Moderator: Community Team
You do!? But I am trying so hard to be scummy.a2thezebra wrote:I'm confident because I have a civ read of you, not because I KNOW you are civ.MacDougall wrote:She knows I am civ. You can tell by the way she phrased the first sentence and also the defense of me when I was absent was confident because she knows my alignment.sig wrote:Could you point it out?
linki - Yup, this is what I am talking about.
But you weren't confident just a little while ago. You don't remind me anything of yourself going after sanmateo, where I was all "Well I think it's just his meta" and you impress us all with your "Don't care, he looks like scum to me" and knock down mafia a peg on day 1. Does this look confident?Golden wrote:As a townie, I always try to be exactly honest about how confident I am. There is a reason I'm fighting for sig to stay and nutella to go... it's because I'm confident. I'm not sure how this does not remind you of, say, my insistence about sanmateo and aether in 87? I was very measured and careful about my suspicion, but also consistent and correct. What part of my baddie game analogue is this? In my baddie game (the only one I had on RYM)... I tried to get brian lynched over and over for days, same with seaside. I don't think this is an honest analysis of what you remember from RYM at all. If I had any 'eh' game, it was 88 where I was civ.
You're not insistent, you did mention a couple very minor things early in the game so I can call you consistent, but insistent no.Golden wrote:Civvie sig's defenses rarely make 'sense', as such, he ties himself into knots. I don't think, however, that as a baddie he would come out and say that the baddies are 'currently' doing x, it doesn't make sense to me as being a scumslip. Plus, the bandwagon has been too easy.
Who else do you suspect? What do you think of the points that have been made on nutella? Are there other people I should be looking at? I don't really have a good idea of who people should vote for, but I think I've had a decent idea of who we shouldn't vote for. I'm not putting my vote anywhere in the dom/svs/epi triangle.
@Sorsha - there are not specific players in there that I'm suspicious of, as such, but it wouldn't surprise me if the existing votes include one or two mafia. I think Bullzeye was sincere in making his case.
sig wrote:Well you two haven't had much interaction in the thread and I'm wondering what you both think of the other. Has your views on each other changed from the last phase into this one?a2thezebra wrote:sig wrote:@Turnip what do you think about Zebra, and zebra what do you think about Turnip curious with how the day phase went what your views on each other are know opposed to last phase.
What exactly do you mean by this?
I thought the meaning of my question was quite clear.
Yup 10PM EstLong Con wrote:Ok, the thread is open. I deleted the placeholder poll, so there is no timer again. Sorry I fucked up. 10pm EST Sunday is the end.
Becauss I want to spend time with you because I like you.a2thezebra wrote:This is the last I will speak of this pointless conflict between Epi and I.
"That's not what I said" can be interpreted as both an accusation of misquotation as well an accusation of inappropriate extrapolation. Since you didn't specify, I think most people would default to misquotation as being what the accusation was. You didn't, because you are more civilized than the rest of us uneducated folk, but if you had given us (read: me) the courtesy of specifying what you meant initially, you could have saved some time and energy on both of our parts. I think communication is more about knowing who you're talking to than what the "proper" interpretation of a statement is, but that's just me.
linki @ Mac - I don't know, if I'm scum then you've caught me red-handed (based on the laziest scumslip accusation I've seen since probably not that long ago) so I'm not sure why you would want my advice.
linki @ sig - CAN WE LYNCH THIS PLEASE LMAO WTF
United States East Coast timezone.MacDougall wrote:What is 10pm est?
Sig. Fuck brah. How long to go.sig wrote:I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Why Golden and Epi though?
lini: it ends at 10 est I think?
If ya really wanna cause trouble tie up the vote between me and nutelle
You think that post lacks conviction about civ? Or just nutella? That is a different thing...HamburgerBoy wrote:When I say "Eh" game, I don't mean off-game or anything. I mean lacking a specific kind of conviction. The bcornett point is interesting actually; sticking with one mild candidate would be much more in line with what I'm seeing here.
Seriously does no one else see this? This alone is lynch-worthy.sig wrote:I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Nah juliets could be on the table. That would be great.Golden wrote:You think that post lacks conviction about civ? Or just nutella? That is a different thing...HamburgerBoy wrote:When I say "Eh" game, I don't mean off-game or anything. I mean lacking a specific kind of conviction. The bcornett point is interesting actually; sticking with one mild candidate would be much more in line with what I'm seeing here.
Because I am feeling confident, consistent and insistent about sig. And nutella is the only other genuine option on the table right now.
It was pretty great in Guess Who.MacDougall wrote:I just feel like Epi and Golden are scum because I feel it would be great.
