Nah, you're cool. Ignore me. I've been up in a hot ass attic tonight.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:23 am Epi, I will endeavor not to use the OT green to communicate something I need a prompt answer regarding in the future, because I understand how it affects the way you will read both parties. I apologize for reacting as I did.
Search found 316 matches
Return to “Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert”
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:24 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:21 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:20 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
[VOTE:
insertnamehere] aubergine
I still think he's a charlatan.
I still think he's a charlatan.
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:18 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:15 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
From a game I'm not in:Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:59 pmEpi hasn't made a single accusation with merit in the entire game in my opinion.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:56 pmWhether I am bad or good I would never ever put game strategy into OT green. It's a shitty accusation.
It's why this is the second day in a row I'm voting for him. He feels more like a parody of himself to me. It could just be a function of time.
I don't give a shit about what people think has merit.
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 12:12 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
You're right. Of all people, I don't think you'd do that.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:56 pm Also, I already set aside my suspicion of Scotty on your say so, so don't sweat over me. It's Scotty you might have to convince, lol.
I want to move my vote off Kyle, but I'm unsure where I want to put it.
Epi, it's insulting to me that you think I would utilize the OT color for a game strategy. That is an out of bounds move imo. Whether I am bad or good I would never ever put game strategy into OT green. It's a shitty accusation.
I'll move my vote when I'm ready.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
[VOTE:
Spacedaisy] aubergine
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Don't tell me to take something to the mod. If you put something in this thread, and I think it's relevant, I'll comment on it.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:18 pmJust like you have the private message function to send me one asking me to not put OT messages in the game if you don’t fucking like it. Idgaf. It doesn’t hurt you or anyone else to scroll past a fucking post. Get over it. Or take it to a mod.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:14 pmShit like this bothers me.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:20 pm @MacDougall Can you check your DM's from me on discord? I need to know if I have your approval before I upload the banners
If you're bad, you have a chat room to pass this message along.
If you are not bad (or even if you are not), you have the private message function.
Moving on.
![Happy :)](./images/smilies/happy.gif)
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Putting shit like that in a game thread makes it look like you aren't teammates.Golden wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:15 pmSo why does it bother you?Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:14 pmShit like this bothers me.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:20 pm @MacDougall Can you check your DM's from me on discord? I need to know if I have your approval before I upload the banners
If you're bad, you have a chat room to pass this message along.
If you are not bad (or even if you are not), you have the private message function.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
*Or even if you are
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Shit like this bothers me.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:20 pm @MacDougall Can you check your DM's from me on discord? I need to know if I have your approval before I upload the banners
If you're bad, you have a chat room to pass this message along.
If you are not bad (or even if you are not), you have the private message function.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 10:43 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Forget whether Quin actually got a message?Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 6:44 pm If it was one shot, then if I had done what he did IO would have made it damn clear that was the case, which he hasn't. Because he painted a big old target on himself with what he did otherwise. It seems reckless and possibly wasteful to me. That said, it depends on whether or not there is something to your text flavor point. And whether or not sig was actually bad. Because if sig is bad, then Quin is not. And neither is INH. This is assuming the message is true.
@Golden You should know by now that you can trust me. I was trying to prove myself, and I would hope you were watching well so you caught it.![]()
Who cares?
He dumped into the thread, and what we got was INH and sig both upset over the message. Neither accused the other. Nether accused Quin. None of that happened. They focused on the message's origin or the consequences it may have for them as individuals rather than for civilians.
That to me is the most important thing, and I could give a toss if Quin was lying or truthful about his message.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
That's what I've been saying.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:18 pm The fact that both sig and INH have attacked the intel, rather than each other, bodes poorly.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:47 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Yet the the latter has produced the former, no?insertnamehere wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:15 pmIt's denial and fear-mongering with no real potential results IMO. I realize I'm not exactly unbiased, but I'd feel more comfortable if the town lynched people because of legitimate in-thread reasons when we have no flips to go off of, instead of contested info-dropping hearsay which won't truly be proven one way or the other until dead peoples' roles are revealed. The former is productive and can generate conversations, while the second won't actually give us any information while serving as a major distraction.ColinIsCool wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:09 pm I don’t agree with the recurring idea that we’ll just get rid of both signand inh to be safe. Quin’s posts should have been the catalyst for a decision, not a non-decision.
