He seems pretty Civ to me. And he almost NEVER seems Civ to me, so I am not sure if that's good or bad...sprityo wrote:I'm inclined to believe fredwood is town based off his change in style this game so far.

Return to “Mass Effect Mafia (END)”
He seems pretty Civ to me. And he almost NEVER seems Civ to me, so I am not sure if that's good or bad...sprityo wrote:I'm inclined to believe fredwood is town based off his change in style this game so far.
I would say that their buddying is not indicative of scum mates (though I do not know exactly what buddying you're referring to). I think that since they know each other IRL and we're playing with basically half new people, it's natural to sort of stick together. I mean I even want to defend JoH when Synd people are rude to him, imagine that...Fredwood wrote:Fair enough, I can re-assess IR. I usually end up playing in Gfish games not being in a game with gfish (the downside of him being my favorite mod...sorry guys), so I may not have the most complete read on their dichotomy.Silver Lantern wrote:RE: IR & Gfish. Quite the opposite. Those guys notoriously gun for each other. Nothing friendly about their play towards each other traditionally.Fredwood wrote: IR may just naturally buddy with Gfish since they are buddies, so I'm always careful when trying to decipher their interactions. Still I don't think scum teammate IR and Gfish buddy that hard in their first exposure to so many players, I would think opposite no? Maybe another Realmser can weigh in on this.
What do you make of them buddying in this context then? Do you buy them as scummates?
I would say that their buddying is not indicative of scum mates (though I do not know exactly what buddying you're referring to). I think that since they know each other IRL and we're playing with basically half new people, it's natural to sort of stick together. I mean I even want to defend JoH when Synd people are rude to him, imagine that...Fredwood wrote:Fair enough, I can re-assess IR. I usually end up playing in Gfish games not being in a game with gfish (the downside of him being my favorite mod...sorry guys), so I may not have the most complete read on their dichotomy.Silver Lantern wrote:RE: IR & Gfish. Quite the opposite. Those guys notoriously gun for each other. Nothing friendly about their play towards each other traditionally.Fredwood wrote: IR may just naturally buddy with Gfish since they are buddies, so I'm always careful when trying to decipher their interactions. Still I don't think scum teammate IR and Gfish buddy that hard in their first exposure to so many players, I would think opposite no? Maybe another Realmser can weigh in on this.
What do you make of them buddying in this context then? Do you buy them as scummates?
Anyone else claim so far?Adam - posts
CaptainNifty - posts
Dom - posts
DrWilgy - posts
Dyslexicon - posts
Epignosis - posts - Claimed Neutral Geth (can align with Town or Reaper)
Fredwood - posts - Claimed some townie... by accident, allegedly...
Immortal_Raven - posts
Jackofhearts2005 - posts - Probably scum
Long Con - posts
MovingPictures07 - posts
nutella - posts
Silver Lantern - posts
sprityo - posts
S~V~S - posts
TonyStarkPrime - posts
DEAD
thellama73 - posts - Dr. Karin Chakwas - Lynched on Day 1
colonialbob - posts - EDI - Killed on Night 1
gfishfunk - posts - Donnel Udina - Lynched on Day 2
I openly admit that I have not led and I have not been hunting at all.Jack: "Silver isn't hunting, ergo he's scum silver."
RE: IR & Gfish. Quite the opposite. Those guys notoriously gun for each other. Nothing friendly about their play towards each other traditionally.Fredwood wrote: IR may just naturally buddy with Gfish since they are buddies, so I'm always careful when trying to decipher their interactions. Still I don't think scum teammate IR and Gfish buddy that hard in their first exposure to so many players, I would think opposite no? Maybe another Realmser can weigh in on this.
This and Nutella's earlier post saying the same thing are such BS... If I was Reaper, I would be trying to distance myself from Epi not be so dumb as to defend him when he is essentially a neutral survivor that cannot win with one of the mafias.Dyslexicon wrote:Immediate thoughts on teamed with Gfish is Jack and Raven. Jack because I read him strongly as scum and I recall Gfish ninja switch to Llama to make it possible for Jack to save himself from being lynched D1. I also think Silver is scum but more likely Reaper because of his post about Epi, he didn't seem concerned at all, but I don't think Jack and Silver are teamed. I mean, it's possible but it's wow much bus.
