Search found 171 matches

by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 5:22 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

And where is everyone?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 5:19 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 5:18 pm man I'm actually torn on mac, I thought I figured something out about him that meant he wasn't mafia but maybe it actually could make him mafia. idk.
What is it?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 5:17 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

What are the reasons to vote Oreki?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 5:07 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

I'm here if someone shows up. I will be in and out.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 4:51 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 4:41 pm
juliets wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 4:33 pm My last vote was for an independent, not a townie.
....is that supposed to be a convincing defense for any reason
I'm actually not trying to defend against you. I don't care that you think I'm bad.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 4:36 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Is anyone else around?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 4:33 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 3:54 pm we only have two hours left in the day it's so quiet and only juliets is here spouting nonsense about me :P

I went back to suspecting you partially because of POE and partially because I just don't get good vibes from you and a lot of my earlier reasons still hold (there was that thing where I was wrong about some chronology but you still make sense as mafia to me in how you've participated in the various wagons)
Your earlier reasons were bunk, as I proved in my refutation of them. My last vote was for an independent, not a townie. You are dead wrong about me but if you're bad you really don't care.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 4:30 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Rej wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 4:18 pm
nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 3:57 pm here's my sort-of-poe

probably not mafia:
indiglo
macdougall
rej
sabie (on the fence here, possible last resort but I thought sokoth sounded genuine)

potential mafia:
birdwithteeth
juliets
long con
mata
oreki
take off your vote from juliets and lets vote up oreki, I have a much worser feeling about him
Rej what are you seeing in your Oreki suspicion?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 3:19 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Rej wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 2:22 pm
juliets wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 1:47 pm There are not many people around today. I would really like to have some conversation about people that are suspected.
What do you think about MacDougall? I am so much confused by his playstyle is this because he is such a uberpro? I have a bad feeling about manipulation comming off from this guy I can't describe it in words.
He is indeed an uber pro. He's got more wins on this site this year than anyone else. His style can be abrupt and brusque, and usually he begins throwing names out right and left and calling them bad or good from the beginning of the game. Or he can be pretty nice but still throwing names out as bad or good without a lot of reasons starting from the beginning. Imo he is very difficult to read.

I don't like that he's still alive at this point BUT I haven't found anything that causes me to say he's bad and his reads are very similar to mine (I have a question about Oreki for him but he's not here yet). So if I were doing a GTH right now I would call him good. I'm wary of him though. Do you see something other than the manipulation feelings you have that would tell us he is bad?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 1:47 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

There are not many people around today. I would really like to have some conversation about people that are suspected.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 11:55 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Oreki wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 11:42 am Can I ask a question? Claiming is not allowed in this game, right? So does this game also have invest result, this may sound like fishing(lol) but I just want to know if we indeed have something like role cop or alignment cop. They can't claim regardless of their results, right?

And one another question how do we do multi-quotes?
Oreki, if there is an investigative role in this game he or she cannot just dump their results in the thread like "DDL is mafia, I know for sure". That is not allowed. Also, since it is a closed set up we do not have any idea what roles, like investigative roles, are in the game. We just don't know.

The only way to multi-quote that I know of is to open a second window, find the quote you want to post, copy it and take it back to the first window and paste it under post reply. You continue to find posts in that second window, copy them and paste them to your reply in the first window. I hope that makes sense. That's the only way I know how to do it.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 11:41 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Who else do we need to look at this round?
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 11:36 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

[mention]indiglo[/mention] now that Dr. Wilgy has flipped independent, how do you feel about the other two you named in the post below. I'm particularly interested in your Oreki suspicion. What are you seeing?
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 4:01 pm Poo, still no consensus and I have to go. I understand it, since there are still a couple hours left, but still, poo.

I'm waffling between a Mac-Wilgy-Oreki team and an LC-Wilgy-Oreki team. I prefer leaving my vote on Wilgy, who I feel more sure about, rather than choosing between Mac and LC. However, my Wilgy vote accomplishes nothing by its lonesome... and Mac and LC both have votes already, so my vote would have a chance to accomplish something.

