You are somewhat right. I have read you and determined you as adequately suspect to be pressured.Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:10 amsaying you suspect someone doesn't magically relieve you of the responsibility of putting forward effort as a civ.MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2018 7:01 amI question you are genuinely trying to solve anything given you have asked me to provide reads on two players that if anyone was genuinely paying attention would know my position on. Given that I question your motives for asking I will refrain. I hope you understand.Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:55 amwe don't have to change the subject but I still want an answer from youMacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:48 amWhat is this trend where players feel like they can just haphazardly make demands of other players like this? I do not like it. It is a very easy way to move the dialogue away from the topic at hand and you have given me no reason for why you chose those four names. Furthermore I have a very recent read on jack and LC so it really feels like you are just trying to change the conversation.
knowing your current reads on those four players helps me assess your motivation
I don't get the impression that you're actually trying to figure out my alignment. it seems like you've made a decision about me that you're now trying to brute-force into reality.
And I don't see you asking me to give you gth reads on four seemingly random players as my civ responsibility. In fact I see doing so as unresponsive given my opinion of you.