Re: Landlord Legacy Listing - Night One (1)
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:48 pm
Murder, Mayhem, and Mafia
https://www.mafiathesyndicate.com/
Well, I'm not you, and I don't think or play like you. Even as town. Your insistence that it is relevant does affect me though, and I concede that there may be something to get out of it, I'm just not sure what. I'm not married to that list... it was mostly very shallow GTH-ish reads. So I'm not that inclined to pick points of it and nitpick with Robyn about which suspicions are right and which are wrong.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:38 pmlol. I just ... assume... someone who is trying to solve the game... might have more thoughts on the subject than that.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:34 pmRobyn disagrees with my reads list a great deal.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:29 pmwell i'm glad you remembered it, is below, if you would like to comment on itLong Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 6:52 pmPfft, you just decided that because you were red on my list.![]()
The one where she said it's so bad and backward that it's lacking TMI? No, I don't believe I responded to that.also my brain kinda feels like its melting from last night but can you remind me if you responded to robyn's defense of your read list? you guys have had some weird interactions, and by weird, ones I read as possibly w/w
since you tease that I am omgus'ing you based on the reads list, i'm sure you have a comment about robyn's alignment based on their interesting defense of said reads listShe's allowed to. Maybe she's right.
If you're so sure I have some relevant comment about it, why don't you just cut to the chase and tell me what it's supposed to be? I don't know where you're going with this.
robyn might be right... robyn is allowed to disagree... and allowed to disagree on the entire list... and you prodded it exactly 0%. not a single question or discussion on which reads are "backwards" or why robyn should just "assume" you are town based on the list.
like i'm just saying if it were me... and I bothered to make an unprompted and large reads list early in the game, I'm doing it for a reason... and if someone comes out of the woodworks to defend me as town because my reads are supposedly trash, I'm going to have some questions or feelings or thoughts about it. you appear to have none and are continuously doubling down on having none. doesn't make sense to act this way from a town perspective
LOL that's not what that means. I mean being coy.
oh I do like being coy, but I was not trying to do that here, sorryLong Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:02 pmWell, I'm not you, and I don't think or play like you. Even as town. Your insistence that it is relevant does affect me though, and I concede that there may be something to get out of it, I'm just not sure what. I'm not married to that list... it was mostly very shallow GTH-ish reads. So I'm not that inclined to pick points of it and nitpick with Robyn about which suspicions are right and which are wrong.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:38 pmlol. I just ... assume... someone who is trying to solve the game... might have more thoughts on the subject than that.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:34 pmRobyn disagrees with my reads list a great deal.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 7:29 pmwell i'm glad you remembered it, is below, if you would like to comment on itLong Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 6:52 pmPfft, you just decided that because you were red on my list.![]()
The one where she said it's so bad and backward that it's lacking TMI? No, I don't believe I responded to that.also my brain kinda feels like its melting from last night but can you remind me if you responded to robyn's defense of your read list? you guys have had some weird interactions, and by weird, ones I read as possibly w/w
since you tease that I am omgus'ing you based on the reads list, i'm sure you have a comment about robyn's alignment based on their interesting defense of said reads listShe's allowed to. Maybe she's right.
If you're so sure I have some relevant comment about it, why don't you just cut to the chase and tell me what it's supposed to be? I don't know where you're going with this.
robyn might be right... robyn is allowed to disagree... and allowed to disagree on the entire list... and you prodded it exactly 0%. not a single question or discussion on which reads are "backwards" or why robyn should just "assume" you are town based on the list.
like i'm just saying if it were me... and I bothered to make an unprompted and large reads list early in the game, I'm doing it for a reason... and if someone comes out of the woodworks to defend me as town because my reads are supposedly trash, I'm going to have some questions or feelings or thoughts about it. you appear to have none and are continuously doubling down on having none. doesn't make sense to act this way from a town perspective
LOL that's not what that means. I mean being coy.
It's tough playing with a lot of people I don't know. There's a lot going on that I can't really follow, like the "omg you are locktown never rescind" and it's on the second page of the game. That kind of stuff, my mind kind of shuts out. I think robyn's analysis of the list was like that. It's so egregiously unlike how I think or play that I just so "sure, ok" and move on.
Sure did! But there was a three-vote manipulation (someone moved all inactive non-voters' votes?), and Porscha was, by apparent votes, was "supposed" to go.
hm... rolling over and giving up instead of poking harder... I suppose I am willing to boil it down to choice of play. i'm still not really townreading your general presence in thread though, I didn't get much reason to townread you after that point either. where is your head at right now?Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:34 pmIt's tough playing with a lot of people I don't know. There's a lot going on that I can't really follow, like the "omg you are locktown never rescind" and it's on the second page of the game. That kind of stuff, my mind kind of shuts out. I think robyn's analysis of the list was like that. It's so egregiously unlike how I think or play that I just so "sure, ok" and move on.