![grin :grin:](./images/smilies/grin.gif)
By the way, your script needs work.
![Meany :meany:](./images/smilies/mean.gif)
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 9:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I've been in the attic on account of a clogged AC drain pipe. I'll be with you all momentarily.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:35 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm not answering you. Piss off.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:23 amNah fuck dat. I asked you a fair question. Do you think he was counter claiming you? Because if he was counter claiming you and you are saying he isn't a doctor, I want to know why you aren't voting for him.Epignosis wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:14 amI know what I'm doing. Leave it at that.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:04 amI thought it was pretty obvious Scotty was counter claiming your doctor claim. Did you miss that or is it something else? Was he not doing that in your eyes?
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:14 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I know what I'm doing. Leave it at that.MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:04 amI thought it was pretty obvious Scotty was counter claiming your doctor claim. Did you miss that or is it something else? Was he not doing that in your eyes?
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:03 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
According to Golden.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 12:03 am
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
To be clear for anybody paying attention, Scotty is "town" and "a doctor" and "somebody who needs Golden alive to win."
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Quin made a claim.
INH did not dispute it, but got angry and suggested he was not a civilian.
sig did not dispute it, but questioned the source of it.
sig is here and INH is not.
Lynch INH.
INH did not dispute it, but got angry and suggested he was not a civilian.
sig did not dispute it, but questioned the source of it.
sig is here and INH is not.
Lynch INH.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:35 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Let's do something more fun.
sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.
Who gets your vote and why?
sig and INH are Booker DeWitt and Comstock. That is to say, both have been swept away by the Luteces. They're not here.
Who gets your vote and why?
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:32 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Bend over and reach me that box of gloves honey and I'll show you.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:27 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
What was my motive for claiming as I did and when I did?MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:26 pmI do question the statement. Why do you think he's not a doctor?
I also now suspicious of how Epi has gradually backtracked from his "claim" when Scotty counter claimed to his most recent *shrug* when I asked if he is a doctor and whether we should let him get away with what seems most likely to be a fake claim that has backfired?
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Scotty isn't a doctor.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:19 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
You don't need to understand me.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pmA moment ago you decided I knew INH was doing this. Now you seem comfortable that I 'don't believe you'.
There's not a whole lot of integrity to your current thought processes.
On the other hand, I have to admit that I don't understand why you'd raise inh's apparent 'claim' at all if you were bad. You'd have been better off just letting things play out.
But I don't understand at all why you'd lynch both one after the other on the basis that sig would be scum if you think INH is covering for being scum.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:16 pm Epignosis are you actually a doctor or were you talking shit? Because there's a bit of an elephant in the room here given Scotty seems to be counter claiming.
![Image](https://78.media.tumblr.com/abdbe4a489aae48d872ee0ffb6ef176c/tumblr_inline_mowvhc4pJd1qz4rgp.jpg)
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Don't give aGolden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:08 pm Epi goes from voting his apparent mafia read to his indy read. Then claims his indy read is a mafia read. But if so, what's his sig read been all about, because this all started with the two clearly not being compatible with each other?
And Epi still wants to lynch both of them... even though he now apparently thinks INH is bad, with no evidence that sig would be indy...
His logic is all over the place inconsistent.
Spoiler: show
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm not providing a thing. I have no interest. I've seen it. You don't believe me? Fine.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
As I said, lynch both.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pmIn my opinion the first thing a caught Mafia does in that scenario is question the validity of the information (ala Sig). A caught independent would almost certainly roleclaim at that juncture. A mafia to indie claim at that point before going after the validity of the information ... no doesn't seem right.
Neither one responded with any enthusiasm. One all but claimed harmless independent (which we won't know if we lynch him) and the other questioned the message (which we won't know is true if we lynch him).
Get rid of both, says I.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
And just to be clear, yes, yes I am trying to decide the next three lynches. And the three after that. Any issue with that?sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm16 players
You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?
like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.
Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I suspect you again.
The first thing a caught mafia does in that scenario is claim to be independent. You're defending him.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
News flash:sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:56 pm16 players
You're trying to decide the next three lynches in a game where we might not even have 5 phases?
like we're down to 14. Nutella was a night action so high chane she's civ and I'd say Zeph is civ we're down to 14. IF Quin and INH are civs along with me who am I civ we'd be down to 8 players.
Like this level of lynch planning makes me very uncomfortable with you Epi.
