The Syndicate

Elohcin wrote:I need to get my butt in gear

Mario Andretti couldn't move that thing!

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I need to get my butt in gear

Mario Andretti couldn't move that thing!

Mario Lopez could

Elohcin wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Elohcin wrote:I need to get my butt in gear

Mario Andretti couldn't move that thing!

Mario Lopez could

Elohcin wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:You make some really neat looking cakes Elo.

Thanks DharmaHelper. You can check out my facebook page - facebook.com/LittleMissCakesNC

I entered a cake decorating contest because my stand mixer broke on me today and the winner of the contest gets a new Kitchen Aid mixer. You can vote for my Dr. Seuss cake by going to the facebook page My Cake Decorating, clicking on Cake Off, and searching for my name "Tasha Brown". Spread the word! I need new mixer

Mongoose wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:You make some really neat looking cakes Elo.

Thanks DharmaHelper. You can check out my facebook page - facebook.com/LittleMissCakesNC

I entered a cake decorating contest because my stand mixer broke on me today and the winner of the contest gets a new Kitchen Aid mixer. You can vote for my Dr. Seuss cake by going to the facebook page My Cake Decorating, clicking on Cake Off, and searching for my name "Tasha Brown". Spread the word! I need new mixer

Done! Hope you win. Those Kitchen Aid mixers are awful snazzy.

DharmaHelper wrote:Oh of course now that I mention Hedge pulled a throwaway vote onto Lizzy everyone starts voting for Lizzy.

DharmaHelper wrote: Nev voted bea and seemed from the onset to want to focus on the late voters for llama, that could be distancing, especially considering that indeed bea does not appear to be in danger of being lynched. It could also be a case of Nev thinking that there are maybe some civvies within the Ace votes and getting attention on them instead of him and possibly his teammates is better than nothing. His vote for Aces was based on Hedge's points, as you can see here he also says that Aces really wasn't all that suspect to him here

At the time of Nev's vote the votes looked like this:
Aces had 2 votes (Hedge, Spag)
BWT had 3 votes (Indiglo, Elo, SpaceDaisy)
Dex had 1 vote (Boomslang)

Nev's vote made it 3-3 between bwt and Aces. Coincidence?

Elohcin wrote:

Mongoose wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:You make some really neat looking cakes Elo.

Thanks DharmaHelper. You can check out my facebook page - facebook.com/LittleMissCakesNC

I entered a cake decorating contest because my stand mixer broke on me today and the winner of the contest gets a new Kitchen Aid mixer. You can vote for my Dr. Seuss cake by going to the facebook page My Cake Decorating, clicking on Cake Off, and searching for my name "Tasha Brown". Spread the word! I need new mixer

Done! Hope you win. Those Kitchen Aid mixers are awful snazzy.

Thanks so much!

I voted for you too, Tasha, even though YOUR HUSBAND GOT ME KILLED!

Good luck!

thellama73 wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

Mongoose wrote:

Elohcin wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:You make some really neat looking cakes Elo.

Thanks DharmaHelper. You can check out my facebook page - facebook.com/LittleMissCakesNC

I entered a cake decorating contest because my stand mixer broke on me today and the winner of the contest gets a new Kitchen Aid mixer. You can vote for my Dr. Seuss cake by going to the facebook page My Cake Decorating, clicking on Cake Off, and searching for my name "Tasha Brown". Spread the word! I need new mixer

Done! Hope you win. Those Kitchen Aid mixers are awful snazzy.

Thanks so much!

I voted for you too, Tasha, even though YOUR HUSBAND GOT ME KILLED!

Good luck!

Epignosis wrote:

thellama73 wrote: I voted for you too, Tasha, even though YOUR HUSBAND GOT ME KILLED!

Good luck!

How many people could say that about their politicians?

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Looking through the past couple days: Vomps and Lizzy are no doubt strange, but they are strange even if they are civs.

Rob's discussion with llama was interesting, but I feel as though they're both civs and just debating for the fun of it, maybe.

Apart from that, the only thing seeming strange to me would be Dex's posts which seem to have little or no relevance. It's possible that maybe he is cursed one way or another.

