I just remember the hyper elaborate games he and BR did that I never really understood because brain too smol
After. I feel that introductions are only polite prior to reading.
I just remember the hyper elaborate games he and BR did that I never really understood because brain too smol
After. I feel that introductions are only polite prior to reading.
*Places tongue down*DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 8:22 pm Put a Finger Down - Mafia Edition
Put a finger down if you already have a suspect
Just kill me. Do it. You know you want to. ~~Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:19 pm In all seriousness, this Day 1 is going to be bizarre because I’m going to feel dirty eliminating a player that has made a triumphant return after a lengthy break only to be yeeted early.
I suppose I can take solace in the fact that rezz’s are in the game. But for day 1? It just feelsbadman.jpg
I guess we could always all just vote for dog lol
Yes, here we commit murder and tax evasion.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:23 pm"yeet" and "yeeted" are not allowed in old school mafia games. Silly Scotty, yeets are for kids.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:19 pm In all seriousness, this Day 1 is going to be bizarre because I’m going to feel dirty eliminating a player that has made a triumphant return after a lengthy break only to be yeeted early.
I suppose I can take solace in the fact that rezz’s are in the game. But for day 1? It just feelsbadman.jpg
I guess we could always all just vote for dog lol
*Lick*thellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:21 amI do not like this post, nor do I like the vote for Bea. Mind you, I think voting for Bea in general is reasonable because people always tend to trust her, which makes her dangerous on the occasions when she is mafia, but Axey’s vote came without explanation and was a pile on after a (marginally) more justified vote.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:28 pm I have an idea of who the mafia is, but it's not who I'm voting at the moment. Though, the person I'm voting may also be mafia, who knows.
Also, why would you not vote for who you think the mafia is?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Thank you! I am flattered.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
You taste of a good tea in an old library.
That’s fair. I often overanalyze roles in my pregame analysis and make bold assumptions that can be easily disproven with the obvious information given.
What about me is townie to you?thellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:33 amMy only town read so far is Scotty. I don’t have a baddie read yet. Stay tuned.
Hey, that was my line
I’ve learned to just disregard Axe in D1 because he does this as town, mafia, independent and axeholethellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:21 amI do not like this post, nor do I like the vote for Bea. Mind you, I think voting for Bea in general is reasonable because people always tend to trust her, which makes her dangerous on the occasions when she is mafia, but Axey’s vote came without explanation and was a pile on after a (marginally) more justified vote.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:28 pm I have an idea of who the mafia is, but it's not who I'm voting at the moment. Though, the person I'm voting may also be mafia, who knows.
Also, why would you not vote for who you think the mafia is?
I don’t hate this vote.
I’ll have you know I went to the groomers last well thank you very much
EBWOP: week
Mainly your refusal to go along with the adverb/grammar thing. I think most baddies would be scared to make such a refusal.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
First of all, I don't remember using "so many words." Second, there was not much to go on at the time of that post. I will most likely have more reads as the day goes on. But for DAY ONE, unless someone majorly slips, any reads are kind-of a shot in the dark. If I were to make a guess, though, I imagine that day 1 mafia players act like one of the following:Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 11:59 amThat’s fair. I often overanalyze roles in my pregame analysis and make bold assumptions that can be easily disproven with the obvious information given.
I think another part of your explanation that is still not swaying me, however, is the way you’ve presented your suspicion for sig in so many words, then just as succinctly dropped your suspicion for him without offering any other reads for other players. It’s very cookie-cutter apple pie and although it doesn’t lack logical progression, it does seem to lack that extra scoop of ice cream a-la-mode
You think I’m distracting from gameplay do you?Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 12:52 pmFirst of all, I don't remember using "so many words." Second, there was not much to go on at the time of that post. I will most likely have more reads as the day goes on. But for DAY ONE, unless someone majorly slips, any reads are kind-of a shot in the dark. If I were to make a guess, though, I imagine that day 1 mafia players act like one of the following:Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 11:59 amThat’s fair. I often overanalyze roles in my pregame analysis and make bold assumptions that can be easily disproven with the obvious information given.
