Mafia: A World Reborn Game Thread - Game Over

#1751

I'm going to move my vote on my self as a place holder.

#1752

sig wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:Sig is Mafia!!! Lynch him!!! I propose a swift orderly cfd!!
ANy reason for this or is it just part of your spidery senses?

Na na na na na na, BATMAN!!!

#1753

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.
What specifically do you stand by?

Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///
That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Wait so do you still stand by it? Because yesterday you said it was wrong

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.
I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)
Sorry I didn't see it. I mean technically you would get more info from two lynches because we will find out two people's roles . So that statement I said was wrong. .

#1754

fingersplints wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.
What specifically do you stand by?

Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///
That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight
Wait so do you still stand by it? Because yesterday you said it was wrong

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
fingersplints wrote:
Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.
I don't get why you don't want to answer my question. How would we get more information from one lynch as opposed to two?

Voting bass
If you give me a good enough answer I will move it.

I hope you guys are right about nutella, but I'm not voting there. I literally didn't have a read on her, and I am not going to jump on a bandwagon of her just because one was forming on someone else. In fact I think it's suspicious the amount of people doing that (while calling her blendy and accusing her of doing just that lol)
Sorry I didn't see it. I mean technically you would get more info from two lynches because we will find out two people's roles . So that statement I said was wrong. .

I was wrong about one Lynch giving us more info then two. I still stand by what I said that I think the double Lynch was not the best option at the time. I was wrong because we got the darkness.

#1755

I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

#1756

Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time

This is what I got after going over her posts:

Sorsha wrote:As Epignosis commands! The bandwagon of Luke stops and the bandwagon of nutella begins! lol j/k :P

I can see the suspicion on both of them. I just looked at Lukes posts and he's been all over the place. Day 1 vote: Tranq for being a low poster. Day 2 vote: sig bandwagon. Day 3 votes: nutella and bug.

I missed that post Typhoony made on nutella until today. I'd be fine with voting for either of these players.

Also noticing that since juliets came under pressure yesterday she's been hopping on the bus to whatever is popular. Yesterday she voted nutella in one of the groups but today initially voted Luke and changed to nutella once the thread direction changed.

Maybe if you just look over her posts yourself, especially her interactions win Epi you'll get a better feel for her. There isn't any one thing I can say about juliets that screams baddie.... It's just the way she changed direction after pressure that is giving me a bad feeling about her.

I'm not 100% on her by any means. I could go for Luke though too I just don't want this to be a runaway vote.

#1757

sig wrote:@Luke right know you have the most votes I could switch off of you, but I need you to do a few things first, mainly answer a few questions.

What are your current reads?
Who do you think is good?
Who do you think is bad?
Then could you defend your voting record? You've avoided many big wagons.
Day 1 voted Tranq
Day 2 You voted for me
Day 3 Nutella and Bug
Day 4 part 1 no vote.

So why did you vote for me Day 2 but not Day 3?
Why did you vote Nutella day 3 but not fay 4 part 1?

Besides joining mine and Nutella wagon you've avoided the major lynches and kept to the backround this is quite pingy to me.
I don't like your reasoning for my vote, and if Bulls/Zebra made such good points why not follow it the next day?
I believe you're scum and was told in BTSC to back off from my wagon a bit which is why you stopped voting for me.

Luke11646 wrote:
Tranq wrote:
sig wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Excuse me sigtown. Who would you vote for if you were scum, town or indy? Name three.
scum BUGLABUSH/Luke
town Bulls/Elohcin
indy I'd go with a bandwagon and flow with it.

sig wrote:Right know placing a vote for Luke I'd like him to answer my questions.
Sig why did you say that you would vote for me if you where scum yet you are voting for me right now?
My opinions change, know I think you're scum, I believe I already answered Tranq on this point and I'm surprised you don't actually defend yourself or answer any questions you just quote Tranq's post.

I don't have any evidence but epi just feels off to me
I think sorsha and Floyd are good, I don't really have any points on them though
I think you might be bad and I think one of Matt, Mac and golden are bad because of the forced vote thing
I voted for tanq day 1 because he hadn't voted and I didn't have any suspicions, I voted you day 2 because you felled off, day 3 Nutella looked suspicious and Bugla was doing nothing and on day 4 I was going to vote Nutella but I kept it off her because it looked like she was going to get lynched

#1758

Luke... I think you're getting some of your points confused with the other game, the forced votes were in Dune.

#1759

Sorsha wrote:
Draconus wrote:I'd still like to know why Juliets, if anyone missed my earlier question. I ended up having to work today, so there won't be much free time
This is what I got after going over her posts:

Sorsha wrote:As Epignosis commands! The bandwagon of Luke stops and the bandwagon of nutella begins! lol j/k :P

I can see the suspicion on both of them. I just looked at Lukes posts and he's been all over the place. Day 1 vote: Tranq for being a low poster. Day 2 vote: sig bandwagon. Day 3 votes: nutella and bug.

