Courage the Cowardly Dog Mafia [THE END]

[Scotty]

Someone gimme some background on this Vom Patty dude

Vompatti is like that car accident on the side of the road that you can't look away from, except he's not really like that at all, I mean maybe he'd be the person on the side of the road giving you the finger telling you to keep going and stop staring but more importantly he writes poetry i think and half of what he says is nonsense idiot savant type behavior that must be fueled by what I can only assume is a hidden genius covering up the fact that he's literally smarter than the rest of us combined.

Your words. They move me

[Lunalee]

I'm gonna [VOTE: nijuukyugou] aubergine

Her greatest contribution thus far is stating that she dislikes when someone asks another player for their meta, and then she describes her meta as congruent between her civilian and mafia play.

I sort of feel the same way. I may move my vote to Niju.

[nijuukyugou]

I'm gonna [VOTE: nijuukyugou] aubergine

Her greatest contribution thus far is stating that she dislikes when someone asks another player for their meta, and then she describes her meta as congruent between her civilian and mafia play.

Well, that answered my question about your vote when looking at the poll. And this is why I don't like questions about meta - I wouldn't win whether or not I chose to answer it, hence being backed into a wall. But fair enough - I chose to answer it as I did. I actually appreciate the suspicion from you and Luna - I'm noticed! It's sig's trust that weirds me out a little.

Obligatory Day 1 philosophy/early commentary: if none of you buggers catches my eye significantly, I will vote a very low poster. I'll repeat and re-repeat (in reference to other games I've played) that I'd rather lynch a nonplayer and get a chance of catching a baddie lying low than lynch a civ who's actually playing Day 1 because they talk. I'll be here, checking in and out, for a bit. Conversation is nice since I have time to do it, yay!

[speedchuck]

speed I won't hate on you but I'm curious about nutella's placement. Usually I read her as bad even when she's good but this game nothing is pinging me about her. What have you seen that causes you to place her toward the bottom of your list?

Let's lynch speedchuck who's with me

This, as mentioned, is a thing.

Hey Kyle's in this game and has like 1.2 on topic posts. Kyle pls share thoughts who do you want to vote for

THIS on the other hand actually pinged me. It's hypocritical and pushes attention away from nutella, while not providing content. Nutella has maybe 2 on-topic posts, if we're being generous.
Great way to look proactive and discussion-generating while putting focus on others and not really doing anything.

It's just the timing of it, when over half the game has ~1.2 on-topic posts. Rubbed me wrong.

[Fractal]

Retuuuuuurn the slaaaaab.

If I return your damn slab, what will I get in return? :ponder:

[Fractal]

I'm gonna [VOTE: nijuukyugou] aubergine

Her greatest contribution thus far is stating that she dislikes when someone asks another player for their meta, and then she describes her meta as congruent between her civilian and mafia play.

Well, that answered my question about your vote when looking at the poll. And this is why I don't like questions about meta - I wouldn't win whether or not I chose to answer it, hence being backed into a wall. But fair enough - I chose to answer it as I did. I actually appreciate the suspicion from you and Luna - I'm noticed! It's sig's trust that weirds me out a little.

Obligatory Day 1 philosophy/early commentary: if none of you buggers catches my eye significantly, I will vote a very low poster. I'll repeat and re-repeat (in reference to other games I've played) that I'd rather lynch a nonplayer and get a chance of catching a baddie lying low than lynch a civ who's actually playing Day 1 because they talk. I'll be here, checking in and out, for a bit. Conversation is nice since I have time to do it, yay!

Do you have any leans, one way or another of some of the people you mentioned? I know you called sig's trust of you weird, but do you actually find it slightly scummy, or neutral?

[Lunalee]

speed I won't hate on you but I'm curious about nutella's placement. Usually I read her as bad even when she's good but this game nothing is pinging me about her. What have you seen that causes you to place her toward the bottom of your list?

Let's lynch speedchuck who's with me

This, as mentioned, is a thing.