Meh. I'm going to take another couple minutes.
I know this was two days ago but could you tell us if this is still how you feel? If so could you talk about your reads? Especially nutella at the top and the three at the bottom.
indiglo wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 12:29 pm Dragomir
nutella
Rej

Epignosis
birdwithteeth11

Sokoth
Mac
LongCon
Matahari
juliets

DrWilgy
Oreki

There is not much to say about Indi as she has not had many posts in the game. I also still would like to know why she dodged my question about Long Con's ISO that I posted earlier in the game. In addition, she never has answered the question about her votes on day 1. I guess I'll repost my earlier post here to make it easier for her to respond to both things:
Spoiler: show
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:44 pm Indiglo's explanation to bwt's question about her votes:
indiglo wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:23 pm
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:22 pm
indiglo wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:20 pm Tossing mine last minute

[VOTE: Sokoth] aubergine


Oh, linki with Daisy LMAO
You come in close to the last minute and then move your vote between 3 different people very quickly. Why?
Because votes are changeable? :grin:
This is the sequence about LC that I mentioned earlier. Seemingly no reason to vote for him. And note that she avoided my question about the ISO.
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:34 pm Oh, LOL caught up. I thought there were going to be more posts. I'm going to go back and iso LC.
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:48 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

It's the best thing going that isn't a Creature vote.

I will not be here for EOD today, but I have several hours still. So hopefully we can stay organized.

(Also, Creature, if you really are mafia, I tip my hat to you. lol :nicenod: )
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:44 pm
juliets wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:27 pm
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:48 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

It's the best thing going that isn't a Creature vote.

I will not be here for EOD today, but I have several hours still. So hopefully we can stay organized.

(Also, Creature, if you really are mafia, I tip my hat to you. lol :nicenod: )
indi, did you see something in LC's ISO that convinced you to vote him?

I'm not married to my vote for LC. At this point, I feel like my most likely candidates would be between Mac, Wilgy and LC. Because of how the votes started going down from the beginning of this day phase.

I wanted to get a vote on the board, and of those 3, LC had the most votes so far. I'm open to further discussion for sure, and vote changing, up until the time I have to leave.
I'm posting this now, I don't think we're going to change to Indi so I'll finish her up after the lynch.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 11:18 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

I also said I would finish looking at indigo though my "find" about her switching votes turns out to be not valid. I'm somewhat disheartened by that but I will finish looking at her anyway just in case there is something more there.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 10:17 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

[mention]nutella[/mention] did you ever come up with an answer here? I didn't see it in your ISO but maybe I missed it
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:24 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:22 am
Creature wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 6:02 pm MacDougall, sabie12, Sokoth, maybe indiglo if we decide to follow Epi.

Am fine doing any of these.
A pretty big salad here. I'm surprised nobody called him out for it, at least from what I've read, since salads are an apparent scum tell in this forum.

I'll fully read the thread when I wake up.
indeed, good catch. I will have to reread how that EOD went down to decide how I feel about creature. I don't know much about him as a player so I may have initially given him a bit too much credit just for high volume of participation. I think something fishy might have gone down with the counterwagons at the end there but again I'll have to reread to figure out what the dynamics were.
nutella posted a lot of site mechanics posts. I can't decide if this was because she was trying to appear that she was participating or she was just being nice.
Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:27 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:24 am
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:17 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:16 am
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:32 pm
Creature wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:28 pm Is the thread supposed to be open?
It is. Discussion is allowed to occur here at night.
Oh shit, didn't even know. I thought it was the DP. How come there was no night talk in the Scrimmage though?
Because the point of the scrimmage was to follow the rules of the championship as closely as possible lol.

Most games here allow night chat.
Interesting. Pretty big advantage for town to still allow town to hunt scums thoroughly and call them out and the latter faction never gets a break.
I actually think that closed NPs are more an advantage to scum than open NPs are an advantage for town. Scum can still participate in night discussion and influence everything happening in the thread, whereas it's the only resource town would have at night. I strongly believe that the locked NP rule is part of why the championship games have been such scumsweeps so far (tbf I've stopped following them and am not sure if that's still happening beyond games 1 and 2) and it was also a pretty significant factor in scum winning the scrimmage.
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:37 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:31 am
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:27 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:24 am
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:17 am
Dragomir wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 2:16 am
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:32 pm

It is. Discussion is allowed to occur here at night.
Oh shit, didn't even know. I thought it was the DP. How come there was no night talk in the Scrimmage though?
Because the point of the scrimmage was to follow the rules of the championship as closely as possible lol.