I missed that post Typhoony made on nutella until today. I'd be fine with voting for either of these players.

Also noticing that since juliets came under pressure yesterday she's been hopping on the bus to whatever is popular. Yesterday she voted nutella in one of the groups but today initially voted Luke and changed to nutella once the thread direction changed.
Maybe if you just look over her posts yourself, especially her interactions win Epi you'll get a better feel for her. There isn't any one thing I can say about juliets that screams baddie.... It's just the way she changed direction after pressure that is giving me a bad feeling about her.

I'm not 100% on her by any means. I could go for Luke though too I just don't want this to be a runaway vote.

Thank you Sorsha. I did see this post earlier but nothing stood out to me. I will do just that if I have time tonight before the day ends. For now I'll happily keep my vote where it is.

#1760

juliets changing direction when pressured isn't really that out of character for me, but that unfortunately doesn't mean anything either way. She is one of the hardest people to read.

#1761

I'm leaning Bullz or MetalMarsh. They both voted progressive (which means it is possible they are one of the civ, bad, or indy crowd - lol I just realized that goes for everyone but ya all know what I mean). Bullz surviving a kill makes me curious. I have map reasons to believe MM is up to no good but I don't think we're allowed to discuss that. Or are we? As long as we don't give specific coordinates? Hmmmm

#1762

While I think Luke is confused about the game, his post has made me more confident that he could be a baddie.

#1763

So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

#1764

I think I'm going to vote MetalMarsh for now.

#1765

TheFloyd73 wrote:I'm going to be away for the majority of the weekend.
I'm putting my vote on nutella for now.
Luke, you may want to answer these questions people are asking.

I don't know that you'll be back before this lynch ends but I'd like to know what you think of Luke when you get back Floyd.

#1766

Bass_the_Clever wrote:
Dom wrote:Not sad about that lynch! Good result-- though it makes me doubt a bit my Sorsha suspicion.

Bass_the_Clever wrote:I don't get why people are saying that what I was saying was wierd. Not going to lie I had a few to many drinks in me last night when I post and realized it was sloppy but I stand by what I said.
What specifically do you stand by?

Sorry for not being aroudn-- fell asleep. :///
That it wasn't wise to vote for a double Lynch. It think when the vote was mad the odds were not in the civvies favor. It was good that we got an Indy last night I just hope we don't Lynch a civ tonight

Why are you so upset at the prospect of two days in a row?

Matt F wrote:
Dom wrote:Who's bad Mac?
All nine of the people listed previously? That's not even possible.

Dom wrote: #5) You have named 9+ people to be "scum" with a high degree of certainty, however, there is a maximum of 8 baddies in the game... who are your suspects? Why are you inconsistent?

How do you know?

Linki - Is that right, Doc?

....because we were literally told.

#1767

Long Con wrote:The game begins with 15 Civvies, 8 baddies, and 7 Independent roles. There are two baddie teams, the Circle of Decay, and the Witherdeath Cabal. The Circle of Decay has the opportunity to kill on odd nights, and the Witherdeath Cabal may kill on even nights.

#1768

Matt no! MM is my friend!! You are my friend as well... You two should be friends!!!

#1769

Thanks Dom. I was curious as to why you would think that when the role list doesn't show us who's who. M'bad.

Dr Wilgy - Lol. Who are you looking at today? sig?

#1770

Luke11646 wrote:I don't have any evidence but epi just feels off to me

That's a good one. Real good. You've never played with me before. In what way am I "off?"

#1771

Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?

#1772

Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?

No. Nobody does. And it pains me.

#1773

Matt F wrote:Thanks Dom. I was curious as to why you would think that when the role list doesn't show us who's who. M'bad.

Dr Wilgy - Lol. Who are you looking at today? sig?

Yes

#1774

Why?

I thought we had something special

#1775

MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?
No. Nobody does. And it pains me.

Yeah I'll go for this.

Mac

#1776

HamburgerBoy wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
Dom wrote:Anyone wanna vote Mac with me?
No. Nobody does. And it pains me.
Yeah I'll go for this.

Mac

Is this OMGUS because I called you a jerk?

#1777

Dom and HB have voted for me before. Has anything untoward happened to either of you as a result?

If you want to lynch me you won't be hurt. Go ahead.

#1778

sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special

Tone reads yo! I tried to catch up, realized that wasn't working, so I'll use what I can to play in the now.

We do Sig, I love you as a player and as a friend! <3 But as long as we aren't on the same team, I gotta end the game as fast as possible so we can be on the same team next game!!

I suppose tone reads are really fragile though... Convince me you aren't bad yo!

**http://www.last.fm/user/nutella23** · #1779

Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

Good question. Hosts do I need to move my vote to the dead option or should I leave it?

#1780

DrWilgy wrote:
sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special
Tone reads yo! I tried to catch up, realized that wasn't working, so I'll use what I can to play in the now.

