Nachomamma8 wrote:There was some concern that claiming to have the map could paint a target on people's backs, so a civilian claiming map when they don't have it obscures who has it and thus protects the civilian with a map. I don't like your push on JJJ/Golden for a couple reasons: 1) it's likelier than both of them have the map than Marmot even though you talked about voting Marmot; multiple people talked about voting JJJ and Golden makes a good target by rep alone, 2) it's an extraordinarily shallow thing to hammer on that has nothing to do with alignment which is something I think you're aware of.
Once again, yes, a person with the map could theoretically provide cover from the real map holder. They could also draw in-thread credibility away from that person.
Look at it from this theoretical perspective: let's say that a bunch of scumbuddies decide to all claim the map in order to "protect the real map-holder," when they're really discouraging everyone but the real map-holder from stepping forward. Then they can dispose of him/her. Not saying that's what's happening, but it's an example of ulterior motives for claimers.
1) The only vote that I for sure know is my own, and I voted for MM. Therefore, he's the one I'm disposed towards believing. I believe it was Scotty who said that he stated in-thread he was voting for 3J, but later took it back and said he really voted for someone else. Yes, 3J and Golden seem like the obvious SUPATOWN (translation = tryhard) choices, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're the ones with the map.
2)
You're an extraordinary shallow thing to hammer on. I think it's a game-relevant fact which could mean something down the road. I pointed out as much, but people kept harping (or hammering) on my posts about it, and even suspecting me for it. So, I had to discuss it even more. Frankly, I'd like to move onto other topics. But, if people keep asking me about it, that's where my attention is going.