Sure did! But there was a three-vote manipulation (someone moved all inactive non-voters' votes?), and Porscha was, by apparent votes, was "supposed" to go.
yeah I saw flipless. I'm not sure I've ever played flipless before. and I saw the whole "vote when you think we've won" thingy. screwy stuff, very Rondo
I dunno. I'll try to get my thoughts together tomorrow with some rereads. "Rolling over and giving up" is obviously not how I see it. I don't see how I did either of those things. My impression of Robyn is that her opinions of players can change with the breeze. For all I know, she'll agree with the whole list before long... way harder to advance suspicions without flips though.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:38 pmhm... rolling over and giving up instead of poking harder... I suppose I am willing to boil it down to choice of play. i'm still not really townreading your general presence in thread though, I didn't get much reason to townread you after that point either. where is your head at right now?Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 8:34 pmIt's tough playing with a lot of people I don't know. There's a lot going on that I can't really follow, like the "omg you are locktown never rescind" and it's on the second page of the game. That kind of stuff, my mind kind of shuts out. I think robyn's analysis of the list was like that. It's so egregiously unlike how I think or play that I just so "sure, ok" and move on.
Sure did! But there was a three-vote manipulation (someone moved all inactive non-voters' votes?), and Porscha was, by apparent votes, was "supposed" to go.
not so sure about that since it was a special power that made scotty dieWindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:24 amEh, it also looks bad for people who didn't vote, like memainly because I never forget to vote before deadline. I was delaying it because I knew I couldn't move it once I voted, though, and I wasn't sure I had solid enough reasons to case Porscha at the time, and a handful of players hadn't even checked into the thread.
Also, I will backread but I'm outta time for now, I got up to page 8 or 9 so far.
I didn't perceive WWA as the most sussed early game and I was there tbh but i guess there is disagreementBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:24 amWhy?
And why isn't my sus on WWA easy, and instead noteworthy? WWA was the most sussed player at early game iirc
okay someone catch me up on how the mech doesnt look good for porscha like what?
never mind ur town, uh help me find wolves besides robyn because im lazyPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:30 amno, if i'm a wolf, I always fucking vote off scotty over nook there even if they are both town because nook didn't do jack in comparison to scotty... scotty had more townreads and would get more if left alive... that is obvious to me and when you used "scotty v nanook = PORSCHA WOLF" as an argument, that felt contrived, not thought out, and therefore I felt your posts had agenda and you made a lot of speculation in a narrow focus instead of "oh maybe this, maybe that, unsure" it wasn't broad, so your attempt at "Explanation" didn't feel real to me and it felt like an opportunistic way to jump to a conclusion that is generally agreeable "wouldn't be surprised if there was some vote manipulation that wolves had some sort of control over" but to specifically push worlds and not seek much past pushing the world and that is why it tasted so disgusting in my mouth to read your posts and yes my reaction reflects thatBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:23 amYou are very aggressive in your defence. You use words like "made up mechanic" and "fake applying" to downplay what happened. There is a focus on "we dont know whats going on" that I feel lead to "so lets drop it", which I think is what you want us to do. The last part "that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmao" is passive-aggressive and downplaying the theories.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:18 amI sincerely don't believe you can explain this without making huge assumptions riddled with agenda, but I do invite you to tryBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:16 amThis feels rand>wolfyPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:06 amwell I didn't vote scotty so I'm not sure what made up mechanic we are fake applying to scotty's wagon that isn't confirmed that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmaoWindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:47 am Wait wait wait, so... I'm on page 11 but there were more votes on porscha than on scotty? Or so it looks? Is that why boq said porscha is outed? Cause if so, I can totally see that, yeah.
I think svs's vote on lily is a poor excuse but I think it's so abrupt and bad that it's towny
And I'm not sure why scotty said he was trying something and voted me, but I'm not done reading yet. I should actually check what the vote count at EoD was but all I paid attention to was my own lack of vote lol, I gotta get back to work but at least I have a little more context now on what went down.
It is like you are newly awake and have a gun in your hand tbh. Like, instead of trying to understand what's going on you are focusing on the fact that we currently don't know what's going on. And I find that to be a wolfy reaction to what's happening tbh
If you are town, should you not be interested in that scum saved you and went for Scotty over Nanook? Instead of aggressively defending yourself, that is tbh.