Most games here allow night chat.
Interesting. Pretty big advantage for town to still allow town to hunt scums thoroughly and call them out and the latter faction never gets a break.
I actually think that closed NPs are more an advantage to scum than open NPs are an advantage for town. Scum can still participate in night discussion and influence everything happening in the thread, whereas it's the only resource town would have at night. I strongly believe that the locked NP rule is part of why the championship games have been such scumsweeps so far (tbf I've stopped following them and am not sure if that's still happening beyond games 1 and 2) and it was also a pretty significant factor in scum winning the scrimmage.
Wait so this kinda supports my point that open NPs are an advantage for town?
Well as I said I don't think it's as strong, and since it's the norm here it is by default/subconsciously taken into account for balancing games I guess. We still get plenty of scum victories with it. Maybe someone could look into the data of this more generally (though comparing to other sites introduces other factors, but we have had a handful of closed NP games on this site and idk what their town/scum win ratios are vs the open np ones)
nutella wrote: Mon May 20, 2019 6:27 pm nooo kyle :(

@Creature often nks are not revealed here
nutella wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 11:48 am @Rej you have to vote in the poll at the top for it to count, the tags are just for tracking and the format is [ vote ] name [ / vote ]
nutella wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 11:49 am And I don't think there's a janitor it's just usually standard on our site for nks not to flip.

Was this TMI?
nutella wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 6:11 pm
Dragomir wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 6:09 pm The only way Nutella and I are mafia is if Creature is mafia as well. Like if Creature is town, then we can't be mafia as I find it bullshit that mafia would try to stop a mislynch and start a new wagon. That makes no sense. Mafia needs to get mislynches, and they just stop one for town cred? Nonsense.

Call this wifom, I don't care.
See this man right here is lock fucking town regardless of creature's flip.
I pointed this quote out before. She says it wasn't for lack of trying but she only said two things about LC - one was that she voted for him saying he was too eager to join Mac's party and -two, "And I still feel worse about LC". I don't see any effort to persuade anyone.
nutella wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 6:29 pm
MacDougall wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 6:21 pm I mean from my perspective. The Long Con wagon you built never had petrol.

You should consider whether nutella is buddying you Dragomir.
I thought the LC case was fine but unfortunately not enough people were even active today let alone joined it. That is in no way my fault for lack of trying. Shut up

Is this more TMI?
nutella wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 7:55 pm Is it just me or is dragomir the only person in this thread who is making any goddamn sense

This still doesn't make any sense to me. She says "Yikes, juliets is bad" but I have no idea why. It comes off to me as trying to put the thought in everyone''s mind because she saw me as an easy mislynch. Maybe she can explain it now.
Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 12:02 pm
juliets wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 7:50 am
MacDougall wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 10:54 pm Okay so where I am at is I see three possibilities.

1. Given that the Creature wagon was indeed a civ wagon with very little push I am still looking for those who pushed against it for cred. These players would be showing TMI. Nutella, indiglo and birdwithteeth are the most questionable here, the latter two because they found their way off the main wagon with very little effort (when I observe BWT specifically, but would expect both, to me more likely to just agree to the main wagon if they are indeed civilians without info). Nutella more so because there is this sort of union between her and Dragomir but the tones are different. Dragomir gets a bit of a pass from me because he sounds more aggressive and is exhibiting more civvie doubt. I am gut and tone reading Dragomir town but Nutella has a more stiff feel in her posting.

2. Maybe we just have a lazier than usual Mafia team and rather than attempting to create some civ credit they chose to take the day off[/b] and just let the mislynch unfold and that I missed it entirely because I was blinded by my own read. I don't think LC and Epi are guilty of this, because Epignosis and Long Con were proponents of the wagon even before I kicked it off, they were not passively agreeing with it like some others. Juliets is someone who comes into question here, because she was on the wagon yet now in light of the flip is choosing to hitch herself to the nutella/Dragomir bloc... which I would do if I was in her position as Mafia. I find it questionable that Juliets has gone from being a proponent of the Creature lynch to now aligning herself with the primary objectors of it. It's a bit too quaint. DrWilgy is also a concern also is the one that put the third quick vote on that wagon and did so with a minimum of fuss, which I find strange for Wilgy who loves competing wagons. I also want to look at how Oreki and Matahari got their votes on to the wagon.