Oh definitely. But lynching scum right now seems to be not the agenda of currently active players as the lack of votes on juliets attests to.a2thezebra wrote:Seriously does no one else see this? This alone is lynch-worthy.sig wrote:I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Sure, and I'm not one to easily get pressured either. I enjoy the fight, but it still smells of an easy set-up (before the lynch is even called) should your biggest scumspect flip scum. Many people going after nutella don't even seem to be acknowledging your specific case, but it makes it look like you were the one that drove the whole thing to begin with. I like how still no one has suspected you for jumping off the tally at 4-4-4 in favor for BUG, when a lot of this case against her seems to involve BUG and some potentially-meaningless tie to begin with. People are dedicated to a sig or a nutella lynch and that's just how it's going to be.Golden wrote:And also, HB... if you feel it's a catch 22 because you'd sooner lynch a civilian than have me after you tomorrow...
If someone says they will be after me, and I'm a civilian, I shrug and say 'bring it on'. I'll still vote for who I think is bad, and I won't care how it looks.
About one hour, it would be great for you to tie me and Nutelle by voting for nutelle.MacDougall wrote:Sig. Fuck brah. How long to go.sig wrote:I'm not sure on Zebra but if we could get a few lynches on her that might reveal some information about her alignment.
Why Golden and Epi though?
lini: it ends at 10 est I think?
If ya really wanna cause trouble tie up the vote between me and nutelle
I just feel like Epi and Golden are scum because I feel it would be great.
My response:a2thezebra wrote:This is the last I will speak of this pointless conflict between Epi and I.
"That's not what I said" can be interpreted as both an accusation of misquotation as well an accusation of inappropriate extrapolation. Since you didn't specify, I think most people would default to misquotation as being what the accusation was. You didn't, because you are more civilized than the rest of us uneducated folk, but if you had given us (read: me) the courtesy of specifying what you meant initially, you could have saved some time and energy on both of our parts. I think communication is more about knowing who you're talking to than what the "proper" interpretation of a statement is, but that's just me.
linki @ Mac - I don't know, if I'm scum then you've caught me red-handed (based on the laziest scumslip accusation I've seen since probably not that long ago) so I'm not sure why you would want my advice.
linki @ sig - CAN WE LYNCH THIS PLEASE LMAO WTF
Lacking conviction about nutella being scum. You frame it as "Well, it's the best we've got".Golden wrote:You think that post lacks conviction about civ? Or just nutella? That is a different thing...HamburgerBoy wrote:When I say "Eh" game, I don't mean off-game or anything. I mean lacking a specific kind of conviction. The bcornett point is interesting actually; sticking with one mild candidate would be much more in line with what I'm seeing here.
Because I am feeling confident, consistent and insistent about sig. And nutella is the only other genuine option on the table right now.
MacDougall wrote:Becauss I want to spend time with you because I like you.a2thezebra wrote:This is the last I will speak of this pointless conflict between Epi and I.
"That's not what I said" can be interpreted as both an accusation of misquotation as well an accusation of inappropriate extrapolation. Since you didn't specify, I think most people would default to misquotation as being what the accusation was. You didn't, because you are more civilized than the rest of us uneducated folk, but if you had given us (read: me) the courtesy of specifying what you meant initially, you could have saved some time and energy on both of our parts. I think communication is more about knowing who you're talking to than what the "proper" interpretation of a statement is, but that's just me.
linki @ Mac - I don't know, if I'm scum then you've caught me red-handed (based on the laziest scumslip accusation I've seen since probably not that long ago) so I'm not sure why you would want my advice.
linki @ sig - CAN WE LYNCH THIS PLEASE LMAO WTF
Dudebroski. Do u think we should lynch juliets in light of the fact that I am heaps town?HamburgerBoy wrote:Lacking conviction about nutella being scum. You frame it as "Well, it's the best we've got".Golden wrote:You think that post lacks conviction about civ? Or just nutella? That is a different thing...HamburgerBoy wrote:When I say "Eh" game, I don't mean off-game or anything. I mean lacking a specific kind of conviction. The bcornett point is interesting actually; sticking with one mild candidate would be much more in line with what I'm seeing here.
Because I am feeling confident, consistent and insistent about sig. And nutella is the only other genuine option on the table right now.
Why isn't Mac a genuine option?
Nah we can lynch juliets for sure.Golden wrote:Well, HB, if you think I'm setting up for nutella to flip bad because I'm her teammate, why don't you vote nutella to see if you are right?
@HB - how many votes does Mac have? How many people with their votes committed are actually coming back to the thread in the last hour? It's not like RYM around here, the last hour is not going to see everyone recast their votes. This lynch will be sig or nutella, I guarantee it.
