The Syndicate

Hello folks. I voted for 8pm!

tutuu why are your posts so riddled with weird errors?

tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:51 pm
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:48 pm Official tone and proper punctuation lowkey scare me tbh. It always sounds so serious. Like someone is scolding me. I am feeling stressed out from writing this right now. I wanna whimper
Oh im sorry @Long Con i didnt mean to say YOUR proper writing scares me ur cuddly and smol duckling :kissie: i was just saying inn general idk nevermind me dont pay me attetion sorry haha

I thought you were talking about Alison.

Alison wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 11:25 pm Too many typos means the typos are intentional. Intentional typos means tutuu is trying to pocket us with her cutesy half-clueless half-tryhard act like she does as scum every time. The difference is that it's genuine when she's town and inauthentic when she's scum.

I am down with that case. That's right up my alley.

Alison wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 7:14 pm Falcon V
JPIC W
MacDougall V
JJJ V

Dear mafia: I am a provable town sided PR. I have just given you four accurate reads. Now you will have to deal with confirmed town Alison the whole of D1. On N1 you will have to choose between shooting town Alison, town Mac or town JJJ. Possibly even town Sloonei as well. Have fun.

Oh geez that's a doozy.

TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:02 am
tutuu wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:36 pm Wait for real???

Alison just made a joke? Like. In her own humorous way u know. I mean u know her. That post of hers is very typical of her. Or if not a joke, like, just casual talk

I dont trust u for making an analytical wall about that alison post (i dont have a read on alison)

I think its full of BALLOONEI which rhymes with SLOONEI wow is he also maf

----
Im sexond guessing myself

U ddbsay "alison very determied player"

So like if u arholdimg her to the standars of a robot - sure. So maybe u could he town and believe that post hm. Maybe u dont know alison as well as i do?
ftr this post was the reason I was TRing Alison

Does that mean you suspect tutuu?

Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:09 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:08 am Does that mean you suspect tutuu?
Why would it?

Maybe he was townreading you for making the same case against tutuu he had in mind? It's not that, as he has revealed, but that might have been my mindset there.

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:32 pm Hello folks. I voted for 8pm!
This post, we can all clearly see that he voted for 8pm. Why feel the need to tell us this at all?

Sweet case.

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:59 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:56 pm
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:32 pm Hello folks. I voted for 8pm!
This post, we can all clearly see that he voted for 8pm. Why feel the need to tell us this at all?
Sweet case.
It's an opening

Oh ok, sorry to interrupt, do continue.

fingersplints wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:03 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:56 pm
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:32 pm Hello folks. I voted for 8pm!
This post, we can all clearly see that he voted for 8pm. Why feel the need to tell us this at all?
Sweet case.
This made me laugh.

But on this thought, once upon a time it used to be a rule that you had to post in the thread what your vote was. Or maybe it was just considered good form. Is this not the case anymore?

I figured it had probably been discussed, and mattered to people, so I vocalized my opinion.

fingersplints wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:12 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:07 pm
fingersplints wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:03 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:56 pm
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:55 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Sun Apr 04, 2021 9:32 pm Hello folks. I voted for 8pm!
This post, we can all clearly see that he voted for 8pm. Why feel the need to tell us this at all?
Sweet case.
This made me laugh.

But on this thought, once upon a time it used to be a rule that you had to post in the thread what your vote was. Or maybe it was just considered good form. Is this not the case anymore?
I figured it had probably been discussed, and mattered to people, so I vocalized my opinion.
I don’t understand your response to me. I don’t have a problem with you vocalising your opinion. I’m just genuinely curious if people don’t post their votes in the thread (like you did) anymore because Oddmerta seemed to find your vote post strange.

What's not to understand? I read your hypothesis for why someone would choose to post their vote, and thought about my reason, and responded. I didn't do it for good form, I did it because I thought it probably mattered to some players to know. Kind of similar, really, I think that's WHY it's good form generally: to make sure people know.

Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:34 pm My new strongest scumread is AL_sama.

Discuss.

I indeed kinda agree.

I changed my mind. AL_sama always uses two question marks.