Yes he would. It is a strong play cause not only does it make you seem like you're not on the teammate's mafia, but the opposing mafia possibly won't be gunning for you right away since they'll probably think the same thing.Fredwood wrote:I might be giving Jack too much credit though, but would he sacrifice a gridlock with a non-team member to bus a team member in order to survive a lynch?
Possibly, but this down here, sure looks a some teammate distancing from a scummer that knows he's headed to the gallows:Fredwood wrote:So Epi, Wilgy and Nut are all for sure not Cerberus.
I'm willing to say Jack isn't Cerberus.
gfishfunk wrote:So, all we really need now are two to three people to switch to JoH. Any takers?
How on earth could you possibly know that you and Fred are on the same team? What a scummy thing to say in a game with 2 mafias lol.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Fred
Please stop. We're on the same side and I can't stand it.
I don't doubt that Gfish of making such a dumb play on purpose, but it does seem way more irresponsible than he'd probably be with a copping. Plus do you honestly believe he wouldn't cop, you, me, or IR? I don't think so...Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Yeah but not this dumb.Silver Lantern wrote:Obviously you have never played with Gfish...Epignosis wrote:Yeah, gfishfunk is a liar. Who the hell uses a block / kill BEFORE an alignment check.
Lies.
He does dumb shit all the time, lololol.
That's a safeclaim.
Do they nerf the lynch all together or just make it so that the next leader is lynched? Cause if so I am staying on JackofScums2005.Fredwood wrote:Silver Lantern wrote:What are you whining on about? Can you quote what role has vote shenanigans that you're concerned about? So that others can understand without stirring up a panic for no reason?Dyslexicon wrote:I'm still afraid that vote shenanigans will fuck up having a lynch.
lol...I chicken littled it earlier, there is at least 2 known vote manipulators...Theres 3 possible reaper vote manipulators, for sure there's one, possibly 2 in that faction. The Thorian is a vote manipulator, and I believe there's another alliance role or two that are vote manipulators.
So, there's almost as much chance for vote shenanigans as there is for roleblocking.
You have no idea how much I like the line "tuck and roll bitches". It immediately catapulted Epi to like my favorite person on this site, but I kinda feel like a big sibling having to defend his little siblings here when he starts to kick my people while they're down not just to him but any non HCR people... Wierd I know, I am trying to shake it, lol.Dyslexicon wrote:Lulz.Silver Lantern wrote:Mainly cause that's my job...
What are you whining on about? Can you quote what role has vote shenanigans that you're concerned about? So that others can understand without stirring up a panic for no reason?Dyslexicon wrote:I'm still afraid that vote shenanigans will fuck up having a lynch.
I really want to like you Epi, cause you used a really cool line like "tuck and roll bitches", but if you could not be such a dickbag to the people from my home site, that would be cool...Epignosis wrote: Tell me: How demoralizing is it to have your first kill of the game wasted on someone you don't need dead to win...and you couldn't even succeed at that?
Obviously you have never played with Gfish...Epignosis wrote:Yeah, gfishfunk is a liar. Who the hell uses a block / kill BEFORE an alignment check.
Lies.
If I were Mafia Jack, you wouldn't have lived past N1.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Lol Silver = ReaverLong Con wrote:I got some swampland in Florida to sell you.Silver Lantern wrote:I just read the Geth Role. Frankly, I don't have an issue with him. I think that the fact that he claimed obviously means he plans to side with the Alliance.
Insert Siren Gif...Fredwood wrote:Not really...if you fucking copped him we would have bypassed the whole Vega debacle.gfishfunk wrote:Might as well just quote at this point.Mordin Solus
You are the very model of a Salarian scientist! And since you were recruited by Shepard to stop the Reaper threat, you have a variety of abilities you can use during the game.
Incinerate - One shot roleblock with a chance to kill your target.
Neural Shock - One shot roleblock nexus (anyone targeting you fails in their action)
Salarian Scientist - Two shot alignment cop
Incinerate. And before you give me hell for my choice of night action, I hit non-town damnit. It was a great night action.
Also...I don't see any kill protection in your roleblock.