3. It is possible that we have a mix, something like the majority of the Mafia team choosing to be passive with one person angling for deepwolf status. Mathematically this is probably more likely, also supported by well as the fact that most Mafia teams don't bloc vote (they should but don't). In this scenario it makes sense that we would have something like a Nutella, DrWilgy, Juliets team, with Nutella taking the opportunity to pocket Dragomir and steer clear of the wagon to infiltrate any forming town bloc, with DrWilgy just relying on wifoming his way out and Juliets taking the safe option as she is want to do.

Lastly I am sorry Creature. I hope to see you in the next game, you play well.
I saw Drago and nutella as town because they were arguing so hard against the lynch. I know you have a theory that the arguing against it made them mafia (or I see you have revised that above to just nutella) but I didn't buy that argument the first time around. I will read through it again when I review your ISO later today to make sure I still feel that way. Anyway, it came off to me that they were most certainly town.

I am not bad, I've just been very busy and maybe haven't thought things through well enough here but I died in the other game so will be able to devote more time to this one starting this afternoon when I get home from work.
Yikes juliets bad

Again with Drago. These posts about him really smack of TMI.
nutella wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 6:45 pm If Dragomir isn't town in this game I will eat a nutella cheese sandwich

Here is the post that is just plain wrong and my response to it. As I pointed out in my post her "facts" are manufactured. Again, I think she sees me as an easy mislynch.
Spoiler: show
nutella wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 7:57 pm @MacDougall juliets is bad because she is saying that in retrospect drago and I are obvtown for objecting to the creature lynch, whereas she never reconsidered her creature vote when it was happening. She made the appearance of taking us and our LC cases seriously after we were proven right, but only after the fact. While creature was being lynched she was totally content to just let it happen.
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 9:50 am
nutella wrote: Wed May 22, 2019 7:57 pm MacDougall juliets is bad because she is saying that in retrospect drago and I are obvtown for objecting to the creature lynch, whereas she never reconsidered her creature vote when it was happening. She made the appearance of taking us and our LC cases seriously after we were proven right, but only after the fact. While creature was being lynched she was totally content to just let it happen.
I will address this again because I don't think it proves anything, and others seem to think it does.

The series of events was this:

1. I suspected Creature
2. I considered Long Con
3. I voted Creature
4. Creature flipped civ
5. After Creature flipped civ the two people who argued against his vote appeared civ to me

So first, nutella says I never reconsidered my Creature vote. In fact, I considered the argument for Long Con BEFORE I voted for Creature.

Secondly, nutella says I only took the LC case seriously AFTER they were proven right which is false. Look at my ISO, I engaged with Drago about his case on Long Con BEFORE Creature flipped civ. I also engaged with indiglo about Long Con BEFORE Creature flipped.

Thirdly nutella says I was "totally content to just let it happen". What? nutella has the ability to get inside my mind and tell you all about the state of my feelings? Who of you are accepting this as fact? @birdwithteeth11 ? I was not "totally content". I stayed in the thread after voting to keep reading and give myself a chance to change my mind.

So I ask those of you who vote for me, which of her points are you considering rock solid fact? I hope if you're voting me you can track it back to something other than this "case" against me.

Here is where she changes direction on me and Long Con at 6:42 pm last night. This was the last thing she said about me before voting me at 1:02 am this morning and giving no reason whatsoever when she vote.
nutella wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 6:42 pm I made a nice rainbow earlier, i feel better about LC and juliets since then and worse about bwt but most of the rest is about the same.
nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 1:02 am Jk you're probably fine actually. :D

