked.

LOL, yeah, now that you mention it, it does seem you have continuously landed experimental roles. Although you did have Ogmo in Super Meat Boy, which... wasn't too weird (comparatively).

Yeah, I agree, on reflection it makes more sense to have setup in that fashion. I didn't want to lift it straight from Roger Rabbit though (which is similar to what you suggest here), so that's why I put the subjective spin on it. Maybe we'll see the role again one of these days...

Roger Rabbit bitchez

Epignosis wrote:Roger Rabbit bitchez

I prefer to block that one out of my memory.

Elohcin wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:This game was fun for the most part for what little time I played. My one suggestion is to make all roles objective rather than subjective. My role being subjective was a bit frustrating.

Your role was definitely experimental; I don't plan on using anything like that again. Was worth trying out though.

And at least you didn't explode randomly this time.

Yes, these are the kinds of roles I land in your games, aren't they . I think its a good role though, the laughing one not the exploding one. It just needed to be made objective. For instance, anytime a player made someone else respond with a ' ' would have worked.

I always seem to land a role that can't be lynched or nightkilled.

@Eloh - that was how Epi did it in Roger Rabbit and it was great. I worked so hard to earn the

And then I went and voweled myself out.

Golden wrote:@Eloh - that was how Epi did it in Roger Rabbit and it was great. I worked so hard to earn the

And then I went and voweled myself out.

It was a real vowel movement.

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:@Eloh - that was how Epi did it in Roger Rabbit and it was great. I worked so hard to earn the

And then I went and voweled myself out.

It was a real vowel movement.

LOL, the vowel movement. That was great.

I just realized, this is my first win in a full game as a civilian. Thanks fellow civs.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I just realized, this is my first win in a full game as a civilian. Thanks fellow civs.

Wow, seriously? Nicely done.

I remember struggling to even win a game for the longest time... let alone as a civilian. My first win as a civilian was probably over two years or so after I started playing.

Well I did win in Cars, but I replaced in late in that game, and as a civilian who was rezzed, so I didn't have to prove myself at all, nor do any work.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well I did win in Cars, but I replaced in late in that game, and as a civilian who was rezzed, so I didn't have to prove myself at all, nor do any work.

Isn't that the best kind of game? :P

I also blocked that game out of my memory. Future games will see a new and improved MP.

I'm hoping, anyway.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Well I did win in Cars, but I replaced in late in that game, and as a civilian who was rezzed, so I didn't have to prove myself at all, nor do any work.

Isn't that the best kind of game? :P

I also blocked that game out of my memory. Future games will see a new and improved MP.

I'm hoping, anyway.

Had you not rezzed me (or BWT who it was at the time I think), things may have been different.

I hope you don't plan on trying to break Jay's posting record in future games.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Had you not rezzed me (or BWT who it was at the time I think), things may have been different.

I hope you don't plan on trying to break Jay's posting record in future games.

No, I only hope to improve my game... mostly by tunneling less. That's goal #1.

As much as I'd like to try to break Jay's posting record, I'd certainly fail out of the PhD program if I did... and be committed to an asylum for overly obsessive behavior.

"Man Fails to Comprehend Difference between Mafia Game and Real Life"

Just have to give you all one last round of applause. I really still can't believe the amount of effort exhibited here.

This game has over twice as many posts as each of the 2013 and 2014 Game of Champions threads.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I just realized, this is my first win in a full game as a civilian. Thanks fellow civs.

Thanks go towards you as well, sir. You played your part to gather up immunity points in great fashion and ultimately saved our asses.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Had you not rezzed me (or BWT who it was at the time I think), things may have been different.

I hope you don't plan on trying to break Jay's posting record in future games.

No, I only hope to improve my game... mostly by tunneling less. That's goal #1.

As much as I'd like to try to break Jay's posting record, I'd certainly fail out of the PhD program if I did... and be committed to an asylum for overly obsessive behavior.

"Man Fails to Comprehend Difference between Mafia Game and Real Life"

It depends though. I tried to break out of tunneling in this game, namely after seaside was lynched. As a result, I felt incredibly waffly, and acutally had a difficult time committing to reads. It also resulted in me dropping my long-time suspicion of a player who almost won it for mafia.

It'd be nice to be an effective tunneler.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Had you not rezzed me (or BWT who it was at the time I think), things may have been different.

I hope you don't plan on trying to break Jay's posting record in future games.

No, I only hope to improve my game... mostly by tunneling less. That's goal #1.

As much as I'd like to try to break Jay's posting record, I'd certainly fail out of the PhD program if I did... and be committed to an asylum for overly obsessive behavior.

"Man Fails to Comprehend Difference between Mafia Game and Real Life"

It depends though. I tried to break out of tunneling in this game, namely after seaside was lynched. As a result, I felt incredibly waffly, and acutally had a difficult time committing to reads. It also resulted in me dropping my long-time suspicion of a player who almost won it for mafia.

It'd be nice to be an effective tunneler.

That's very true; there's a fine line between tunneler and wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey noncommital. The hardest is walking down that exact line, since it's easy to stumble onto one side or the other.

Better to be wibbly-wobbly than flippy-floppy.

Ricochet wrote:I'm happy to report that This Must Be the Place (Naive Melody) now occupies the third spot in my favourite TH songs list, behind The Great Curve and New Feeling.