Hey Kyle's in this game and has like 1.2 on topic posts. Kyle pls share thoughts who do you want to vote for

THIS on the other hand actually pinged me. It's hypocritical and pushes attention away from nutella, while not providing content. Nutella has maybe 2 on-topic posts, if we're being generous.
Great way to look proactive and discussion-generating while putting focus on others and not really doing anything.

It's just the timing of it, when over half the game has ~1.2 on-topic posts. Rubbed me wrong.

So why are you voting Dom and not nutella?

[nijuukyugou]

I'm gonna [VOTE: nijuukyugou] aubergine

Her greatest contribution thus far is stating that she dislikes when someone asks another player for their meta, and then she describes her meta as congruent between her civilian and mafia play.

Well, that answered my question about your vote when looking at the poll. And this is why I don't like questions about meta - I wouldn't win whether or not I chose to answer it, hence being backed into a wall. But fair enough - I chose to answer it as I did. I actually appreciate the suspicion from you and Luna - I'm noticed! It's sig's trust that weirds me out a little.

Obligatory Day 1 philosophy/early commentary: if none of you buggers catches my eye significantly, I will vote a very low poster. I'll repeat and re-repeat (in reference to other games I've played) that I'd rather lynch a nonplayer and get a chance of catching a baddie lying low than lynch a civ who's actually playing Day 1 because they talk. I'll be here, checking in and out, for a bit. Conversation is nice since I have time to do it, yay!

Do you have any leans, one way or another of some of the people you mentioned? I know you called sig's trust of you weird, but do you actually find it slightly scummy, or neutral?

As Day 1 feelings go, I'll give Marmot and Luna a civ lean, and give sig a neutral eyebrow. He's contributing, at least, like a puppy (I mean that in the best way, sig - this is my mental image of your posts!) if not all over the place. But everything else that I've read, suspicion-wise, feels like darts thrown in the dark, as usual. Better than no darts, I suppose.

I'm curious to see how nutella reacts to speed's suspicion of her, at the moment, since that's the most recent thing that's caught my eye.

(Also, descriptions of Vomps' gameplay is like trying to describe Night Vale to someone - it's impossible with hilarious results. Welcome back, Vomps!)

[ColinIsCool]

I’m inclined to agree with Blooper’s low-voter pitch, tbh. Dom is definitely not the Dom I saw in Greece but I can’t say it’s alignment indicative to be non-serious.

[nijuukyugou]

I'll be back a bit later - too much screen time, and these black beans need soakin'!

[Scotty]

I don't approve random voting d1 at all. Where people push and for what reasons are one of the top things we can use the coming days. We'll have less info day 2, and less intresting conversations, which will lead to less info d3 etc etc.

Let's just make reads the best we can imo.

I see the points of it, but i don't think the info-loss coming days is worth the slight increase of chance to lynch scum today but randomizing.

Hi

I think we all have our prescribed ways of handling D1’s. My opinion is that D1 is hot garbage anyway. No hard info, lots of mudslinging at times, and it’s just quite unfair all around. Completely favors the mafia because they’re the only ones that can steer the ship precisely.

I won’t vote for you today because I don’t know you yet. But day 2 is fair game

[Scotty]

Shit this ends soon! Forgot it was 24 hrs
[VOTE: Dom] aubergine

Hi Dom!

[ColinIsCool]

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

[Scotty]

I’m inclined to agree with Blooper’s low-voter pitch, tbh. Dom is definitely not the Dom I saw in Greece but I can’t say it’s alignment indicative to be non-serious.

Finally you’re coming into the light side

[Scotty]

Slightly hypocritical though for me to still look primarily at low posters since I think I am one, but sometimes one needs to step outside themselves, ya dig?

[Scotty]

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

Wait, lap is playing??

Holy shit

[VOTE: lapluie] aubergine

Everyone else get on this bandwagon. It smells nice

[ColinIsCool]

I mean, we’re all kinda low posters but I mean no posters I guess or real lurkers.

[juliets]

Has lapluie posted?

Not that I've seen.

Hey, you have any town or scumfeels from anyone yet?

@juliets

Also, since you inquired in Speedy's Nutella read, I'm wondering at which point you usually notice something is off with nutella when she's been scum in the past? Would you've expected to already notice some pings there if she's scum?