Who is "HIS"/"HIM" and can you explain exactly WHAT he will not die from?DrWilgy wrote:Can you explain a good reason for his claim as a baddie? For him to outright risk counter claim?Silver Lantern wrote:To be frank at this point hasn't there been enough back and forth (guessing here) that we will get solid info from any of these lynches.DrWilgy wrote:
To EVERYONE we will gain mpre info from a JoH lynch than an Epi lynch.
We would gain the most info from a gfish lynch.
Isn't info what all civs thirst for?
Cause if so, stop trying to make it seem like one is better than another. That just makes you seem like a team mate trying to protect Epi.
He
will
not
die
from
this
Meaning we gain nothing.
Is Epi only after you cause you claimed to have blocked him?gfishfunk wrote:I claimed a role block with self protection.Fredwood wrote:He claimed one of 28 roleblocks
To be frank at this point hasn't there been enough back and forth (guessing here) that we will get solid info from any of these lynches.DrWilgy wrote:
To EVERYONE we will gain mpre info from a JoH lynch than an Epi lynch.
We would gain the most info from a gfish lynch.
Isn't info what all civs thirst for?
Thanks for answering.gfishfunk wrote:Epi has admitted to be the neutral role Gesh. And Reavers, Reapers. Whatever. I like Firefly better.Silver Lantern wrote:I really think Jack is scum, so I prefer to vote for him over anyone else.gfishfunk wrote:Hey Silver. Want to help lynch a possible Reaver and probable Scummy neutral? Vote Epignosis!Silver Lantern wrote:Okay obviously I am not gonna catch so I will try starting from the end and working my way back.
What do we have on Epi that makes you think he's scum? All I saw (and admittedly I did not catch up) was a silly suggestion on his part that someone RBing a kill and coming forward was a reason to vote for you (I am paraphrasing), which quite frankly is kinda dumb, but not lynch worthy.
Also, did you answer my question of why you alleged there was no bodyguard in the game? IS IMPORTANT!
The bodyguard was a misread of the role that died last night.
Cause he's scum and he knows that once I come up town he's cooked. He's just desperately trying to take any attention away from himself, by any means necessary. Typical scum Jack.Fredwood wrote: My suspicions are independent of Dom's and SVS. I'm pretty sure I explained it, Adam followed the logic. It's a combination of cost/benefit assessment and uncharacteristic opportunistic play. I really didn't like the switch to Epi from Silver, If you're that sure on Silver you stay on Silver and try building your case, especially in plurality. We're not at a point were we have to play it safe (even if we think Epi is a "safe" vote) we can afford to take a few risks. The more I think about an Epi lynch, the more it sounds dumb because we still have plays that provide a greater benefit then maintaining the status quo. Epi's only a lynch if we have no better alternatives.
Why would his kill on you fail?Epignosis wrote:A reaver? What the hell is that?gfishfunk wrote:Hey Silver. Want to help lynch a possible Reaver and probable Scummy neutral? Vote Epignosis!Silver Lantern wrote:Okay obviously I am not gonna catch so I will try starting from the end and working my way back.
You are Cerberus, and I think Long Con is too. You tried to kill me. It failed. So you made up this bullshit role block story.
You are bad.
I really think Jack is scum, so I prefer to vote for him over anyone else.gfishfunk wrote:Hey Silver. Want to help lynch a possible Reaver and probable Scummy neutral? Vote Epignosis!Silver Lantern wrote:Okay obviously I am not gonna catch so I will try starting from the end and working my way back.
Completely agree. Jack trying to point the finger at me does not sit well at all. Look how he left me alone in the last game we played on here and we were both town. Jack pushing on me, is a meta play trying to get me to blow up and seem scummy or just to take attention off himself. It's a pretty heads up play on his part.Fredwood wrote:DrWilgy wrote:Can we aim to at leas make Gfish the alternate wagon?
Hmm... a thought. I'm damn near a unanimous town read. Yet little to no one is voting with me.
Who legitimately thinks that I am just wrong out of this group.
I think the bigger issue for me is the vote manipulation. Gfish is a good candidate, right now we have such a wide list of suspects that adding another leaves us open to vote manipulation having a greater effect on the outcome. I did list fish as an asterisk on my main post, but seeing as how nobody is really moving to a consensus of one or two people, pushing him felt like a dangerous proposition.