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:56 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:41 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:40 pm tedextr is a wolf
Is ted even in this game
i thought my avatar would have more of an impact, guess i was wrong

It's driving me mad, I scroll it away as soon as I can.

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:08 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:06 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:56 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:41 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:40 pm tedextr is a wolf
Is ted even in this game
i thought my avatar would have more of an impact, guess i was wrong
It's driving me mad, I scroll it away as soon as I can.
cmon kakashi

It's that couple of frames of another camera shot. I hate it.

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:13 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:11 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:08 pm
Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:06 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 2:56 pm
NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:41 pm
staypositivefriend wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 1:40 pm tedextr is a wolf
Is ted even in this game
i thought my avatar would have more of an impact, guess i was wrong
It's driving me mad, I scroll it away as soon as I can.
cmon kakashi
It's that couple of frames of another camera shot. I hate it.
i know another person that hated the transition. i thought of cutting the first few seconds of the second camera shot

something like this

Just cut the second shot entirely if you can edit.

tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:18 pm that'd produce the lamest gif in history though

...

...are you designating the longer shot with the spin in it as the second one?

tutuu wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:28 pm

there ya go buddy took me 5 seconds im the GIF MACHiNE

Yessss!

Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 4:31 pm
tedxtr wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 3:59 pm and besides - there's a possibility tutuu straight up spewed jpic a villager here since she's making a few wolfy posts
tutuu would be in my POE if not for the shield dropped on her by Mac.

What makes you think you can rely on Joseph's reads?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 4:44 pm I kind of want to squeeze hard and call Long Con a civilian. It wouldn’t be my best-supported read, but it’s where my gut settles when I stare at the posts.

Don't force it.

fingersplints wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:49 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:42 pm I don't have a read on LC. If you guys are at all confident about your read on him then you can read him better than I can. Or you're playing up the confidence, or just straight up lying.
I’ve been playing with LC for quite a long time, and I’m also surprised at any early confident reads on him.

Especially this game... I have not posted much, nor have I read everything. I'm just having a chill Day 0 until the game really starts.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 5:59 pm I’m not confident about LC. I’m not sure I care. He has a way of discouraging confidence on purpose.

or maybe

, I'm not sure which to do.

BoKnows wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 7:52 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 7:51 pm
BoKnows wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 7:50 pm The votes don't count right now eh?
They count. Thanks for answering my questions. I will consider what you've said.

I'd appreciate others' perspectives on Bo.
okay umm [VOTE: unvote] aubergine never planned on keeping my vote on tutuu

What was it for then?

LOL then it didn't count.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:01 am
Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:08 pm
KZA wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:48 pm
Alison wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 6:47 pm I am interested in investigating the following people more:
- Marmot
- SPF
- Dom
- Long Con
- Fingersplints
what about @Michelle
I usually don't have a huge amount of trouble reading Michelle, and she's the type whose alignment becomes more and more clear over the course of the game. So I don't see a huge need to investigate her right now.
Strangely enough, this post gives me the closest thing to a town read on Alison that I've had all game.

Strangely enough, I feel like this is a carbon copy of what she says about Michelle every game, and rather NAI. I didn't research that, but it just seems very familiar to me.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:27 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 11:05 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 11:03 pm
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:59 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 10:57 pm actual read: some of your posts this game have given me the impression that you're doing a sloonei impersonation
Stuff like this is what concerns me. I don't have to do a Sloonei "impression". There's a reason he and I are memed together so often. It's been this way as long as you've been here.
you are not the same person
You're right that I am not Jay, but he and I still share enough similarities that players routinely confuse me for being him.
Er, I meant to say you're right that I am not Sloonei. Sorry, typo.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 8:04 am Michelle is town tho.

OK, maybe. That's not what I was discussing.

NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:47 am I just realized today that if you hit the arrow next to a topic on mobile it takes you to the newest post

I'm v happy

I can't believe you made it this long without it. How did you live??

