The Syndicate

G-Man wrote:I refuse to believe that we are this dependent upon Slooeni for conversation. Speak up people- while you still can.

timmer wrote:having fun waiting to die, really.

Golden wrote:If it's not a known fact, then even if it is a role ability, why assume it's mafia not civilian?

Golden wrote:Even more - one of the powers of mafia 1. He was very specific.

Scotty wrote:I wonder if these polls dictate which PM Dom sends us? Interestingly enough, the "Do you want to read from a book" poll only had one person voting 'no'. And that was Epi.

Epi, did you receive a PM Night 2 pertaining to a book? If so, what was it? Was it any different than what the rest of us received?

Golden wrote:I voted Les Mis because I love it.

Scotty wrote:1- I just never got Miss Saigon. I don't know why it was ever made into a musical.
2- I'm sorry to hear that, Dom! Feel better brotha. Maybe its all that lighter fluid in your diet?

G-Man wrote:

Epignosis wrote:Bada-bing.

How's that LC-sig teammate theory working out for you? :P

FZ. wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

FZ. wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I am.

If you had to vote now, would you still vote for G-man over LC?

I realize my answer may not be helpful to you, but remember that I believe they are teammates. Both bad. Either one should go. I would prefer there not be a tie, however.

Okay, LC it is. Thanks. I really hope this is not a mistake. I don't think I can stand another day of G-man spamming the thread with his long pointless posts. :P

FZ. wrote:

Epignosis wrote:I am.

If you had to vote now, would you still vote for G-man over LC?

FZ. wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

FZ. wrote:That said, I don't care how many times you refute it Epig, you've been posting very differently than your first day style.

How many times have I refuted it?

At least once, but it feels like more. And you say there's not much to say.

Neverwhere wrote:Then again this leads to question Cobalt. I don't have a great feeling about him, however, I'm wondering if it's maybe his style that just rubs me the wrong way. I'm pretty sure we have a role checker amongst us and Ihave been wondering if Cobalt could have that ability as he's been dogging LC from the start. Now he's 100% of Epi -- who I am also leaning mafia on. I'm hoping if we get this LC lynch and he flips mafia we may have more of an idea on if we can trust Cobalt at all.

Neverwhere wrote:Very good point. Also...like I said before. Cobalt out of nowhere says he's 100% sure of Epi being bad and Golden suddenly just votes for him also.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Cobalt Posts

Cobalt wrote:literally eat purple woman asshole

FZ. wrote:That said, I don't care how many times you refute it Epig, you've been posting very differently than your first day style.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Metalmarsh89 wrote:3) The post you responded to saying "I don't think you're interested." was a question to Epignosis that I want an answer to. Epignosis was silenced all day yesterday (so it appears), so I don't know what he thinks about G-Man.

You don't? I wasn't silenced Night 3, and I said what I think about G-Man.

You mention G-Man 0 (zero) time(s) and ThatGamerGuy 1 (one) time(s) over the course of Night 3. Your mention was that ThatGamerGuy is a new player.

So no, I don't know what you think about G-Man, and I want to hear more since you have given G-Man your vote.

TinyBubbles wrote:and epi's has been very quiet compared to earlier in the thread when he had a different role (if i recall correctly?) which is also making me wary

G-Man wrote:ebwop: are you equivalence now?

Sloonei wrote:I demand rainbow lists from everybody ASAP.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:3) The post you responded to saying "I don't think you're interested." was a question to Epignosis that I want an answer to. Epignosis was silenced all day yesterday (so it appears), so I don't know what he thinks about G-Man.

Cobalt wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Cobalt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Cobalt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:While we're all trying to interpret that End of Night post, what do we make of those two hooded figures shaking hands? Did they conspire to save me? Hoods are an inherently evil clothing item, so I dunno

idk why dont you tell us scumnei

are you trying to call me scum here?

not if you help me FINALLY lynch long con today

what i don't understand is if people like Epi think me and LC are teammates then it's beneficial to kill both of us so let's just start with Long Con mmkay?

Why not lynch G-Man today?

Cuz my vote isn't changeable and not for nothing but I feel bad lynching someone when they're incapable of properly defending themselves.

Long Con wrote:sig

Cobalt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:

Cobalt wrote:

Sloonei wrote:While we're all trying to interpret that End of Night post, what do we make of those two hooded figures shaking hands? Did they conspire to save me? Hoods are an inherently evil clothing item, so I dunno

idk why dont you tell us scumnei

are you trying to call me scum here?

not if you help me FINALLY lynch long con today

what i don't understand is if people like Epi think me and LC are teammates then it's beneficial to kill both of us so let's just start with Long Con mmkay?