Jack moving to Epi of all the other options just keeps adding to the reason why I want to vote for Jack, despite my Risk/Reward analysis. Jack's defense doesn't feel like he's defending himself but trying to get us to look at other people we want to lynch. I think a townie Jack sticks to his guns on Silver, not switch to epi. There's been plenty of times I recall Jack not going for the easy lynch when he was town, going for the easy lynch now is suspect.
I like your aggresiveness Dom, and I too think Jack is playing scummy, but I think you need to consider that some of us HCR folks do not know the mechanics and rules of posting here and perhaps you cannot attribute such meta things to us. For example, I have no idea what HEX is.Dom wrote:POLL: Do you think Jack was really making a fucking rainbow list, using color codes that are all in HEX (right-- that's HEX right?) in quick reply?
That sounds like some serious bullshit to me.
Town Jack doesn't back down. Look Jack, I can play this game too...Jackofhearts2005 wrote:No.Dom wrote:Don't discredit me because I suspect you. Refute it with actual specifics. Don't complain that nutella is too vague but not provide specifics on why I'm wrong.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:
Jesus Christ. If I didn't already know your town game makes no sense to me after Unfortunate Events...
You're claiming to magically know I lied about making a rainbow. You're either convinced I'm scum and there's nothing I can possibly do about that or you're pretending and your town play as seen in Unfortunate Events is so far off what I understand that I don't have any confidence in my ability to catch you.
You can vote for me if you like but I don't see the merit in engaging with you. I'll take my chances in surviving the day with one extra vote on me.
No bodyguard? Based on what Fish? Source please.gfishfunk wrote:Right now, my topic scum pick is Epignosis for a simple reason.
Epi was pinging some of the syndicate and did not vote. I targeted Epi with a role block. Only one kill occurred last night, and there should have been two (see the roles in he beginning). With no doctor and no bodyguard, the lack of a kill is indicative of a role block.
I have absolutely no qualms about killing Bob (or anyone else) on any night and I have zero problems admitting that.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:@Silver
You're playing much more like bad you and much less like good you. I know you'd have no qualms about killing Bob on night one.
Why should I not vote for you and who should I vote for instead?
So because I don't entertain your bullshit argument I want to squash discussion? Do you litter every game with this load of garbage?S~V~S wrote:Where does Silver who told me my post is garbage come in on the spectrum?gfishfunk wrote:I second this. Silver Town has a gallon jub of gasoline. Silver Scum is reserved (for Silver).TonyStarkPrime wrote:I'm going to suggest that others who have played more with him answer this, but Silver as maf tends to play things off more and be a little less direct while maintaining a general offensive persona, where town Silver can and sometimes will verbally assault you for voting for him.
He has very much felt to me like a person who wishes to squash discussion.
Hey Gfish, when did YOU stop beating your wife?gfishfunk wrote: I second this. Silver Town has a gallon jub of gasoline. Silver Scum is reserved (for Silver).
Please quote for me where I say it was a tell for me. All I said is that having played a game with me (where I was Civ and him as maf) LC should not be surprised that I am overly defensive. It's just kinda my natural reaction to things, whether I am town or scum. I.e. it should not be indicative of alignment. He was saying it was suspicious, I was calling BS on his suspicion.S~V~S wrote:I was suggesting it because YOU said that was a tell for you. So yes, there could be a quantifiable difference from how you behave when sincere to how you behave when insincere. That is how I play, i look for insincerity and it's related behavioral markers. And I would think that if you DO have behavioral tells you would want to know about it so you could fix them and improve your baddie game.Silver Lantern wrote:Nah SVS, I'm just too damn good for people to have a ready to order meta read on me of when I'm town vs when I am not.S~V~S wrote: So tell me the difference between *town* Silver defensiveness and overreaction and *baddie* Silver defensiveness and overreaction reaction. There must be one, and if he is town he will welcome it being put out there.
I mean, are you seriously suggesting that there must be a quantifiable way to determine if I'm town or evil based on simple behavior anyone can pinpoint? And you claim that I would welcome that as town? No, I wouldn't welcome that as town because no one plays town all the time and only a lame-o who doesn't want a challenge would want such a thing to exist. What a load of garbage...