I'm feeling the Bo vote. [VOTE: Boknows] aubergine

I had looked at Bo's ISO last night, and I got some bad vibes from it. Then Joseph said something negative about Bo that I agreed with or at least was willing to sheep. And the "I forgot who ted was" thing strikes me as a not-entirely-genuine mistake (probably with a real core) that is getting played up to cultivate a slightly derpy harmless-town look.

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:38 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:26 am Read a little and the two people on my wagon did not explain their vote on me. Little bit annoying but whatever.

@Long Con
@Justplayingitcool
explain please!
Those two be me scumreads

Oh yeah, the "Long Con vocalized his non-elimination vote" case.

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:43 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:40 am
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:38 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:26 am Read a little and the two people on my wagon did not explain their vote on me. Little bit annoying but whatever.

@Long Con
@Justplayingitcool
explain please!
Those two be me scumreads
Oh yeah, the "Long Con vocalized his non-elimination vote" case.
And now you are voting the same as one of my other scumreads, the evidence is mounting

LOL. "Evidence".

Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.

Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:04 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:55 am Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.
Yes

I'm watching you

Go on.

Drinking is like pouring smiles on your brain.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:21 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:55 am Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.
Why wouldn't mafia vote together in a situation like this? What kind of situation is this?

One reason mafia wouldn't vote together is that they don't want to be associated, but that's neither here nor there - your reverse question isn't pertinent.

The situation is voting for a player who has no other votes, in the first half of day 1.

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:30 am If you guys wanna see 2 beautiful players talking about themselves and how great they are, please look no further than Mac & JJJ.

They are strikingly handsome, watching their banter is like staring at an Adonis smothered hot, steaming fabulous.

Welcome to The Syndicate.

fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:31 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:27 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:21 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:55 am Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.
Why wouldn't mafia vote together in a situation like this? What kind of situation is this?
One reason mafia wouldn't vote together is that they don't want to be associated, but that's neither here nor there - your reverse question isn't pertinent.

The situation is voting for a player who has no other votes, in the first half of day 1.
In the last game we played, Bee Mafia, two mafia voted together for their third mafia member Day 1. This allowed them to win.

I’m not saying this is exactly the same situation, but I definitely am rethinking what “mafia wouldn’t do” after that game.

That's probably a good thing, but do you suspect two players that vote for the same player because of it, moving forward?

falcon45ca wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:34 am
fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:31 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:27 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:21 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:55 am Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.
Why wouldn't mafia vote together in a situation like this? What kind of situation is this?
One reason mafia wouldn't vote together is that they don't want to be associated, but that's neither here nor there - your reverse question isn't pertinent.

The situation is voting for a player who has no other votes, in the first half of day 1.
In the last game we played, Bee Mafia, two mafia voted together for their third mafia member Day 1. This allowed them to win.

I’m not saying this is exactly the same situation, but I definitely am rethinking what “mafia wouldn’t do” after that game.
It's true. And LC saw it happen, so I'm not sure why he's acting like it's not a possibility

You've lost track of my point entirely.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:37 am My first instinct is that Long Con is doing that incredulous town thing where you dismiss an idea that sounds unlikely on the surface even if it really isn't farfetched. I probably won't take that read anywhere though, because it's tiny and weak. Long Con told me not to force it.

I'm not clear - what idea am I dismissing?

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:39 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:37 am My first instinct is that Long Con is doing that incredulous town thing where you dismiss an idea that sounds unlikely on the surface even if it really isn't farfetched. I probably won't take that read anywhere though, because it's tiny and weak. Long Con told me not to force it.
I'm not clear - what idea am I dismissing?
The notion that two mafia would act as the only two votes for the same player halfway through Day 1. I would find that rather unremarkable.

I'm not dismissing that. You asked me for a reason why two mafia might want to NOT vote the same person. I came up with one and told you that the point isn't relevant.

I mean "pertinent". I also like "relevant".

