The Syndicate

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:14 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:08 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

That depends.

Does my reason have to be substantial?

I'd prefer it, yes.

I will judge you once there has been a mafia lynched. So keep doing your thing.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:24 am i need to sleep. do your thing without me.

Shit I'm going to bed too.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 11:23 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:58 pm Ah yes, I recall.

I voted LC, breaking the tie there, but LC voted last second, making it a tie again.

Was this before or after I moved my vote?

I don't know.

I'm voting MacDougall.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:38 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg

Tell me more

you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take

U bad

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:39 pm I am Merry and I got to start the game with a red peek on nutella.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:51 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:06 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:51 pm nutella is bad. Confirmed.

No. I'm not bad. You're either making shit up (about a role that doesn't even have a power) or you for some reason mysteriously got false info on day 0. I'm gonna go with making shit up. Whether that's for a discussion-stimulating pro-civ motive or a scum anti-civ motive is yet to be seen... but if you want to lynch me it will only hurt the civs.

Nah my red peek says that it is definitely not false info in the PM.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:06 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:04 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:53 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:33 pm i also don't think we should be so relaxed about roleclaiming. doing it helps the mafia narrow down who frodo is, and the role list also has additional civ roles "intended for mafia claims" so i don't think roleclaiming should even necessarily be a reason to trust someone.

You're bad too btw.

2 scum found.

why do you think Kyle is bad? He's expressing a very civ-minded strategic thought in this post

No he isn't. He's expressing something that sounds like that that is far more likely to have been thought of by a scum player trying to think of their opportunities and he has implied that I was legitimately role claiming rather than fake claiming, realised it and then made that afterthought part of the post to counteract it, then he looked at his post and thought he'd done a good job cleaning it up but he hadn't unfortunately.

Also I have a red peek.

MacDougall went on about a "red peek," which I figured was his way of generating something to talk about.

Instead of examining the posts people made with respect to nutella and his peek, MacDougall said this:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:00 am

nutella wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:04 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:01 am Let’s lynch nutella

Why

Gotta lynch someone

MacDougall had a chance to put nutella in the running to be lynched Day 1:

DFaraday
3
18%
Voters: rabbit8, timmer, Long Con

Long Con
3
18%
Voters: Sloonei, Ambray, Epignosis

nutella
2
12%
Voters: Glorfindel, novaselinenever

Sloonei
1
6%
Voters: MacDougall

But he didn't take it. MacDougall voted Sloonei.

I want to know why.

What was the joke?

And if you find Sloonei more suspicious, why are you voting nutella?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:20 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:54 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:13 pm The red peek was just a joke obviously. I am voting nutella today for no reason. I haven't really focused much on the games for several days as I have been working so I've just been posting dumb shit. I'll try a bit more tomorrow when I am at my desk at work. Presuming I don't get lynched today.

I didn't take it as a joke. I didn't take it as serious, but not a joke either. I thought you were going somewhere with the "red peek." You didn't go anywhere.

Really?

Really.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:30 pm I can't believe that. Why you lying?

What am I lying about?

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:51 pm You didn't think he was going somewhere with that shit....

Listen old timer.

MacDougall comes from a place where people make up shit to generate discussion. Ask JaggedJimmyJay or Sloonei or whoever came from their world.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Wed Jan 17, 2018 10:31 am Kyle is with the Russian Police. Discuss.

That's civilian JJJ slinging shit at civilian Kylemii, and Sloonei followed suit by slinging shit at Kylemii.

You can read all about it here.

MacDougall comes from the same community. I expected him to follow up on his bullshit. He doubled down on it today. None of that makes sense to me.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:27 pm Listen spring chicken.

None of that makes sense to me.

Even if he followed up on it I doubt you thought he was going somewhere with it. Since you knew he was slinging shit for the sake of slinging shit. Why didn't you just say that?

My assumption was that he was slinging shit to sling shit. He called it a joke. That's not the same thing.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:33 pm Where would he go with it? This is the line I have a question about. Just randomly accuse people based on some assumed bullshit?

I said as much already. People like JJJ, Sloonei, MacDougall, et al. come into a thread early and lay down some bullshit on people, and then analyze how people react.

It isn't about catching mafia. It's about generating connections among players so that when that first mafia gets lynched, they have something to look back on and find teammates.

I think MacDougall was feigning this strategy. He did it at first and now claims it was a joke. Joke or not, there is something there for him to analyze. He does not strike me as a civilian, no.

rabbit8 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:43 pm So JJJ was bad in the game you linked to? That's a lot of reading for little gain when you could just tell me. If you lied I'm sure someone else played that game and would gladly call you out on it.

No. JJJ was a civilian, and Sloonei was a civilian.

They made up bullshit on Kylemii and got people to talk about it. They come from the same community as MacDougall, who apparently was pulling the same shit, but it doesn't look believable to me, especially since he's calling it a joke and voting nutella anyway.