IMO both robyn and lily have had a decent amount of AtE in their interactionsBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:46 amCool, so scum porscha votes out Scotty, and Scotty was voted out tbh, I understandPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:30 amno, if i'm a wolf, I always fucking vote off scotty over nook there even if they are both town because nook didn't do jack in comparison to scotty... scotty had more townreads and would get more if left alive... that is obvious to me and when you used "scotty v nanook = PORSCHA WOLF" as an argument, that felt contrived, not thought out, and therefore I felt your posts had agenda and you made a lot of speculation in a narrow focus instead of "oh maybe this, maybe that, unsure" it wasn't broad, so your attempt at "Explanation" didn't feel real to me and it felt like an opportunistic way to jump to a conclusion that is generally agreeable "wouldn't be surprised if there was some vote manipulation that wolves had some sort of control over" but to specifically push worlds and not seek much past pushing the world and that is why it tasted so disgusting in my mouth to read your posts and yes my reaction reflects thatBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:23 amYou are very aggressive in your defence. You use words like "made up mechanic" and "fake applying" to downplay what happened. There is a focus on "we dont know whats going on" that I feel lead to "so lets drop it", which I think is what you want us to do. The last part "that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmao" is passive-aggressive and downplaying the theories.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:18 amI sincerely don't believe you can explain this without making huge assumptions riddled with agenda, but I do invite you to tryBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:16 amThis feels rand>wolfyPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:06 amwell I didn't vote scotty so I'm not sure what made up mechanic we are fake applying to scotty's wagon that isn't confirmed that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmaoWindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:47 am Wait wait wait, so... I'm on page 11 but there were more votes on porscha than on scotty? Or so it looks? Is that why boq said porscha is outed? Cause if so, I can totally see that, yeah.
I think svs's vote on lily is a poor excuse but I think it's so abrupt and bad that it's towny
And I'm not sure why scotty said he was trying something and voted me, but I'm not done reading yet. I should actually check what the vote count at EoD was but all I paid attention to was my own lack of vote lol, I gotta get back to work but at least I have a little more context now on what went down.
It is like you are newly awake and have a gun in your hand tbh. Like, instead of trying to understand what's going on you are focusing on the fact that we currently don't know what's going on. And I find that to be a wolfy reaction to what's happening tbh
If you are town, should you not be interested in that scum saved you and went for Scotty over Nanook? Instead of aggressively defending yourself, that is tbh.
I used several arguments, some to your benefit, some to not. Nor did I jump to a conclusion, but formed a conclusion of the information I have. Then I ultimately chose you > nanook, but that's because you gotta lean somewhere.
If you're town, you should try to approach my posts directly instead of hitting me with a run down sentence. You are not quoting anything tangible. Just hitting with anger, and I feel like that's a strategy to start a fight with me by also avoiding and meeting what I actually said. You are saying that I do not "seek much past pushing the world", but that is objectively false if you actually read my analysis. And even if you skip the longer posts, you'll notice that whilst my first reaction was "this is damning for porscha", my second was "tho Scotty died over Nanook hmm". This directly disproves your accusation and should show that I am solving and considering several worlds. Especially since I use that train of thought in my longer reasoning.
But you seem to be more happy with being Angerey and defending yourself, not solving. Like in this very post, there is zero curiosity in why I am saying something. There is zero attempt at solving my claims. No interest in the claims that are for your benefit, not much interest in my reasoning. You saw me push a wolf you thought, and went for attack mode immediately. This seek and destroy strategy is something I find more common in wolves who want to feign AtE and discourage villagers scum reading them by reacting strongly. Your posts are not generous in their interpretation of what I am saying, like I am just reading a critic here.
Compare the tone in our posts. I am calm, in control of myself, despite these posts of yours. You are not. And that's what makes me unable to town read you here. Because you have no reason as town to react with this outburst of emotion towards my posts. My posts aren't threatening you. They are trying to solve you. This makes me believe this to be fake AtE.
can you do what i desire the most; post a full reads list?
TOWN:
if you mean the game here you actually mech outed me : p still mad abt thatWindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:57 pmThe last time I played with wolf!lily I thought she was town until she slipped or whatever happened, I think you were also a wolf in that game? And I suspected you but retracted it for flimsy reasons because I didn't want to deal with it lol.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:51 pm Lily insists to me that she has a noticeable tonal gap between her alignments. But I usually struggle to find it early. Here, I feel like I hear it, it's a bit overly performative, lily accuses robyn of lazy power wolfing but I dont know how she can think that. Lily also said this page to robyn that she has been tr'ing me, but it wasnt more than 1 or 2 pages back I had to say to lily that at least robyn had the decency to note that I town told, whether it was tmi or not, and I argued with lily about whether she thinks I have been confident, expressing conflicting opinions with others, and making reads, and she tried to pretend like I wasnt doing all of those things when I objectively was. And then turns around and tells robyn she has been tr'ing me. Lol like... no you havent...