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:42 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:41 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:39 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:38 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:37 am My first instinct is that Long Con is doing that incredulous town thing where you dismiss an idea that sounds unlikely on the surface even if it really isn't farfetched. I probably won't take that read anywhere though, because it's tiny and weak. Long Con told me not to force it.
I'm not clear - what idea am I dismissing?
The notion that two mafia would act as the only two votes for the same player halfway through Day 1. I would find that rather unremarkable.
I'm not dismissing that. You asked me for a reason why two mafia might want to NOT vote the same person. I came up with one and told you that the point isn't relevant.
I'm referring to your initial response to Oddmerta's gripe. Whatever though, I don't view this dialogue as being especially informative.

Would you like it to be? I can explain my point again, since you missed it.

My point is that Oddmerta is using the fact that I voted alongside someone that Odd suspects, as evidence that I'm bad.

I don't think that's genuine logic. Two scum CAN vote together, but is such a thing SO LIKELY that you form a suspicion on one player merely because that player voted alongside another? Of course not, that is not logical at all. Furthermore, Oddmerta fluffed it off and didn't confront or clarify that accusation, which looks bad.

fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:46 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:36 am
fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:31 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:27 am
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:21 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 9:55 am Odd, you honestly think that scum like to vote together in a situation like this?

Why would that be a thing? What logic are you supposedly employing here? This is suspicious.
Why wouldn't mafia vote together in a situation like this? What kind of situation is this?
One reason mafia wouldn't vote together is that they don't want to be associated, but that's neither here nor there - your reverse question isn't pertinent.

The situation is voting for a player who has no other votes, in the first half of day 1.
In the last game we played, Bee Mafia, two mafia voted together for their third mafia member Day 1. This allowed them to win.

I’m not saying this is exactly the same situation, but I definitely am rethinking what “mafia wouldn’t do” after that game.
That's probably a good thing, but do you suspect two players that vote for the same player because of it, moving forward?
I wouldn’t suspect two players for ONLY the reason of voting for the same person

EXACTLY. But Oddmerta is. Is that not worth thinking about?

fingersplints wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:52 am Everything is worth thinking about.

BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:55 am
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:54 am I suspected them first, of course I'm going to notice them voting for the same person
What was the original reasoning for you suspecting them?

I vocalized my non-elimination vote in the thread. That's the other big gotcha moment Odd caught me in - besides voting alongside my teammate.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:50 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:48 am Would you like it to be? I can explain my point again, since you missed it.

My point is that Oddmerta is using the fact that I voted alongside someone that Odd suspects, as evidence that I'm bad.

I don't think that's genuine logic. Two scum CAN vote together, but is such a thing SO LIKELY that you form a suspicion on one player merely because that player voted alongside another? Of course not, that is not logical at all. Furthermore, Oddmerta fluffed it off and didn't confront or clarify that accusation, which looks bad.
I tend to see that as confirmation bias. I think confirmation bias would be the story of Oddmerta's entire post history if he is a civilian.

What is it if he's not?

BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:03 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:59 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:55 am
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:54 am I suspected them first, of course I'm going to notice them voting for the same person
What was the original reasoning for you suspecting them?
I vocalized my non-elimination vote in the thread. That's the other big gotcha moment Odd caught me in - besides voting alongside my teammate.
Those don't seem like real reasons to me.

Me neither.

Are you... listening to me?

BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:06 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:04 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:03 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:59 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:55 am
Oddmerta wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:54 am I suspected them first, of course I'm going to notice them voting for the same person
What was the original reasoning for you suspecting them?
I vocalized my non-elimination vote in the thread. That's the other big gotcha moment Odd caught me in - besides voting alongside my teammate.
Those don't seem like real reasons to me.
Me neither. Are you... listening to me?
Yeah I'm just agreeing with you :P

Wow.

So that's what that feels like.

BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:13 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:12 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:06 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:04 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:03 am
Long Con wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:59 am
BoKnows wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 10:55 am

What was the original reasoning for you suspecting them?
I vocalized my non-elimination vote in the thread. That's the other big gotcha moment Odd caught me in - besides voting alongside my teammate.
Those don't seem like real reasons to me.
Me neither. Are you... listening to me?
Yeah I'm just agreeing with you :P
Wow.

So that's what that feels like.
Soak it in

Well, I am pocketed.

[VOTE: oddmerta] aubergine

Search found 557 matches