[VOTE: juliets] aubergine
So these are some things I see about nutella. I'm leaning mafia on her now instead of town but I would like to know what other people think of her. Please read her ISO for yourself and see which things you think are important. They may not be the same as mine.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 8:56 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

sabie12 wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 8:33 am
juliets wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 8:26 am
sabie12 wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 8:15 am There's so much less conversation over here than there was over at the other game. Not sure where to start. Out of the options people have voted I mean maybe nutella. I'll have to iso. Now that I'm dead in the other game I have more time to read through here. Did nutella express reasoning for suspecting juliets?
She suspected me earlier in the game for something, maybe the fact that I wasn't participating as much because I was in the other game and had all that rl stuff going on. Then she read me as town. Now all of a sudden with no reason given she votes me. She gave no reason when she voted for me but I had just expressed that I would be taking a look at her this morning. I have been conflicted about her for most of the game. I thought she was town at one time but that was gut and when I re-read her I found that feeling was not as strong as I thought it was. So, I'll see.
Yeah I don't know I mean I didn't get a super clear view of why she was suspecting you. Just that she had expressed it prior to voting but you're right she did change her mind then all of a sudden go back to it. With her I mean I can see macs point about her kind of coasting. She is so hard to read because of the constantly changing suspicions.
Yes she is. Part of her civ meta is to be wishy-washy but that's also something easily faked if she is bad.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 8:26 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

sabie12 wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 8:15 am There's so much less conversation over here than there was over at the other game. Not sure where to start. Out of the options people have voted I mean maybe nutella. I'll have to iso. Now that I'm dead in the other game I have more time to read through here. Did nutella express reasoning for suspecting juliets?
She suspected me earlier in the game for something, maybe the fact that I wasn't participating as much because I was in the other game and had all that rl stuff going on. Then she read me as town. Now all of a sudden with no reason given she votes me. She gave no reason when she voted for me but I had just expressed that I would be taking a look at her this morning. I have been conflicted about her for most of the game. I thought she was town at one time but that was gut and when I re-read her I found that feeling was not as strong as I thought it was. So, I'll see.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 7:54 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Maybe it's because I said I would look at you today? I see nothing else I've done to warrant it.
by juliets
Sat May 25, 2019 7:53 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Sat May 25, 2019 1:02 am Jk you're probably fine actually. :D

[VOTE: juliets] aubergine
So what's the reason for this nutella?
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 9:51 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

MacDougall wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 9:35 pm 20 pages and no scumflips. Nutella is in cruise mode. I'd vote there especially now that Dragomir has died in front of her.
I will look at her tomorrow but shouldn't I also be wondering why you are still alive?
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 8:51 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Oops no one here I guess.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 8:44 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

[mention]MacDougall[/mention] talk to me about nutella. I'm conflicted.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 8:29 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

I am here but having trouble getting started.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 6:31 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Rej wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 6:23 pm I just wrote a half case and it got deleted, I cry q.q

Short summary:
Mac profits from Drago kill
Oreki profits from Drago kill
Matahari profits in no way from Drago kill
BWT leaning town
juliets unsure
Long Con/Nutella/Sabie12 one of them might be Wolf
Rej, I would have to see your cases tomorrow.
Drago called Mata bad so why wouldn't she profit from his death?
Drago also called you bad, so don't you profit from his death?
Why does Oreki profit from his death?
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 6:25 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

Rej wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 6:24 pm I will go sleep soon so I will see if I can make better cases once we are half into DP, sry for the confusion caused, I am a bit overloaded.
No problem Rej.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 6:14 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 4] Better Off Ted

RIP [mention]Dragomir[/mention] it sure was nice playing with you.

Daisy I LOVE your write ups and these videos.

Ok time to start looking at people again.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 5:51 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Night 3] Better Off Ted

MacDougall wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 5:48 pm For some reason I attributed one of Matahari's posts to Oreki. Matahari is the civilian. Oreki can be bad.
Oh! Ok, I'll look for your point of view when I look at him again.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 5:46 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