FZ. wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

FZ. wrote:Epi, do you think it was LC who tried to kill you? Does he do that when bad (go after those pushing strongly for his lynch)?

I'll sum it up this way: Epignosis dies early, often. He hasn't made it past Night 3 in many moons, poor fellow. One who has been in those games with him might be apt to take pity on his bullet-riddled soul. That did not happen. That indicates that a Mafia team is largely composed of new people. sig being on that team makes sense. XthAtGAm3RGuYX makes sense. Cobalt makes sense. All new people. I think Long Con was just okay with their Night 1 choice and said "whoever you guys want is fine with me."

This all just seems too easy. That's it? You have the first mafia team pegged out? Wow, you're that good. No wonder you were killed so fast.

Epignosis wrote:

Canucklehead wrote:Link: OMG Epi just pulled out some legit Stunk & White jams.
Sidenote: my autocorrect changes "Epi" to "Epic".

You truly have a Smart Phone.

Canucklehead wrote:Link: OMG Epi just pulled out some legit Stunk & White jams.
Sidenote: my autocorrect changes "Epi" to "Epic".

FZ. wrote:Epi, do you think it was LC who tried to kill you? Does he do that when bad (go after those pushing strongly for his lynch)?

FZ. wrote:Epi, why are you so short on words now? I'd expect you to be a lot more talkative after being silenced.

Golden wrote:epi - do you think it could be sig/cobalt/TGG/LC?

Sloonei wrote:

Spoiler: show

sig wrote:I don't see SVS as that suspicious what is the argument against him?

I find Epi interesting he or she? is trying to find the mafia, but with two teams he could be mafia hunting in hopes to get rid of the other team, He is leaning as not a mafia for me at the moment, but only slightly.

I have a null read on Gumshoe, I'm unsure off him from his early engagement with Cobalt. But his response to Golden seemed sound.

Sloonie has contributed alot some fluff some not I find it interesting he says he isn't a noob. You would think if he was mafia he would say he was a noob so any slip ups made could be blamed on his newbieness. Are you suspicious of a Gumshoe/Cobalt mafia team or were you just pointing it out in early posts?

I don't like XthAtGAm3RGuYX waiting until day 2 to be serious however, this doesn't mean he is mafia he could just have that play style in general. Though I don't really like this play style it isn't overly suspicious. I haven't seen a reply about how people are circumventing his methods either which I would like to see. His later replays about how his activity seem fine but, he is null at the moment.

Cobalt why do you think LC is suspicious could you summarize that and why you think Epi is clean? Or is this a gutfeeling? I'm also not so sure about the bandwagon Cobalt seems to be pushing. But then again I'm never sure about Cobalt and find him to be scummy alot.

I'm not sure about LC I'm not seeing damning evidence against him, but I don't see him as clean yet either.LC what do you think of Cobalt going after you so much? LC second post about Scotty Independence claiming is interesting, not sure if it is a joke or if he was trying to put attention on Scotty.

Hedgeowl seems interesting he (sorry if I'm not getting gender right please correct me) has posted a few times but nothing really of substance Hedgeowl what do you think of the LC votes?

Big lit of reads. This could be helpful. I'll ignore what he had to say about dead players.
"null read on Gumshoe", seems totally unsure what to say here, which gives the vibe that Gumshoe is possibly partnered with sig, or that sig was just trying to comment on things but wasn't sure what to say about one particular case that existed in the thread at that time.

Sloonei has some fluff and should have lied about being a noob.

Opportunistically hops on some early Gamerguy suspicion. This does not have the appearance of bussing, but with two scum teams it does nothing to exonerate gamer/g-man.