Anyway, I digress, I meant to say I don't think lily has a noticeable tonal gap early in the game but it shows up later.
Oh, ok. [VOTE: SVS] aubergine.S~V~S wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:09 pm@DrWilgy not sure of many things. Not sure what this poll is for, not sure why you voted for me, if it even means anything, and if it not counting even matters.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Sun Oct 22, 2023 6:08 pm Host announcement: Since it is Day 1 and there seems to have been some confusion about the voting protocol Rondo is going to let those who did it incorrectly slide and accept your votes. Going forward, remember two things:
1. Votes are not movable
2. You need to vote in the thread with vote tags before you vote in the poll.
If you either move your vote, or you vote in the poll without voting in the thread with vote tags, your vote will be invalidated.
But assuming this applies also to night polls, you have to post tags first before you vote in the poll.
I dislike their AtE too and makes the game less enjoyableCape90 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 9:16 pmIMO both robyn and lily have had a decent amount of AtE in their interactionsBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:46 amCool, so scum porscha votes out Scotty, and Scotty was voted out tbh, I understandPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:30 amno, if i'm a wolf, I always fucking vote off scotty over nook there even if they are both town because nook didn't do jack in comparison to scotty... scotty had more townreads and would get more if left alive... that is obvious to me and when you used "scotty v nanook = PORSCHA WOLF" as an argument, that felt contrived, not thought out, and therefore I felt your posts had agenda and you made a lot of speculation in a narrow focus instead of "oh maybe this, maybe that, unsure" it wasn't broad, so your attempt at "Explanation" didn't feel real to me and it felt like an opportunistic way to jump to a conclusion that is generally agreeable "wouldn't be surprised if there was some vote manipulation that wolves had some sort of control over" but to specifically push worlds and not seek much past pushing the world and that is why it tasted so disgusting in my mouth to read your posts and yes my reaction reflects thatBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:23 amYou are very aggressive in your defence. You use words like "made up mechanic" and "fake applying" to downplay what happened. There is a focus on "we dont know whats going on" that I feel lead to "so lets drop it", which I think is what you want us to do. The last part "that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmao" is passive-aggressive and downplaying the theories.
It is like you are newly awake and have a gun in your hand tbh. Like, instead of trying to understand what's going on you are focusing on the fact that we currently don't know what's going on. And I find that to be a wolfy reaction to what's happening tbh
If you are town, should you not be interested in that scum saved you and went for Scotty over Nanook? Instead of aggressively defending yourself, that is tbh.
I used several arguments, some to your benefit, some to not. Nor did I jump to a conclusion, but formed a conclusion of the information I have. Then I ultimately chose you > nanook, but that's because you gotta lean somewhere.
If you're town, you should try to approach my posts directly instead of hitting me with a run down sentence. You are not quoting anything tangible. Just hitting with anger, and I feel like that's a strategy to start a fight with me by also avoiding and meeting what I actually said. You are saying that I do not "seek much past pushing the world", but that is objectively false if you actually read my analysis. And even if you skip the longer posts, you'll notice that whilst my first reaction was "this is damning for porscha", my second was "tho Scotty died over Nanook hmm". This directly disproves your accusation and should show that I am solving and considering several worlds. Especially since I use that train of thought in my longer reasoning.
But you seem to be more happy with being Angerey and defending yourself, not solving. Like in this very post, there is zero curiosity in why I am saying something. There is zero attempt at solving my claims. No interest in the claims that are for your benefit, not much interest in my reasoning. You saw me push a wolf you thought, and went for attack mode immediately. This seek and destroy strategy is something I find more common in wolves who want to feign AtE and discourage villagers scum reading them by reacting strongly. Your posts are not generous in their interpretation of what I am saying, like I am just reading a critic here.
Compare the tone in our posts. I am calm, in control of myself, despite these posts of yours. You are not. And that's what makes me unable to town read you here. Because you have no reason as town to react with this outburst of emotion towards my posts. My posts aren't threatening you. They are trying to solve you. This makes me believe this to be fake AtE.