MacDougall wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 4:53 pm WB Sabie. Sorry to hear about your aunt Mata. Oreki is a civilian.
What changed your mind? He sounds civ to me as well so I was surprised last night when you said he was mafia. But that was just a GTH.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 2:21 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Matahari wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 2:10 pm I might remake my list into colors later today, to denote levels of trust/suspicion, but my aunt just died and I will be away for the next few hours.
Oh Mata I am so sorry. Don't worry about us, tend to your family, they are way more important.
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 2:01 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 1:57 pm @Matahari if you go into the full editor it's the button that looks like a drop of paint that expands into the color menu. it's still a pain to do on mobile though lol
I've always wondered how people colored their lists!
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 7:57 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Spacedaisy wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 7:55 am Effective immediately Sabie12 is replacing SokothQultuq.
I hate to see Sokoth go because I don't get to play with him often but WELCOME SABIE!!!
by juliets
Fri May 24, 2019 7:32 am
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Oreki wrote: Fri May 24, 2019 6:13 am
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:45 pm
MacDougall wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:42 pm
nutella wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:29 pm I see what you mean oreki, now it's seeming like this wagon is taking a significant lead as easily as the creature wagon did. I'm tempted to switch back to juliets or maybe join you on bwt
Nutella, Oreki and Wilgy are Mafia together I think.
Why Oreki? I feel like he might be civ because he seems like he is speaking his own mind, but he's come off as lacking conviction to really pursue any of his suspects further than just surface level stuff.

Linki: Looking forward to seeing the rest.
Actually, I'm lacking conviction due not being able to active much in the previous phase, being new here and I'm trying to adept the environment of this site, it's kind of different than where I play. So I can't help it right now and I'm also not really experienced player so It's still hard for me to elaborate the cases properly which I indeed working on it and maybe the main case I'm starting to play here

So I'm trying to observe you all how you guys play
Oreki, if you are town I urge you to name your suspects and just do the best you can to tell us why. We all understand how being a new player in a new environment can be hard but if you don't continue to name suspects and why they are suspicious you will become more and more of a suspect yourself. Hopefully life will let you be more active this next round.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 6:05 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Ok so independent. That takes away the suspicion about indigo's votes.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 5:53 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

MacDougall wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:49 pm I think the Mafia, which I have just described who I think it is. Have been setting up a BWT mislynch since the game started.

I think Indiglo is a civ.
[mention]indiglo[/mention] may be civ, but if she is she would do herself a favor to explain that voting behavior at the end of Day 1 and her response to bwt's question about it.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 5:44 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Indiglo's explanation to bwt's question about her votes:
indiglo wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:23 pm
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:22 pm
indiglo wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:20 pm Tossing mine last minute

[VOTE: Sokoth] aubergine


Oh, linki with Daisy LMAO
You come in close to the last minute and then move your vote between 3 different people very quickly. Why?
Because votes are changeable? :grin:
This is the sequence about LC that I mentioned earlier. Seemingly no reason to vote for him. And note that she avoided my question about the ISO.
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:34 pm Oh, LOL caught up. I thought there were going to be more posts. I'm going to go back and iso LC.
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:48 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

It's the best thing going that isn't a Creature vote.

I will not be here for EOD today, but I have several hours still. So hopefully we can stay organized.

(Also, Creature, if you really are mafia, I tip my hat to you. lol :nicenod: )
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:44 pm
juliets wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 1:27 pm
indiglo wrote: Tue May 21, 2019 12:48 pm [VOTE: Long Con] aubergine

It's the best thing going that isn't a Creature vote.

I will not be here for EOD today, but I have several hours still. So hopefully we can stay organized.

(Also, Creature, if you really are mafia, I tip my hat to you. lol :nicenod: )
indi, did you see something in LC's ISO that convinced you to vote him?

I'm not married to my vote for LC. At this point, I feel like my most likely candidates would be between Mac, Wilgy and LC. Because of how the votes started going down from the beginning of this day phase.

I wanted to get a vote on the board, and of those 3, LC had the most votes so far. I'm open to further discussion for sure, and vote changing, up until the time I have to leave.
I'm posting this now, I don't think we're going to change to Indi so I'll finish her up after the lynch.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 5:37 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

birdwithteeth11 wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:31 pm
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 5:28 pm Ok Day 1 Indie votes:
1st at 7:04 she says she votes for sabie (she actually never voted though)
then at 7:12 she says she's paranoid about Sabie and votes Wilgy
then at 7:20, the very end of the lynch she votes Sokoth but gives no reason why

In between 7:12 and 7:20 Kyle voted Wilgy. Is that the reason indiglo changed to Sokoth? Because if she had stayed there would have been 4 votes on Wilgy, 4 on sabie. Are indiglo and Wilgy part of a mafia team? If so I don't see a reason to pull off Dr. Wilgy and change to indiglo. (I'm going ahead and posting this now instead of waiting until I've revised all her posts because it took me 20 minutes to research all the vote times and see what exactly happened here.)