Part of the problem with my nutella pings is I notice them almost right off the bat - maybe not her first post but by her second or third I'm feeling uneasy. This time I haven't had that feeling at all. I'm not saying it's AI because I seem to be pinged by her when she is good and bad. Because I'm not pinged this time I'm neutral on her.

[Scotty]

I mean, we’re all kinda low posters but I mean no posters I guess or real lurkers.

No posters < low posters

[Scotty]

Has lapluie posted?

Not that I've seen.

Hey, you have any town or scumfeels from anyone yet?

@juliets

Also, since you inquired in Speedy's Nutella read, I'm wondering at which point you usually notice something is off with nutella when she's been scum in the past? Would you've expected to already notice some pings there if she's scum?

Part of the problem with my nutella pings is I notice them almost right off the bat - maybe not her first post but by her second or third I'm feeling uneasy. This time I haven't had that feeling at all. I'm not saying it's AI because I seem to be pinged by her when she is good and bad. Because I'm not pinged this time I'm neutral on her.

Don’t worry about her, I already said I’m gonna kill her tonight.

[Turnip Head]

If I had two votes right now I'd still vote Marmot twice

[Fractal]

I don't approve random voting d1 at all. Where people push and for what reasons are one of the top things we can use the coming days. We'll have less info day 2, and less intresting conversations, which will lead to less info d3 etc etc.

Let's just make reads the best we can imo.

I see the points of it, but i don't think the info-loss coming days is worth the slight increase of chance to lynch scum today but randomizing.

Hi

I think we all have our prescribed ways of handling D1’s. My opinion is that D1 is hot garbage anyway. No hard info, lots of mudslinging at times, and it’s just quite unfair all around. Completely favors the mafia because they’re the only ones that can steer the ship precisely.

I won’t vote for you today because I don’t know you yet. But day 2 is fair game :beer:

Hey
To a certain point, I agree with you. There's no hard info, but the mudslinging gets reactions, which one can get reads off. And then conversation can get deeper slowly over time. But if everyone calls d1 useless and decides to random-vote and wait for d2, d2 is basically gonna be the exact same as d1, because we didn't want to start playing "for real" d1. That's how I look at it.

Btw, did you mention that you won't vote for me because you would've voted me for my post if you'd known me, or did you just mention it but it was unrelated to the earlier part?

Feel free to vote me if you think I'm mafia, that's a great way to get to know someone :)

[Marmot]

I'm gonna [VOTE: nijuukyugou] aubergine

Her greatest contribution thus far is stating that she dislikes when someone asks another player for their meta, and then she describes her meta as congruent between her civilian and mafia play.

Well, that answered my question about your vote when looking at the poll. And this is why I don't like questions about meta - I wouldn't win whether or not I chose to answer it, hence being backed into a wall. But fair enough - I chose to answer it as I did. I actually appreciate the suspicion from you and Luna - I'm noticed! It's sig's trust that weirds me out a little.

Obligatory Day 1 philosophy/early commentary: if none of you buggers catches my eye significantly, I will vote a very low poster. I'll repeat and re-repeat (in reference to other games I've played) that I'd rather lynch a nonplayer and get a chance of catching a baddie lying low than lynch a civ who's actually playing Day 1 because they talk. I'll be here, checking in and out, for a bit. Conversation is nice since I have time to do it, yay!

I like your response.

Alright [mention]Lunalee[/mention], where are we voting now?

[Fractal]

Has lapluie posted?

Not that I've seen.

Hey, you have any town or scumfeels from anyone yet?

@juliets

Also, since you inquired in Speedy's Nutella read, I'm wondering at which point you usually notice something is off with nutella when she's been scum in the past? Would you've expected to already notice some pings there if she's scum?

Part of the problem with my nutella pings is I notice them almost right off the bat - maybe not her first post but by her second or third I'm feeling uneasy. This time I haven't had that feeling at all. I'm not saying it's AI because I seem to be pinged by her when she is good and bad. Because I'm not pinged this time I'm neutral on her.

oh ok, i follow you. Do you have any reads/leans so far?

[speedchuck]

So why are you voting Dom and not nutella?