Complete waffling read on Long Con. "Not sure" "Not seeing damning evidence" "not clean either" asks a lot of questions about posts people have made about LC.

and last but not least, hedgeowl is "interesting". This looks more like sig trying to subtly turn some suspicion against hedge. Long Con looks the worst of all the people mentioned in this post, imo. The way sig seems so unsure of what to say about him suggests he has reason to be hung up on that particular case. LC was obviously a big target early, and sig probably would have felt uncomfortable coming out in strong defense of him (if they are teammates), but he would also have been hesitant to put any more pressure on him. The way sig acts about Long Con in this post (and others, from what I remember) does not make LC look good. He had some posts of a similar tone about Cobalt, but sig seemed more willing to actually get Cobalt lynched at the end of Day 1 (see this post for example)

sig wrote:I'm not sure about LC I'm not seeing damning evidence against him, but I don't see him as clean yet either.LC what do you think of Cobalt going after you so much? LC second post about Scotty Independence claiming is interesting, not sure if it is a joke or if he was trying to put attention on Scotty.

sig wrote:I'm not sure about LC I'm not seeing damning evidence against him, but I don't see him as clean yet either.

sig wrote:LC what do you think of Cobalt going after you so much?

sig wrote:LC second post about Scotty Independence claiming is interesting, not sure if it is a joke or if he was trying to put attention on Scotty.

sig wrote:At this point I'm not sure what to think of Cobalt I still have him down as heavily suspicious, but i'm not going to go into day 2 voting for him. I want to see Cobalt offer opinions/suspicions on other players besides LC I don't like that he is tunneling LC, but I'm not sure if he is mafia or just very focused. Tunneling a player seems like a bad way for the mafia to act since when said player flips civilian the spot light is on them. However, if CObalt doesn't offer thoughts on other players and stops with the non caring about getting lynched I could support a Cobalt lynch. If he flips mafia we are good, if he flips town we are even better. Flipping town would lead me to believe his few earlier reads were right such as hi s LC tunneling, while flipping mafia would make LC more clean.

So as of right know he would be my number one.

FZ. wrote:The thing that bothers me about LC is that he basically went after each person that went after him, minus Epi maybe. First it was Cobalt, and then it was you. I'd like to see him point out some other suspicions. Did I miss any?

Sloonei wrote:woohoo. Good productive day, everyone.

Cobalt wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

sig wrote:Okay nutella thanks I couldn't remember him posting or any being asked to be replaced. So everyone is still alive shouldn't Cobalt have died and taken LC with him. Unless Cobalt is really unlynchable.

Cobalt's not a big fish.

He's a little shitter.

Literally eat my big brown asshole.

Golden wrote:Either Cobalt or Long Con could be entirely misdirecting us (or both), but I think he had means to switch the lynch to Long Con and Long Con had means to survive the lynch. It strikes me as the most obvious answer based on what the pair of them have said in the thread.

I have to say, the tinfoil wifom idea that they could be a baddie team who planned this intrigues me. But it doesn't seem likely. All too much attention, and surely Cobalt would have to know that he would be the first name on the block for lynch on day three after that outcome?

I don't care. Lynch me. I wanted Long Con dead and now it's ruined. I hate you all.

Long Scum, Scum Con, Scum Scum. He's fucking mafia. Someone on his team saved his ass, or someone with a civ ability wanted to thwart my plan. Unless he's a one time lynchproof mafia which would be broken as fuck.

I'm so over this, omg. Gonna go eat my feelings.

Golden wrote:Epi, why do you think you can take 'no-one died' as an indicator of who is good and bad?

Golden wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Golden wrote:Either Cobalt or Long Con could be entirely misdirecting us (or both), but I think he had means to switch the lynch to Long Con and Long Con had means to survive the lynch. It strikes me as the most obvious answer based on what the pair of them have said in the thread.

I have to say, the tinfoil wifom idea that they could be a baddie team who planned this intrigues me. But it doesn't seem likely. All too much attention, and surely Cobalt would have to know that he would be the first name on the block for lynch on day three after that outcome?

I don't agree with you analysis. Too many ifs.

I didn't use any ifs at all.

What do you think is 'the most obvious answer', then?

Sloonei wrote:So how do we approach Day 3? I'm sick of talking about Cobalt and Long Con, but this is obviously an important development that demands discussion.

Golden wrote:Either Cobalt or Long Con could be entirely misdirecting us (or both), but I think he had means to switch the lynch to Long Con and Long Con had means to survive the lynch. It strikes me as the most obvious answer based on what the pair of them have said in the thread.

I have to say, the tinfoil wifom idea that they could be a baddie team who planned this intrigues me. But it doesn't seem likely. All too much attention, and surely Cobalt would have to know that he would be the first name on the block for lynch on day three after that outcome?

sig wrote:Okay nutella thanks I couldn't remember him posting or any being asked to be replaced. So everyone is still alive shouldn't Cobalt have died and taken LC with him. Unless Cobalt is really unlynchable.