We do Sig, I love you as a player and as a friend! <3 But as long as we aren't on the same team, I gotta end the game as fast as possible so we can be on the same team next game!!

I suppose tone reads are really fragile though... Convince me you aren't bad yo!

I would need to see bank account numbers and pictures before I can confirm the loving factor. :P

How could I convince you I'm not bad any questions you might have?

#1781

Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?

Nope!

#1782

#1783

Voted Luke.

#1784

MacDougall wrote:Dom and HB have voted for me before. Has anything untoward happened to either of you as a result?

If you want to lynch me you won't be hurt. Go ahead.

Nothing yet. I'll assume that we'll be fine.

Also, I'm wondering if Yin & Yang are doing their thing right now. Everything seems as expected so far, aside from the lack of mafia nightkill last night (which is most likely unrelated).

#1785

Long Con wrote:
Tranq wrote:So does nutella's vote for Luke still count?
Nope!

Rude :P

#1786

sig wrote:
DrWilgy wrote:
sig wrote:Why?

I thought we had something special
Tone reads yo! I tried to catch up, realized that wasn't working, so I'll use what I can to play in the now.

We do Sig, I love you as a player and as a friend! <3 But as long as we aren't on the same team, I gotta end the game as fast as possible so we can be on the same team next game!!

I suppose tone reads are really fragile though... Convince me you aren't bad yo!
I would need to see bank account numbers and pictures before I can confirm the loving factor. :P

How could I convince you I'm not bad any questions you might have?

Sent via PM...

Nope! just convince me!

#1787

Crapweasel. Thought I had another day and no time to really catch up. Will read last few pages and vote in the next short while.

#1788

I'm a civilian since the argument against me is fundamentally wrong. This argument is based around a "scum slip". I said it appeared the scum was killing low posters and a few players attacked me for it. Mainly Zebra and Bulls. That is the center of suspicion on me, I've had several players clear me, as well as the fact I defended the points brought up against me.

There are several other arguments for lynches today besides the imo weakly constructed argument . Two of my voters have been tunneling on me. Bulls since day 1 and DFaraday since day 2, In DFaraday case they have posted very little and just dropped votes on me. I don't know why timmer 2.0 is voting for me and Luke is since I voted him and this is the other wagon.

So you see I'm not the best candidate for today's lynch especially since several players have expressed a desire to not lynch me.
The other argument used against me is based around how day 2 I defended myself suspiciously keep in mind I spent that entire phase defending myself from both Zebra and Bulls who were aggressively pursuing me as several people voted for me without truly looking over my defense.

plus I'm fun and they aren't.

#1789

sig wrote:I'm a civilian since the argument against me is fundamentally wrong. This argument is based around a "scum slip". I said it appeared the scum was killing low posters and a few players attacked me for it. Mainly Zebra and Bulls. That is the center of suspicion on me, I've had several players clear me, as well as the fact I defended the points brought up against me.

There are several other arguments for lynches today besides the imo weakly constructed argument . Two of my voters have been tunneling on me. Bulls since day 1 and DFaraday since day 2, In DFaraday case they have posted very little and just dropped votes on me. I don't know why timmer 2.0 is voting for me and Luke is since I voted him and this is the other wagon.

So you see I'm not the best candidate for today's lynch especially since several players have expressed a desire to not lynch me.
The other argument used against me is based around how day 2 I defended myself suspiciously keep in mind I spent that entire phase defending myself from both Zebra and Bulls who were aggressively pursuing me as several people voted for me without truly looking over my defense.

plus I'm fun and they aren't.

You really do yourself a disservice when you defend yourself. It's like a train ran off the rails into a circus. It's horrifying, but I can't stop watching.

#1790

I'm voting Luke.

#1791

Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

#1792

LoRab wrote:Voted sig. His last post tipped the decision. He continues to not accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people. And his defenses in general continue to make him more suspish.

You don't know the guy.

But I know you. You sure ain't twirling much.

#1793

You're right. I don't know him. But I find his posts suspicious.

And I've been at a convention all week and hardly posted. But please feel free to examine me and my posts. I'll twirl all you want. I have nothing to hide. I'm civ. :Lorab:

#1794

Also, I don't know why sig should have to "accurately describe his initial slip post or characterize what pinged several people."

Not only is that a loaded statement, that's not his responsibility. How is he supposed to "accurately describe his initial slip?" How should he "characterize what pinged several people?"

Bullshit vote right here.

Lorab

#1795

Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Luke.

Just yesterday you were surprised at the "mob" on Luke and now you vote for him?

#1796

Matt F wrote:
Epignosis wrote:I'm voting Luke.
Just yesterday you were surprised at the "mob" on Luke and now you vote for him?

That's right.

#1797

#1798

Matt F wrote:Lol

I'm not laughing.

#1799

Epignosis wrote:
Matt F wrote:Lol
I'm not laughing.

I see that.

#1800

zoinks

Who to lynch? 24 hour day!