Dom pinged me for other reasons. I've explained them earlier. Tonal meta.

[Marmot]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

[Fractal]

If I had two votes right now I'd still vote Marmot twice

Is it a serious vote or a joke vote you're just very behind?

[juliets]

I'm inclined to vote [mention]lapluie[/mention] at this point in time because she is a no show and I don't have any other good candidates. I'll reconsider if she shows up and does things that are civ leaning.

[VOTE: lapluie] aubergine

[Fractal]

my pool of towns i feel good about so far are:
speedchuck
Sig
Marmot

[Marmot]

If I had two votes right now I'd still vote Marmot twice

If I had seven (7) votes, you'd get two (2) of them, and Vompatti would get one (1).

[ColinIsCool]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

Flipped a coin between lap and nova, where there is shared rationale. Not totally random.

[Scotty]

I don't approve random voting d1 at all. Where people push and for what reasons are one of the top things we can use the coming days. We'll have less info day 2, and less intresting conversations, which will lead to less info d3 etc etc.

Let's just make reads the best we can imo.

I see the points of it, but i don't think the info-loss coming days is worth the slight increase of chance to lynch scum today but randomizing.

Hi

I think we all have our prescribed ways of handling D1’s. My opinion is that D1 is hot garbage anyway. No hard info, lots of mudslinging at times, and it’s just quite unfair all around. Completely favors the mafia because they’re the only ones that can steer the ship precisely.

I won’t vote for you today because I don’t know you yet. But day 2 is fair game

Hey
To a certain point, I agree with you. There's no hard info, but the mudslinging gets reactions, which one can get reads off. And then conversation can get deeper slowly over time. But if everyone calls d1 useless and decides to random-vote and wait for d2, d2 is basically gonna be the exact same as d1, because we didn't want to start playing "for real" d1. That's how I look at it.

Btw, did you mention that you won't vote for me because you would've voted me for my post if you'd known me, or did you just mention it but it was unrelated to the earlier part?

Feel free to vote me if you think I'm mafia, that's a great way to get to know someone

You seem like a smart feller. Probably smarter and craftier than I. I see your point and also agree to an extent, because I like looking at the votes on D1 and seeing how they correspond to the flow of the day. In a vacuum, my style doesn’t work if everyone does my style. Because there is nothing to be gained.

I think I just had a learning experience

[Fractal]

Spoiler: show

I don't approve random voting d1 at all. Where people push and for what reasons are one of the top things we can use the coming days. We'll have less info day 2, and less intresting conversations, which will lead to less info d3 etc etc.

Let's just make reads the best we can imo.

I see the points of it, but i don't think the info-loss coming days is worth the slight increase of chance to lynch scum today but randomizing.

Hi

I think we all have our prescribed ways of handling D1’s. My opinion is that D1 is hot garbage anyway. No hard info, lots of mudslinging at times, and it’s just quite unfair all around. Completely favors the mafia because they’re the only ones that can steer the ship precisely.

I won’t vote for you today because I don’t know you yet. But day 2 is fair game :beer:

Hey
To a certain point, I agree with you. There's no hard info, but the mudslinging gets reactions, which one can get reads off. And then conversation can get deeper slowly over time. But if everyone calls d1 useless and decides to random-vote and wait for d2, d2 is basically gonna be the exact same as d1, because we didn't want to start playing "for real" d1. That's how I look at it.

Btw, did you mention that you won't vote for me because you would've voted me for my post if you'd known me, or did you just mention it but it was unrelated to the earlier part?

Feel free to vote me if you think I'm mafia, that's a great way to get to know someone :)

:ponder:
You seem like a smart feller. Probably smarter and craftier than I. I see your point and also agree to an extent, because I like looking at the votes on D1 and seeing how they correspond to the flow of the day. In a vacuum, my style doesn’t work if everyone does my style. Because there is nothing to be gained.

I think I just had a learning experience
[/quote]

:beer:

[Fractal]

that spoiler didn't go so well

[speedchuck]

If I had two votes right now I'd still vote Marmot twice

If I had seven (7) votes, you'd get two (2) of them, and Vompatti would get one (1).

Who gets the other 3?