Despite all this, I really can't call any of the above-mentioned people baddies. Because of this, I'll vote for myself and later see what further discussion occurs between these people.

Hedgeowl wrote:

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Looking through the past couple days: Vomps and Lizzy are no doubt strange, but they are strange even if they are civs.

Rob's discussion with llama was interesting, but I feel as though they're both civs and just debating for the fun of it, maybe.

Apart from that, the only thing seeming strange to me would be Dex's posts which seem to have little or no relevance. It's possible that maybe he is cursed one way or another.

Despite all this, I really can't call any of the above-mentioned people baddies. Because of this, I'll vote for myself and later see what further discussion occurs between these people.

Another self-voter? What is up with this game?

DharmaHelper wrote: Bullz has made a few more posts than boo during D3 but they are equally as chin-scratch worthy. going to rewind a bit to D2 first though here he debates the merits of voting for Dex or Aces, but ultimately decides that voting for Dex would be too risky as he's "trying to grab himself some votes".

Fast forward a bit and here Bullz says that if he really wanted to defend BWT, he would have done so. Because the smartest thing a baddie can do is openly and actively defend a sinking ship instead of covertly and subtly trying to get the votes needed for that teammate to survive.

He also says that he doubts Ace's voters (a group which he is conveniently a part of) made an attempt to save BWT by voting Aces. He states that it is just as likely that Dex voters (whom I will examine later) were trying to save BWT by voting Dex as they were tied or close for a while. Now you see why I rewound back to his D2 vote post where he waffles between voting Dex and voting Aces. Either vote would have been sufficient to save a teammate, by Bullz's own admission, yet the Aces vote carried significantly less risk.

at the time of Bullz's comment and vote, the poll looked like this:
Aces had 4 votes (Hedgeowl, Spaghetti, Nev, and Boo)
BwT had 5 votes (Indiglo Elo, SD, Epig, Aces)
Dex had 3 votes (Boomslang, Devin, Dex)
So it would make more sense to put a vote on Aces at the time of Bullz's vote.

nutella wrote:I'm *voting Lizzy*.

But tomorrow I'm looking at Boats. How did he catch up and write all those thoughts in 12 minutes? He has BTSC teammates helping him out for sure.

Epignosis wrote:

nutella wrote:I'm *voting Lizzy*.

But tomorrow I'm looking at Boats. How did he catch up and write all those thoughts in 12 minutes? He has BTSC teammates helping him out for sure.

That's a fantastic catch. Wow.

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

nutella wrote:I'm *voting Lizzy*.

But tomorrow I'm looking at Boats. How did he catch up and write all those thoughts in 12 minutes? He has BTSC teammates helping him out for sure.

That's a fantastic catch. Wow.

3-4 pages doesn't take very long to read when you're skimming through the discussions. By all means, vote for me if you feel you must, but I know for a fact that I read through.

Snow Dog wrote:^How is this 12 minute figure arrived at?

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Whoa, I've missed a lot. Sorry, I'm about to catch up and see what exactly is going on.

BoatsBoatsBoats wrote:Looking through the past couple days: Vomps and Lizzy are no doubt strange, but they are strange even if they are civs.

Rob's discussion with llama was interesting, but I feel as though they're both civs and just debating for the fun of it, maybe.

Apart from that, the only thing seeming strange to me would be Dex's posts which seem to have little or no relevance. It's possible that maybe he is cursed one way or another.

Despite all this, I really can't call any of the above-mentioned people baddies. Because of this, I'll vote for myself and later see what further discussion occurs between these people.

nutella wrote:I'm *voting Lizzy*.

But tomorrow I'm looking at Boats. How did he catch up and write all those thoughts in 12 minutes? He has BTSC teammates helping him out for sure.

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

DharmaHelper wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

I sort of had a feeling llama was being railroaded towards the end there. Will have my eye firmly on you in the next lynch though, that's for sure. I will also examine the Dex voters in a later post.

1

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

thellama73 wrote:Thanks for a fun game, everybody!

