JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I am sorry but either my memory is very bad and I forgot about you or we played and you had anorher name
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am
How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?
His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?
This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?
Did I put enough question marks in this ^^? Maybe I need a few more?
@DrWilgy mathematical balance is not my strong suit; I was working on the premise that he wouldn’t have more wolves than in a game with more players than this. Hopefully he chooses to tell us, but if not, not.
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am
How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
With only 10 players? That’s almost a third of the players list?
His Solar System game had 11 players, 2 mafia. With fewer players more wolves seems unlikely?
This is rather a debatable point to get aggro about?
Did I put enough question marks in this ^^? Maybe I need a few more?
@DrWilgy mathematical balance is not my strong suit; I was working on the premise that he wouldn’t have more wolves than in a game with more players than this. Hopefully he chooses to tell us, but if not, not.
I mean, It just depends on misyeet count for me. How many mistakes are town allowed to make before W's win. I've seen more arguments for a 4 misyeet game being balanced than I've seen of a 3 misyeet game being balanced.
with 8-2 we are a 4 misyeet game, 7-3 a 3 misyeet game.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am
How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
@S~V~S is this the post you are referring to as shade in?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.
Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:50 am
How many mafia we have in this game?
Well a post up there ^^ mentions that the “team” can start BTSC, so more than 1. Prolly 2. More than that would be unbalanced and Jay is all about balance.
Why would be 3 unbalanced?
@S~V~S is this the post you are referring to as shade in?
No the one I quoted, where she said “fight me” to someone else since she said that after I called her aggro lol
More making fun than shading, maybe like :P
Skip softly, my moonbeams, for I have heard tell
That the stairs up to heaven lead straight down to hell
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.
Well, with what little we have, what else would you like to form a basis of a read upon?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.
Because Michelle is not a new and she is posting like one.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?
Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.
LinearPoint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 9:22 am
It was a late night start.
But no matter, the thread shall not be dead forever.
You still here?
Had stepped away for a sec, but yes.
As for what has been said so far. 3 wolves is pretty much always pushing it on a 10 player setup. Although I don't think I agree on susing Michelle for questioning the ruling out of 3 wolves.
As for all the meta talk about Guillotine and Michelle I don't really know much about right now since it's been a hot minute since I played with either.
I think what's more so, is that it's easier for a W to advise 'this is town favored' than a T to do so, especially without the set up being revealed.
That is true that mafia are a bit more tempted to join speculation talk due to knowing the answer. But I find that kind of talk is more a point against people when we get a few flips than a basis for a read.
This is as interesting as Abigail putting a wolf by default in the first wagon of 3 players in my previous game.
Can I know why do you think a wolf have to bus in this game?
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am
Ok, Wilgy is towmie
No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.
Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?
Weird shade buddy.
Nah, it's pretty standard after last game
I mean, I think I have a good read on you. That being the case, as T I'm just correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread, as W I have to pretend to be correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread.
What makes my T read on you differ from my W read on you? What makes my T excitement at you entering thread, different from my W excitement at you entering the thread?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.
Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?
Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.
I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.
To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
S~V~S wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:54 am
@falcon45ca nah
You’re reading too much into one word. I’ve noticed you tend to do this with me.
Do you think Michelle is town?
I mean, I kinda saw it too.
I think assumption of aggro from Michelle was somewhat overplaced, I do think W's are immediately more aware or easier to perceive pushes against them. i.e. aggro.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Michelle wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:34 am
Ok, Wilgy is towmie
No pocketing me. Pockets taste like chalupas with too much sour cream.
Implying that I'm pocketing you off of me asking what's happening with my dear friend Falcon when I see them enter the thread?
Weird shade buddy.
Nah, it's pretty standard after last game
I mean, I think I have a good read on you. That being the case, as T I'm just correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread, as W I have to pretend to be correct on you and excited to see you enter the thread.
What makes my T read on you differ from my W read on you? What makes my T excitement at you entering thread, different from my W excitement at you entering the thread?
It's my intro post, you can't WR or TR me off it...as you say, you're excited to see me (and I you), but I can't tell the difference if you're fakin' it or not.
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
Damn, may as well stop discussing in general because it allows scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of fake reads and observations.
Who is making fake reads?
I could be, why aren't mine fake?
Stop,playing dumb, it is obvious you were insinuating it was me, i just asked you to see if you had the guts to tell it to my face and then i'd ask you why are they fake, which are fake.
I don't think your reads are fake. I agree with your Michelle read and I think it makes sense for you to have it. I do think your approach to d1 and game start was negative town ev. I also think discouragement of any form of discussion is negative town ev. I do not know if that was motivated by a W perspective or a flawed one.
To assume I'm playing dumb though, how feisty.
Feisty? You forgot we wolfed and won together not less than a month ago?
Guillotine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2023 10:46 am
How about we stop speculating about mafia:town ratios?
It gives scum the opportunity to hide under the guise of creating content by talking about it.
I for one think it's productive as it's likely to draw in wolves to the discussion and open them up for slipping.
Plus it's not like there is anything else we can realistically do at the very start of day 1. There's no mechanical info to go off of so we need people to talk, associate, and take positions.
But there is a far better subject than mechanical talk now.
Me
Why would discussion strictly on you be more beneficial than discussions on set up?
Assuming you are T, it can escalate you into the game yes, but does this escalate the entire thread into the game like a mechanical discourse would?
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
so for me it had a joking tone.