lots of linki, posting then reading
So you think we would gain the most info from lynching Wilgy?
Hmm, - I guess right now I'm suspicious of Indi but I haven't finished her ISO so I wouldn't change my vote to her at this time. So that makes me want to stick with Wilgy for now. Who would we get the most info from? I just can't say yet but I'll consider it as I read her. Dang only 25 minutes left.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 5:28 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Ok Day 1 Indie votes:
1st at 7:04 she says she votes for sabie (she actually never voted though)
then at 7:12 she says she's paranoid about Sabie and votes Wilgy
then at 7:20, the very end of the lynch she votes Sokoth but gives no reason why

In between 7:12 and 7:20 Kyle voted Wilgy. Is that the reason indiglo changed to Sokoth? Because if she had stayed there would have been 4 votes on Wilgy, 4 on sabie. Are indiglo and Wilgy part of a mafia team? If so I don't see a reason to pull off Dr. Wilgy and change to indiglo. (I'm going ahead and posting this now instead of waiting until I've revised all her posts because it took me 20 minutes to research all the vote times and see what exactly happened here.)

lots of linki, posting then reading
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 5:10 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

I'm reviewing indie but as a part of my review I'm looking at the votes Day 1 - Epi, Creature and Kyle voted for Dr. Wilgy. All are now dead.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 4:57 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

[mention]Matahari[/mention] do you have any thoughts about indiglo? I'm going to iso her right after my MU phase ends.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 4:44 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Dang.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 4:41 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Why is there no one here?
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 4:15 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

I have to complete something in the non-mafia game I'm playing on MU by 5:00 pm. I'll still be in and out of here but I'll be back full time after 5:00. (It's 4:14 my time right now).
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 3:44 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Ok I really don't like being parked on Wilgy now. [mention]Matahari[/mention] thanks for the memory of bwt, your memory is so much better than mine. So I don't know where to move. I'm not suspecting bwt at the moment either.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 3:19 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:14 pm
Oreki wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:10 pm
indiglo wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:07 pm I have to do drive-by mafiaing today. I will be scarce all weekend, I have holiday weekend plans and I don't phone mafia. I'll try to at least get my votes in. Sorry to our hostess with the mostest. :scared:

[VOTE: Dr. Wilgy] aubergine

Again. Obvs. :nicenod:
Like this vote, voting that player without putting any thoughts into it. The wagon is just getting bigger
Indi has been suspecting wilgy longer than anyone so I have no issue with her joining the wagon.
Oh, alright I didn't realize that.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 3:19 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Oreki wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:10 pm
indiglo wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 3:07 pm I have to do drive-by mafiaing today. I will be scarce all weekend, I have holiday weekend plans and I don't phone mafia. I'll try to at least get my votes in. Sorry to our hostess with the mostest. :scared:

[VOTE: Dr. Wilgy] aubergine

Again. Obvs. :nicenod:
Like this vote, voting that player without putting any thoughts into it. The wagon is just getting bigger
Yeah, I'm not wild about that vote.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 2:43 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Ok dang now I'm worried about the Wilgy train especially when I see Wilgy has voted for himself.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 2:35 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

DrWilgy wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 2:31 pm
Rej wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 2:30 pm I find DrWilgy's way of handeling the case against him contentless, anyone with me?
Dude, nice to meet you. This is par for the course.
Lol, Dr. Wilgy I've missed you but for now I'm still voting for you.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 2:23 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

DrWilgy wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 2:19 pm
nutella wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 12:31 pm
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 8:23 am Re: Dr. Wilgy

I had forgotten about this until I was reviewing bwt's posts:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:16 pm As much as I trust Kyle and Creature right now, I just don't get the switch to Wilgy at the last second.
Kyle died that night and Creature died in the lynch the next day and Dr. Wilgy voted for him.
This is a contributing point to bwt/wilgy suspicion
I'll have you know that I am not BWT's teammate. I'll even bus him to prove it.
But wait, why are you voting for him?
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 2:19 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

nutella wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 12:31 pm
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 8:23 am Re: Dr. Wilgy