I don't get why you are obsessed with me lying about something. I am telling your absent ass how people you don't know operate.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:14 pm Epi/Jack tell me about MacDougall

I felt good about what I posted regarding MacDougall. However, I don't know what to make of his response, which is him giving up because he says he needs to play less Mafia. What's your take on him?

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:49 pm are social manips a consistent Epignosis civ trait?

I do different things depending on lots of factors, including the setup and my own role. LC should know this.

Unfortunately, you won't be seeing LC vs Epi Round 19 today because I believe voting for him was a mistake. Also, football.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 6:09 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:56 pm

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:14 pm Epi/Jack tell me about MacDougall

I felt good about what I posted regarding MacDougall. However, I don't know what to make of his response, which is him giving up because he says he needs to play less Mafia. What's your take on him?

I'm not giving up. I'm just not going to defend myself. My day 1 was just trashy moron posts and if that gets me lynched so be it.

I basically have two modes. Phone at home short posts and cbf casing or at my desk at work with effort. I barely have time to Mafia at work and most of my workday is when the thread is sleeping anyway. So if you're wondering why my posts suck so much it's because I have trouble mustering the energy to play properly on my phone.

I can understand that. I don't even try to play on a phone unless it's unavoidable.

Sloonei, eye see you.

I'm not satisfied with a MacDougall lynch. Where should I vote?

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 8:45 pm The Philadelphia Eagles

But not Gostkowski.

Half the votes are missing.

I moved my vote to Ambray.

I hope MacDougall eats his Wheaties (and second breakfast too).

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 9:08 pm oh wow the lynch is at 5 i thought it was later

I thought it ended tonight too.

And here I am not devoting my full attention to Martin Luther King, Jr. speeches being used to sell Dodge Rams.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 10:36 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 8:37 pm Sloonei, eye see you.

I'm not satisfied with a MacDougall lynch. Where should I vote?

You seem so much nicer in this game than usual

Is that a scumtell for you?

nutella, can you summarize your vote for Ambray? I know you voted there Day 1.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:59 pm nutella, can you summarize your vote for Ambray? I know you voted there Day 1.

I didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.

Do you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?

Missed this.

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:29 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2018 8:37 pm Sloonei, eye see you.

I'm not satisfied with a MacDougall lynch. Where should I vote?

How do you feel about DFaraday?

I don't have a reason to lynch him.

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:27 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:26 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:17 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:10 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:59 pm nutella, can you summarize your vote for Ambray? I know you voted there Day 1.

I didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.

Do you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?

Not necessarily. Could be the case I guess but it's not enough to sway me off voting for her at the moment.

Epignosis is speculating that she might have been supplied with context by teammates which would only add fuel to suspicion. Why would that sway you OFF voting for her? Or am I misunderstanding?

No he's saying that since she never seemed to learn the context she probably doesn't have teammates

It was just something that occurred to me. I have hosted plenty of BTumbleweedSC chats to know better than to say it's a definite point in her favor.

Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:16 pmSadness.

timmer wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:28 pm Sperry for missing the vote I have to start leaving early votes in case, it seem

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 8:19 pm Hazlenut do you not like me?

I thought we could be bffs...

In looking at Wilgy's posts, this jumped out:

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:27 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:21 pm

DrWilgy wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:18 pm How bout we lynch Rico?

why not ambray?

Wasn't serious. Still after Amby.

Rico isn't playing. That's a joke.

Sloonei asked about Ambray.

"Wasn't serious" is funny thing to say when it should be obvious to both parties that lynching Rico is impossible.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:36 pm I'd like to lynch slooneichuck as a matter of priority thanks.

Let's hear it, second breakfast.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:40 pm I've laid out my issues with Sloonei already and I don't think he trades out of the game as a civ here. My suspicion of him was related to but independent of Ambray's alignment as well. I think he implied knowledge of her alignment in hindsight by the way he approached her.

I'll look back to see what you said.

However:

Sloonei wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:52 pm I'll probably be away for a while in mid-February, which I realize is going to impact my availability in any of these games.

That's from the sign-up thread. We're venturing into the middle of February.

I'm looking through your posts to find your comments on Sloonei:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:54 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:52 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:35 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:17 pm @nutella I'm not sure I follow your thought process RE: Glorfindel. On the one hand you say his behavior is NAI, but in the same sentence you add that it gives you a bad feeling. What's the bad feeling is his behavior doesn't indicate anything about his alignment?

A wild scum appears

Vote for somebody.

Ok

I assume you voted Sloonei here, given the following exchange:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:28 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:23 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:10 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:56 pm Thank you. Now talk about that vote.

