Vulgard wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 7:09 am I think Daisy's a wolf.
- Her ISO is a hedge maze.
- Her townreads contain at least two wolves. Scotty and Mac. Both have never been explained, she just plopped them in there.
- Her pushes have been wolfsided. Pushes on Gavial who I'm certain is town. OMGUS push on Jack who wrote a great case on her.
- Does not seem to care much about the d1 wagons or the d2 wagons, both of which were V/V from my perspective.
- Asks literal hundreds of questions, yet they don't inform her reads. I never saw her come back to any question she had asked prior. She asks them and moves on.
- Her actions such as the pinging of inactives and mechanical discussion look performative. Instead of wolfhunting, she tries to get people to do things; but not things that comprise wolfhunting.
- Her argument with Kyle is a major part of her d1 ISO. After it's over, though, she plops a townread on Kyle and never comes back to this. In her later readlists, Kyle actually trends down, but there's no visible reason for it.
- Her playstyle is extremely chaotic, but has no wolfhunting direction. She has stuck to three townreads her entire game. Her scumreads have fluctuated without a decent sense of progression. And her reasons for pushing some scumreads (which she does rarely; she has only done this twice in this entire game, as described below) are terrible.
- Her initial reason for pushing on Gavial is because he... easily claimed his role. And she doesn't even call him mafia, she says he's better off removed from the game because wolves can exploit his bad position, or he's mafia.
- Her reason for pushing on Jack is terrible. She pushes him because she thinks his case on her is a false narrative. Even when other people point out that it might not be, she ignores that. It's basically OMGUS.
- She writes a ton of LAMIST posts. Many include "I am very town"-type statements.
- Her posts look padded. She might just be a rambly person, but I've read all her long posts and they all say almost nothing of value. Makes me think they were written for towncred.
■ it is NAI to ping people. we have had the vast majority of players your slot included to be extremely inactive.
■ my pushes on Gavial and Jack is not wolf sided
■ my push on Jack is not an OMGUS. I sussed him before he sussed me.
■ Jack did not make a great case on me. it is only 2 parts. the way I talk to Marmot and that completely incorrect and lying way he thinks I voted. He quotes Syn there and says I killed Syn because Syn questions my voting. I proved that wrong and false information. Then Jack back pedals and claims a separate post is his actual case. Him and Tony claim I never addressed it. thst 2nd post is a repeat of the first and literally just leaves out any links to quotes.
■ i care alot about the wagons. I made several posts that idk how to do vote count analysis. people never replied to them.
■ Idk Kyle's alignment. last I checked Kyle pretty much became an inactive since day 1. last I checked pretty lots of players been inactive too. it's been literally the same 4-6 people talking. I can't go back in time and force people to play. if I wasn't talking to a player it's because they were not there. blame yourself and the inactive. don't blame me for mislybches. last I checked we all got same 48hrs. if mislynchs happens it isn't just on me. can't solve a game if players do 0.
■ yeah I townread kza, syn, mac and tim and Scotty. kza was town, syn was town. and Mac was mafia. gee, do u blame me for those reads? mac seemed game dolvey and scum hunting. like wow so town never messed up and make mistakes? idk tim's and Scotty's alignments. literature thry been the only one's playing the 1st half of game. get over it. blame it on literally a huge swath of players slanking. at least I have been trying.
■ Gavial is scum. probably the 3rd party.
■ Jack did create a false narrative. his case is all conjecture and riddled with just his assumptions of my actions and posts and his interpretation of why I did what I did. he 1 and only 1 supposed receipt of my supposed action that he found eolfy was proven he was wrong and lying. his case is indeed just his opinions of events that never occurred. him not liking how I talk/post to people.
just like you. not liking my playstyle. not liking i ask alot of questions. and I do go back to reply when peeps answered me. but I guess you think it's not how you would reply back do it must be scum. dude grow up.
■ idk what LAMIST means so gonna say nope u r wrong.
■ you can't say my posts have nothing of value and then say my words have weight and I should not act like this and I should be game solvey or whatever.
your case is based on just your wacko opinions of my posts. just a criticism. sorry I haven't found wolves for you. sorry I haven't solved the game. sorry I scum read people you disagree with. sorry I thought a wolf was town. sorry I mislynched.
last I checked this game isn't called Daisy must find all the wolves and no one else. because this case reads like that. a huge chunk of players decided to do 0 the first days of game and a result mafia took the advantage. it stinks. town hasn't lost yet. but don't act all high and mighty when several towns people have died or been mislynchdd.
if you think I'm still scum then I suggest you share some links, show the receipts of me being scum. these little criticisms of my posts is wrong and false.
I can't make proper reads on players who r inactive. iirc only wolves can do that.