But what do I know? I am apparently only a garbage peddler
We do play only Closed Setups, and NKs are only hidden with a janitor role.S~V~S wrote:In open setups we don't always role reveal an NK on death. The gameplay section on the first page says lynched roles are revealed, it says nothing about NKed roles.Silver Lantern wrote:Yep. Jack is definitely scum. The opposing mafia or the vig should kill him tonight.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Silver Lantern - too quiet, not enough reads, not enough anything but one (phoned in?) defensive rant. Looks like scum Silver. Shoulda pushed on him instead of Nut but boss was watching so I wasn't thorough. Like IR, I'm play with pushing him off until later cause I tend to be good at reading him.
We learn more from lynching than NKs if that is so. Do you guys usually play only closed set up games?
*POSTING AS I CATCH UP*Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Cause I think you're bad?Silver Lantern wrote:Yep. Jack is definitely scum. The opposing mafia or the vig should kill him tonight.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Silver Lantern - too quiet, not enough reads, not enough anything but one (phoned in?) defensive rant. Looks like scum Silver. Shoulda pushed on him instead of Nut but boss was watching so I wasn't thorough. Like IR, I'm play with pushing him off until later cause I tend to be good at reading him.
Really liking Dom's aggresiveness.That's some bullshit.
You made a rainbow list in the quick reply?
bad.
Yep. Jack is definitely scum. The opposing mafia or the vig should kill him tonight.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: Silver Lantern - too quiet, not enough reads, not enough anything but one (phoned in?) defensive rant. Looks like scum Silver. Shoulda pushed on him instead of Nut but boss was watching so I wasn't thorough. Like IR, I'm play with pushing him off until later cause I tend to be good at reading him.
Score! Suck it, Fredwood's Goats...Fredwood wrote:That one got past me.Silver Lantern wrote:I can never get one past this damned goat herder...Fredwood wrote:FILL YOUR HANDS YOU SONOVABITCH!!1Silver Lantern wrote:
That's some mighty bold talk for a one eyed fatman...![]()
I can never get one past this damned goat herder...Fredwood wrote:FILL YOUR HANDS YOU SONOVABITCH!!1Silver Lantern wrote:
That's some mighty bold talk for a one eyed fatman...![]()
Hey, at least I don't Buddy up to townies when I'm scum and then feign surprise when everyone is on to my scum tell you predictable bottle washer.Jackofhearts2005 wrote:Do you throw fits when you're scum, Silver?Silver Lantern wrote:Nah SVS, I'm just too damn good for people to have a ready to order meta read on me of when I'm town vs when I am not.S~V~S wrote: So tell me the difference between *town* Silver defensiveness and overreaction and *baddie* Silver defensiveness and overreaction reaction. There must be one, and if he is town he will welcome it being put out there.
I mean, are you seriously suggesting that there must be a quantifiable way to determine if I'm town or evil based on simple behavior anyone can pinpoint? And you claim that I would welcome that as town? No, I wouldn't welcome that as town because no one plays town all the time and only a lame-o who doesn't want a challenge would want such a thing to exist. What a load of garbage...
That's some mighty bold talk for a one eyed fatman...TonyStarkPrime wrote:I'm going to suggest that others who have played more with him answer this, but Silver as maf tends to play things off more and be a little less direct while maintaining a general offensive persona, where town Silver can and sometimes will verbally assault you for voting for him.S~V~S wrote:So tell me the difference between *town* Silver defensiveness and overreaction and *baddie* Silver defensiveness and overreaction reaction. There must be one, and if he is town he will welcome it being put out there.TonyStarkPrime wrote:I'm sure someone has already said something, but this is natural Silver. It is still Is valid reaction, but I don't put too much stock into it.Long Con wrote: 1. This would be the reaction that tickled my suspiciometer. Defensive, with a thin slice of OMGUS at the end.
Nah SVS, I'm just too damn good for people to have a ready to order meta read on me of when I'm town vs when I am not.S~V~S wrote: So tell me the difference between *town* Silver defensiveness and overreaction and *baddie* Silver defensiveness and overreaction reaction. There must be one, and if he is town he will welcome it being put out there.
Meh, like I said, her response was rather satisfying, so I'm sure there was nothing there anyway.Long Con wrote: Actually, neither, but I did remember in the meantime. You're that defensive guy!
And sorry if I fubar'ed your S~V~S interrogation. Not the first time, and won't be the last, that I insert myself into such a conversation.