Your question of nutella was a bad look. Her feelings were justified and needn't elaboration. You were faking confusion to make someone who is attracting heat justify something that was obvious. I believe it is because of a mixture of a) you aren't genuinely trying to find the bad guys b) you are hoping to build a mislynch or c) you are both bad and you are establishing distance.

No. I asked for clarification because I wanted nutella to be more clear. It's what I do. I liked the answer she gave. What is your read on her?

Orange skittle

All of your posts prior to this were related to the "joke" incriminating nutella as bad.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:15 pm Glorfindel never lies. Glorfindel refused to answer whether he was maphier. Glorfindel said in another thread he wasn't going to directly answer the question either way. So it's pingy but ultimately NAI.

Your stomping round the thread on day 1 trying to promote gameplay to keep up with your meta but it's clunky and coming off insincere Mr. Darth Sloonei.

In the past, I have accused the likes of JJJ and Sloonei of doing this very thing for different reasons. I've done it as evil, and I've done it because I've had an important role I didn't want Night killed.

Your reaction to the potential lynch against you doesn't give me any hope that the latter case is yours.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:49 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:13 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:59 pm nutella, can you summarize your vote for Ambray? I know you voted there Day 1.

I didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.

I actually suspect Sloonei independently of her as well. I think she has done more than enough to come into the sphere of Sloonei suspicion and he has given her nothing but benign pokes. He's either not coming at a scum teammate or he knows she is a civ ergo doesn't want to be a part to a mislynch.

On song civ Sloonei would be exhibiting some levels of suspicion imo.

Operative post but I've had my eye on Sloonei the entire game pretty much.

Yet you said this:

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:42 pm So I am ignoring Jack because his emoji posts are dumb.

Sloonei your posts are tldr.

Let's lynch Wilgy.

Rather than push for Sloonei, you commented on the length of his posts and recommended a DrWilgy lynch. Was that a joke too?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:37 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:28 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:26 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:11 pm Mac, talk about wilgy.

He's either good or bad and we will never be able to truly know until we conduct a post mortem.

I have not much enthusiasm for the games right now. I'm doing my best.

Does a lack of enthusiasm result in you picking DrWilgy to lynch over someone you've had your eye on the "entire game pretty much?" Why pick Wilgy?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:49 pm Let's lynch Epi

Or me, some three hours later?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:53 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:52 pm

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:49 pm Let's lynch Epi

Famous last words.

I'll just replace back in after you mislynch me and someone vanishes. I'm that kind of guy.

The banter and subsequent list (see below) gave me the impression this was a joke too, but if- just if- some people said, "To hell with it. Let's do it," you've given yourself a "reason" to place your vote on me.

Your jokes aren't funny. Jokes are supposed to be funny.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2018 8:55 pm GTH time as I prepare to be mislynched in two games;

Ambray - Scum Civilian
DFaraday - Town
DrWilgy - Town
Epignosis - Town
Glorfindel - Town
insertnamehere - Town
Jackofhearts2005 - Town
Kylemii - Town
Long Con - Town
novaselinenever - Town
nutella - Scum Civilian
rabbit8 - Scum
Sloonei - Scum
timmer - Scum

This leaves you with three evildoers, based on your original list. I have only seen you go after Sloonei.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 1:53 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:59 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:41 am

Sloonei wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:36 am I consider those reasons substantial. Thank you. I also justified my vote, albeit early in the day as well. I think you responded to the post. His treatment of nutella looked shaky.
What are your Day 2 thoughts?

That if you're bad, nobody's ever going to lynch you because you're running the show.

Good thing I'm not bad. Do you have reason to think I am?

We are playing mafia and the roles are randomly drawn

The points you would raise later, and are raising again now: Why would you wait until now to emphasize them? Why not when Sloonei asked?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:48 am

Kylemii wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:44 am @MacDougall do you have a read on Sloonei? do you trust sloonei to be an effective shit disturber/town leader in this game?

He seems to be his usual self but tinfoil is always a thing with the sloons and the jays.

Purpose of the question now plz?

Nobody was going to lynch Sloonei early on. I don't understand why you are asking Kylemii the purpose of his question.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 7:57 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg

I actually agree.

"Actually" ... to qualify your own opinion...

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:00 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:30 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:27 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:19 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 7:05 pm Hot take ambray and sloonei are scum mates gg

Tell me more

you're asking all these questions to the point of sounding fake

idk the chance that you're actually teammates is probably pretty low, especially with all this interaction right after the game thread opens on day 0, but still I could see it as a possibility based on this behavior. and making a bold assertion like this should stimulate the discussion. hence the hot take

I like to ask questions. They also stimulate the conversation.

I actually don't know what I was thinking when I called nutella bad for that post because at my DESKTOP and having the energy to think I actually agree with her read entirely.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:13 pm

nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:59 pm nutella, can you summarize your vote for Ambray? I know you voted there Day 1.

I didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.

I actually suspect Sloonei independently of her as well. I think she has done more than enough to come into the sphere of Sloonei suspicion and he has given her nothing but benign pokes. He's either not coming at a scum teammate or he knows she is a civ ergo doesn't want to be a part to a mislynch.

On song civ Sloonei would be exhibiting some levels of suspicion imo.

I ACTUALLY have something more to say about this one.

Pay attention to the underlined.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:10 pm

Sloonei wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2018 5:56 pm Thank you. Now talk about that vote.

Your question of nutella was a bad look. Her feelings were justified and needn't elaboration. You were faking confusion to make someone who is attracting heat justify something that was obvious. I believe it is because of a mixture of a) you aren't genuinely trying to find the bad guys b) you are hoping to build a mislynch or c) you are both bad and you are establishing distance.

1. With Ambray, Sloonei is:

a) Not coming at a teammate
b) He knows she is good and doesn't want to be a part of the lynch

2. With nutella, Sloonei is:

a) Not trying to find the bad guys
b) Hoping to build a poor lynch
c) Establishing distance

1a and 2c are opposites.
1b and 2b are opposites.
2a is an empty accusation.

Damn I feel good about a MacDougall lynch.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:06 am Well that's dumb but I'm not going to bother replying to a premeditated wall of nonsense when you clearly already had your mind made up.

Premeditated wall of nonsense? Clearly already had my mind made up?

What the hell?

That took me over an hour to put together.

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:08 am How am I even meant to reply to that post if I want to? It's a huge mountain of a post. Argh how frustrating.

I said I would look for your posts about Sloonei. You had several of them. You've interacted with Sloonei more than anybody else from what I could see.

I compiled all of them together, commented on them, and drew an opinion from that.

Did you do that on your phone?

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:39 am

Epignosis wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:12 am

MacDougall wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:06 am Well that's dumb but I'm not going to bother replying to a premeditated wall of nonsense when you clearly already had your mind made up.

Premeditated wall of nonsense? Clearly already had my mind made up?

What the hell?

That took me over an hour to put together.

Yeah sorry but it shocked the fuck out of me. I thought you'd died down on your suspicion of me and here we are again. I might have overreacted.

I had.

With the Ambray lynch, I only moved to her to have somewhere else to go, and then people flocked there, and after that I didn't have the time or strength to consider anywhere else, so I said, "What the hell."

I will admit some "buyer's remorse" by not sticking by my vote for you.

Assuming MacDougall is a civilian, then his opinion on Sloonei (now speedchuck) is genuine.

Would you lynch speedchuck. Why or why not?

Damn it nutella, get in here and provide some content. I don't know how I feel about you.



Holy shit, guys. Wheaties. Second Breakfast.

Kylemii wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:41 pm

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:27 pm nutella
Kylemii

Why aren't you voting?

*switches back to Mac*

the poll doesn't expire til tomorrow and i'm just kinda chilling, i guess. i should probably be putting more effort in since people want to kill me, I'm just tired lol. 3 games is too many games for any mortal man

I thought you were voting early and often these days.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:38 pm

speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 2:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:20 am Apologies for the Day 2 absense.

People I plan on ISO'ing:

Kylemii - was suspicious of him D1
Long Con - voted Ambray - don't have a cogent read of him
Epignosis - has a whole thing going with Mac, not 100% sure on my read of that dynamic
Mac - pretty much same reasoning as Epignosis
Wilgy - had a whole thing against Ambray
Novaseline - has left literally no impressions on me as a player, and went after Nutella D1

Wish me luck.

Why these six?

Is fucking dead.

I swear to God.

I see I am going to have to win this game by myself.

I am unable to access a number of pages of this thread at work. Apparently rabbit swears too much. Can we lynch him?

If the choice is between speedchuck and Kyle, I'm switching to Kyle. Sloonei cared about the Hobbitses.

Three people didn't vote, and Kylemii was one of them.

I'm here.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:55 pm Hmm. Interesting kill choice.

RIP Mac

Did you do it?

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:01 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:55 pm Hmm. Interesting kill choice.

RIP Mac

Did you do it?

Nope. Did you?

No.

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:47 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:24 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 9:01 pm

Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:58 pm

insertnamehere wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:55 pm Hmm. Interesting kill choice.

RIP Mac

Did you do it?

Nope. Did you?

No.

That's exactly what Mac's killer would say.

Do you have an alibi?

If I told you I was fucking the midget from Twin Peaks, would you believe me?

Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2018 10:05 pm Why kill Mac? Even if he wasn't a suspect, he wasn't doing a lot to help the town. He even said himself he wasn't playing s very good game.

It's possible Frodo has some sort of misdirection power.

Killing MacDougall makes sense.

speedchuck isn't bad.

Mafia wants to add fuel to the fire.