[Scotty]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

Flipped a coin between lap and nova, where there is shared rationale. Not totally random.

Why nova above the ones with say 7 posts?

If it’s between the 2, why are they both on equal footing?

That doesn’t make sense to me Mr. Cool

[Marmot]

If I had two votes right now I'd still vote Marmot twice

If I had seven (7) votes, you'd get two (2) of them, and Vompatti would get one (1).

Who gets the other 3?

The Prince of Nigeria.

[Scotty]

that spoiler didn't go so well

Welcome to our site

Spoilers can cause cancer sometimes.

Also sometimes quotes don’t quite work how you think they will

[Lunalee]

So why are you voting Dom and not nutella?

Dom pinged me for other reasons. I've explained them earlier. Tonal meta.

[mention]Marmot[/mention] I may switch to Dom. I trust speedchuck is town, and he has a better read on Dom's meta than I do.

[juliets]

Has lapluie posted?

Not that I've seen.

Hey, you have any town or scumfeels from anyone yet?

@juliets

Also, since you inquired in Speedy's Nutella read, I'm wondering at which point you usually notice something is off with nutella when she's been scum in the past? Would you've expected to already notice some pings there if she's scum?

Part of the problem with my nutella pings is I notice them almost right off the bat - maybe not her first post but by her second or third I'm feeling uneasy. This time I haven't had that feeling at all. I'm not saying it's AI because I seem to be pinged by her when she is good and bad. Because I'm not pinged this time I'm neutral on her.

oh ok, i follow you. Do you have any reads/leans so far?

oops I missed this. I feel good so far about you, Colin, sig, blooper, TH, and speed. I tend to solve by POE and don't really have any bad leans yet. I'm sure that will[mention]juliets[/mention]

lots o linki

[juliets]

I don't know why that @juliets appears in my post ^

[ColinIsCool]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

Flipped a coin between lap and nova, where there is shared rationale. Not totally random.

Why nova above the ones with say 7 posts?

If it’s between the 2, why are they both on equal footing?

That doesn’t make sense to me Mr. Cool

I don’t think nova has made any posts that are related to the game.

[Scotty]

I think Dom is Ramses.

Don’t ask me why I don’t know why he just wants his slab all right?

[Marmot]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

Flipped a coin between lap and nova, where there is shared rationale. Not totally random.

You hadn't discussed nova as an alternative to lapluie though.

And even had you done so, you previously opposed random votes and the endorsements of such, then placed a random vote here.

[Fractal]

I don't know why that @juliets appears in my post ^

I noticed the site forces a box in your chatbox if you quote an "@" with a name after, since it thinks it's you who's trying to @ someone and not just a quote. Might be what happend

[Scotty]

I don’t really understand the rationale behind a random vote or the endorsement of it by other players.

[VOTE: Lap] aubergine

I flipped a coin. I can easily be persuaded to go elsewhere.

These two things don't line up at all.

[VOTE: Colin] aubergine

Flipped a coin between lap and nova, where there is shared rationale. Not totally random.

Why nova above the ones with say 7 posts?

If it’s between the 2, why are they both on equal footing?

That doesn’t make sense to me Mr. Cool

I don’t think nova has made any posts that are related to the game.

But nova has made a post, whereas lap literally is shooting blanks faster than my old buddy Jumpy Jonathan

[speedchuck]

I don't know why that @juliets appears in my post ^

It's because you quoted a loose @juliets, and then your editor tried to autocomplete it into a mention, and you pressed Enter which confirmed it.

Happens all the time. Careful when quoting mentions.

[Marmot]

I feel like I can at least discount that Scotty and Colin are teammates this game.

[Fractal]

I feel good so far about you, Colin, sig, blooper, TH, and speed

Why Turnip head? It sticks out to me, I could see reasons for the other ones

[speedchuck]

So why are you voting Dom and not nutella?

Dom pinged me for other reasons. I've explained them earlier. Tonal meta.

@Marmot I may switch to Dom. I trust speedchuck is town, and he has a better read on Dom's meta than I do.

Okay this is a scray post.

Why coordinate with Marmot? Why trust me when I don't trust you?