I think another part of your explanation that is still not swaying me, however, is the way you’ve presented your suspicion for sig in so many words, then just as succinctly dropped your suspicion for him without offering any other reads for other players. It’s very cookie-cutter apple pie and although it doesn’t lack logical progression, it does seem to lack that extra scoop of ice cream a-la-mode
a) pretty quiet (laying low)
b) kind-of silly/off-topic (distracting from gameplay), or
c) hard core readers (they obviously know who isn't a part of their own)
This is what I am looking for. So far I have my eye on Scotty for reasons of letter (b).
Nice clown shoes.thellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 11:01 am I now notice that Axey said he voted Bea while actually voting Scotty. Lying about your vote is not a good way to get me to trust you.
What do you mean by that
I’m a scattershot on D1 here in the Wild West, partner
See my progression
Who‘s the suspect tho ?DrWilgy wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:39 am*Places tongue down*DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 8:22 pm Put a Finger Down - Mafia Edition
Put a finger down if you already have a suspect
Could you articulate your reasoning instead of putting the onus on me to do it for you?
Begrudgingly, sure, even though it’s only 20 posts back. I could probably flesh it out more.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:49 pmCould you articulate your reasoning instead of putting the onus on me to do it for you?
They most likely have fingers, toes and produce oils out of fleshy glands.
I understand the concept of throwing out votes in movable-vote games to gauge reactions, but at the same time that can be a cop out way to excuse bad behavior. If you successfully start a wagon with your vote, you get what you want, but if it doesn't take you can just claim it was for role fishing and claim immunity from any criticism. Don't expect me not to evaluate you based on your behavior just because you claim it doesn't mean anything.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:27 pm That is some effective R o L e F I S h i N g
For anyone who misunderstood my intent.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Good point. Apollo Doctrine.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
So you're voting for Eloh because she acted on a weak suspicion, backtracked on it nearly as soon as it was called out, and offered a "whatever sticks" explanation as to her actions?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:06 pmBegrudgingly, sure, even though it’s only 20 posts back. I could probably flesh it out more.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:49 pmCould you articulate your reasoning instead of putting the onus on me to do it for you?
It’s admittedly a pretty weak scumread, but the arguments that Elo had made agreeing with the suspicion of sig based on a mechanic that she hadn’t read, then recanting her suspicion upon learning said mechanic was rather safe. It wasn’t a slam dunk by any means. But then she reacts to my read of her with a long winded explanation that mafia will have certain qualities in D1. She lists them; then, she makes, in more or less words, an OMGUS on me using one of the bullet points “silly/off-topic (distracting from gameplay)” which is objectively a terrible statement. Sure, I’m perhaps silly as much as a pumpkin spice latte in spring, but you can still DRINK a pumpkin spice latte in spring I’m making gab, advancing gameplay. Am I not?
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Someone earlier said this is NAI for Axe and I have to agree with that. He always does this kind of thing.thellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:09 pmI understand the concept of throwing out votes in movable-vote games to gauge reactions, but at the same time that can be a cop out way to excuse bad behavior. If you successfully start a wagon with your vote, you get what you want, but if it doesn't take you can just claim it was for role fishing and claim immunity from any criticism. Don't expect me not to evaluate you based on your behavior just because you claim it doesn't mean anything.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:27 pm That is some effective R o L e F I S h i N g
For anyone who misunderstood my intent.
Have you played with Michelle before?
It’s not a slam dunk because D1 reads are never slam dunks. I’m like the looney tunes when the monstars suck the power away. I need reveals to better get a sense for players.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:20 pmSo you're voting for Eloh because she acted on a weak suspicion, backtracked on it nearly as soon as it was called out, and offered a "whatever sticks" explanation as to her actions?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:06 pmBegrudgingly, sure, even though it’s only 20 posts back. I could probably flesh it out more.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:49 pmCould you articulate your reasoning instead of putting the onus on me to do it for you?