Thoughts there?
sorry I don't think I saw this boq, I hear you and I think you're still saying a lot of words to scum read me and I acknowledge I could have to some degree been a bit over done last night, I had just gotten home from a crazy day last night and was frayedBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:46 amCool, so scum porscha votes out Scotty, and Scotty was voted out tbh, I understandPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:30 amno, if i'm a wolf, I always fucking vote off scotty over nook there even if they are both town because nook didn't do jack in comparison to scotty... scotty had more townreads and would get more if left alive... that is obvious to me and when you used "scotty v nanook = PORSCHA WOLF" as an argument, that felt contrived, not thought out, and therefore I felt your posts had agenda and you made a lot of speculation in a narrow focus instead of "oh maybe this, maybe that, unsure" it wasn't broad, so your attempt at "Explanation" didn't feel real to me and it felt like an opportunistic way to jump to a conclusion that is generally agreeable "wouldn't be surprised if there was some vote manipulation that wolves had some sort of control over" but to specifically push worlds and not seek much past pushing the world and that is why it tasted so disgusting in my mouth to read your posts and yes my reaction reflects thatBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:23 amYou are very aggressive in your defence. You use words like "made up mechanic" and "fake applying" to downplay what happened. There is a focus on "we dont know whats going on" that I feel lead to "so lets drop it", which I think is what you want us to do. The last part "that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmao" is passive-aggressive and downplaying the theories.Porscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:18 amI sincerely don't believe you can explain this without making huge assumptions riddled with agenda, but I do invite you to tryBoquise wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:16 amThis feels rand>wolfyPorscha wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:06 amwell I didn't vote scotty so I'm not sure what made up mechanic we are fake applying to scotty's wagon that isn't confirmed that surely must have been all my doing while I wasn't here, yup lmaoWindwardAway wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:47 am Wait wait wait, so... I'm on page 11 but there were more votes on porscha than on scotty? Or so it looks? Is that why boq said porscha is outed? Cause if so, I can totally see that, yeah.
I think svs's vote on lily is a poor excuse but I think it's so abrupt and bad that it's towny
And I'm not sure why scotty said he was trying something and voted me, but I'm not done reading yet. I should actually check what the vote count at EoD was but all I paid attention to was my own lack of vote lol, I gotta get back to work but at least I have a little more context now on what went down.
It is like you are newly awake and have a gun in your hand tbh. Like, instead of trying to understand what's going on you are focusing on the fact that we currently don't know what's going on. And I find that to be a wolfy reaction to what's happening tbh
If you are town, should you not be interested in that scum saved you and went for Scotty over Nanook? Instead of aggressively defending yourself, that is tbh.
I used several arguments, some to your benefit, some to not. Nor did I jump to a conclusion, but formed a conclusion of the information I have. Then I ultimately chose you > nanook, but that's because you gotta lean somewhere.
If you're town, you should try to approach my posts directly instead of hitting me with a run down sentence. You are not quoting anything tangible. Just hitting with anger, and I feel like that's a strategy to start a fight with me by also avoiding and meeting what I actually said. You are saying that I do not "seek much past pushing the world", but that is objectively false if you actually read my analysis. And even if you skip the longer posts, you'll notice that whilst my first reaction was "this is damning for porscha", my second was "tho Scotty died over Nanook hmm". This directly disproves your accusation and should show that I am solving and considering several worlds. Especially since I use that train of thought in my longer reasoning.
But you seem to be more happy with being Angerey and defending yourself, not solving. Like in this very post, there is zero curiosity in why I am saying something. There is zero attempt at solving my claims. No interest in the claims that are for your benefit, not much interest in my reasoning. You saw me push a wolf you thought, and went for attack mode immediately. This seek and destroy strategy is something I find more common in wolves who want to feign AtE and discourage villagers scum reading them by reacting strongly. Your posts are not generous in their interpretation of what I am saying, like I am just reading a critic here.
Compare the tone in our posts. I am calm, in control of myself, despite these posts of yours. You are not. And that's what makes me unable to town read you here. Because you have no reason as town to react with this outburst of emotion towards my posts. My posts aren't threatening you. They are trying to solve you. This makes me believe this to be fake AtE.
_we used to have something special, you and I_Cape90 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2023 9:47 pmTOWN:
WWA
Boq
Porscha
Lime Coke
Princess Abigail
LIGHT TOWN:
Bereft
lilypetal
S~V~S
EnderWiggin
LIGHT WOLF:
DrWigly
robyn
JOH2005
NANOOK
1 WOLF:
Marmot
Long Con (one between him and Marmot and yes this is a wagon read)
then the only one i missed is pyxxy which right now Idk.