You flatter me, sir.MacDougall wrote:If I had to guess the alignments of epi, Golden, Zebs and MattF I would say scum, scum, scum, cum.
Tying the lynch up would make things fair and at least ease my conscience. I'm still considering it.Golden wrote:Well, HB, if you think I'm setting up for nutella to flip bad because I'm her teammate, why don't you vote nutella to see if you are right?
@HB - how many votes does Mac have? How many people with their votes committed are actually coming back to the thread in the last hour? It's not like RYM around here, the last hour is not going to see everyone recast their votes. This lynch will be sig or nutella, I guarantee it.
lolMatt F wrote:You flatter me, sir.MacDougall wrote:If I had to guess the alignments of epi, Golden, Zebs and MattF I would say scum, scum, scum, cum.
Golden wrote:It was pretty great in Guess Who.MacDougall wrote:I just feel like Epi and Golden are scum because I feel it would be great.
You were pushing me? Dude that is straight up not kind.HamburgerBoy wrote:Tying the lynch up would make things fair and at least ease my conscience. I'm still considering it.Golden wrote:Well, HB, if you think I'm setting up for nutella to flip bad because I'm her teammate, why don't you vote nutella to see if you are right?
@HB - how many votes does Mac have? How many people with their votes committed are actually coming back to the thread in the last hour? It's not like RYM around here, the last hour is not going to see everyone recast their votes. This lynch will be sig or nutella, I guarantee it.
And yeah, I'm realizing you're right. When I was pushing Mac over sig and nutella I think nutella still only had a vote or two, several hours ago, but a lot of people have already mentioned casting their votes for the day. Last-minute poll flips are usually a fetish of mine, so I'll have to get used to being louder around that apparent t-minus 6 sweet spot if I want to influence things here.
scum nutelleMacDougall wrote:Excuse me sigtown. Who would you vote for if you were scum, town or indy? Name three.
I think it would result in Floyd being lynched.HamburgerBoy wrote:Mac, what would you think about a Floyd lynch?
OK. Now that you see what I mean about it being sig or nutella, do you understand my side of this conversation? I do have conviction about sig and I think I've been very consistent about that. I didn't mean to put you in a catch 22, but from my perspective I gave you the option to vote nutella over sig on that basis after you said you would given the choice between the two, and you flip flopped.HamburgerBoy wrote:Tying the lynch up would make things fair and at least ease my conscience. I'm still considering it.Golden wrote:Well, HB, if you think I'm setting up for nutella to flip bad because I'm her teammate, why don't you vote nutella to see if you are right?
@HB - how many votes does Mac have? How many people with their votes committed are actually coming back to the thread in the last hour? It's not like RYM around here, the last hour is not going to see everyone recast their votes. This lynch will be sig or nutella, I guarantee it.
And yeah, I'm realizing you're right. When I was pushing Mac over sig and nutella I think nutella still only had a vote or two, several hours ago, but a lot of people have already mentioned casting their votes for the day. Last-minute poll flips are usually a fetish of mine, so I'll have to get used to being louder around that apparent t-minus 6 sweet spot if I want to influence things here.
Yes. You are my hero.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
Why did you vote for me Turnip Head?MacDougall wrote:Yes. You are my hero.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 3:24 pm Always good to remember that there is no such thing as a Mafia circumstance that is worth real human emotion. Sometimes it will naturally come out, but it can be contained if we just remember that this is a game on a message board forum that 99.99% of the population of the Earth has never heard of before. No matter how successful anyone is, it means just about nothing.
Nah you are lying.sig wrote:scum nutelleMacDougall wrote:Excuse me sigtown. Who would you vote for if you were scum, town or indy? Name three.
town nutelle/Elohcin
indy nutelle
Or do you mean if I wasn't about to get lynched? If not it would be
scum BUGLABUSH/Luke
town Bulls/Elohcin
indy I'd go with a bandwagon and flow with it.
Gummonnnn. Juliets is lurking hard and not contributing to this hunt at all.juliets wrote:Why did you vote for me Turnip Head?MacDougall wrote:Yes. You are my hero.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
Where were you during your AMA session on your sudden Dom vote? I asked you something. Now another unexplained vote.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
My vote on Dom wasn't doing anything. I just want to see what happens.juliets wrote:Why did you vote for me Turnip Head?MacDougall wrote:Yes. You are my hero.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
The people you would hypothetically vote for. You also took way too long to answer because you mulled over what the best answers would be and to top it off your answers as to who you would vote for as scum with no vote on you indicates you know nutella is a mislynch.sig wrote:About?
What did you ask me? I missed it.HamburgerBoy wrote:Where were you during your AMA session on your sudden Dom vote? I asked you something. Now another unexplained vote.Turnip Head wrote:juliets