I had forgotten about this until I was reviewing bwt's posts:
birdwithteeth11 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 7:16 pm As much as I trust Kyle and Creature right now, I just don't get the switch to Wilgy at the last second.
Kyle died that night and Creature died in the lynch the next day and Dr. Wilgy voted for him.
This is a contributing point to bwt/wilgy suspicion
Oh ok nutella, I see why you're seeing team in that.
by juliets
Thu May 23, 2019 12:38 pm
Forum: Previous Side Missions
Topic: [Game Over] Better Off Ted
Replies: 1288
Views: 26088

Re: [Day 3] Better Off Ted

Rej wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 12:22 pm
juliets wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 11:50 am
Rej wrote: Thu May 23, 2019 11:26 am I am totally splitted and this maffia bafflegab is just killing me and totally new for me.
My vote on Juliets came from my gut feelings of D2, observing the low investment of Juliets took in both wagon and permanently questioning stuff that is discussed already. And I went sleep so I just left the vote on Juliets to see what happens and how I would reengage into the conversation.
I don't know Juliets meta but she suddenly changed completely, making me think she is either scum who wants to avoid a lynch wagon being formed on her or a town who wants to make a counter wagon. I am 60/40 still.

<snip>
Rej, I did start becoming invested in this game late for several reasons, all of which I outlined in the other game but not here. The shortened version is I've had several real life issues in the last week - several medical issues and it was my birthday and I was pre-occupied with birthday things. In addition, I was playing the other game which is a monster game and it was sucking up most of the free time I had plus studying the background for a massive non-mafia game I agreed to sub into at MU. I have had a lot on my plate. I'm now dead in the other game so that frees up a chunk of time to play this one better. So you are correct about your gut feeling that I did not have high investment.

The thing I don't really understand is your comment that I was "permanently questioning stuff that is discussed already". Can you point that out? It's certainly possible that I missed something while skimming through the game and asked a question that already had been asked but I don't know that I did it. Also, how does that make me scum? And finally, the reason why you saw the change in me is back to the first point: I died in the other game and I am not spending a load of time in doctor's offices like I was. It's just a matter of time that was freed up.

I strongly urge you to take another look at my behavior and see if it makes sense for the reasons I've given you. As I said before, I won't be devastated if I get lynched but it will be the third mislynch in this game if it happens. I really don't want that to happen for game reasons. I would like for us to pull a win out of this and that is not looking favorable right now.
Oh I am sorry, you didn't have to spill out the details, I heard from some veteran players that empathy doesn't belong into mafia, so I am new here I see it as a way to engage in discussion with you. Maybe my reasoning is still not in depth but sec. Ahyeah the recent questioning from you has been on page 15 resolved, but especially earlier on you did rather question people but I should take it more easy. For a certain part of the game I had my eyes on the players with lower activity, especially Oreki and you and I made observations and found especially you having no impact on anything, similair like me. The mislynch wagons were formed by others, so I regret taking a look at you as a primary scum and that's where I lean more towards a Mac + x combo or a Long Con + x combo.
Also who gives us the confirmation that enemies are one mafia, seeing how splitted it is I get the vibes of this being a multiball with potential a even-night scum duo and a odd-night scum duo. I wonder why people are not really considering triple dynamics in here. It is a mess to read for my part.

Also to your question bout Mac, the way he manipulated Long Con to lynch Creature and how easy Long Con jumped on it is bothering me, also that's why I asked if Mac always plays scummy as town because I still townread him based on how he converses with people, but looking behind his actual plays and their outcomes he is just scum. Also how he planted confusion D1 and noone cared gives me the idea of another bunch of scum just bypassing this opener. I hope I make a bit more sense now.
Rej, yeah the part about empathy, I'm not asking for you to feel sorry for me, I'm just explaining how busy I was and why I wasn't as engaged. I think you can see I'm engaged now that some time has freed up. I did look at pg. 15 but the only question I saw that I asked on that page had to do with what you meant by a post and it turned out you thought I was another juliets. So I'm going to consider that resolved. Regarding confirmation on how many mafia teams there are in the game people usually make an assumption there is only one team when the player count is this low and/or because in the night posts there is no mafia team mentioned (x was killed by the Mafia Team y). And thanks for answering my question about Mac.

linki
I'm off to the gym will catch up when I return.

Return to “[Game Over] Better Off Ted”