Bullzeye wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

I sort of had a feeling llama was being railroaded towards the end there. Will have my eye firmly on you in the next lynch though, that's for sure. I will also examine the Dex voters in a later post.

1

I responded to your points about me earlier. Did you see it? Also, what do you think of the fact that Ace and Bea used your logic and nothing more to support votes for me?

2

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

I had my doubts. I think it was mostly because his defending of BWT was made so clear. I usually think a baddie wouldn't put themselves in the clear so much in that situation, but who knows.

1

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

Bullzeye wrote:I was gonna just ignore DH's post about me for now because I wasn't too bothered, but then other people started latching on so I thought I'd address it a bit.

DharmaHelper wrote: Bullz has made a few more posts than boo during D3 but they are equally as chin-scratch worthy. going to rewind a bit to D2 first though here he debates the merits of voting for Dex or Aces, but ultimately decides that voting for Dex would be too risky as he's "trying to grab himself some votes".

As you've just shown, I was unlikely to vote BWT even before he became an obvious candidate. If I'd mentioned BWT as highly suspicious and then voted Aces then I would agree that my vote looked like a save attempt.

Just because you didn't mention BWT doesn't mean you weren't trying to save him, Bullz. Oft times I stay away from bringing up my teammates when bad. Weak defense is weak.

Fast forward a bit and here Bullz says that if he really wanted to defend BWT, he would have done so. Because the smartest thing a baddie can do is openly and actively defend a sinking ship instead of covertly and subtly trying to get the votes needed for that teammate to survive.

I would have defended the ship before it started to sink. We've been bad together at least once, you surely know I try to defend my teammates when I can. It has been the death of me a few times.

I'm sure you would have done anything in your power to help a teammate. Like, you know, tie the vote.

He also says that he doubts Ace's voters (a group which he is conveniently a part of) made an attempt to save BWT by voting Aces. He states that it is just as likely that Dex voters (whom I will examine later) were trying to save BWT by voting Dex as they were tied or close for a while. Now you see why I rewound back to his D2 vote post where he waffles between voting Dex and voting Aces. Either vote would have been sufficient to save a teammate, by Bullz's own admission, yet the Aces vote carried significantly less risk.

I obviously worded that post wrongly. I meant it might not have only been Aces' voters trying to save BWT, as Dex was close as well so some could have jumped on him. Also voting for someone close to the person you're trying to save but not the closest would surely be a good way to disguise the fact that your vote is a save attempt right?

But as you said, voting for Dex in your opinion would have given him an advantage, so giving an opposing baddie an advantage wasn't something I think you would have done.

at the time of Bullz's comment and vote, the poll looked like this:
Aces had 4 votes (Hedgeowl, Spaghetti, Nev, and Boo)
BwT had 5 votes (Indiglo Elo, SD, Epig, Aces)
Dex had 3 votes (Boomslang, Devin, Dex)
So it would make more sense to put a vote on Aces at the time of Bullz's vote.

I see. I couldn't remember if Aces and Dex were tied or not at the time I voted, I thought they had been but apparently not.

Linki Nutella - interesting point about Boats there. Definitely worth a look.

AceofSpaces wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

I sort of had a feeling llama was being railroaded towards the end there. Will have my eye firmly on you in the next lynch though, that's for sure. I will also examine the Dex voters in a later post.

1

I responded to your points about me earlier. Did you see it? Also, what do you think of the fact that Ace and Bea used your logic and nothing more to support votes for me?

2

Would you rather I just repeat everything DH said again? If someone makes a case that makes sense, why wouldn't I support it? You're actions during day two were suspicious, and DH pointed it all out very well. I'm not sure where you are going with that.

1

Epignosis wrote:

Bullzeye wrote:

DisgruntledPorcupine wrote:Lame result. RIP!

Yeah, lame. I'd hoped there was a good chance of him being bad based on his defending BWT. Apparently not.

1

"Apparently not" is not a sentence. "Yeah, lame" is not a sentence (thought we might be able to argue about that one). Actually, no we cannot, and I'm not going to tell you why.

1