It’s admittedly a pretty weak scumread, but the arguments that Elo had made agreeing with the suspicion of sig based on a mechanic that she hadn’t read, then recanting her suspicion upon learning said mechanic was rather safe. It wasn’t a slam dunk by any means. But then she reacts to my read of her with a long winded explanation that mafia will have certain qualities in D1. She lists them; then, she makes, in more or less words, an OMGUS on me using one of the bullet points “silly/off-topic (distracting from gameplay)” which is objectively a terrible statement. Sure, I’m perhaps silly as much as a pumpkin spice latte in spring, but you can still DRINK a pumpkin spice latte in spring I’m making gab, advancing gameplay. Am I not?
Why is that not a slam dunk? Where is this hesitation and hedging coming from? Is she doing an OMGUS to you or are you doing an OMGUS to her?
Sig is known miselimination fodder.thellama73 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:22 pm I will also state for the record that I don't buy the suspicion on Sig. Feels too easy.
"Currently voting there" with lots of qualifiers about how unsure you are and about how wild Day 1 reads can be and about how weak the case is, yeah.Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:37 pmIt’s not a slam dunk because D1 reads are never slam dunks. I’m like the looney tunes when the monstars suck the power away. I need reveals to better get a sense for players.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:20 pmSo you're voting for Eloh because she acted on a weak suspicion, backtracked on it nearly as soon as it was called out, and offered a "whatever sticks" explanation as to her actions?Scotty wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 2:06 pmBegrudgingly, sure, even though it’s only 20 posts back. I could probably flesh it out more.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 1:49 pmCould you articulate your reasoning instead of putting the onus on me to do it for you?
It’s admittedly a pretty weak scumread, but the arguments that Elo had made agreeing with the suspicion of sig based on a mechanic that she hadn’t read, then recanting her suspicion upon learning said mechanic was rather safe. It wasn’t a slam dunk by any means. But then she reacts to my read of her with a long winded explanation that mafia will have certain qualities in D1. She lists them; then, she makes, in more or less words, an OMGUS on me using one of the bullet points “silly/off-topic (distracting from gameplay)” which is objectively a terrible statement. Sure, I’m perhaps silly as much as a pumpkin spice latte in spring, but you can still DRINK a pumpkin spice latte in spring I’m making gab, advancing gameplay. Am I not?
Why is that not a slam dunk? Where is this hesitation and hedging coming from? Is she doing an OMGUS to you or are you doing an OMGUS to her?
This could very well just be a player personality that I’m reading too much into.
Though I wouldn’t call this hedging. I’m currently voting there
I don’t remember. Maybe.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Maybe the next one to say it it's not a mothertruckerDharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:02 am I swear to God I'm going to ascend to Modhood just to modkill myself if another mothertrucker says aubergine one more time.
I laughedVivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:24 amAre you flamboyantly declaring your intent to dastardly sacrifice yourself spectacularly ?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:02 am I swear to God I'm going to ascend to Modhood just to modkill myself if another mothertrucker says aubergine one more time.
What happened to the last person that tried to feed you vegetable soup ?
Your explanation sounds complicated for me, do you have an AI conclusion? What do you think about Sloonei's post,DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:48 amYeah if only there were a role that explicitly stated (hey look guys, adverb. I'm multitasking!) that votes were changeable.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:21 pmI would say it is something to consider.
I'm not a fan of changing votes. I like to take the day to interact and observe without being hasty.
Sig says votes are changeable. I don't see how he could have known this before voting. I can only find him sus right away as his hasty vote would most likely land on a civ.
Maybe Eloh missed that part, though. I guess if it were an indie role or a mafia role, and Eloh were a civ and had no reason to read up on the mafia/indie sides of things, that could be it.
But if that role were not an indie or mafia role, and Eloh were a mafia or an indie and would have reason to be more focused on that side of the board, I could see a world where Eloh might forgo reading up on the civ side of things.