
And yeah, I like to be sarcastic. Sue me.

Moderator: Community Team
Ambray
I have clearly stated I have no suspicions of you. So I'm not trying to turn anything. I would say that you posting to go ahead and lynch you with no fight is, in my book, giving up.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:29 pm Yes well I am posting at my computer. Should I start posting selfies so people can see which device I am using to determine their expectations of my meta?
I never gave up. I just don't care to defend myself. Given some time and some energy I had a quick look through in an attempt to at least try to find baddies. I like how you are trying to cast dispersions on me subtly for doing what is expected of a civ.
differently why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:38 pmWhen I got online and I decided to actually read some back game and ISOs and saw glaring scumtells from the first ISO I read. I was reading the game very differently before about 30 minutes ago.
I was reading the game on my phone. Hadn't read one ISO. Was making snap replies that weren't thought through. The entire game was me reading out of context posts and trying to discern tone.Kylemii wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:40 pmdifferently why?MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:38 pmWhen I got online and I decided to actually read some back game and ISOs and saw glaring scumtells from the first ISO I read. I was reading the game very differently before about 30 minutes ago.
Mmm spicyMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:04 pmBecause the player who is most likely to dictate the thread's activity is her teammate obviously.
I didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
I can check in a minute but I know that I do not like this post. Especially after Mac insinuating she and Sloonei could be teammates. Tricky distancing ploy. Fake as hell.
Do you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
I actually suspect Sloonei independently of her as well. I think she has done more than enough to come into the sphere of Sloonei suspicion and he has given her nothing but benign pokes. He's either not coming at a scum teammate or he knows she is a civ ergo doesn't want to be a part to a mislynch.nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
Not necessarily. Could be the case I guess but it's not enough to sway me off voting for her at the moment.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:10 pmDo you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
Epignosis is speculating that she might have been supplied with context by teammates which would only add fuel to suspicion. Why would that sway you OFF voting for her? Or am I misunderstanding?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:17 pmNot necessarily. Could be the case I guess but it's not enough to sway me off voting for her at the moment.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:10 pmDo you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
No he's saying that since she never seemed to learn the context she probably doesn't have teammatesMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:26 pmEpignosis is speculating that she might have been supplied with context by teammates which would only add fuel to suspicion. Why would that sway you OFF voting for her? Or am I misunderstanding?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:17 pmNot necessarily. Could be the case I guess but it's not enough to sway me off voting for her at the moment.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:10 pmDo you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
I don't have a reason to lynch him.
It was just something that occurred to me. I have hosted plenty of BTumbleweedSC chats to know better than to say it's a definite point in her favor.nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:27 pmNo he's saying that since she never seemed to learn the context she probably doesn't have teammatesMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:26 pmEpignosis is speculating that she might have been supplied with context by teammates which would only add fuel to suspicion. Why would that sway you OFF voting for her? Or am I misunderstanding?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:17 pmNot necessarily. Could be the case I guess but it's not enough to sway me off voting for her at the moment.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:10 pmDo you think a bad Ambray have been informed by her teammates about that particular context?nutella wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:06 pmI didn't like the back-and-forth between her and Sloonei at the very beginning. I didn't like her blind joining of Kyle against Glorfindel despite not understanding context. Her defense of that later on was sort of okay but not stellar. She has said she is busy but I'm still not seeing civ motivations in her posts. Plus with Mac's recent assessments I'm kind of going back to the tinfoil that Sloonei is her teammate, but I suspect her independently of him as well.
I'd like to discourage this right now. Ambray/Sofi appears to have a firm civ read on me and reducing the options to Ambray vs. Mac at this point of the day is going to encourage Mafia/lazy players to just throw drive by votes on whichever of us they gut read worse with little explanation which is going to miss an opportunity. I prefer your line of thinking as to who else might be on the table, and I feel like Sloonei firmly should be for one.
this is the only post i found where sofi mentions feeling negative about slooneiAmbray wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:28 pm Don't have much to contribute other than I'm still uneasy over the LC 'bandwagon' situation.
Sloonei's posts I don't like just as a vibe as I struggle to see whether they posts as a civ throwing mud and seeing what sticks or a baddie just stirring trouble. However, from how others have reacted this seems his typical game style so hard to judge.
Jack's posts are going to get old pretty quick. I'm not looking to lynch him at all right now, but I question whether this is normal behaviour for him? I think it would be pretty easy to get the ball rolling as an easy lynch. If he is civ, I don't really know how he's helping himself or others with his posts..
that's actually not why I asked that, I noticed Sloonei is viewing the thread, I want to know his thoughts on this particular topic since he's at least tangentially involvedMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:34 pmI'd like to discourage this right now. Ambray/Sofi appears to have a firm civ read on me and reducing the options to Ambray vs. Mac at this point of the day is going to encourage Mafia/lazy players to just throw drive by votes on whichever of us they gut read worse with little explanation which is going to miss an opportunity. I prefer your line of thinking as to who else might be on the table, and I feel like Sloonei firmly should be for one.
No. i'm just glancing at the thread every now and then. Don't have time to actually read things in depth.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.