I don't care how uncomfortable you are with me. Get comfortable.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
This is some sloppy shit from sig. That's all I've got to say.
[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine
[VOTE: insertnamehere] aubergine
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'd say INH is independent and sig is bad. Lynch both. Move on.
Then Quin for good measure.
Then Quin for good measure.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Aren't you his significant other? Can't you show him something else what would be extremely painful?
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:50 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
So that qualifies as "keep forgetting?"
Your words.
"Keep forgetting" is a tense that implies you have habitually done this. This remark came after you made that list. When did you forget me before?
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:48 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm surprised nobody has said anything.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:42 am I thought Scotty's D1 voting pattern was weird and suspicious enough for me to vote for him, however, if he later went against what made me suspicious, I was open to changing it to someone else.
Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.
But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.
Linki:What? I thought fake-claims were more character based. Like, if everyone said the name of their role, and three of the names were obvious bad guys in time-travel related tales, then fakeclaims would allow them to at least appear as simpatico, non-enemy sounding roles. That's how I used them in the games I've hosted. I'm not familiar with fake-claims including fake abilities.
Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.
Might as well ignore you then.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:46 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
On what basis do you believe INH is a civilian?sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:43 pmI'm a civEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:40 pmOn what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
I believe he's a civ
I think it's just as likely that this is a mafia power as a civ power and that thoughts compounded by the fact that nobody else seems to question it.
I think mafia would send a PM saying that one of two civ players aren't civ to get us both lynched and distract the thread from anything else.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:44 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:40 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
On what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
By the way, in case it eluded anybody's attention, INH all but claimed not to be a civilian.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:36 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
This is bullshit.
If you were a civilian, and you knew yourself for a civilian, and Quin got a message saying you and INH were not "aligned," you should have been ready to bury INH.
Instead, you're making up funny theories about the origin of the message.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Oh ffs.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:24 pmWe have no reason to not not doubt it either though. Also how does it make sense? The way I see it two different night actions would've been needed to achieve it. Also no a civ/unaffected should doubt it. You're following information from an untraceable source, say INH and I both are civs (which you won't know since no flips and a mafia messenger would take advantage of that) who if you do figure out we're civs would you blame? Not quin since he just got the message but some faceless random player.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:19 pmBecause we have no reason to doubt it at all and it makes sense to have occurred in this game. There is zero reason to doubt it if you are a civilian and/or unaffected by it.
Honestly wouldn't be shocked if Mac sent the message, built a fake meta case to distance himself from it and now is using it to try to get me lynched. And he doesn't want to kill me since one he might believe I can't be killed and two it would paint a giant LYNCH ME I"M SCUM sign on him.
Epi has already said he wants to lynch INH next that's two phases wasted and no civs gone and mafia 4x closer to winning.
Someone pushing this PM INH vs SIg is bad and had a hand in sending the message. ALso notice how I was targeted and a semi inactive player? And I had just won the election boosting me and giving me something.
![Sure.... :rolleyes:](./images/smilies/Roll%20eyes.gif)
Is INH a civilian, sig?
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
We'll probably lynch INH after you, so don't worry.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:55 pmGood question. First I'd say being tinfoiling isn't always a hallmark of my town play, I've had town games where I don't tinfoil.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:50 pmExplain to me why you are behaving in a passive and relatively timid way under duress here when in other recent town games I have seen you play you are blunt, aggressive and tinfoily.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:48 pmI feel so loved tbh, but y'all are wrong.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:47 pmSig has three different and unrelated cases being made against him.
My case is based on his meta.
The majority are pushing for his lynch based on Quin's info.
Epi's case is based on analysing his post content.![]()
Here you are actively avoiding tinfoiling which is a hallmark of your town play.
1. I wouldn't say I'm being passive or timid, I'm just messing around more right now. I think you're putting to much stock into my recent game meta and attributing it 100% to me being town.![]()
2. I won't be getting lynched yet soooooo figured I'd have some fun and get to see how people are interacting with me.
3. I decided to switch some things around seeing how the last few games i've been killed rather early, but overall my behavior is more attributed to me being able to not get lynched.
Don't you find the whole Quin thing a bit odd? As well as how quickly people who were civ reading me jumped when INH was thrown out as the second? I'd not be shocked if INH is mafia and his buddies are pushing my wagon.
![Charlie :charlieblackmon:](./images/smilies/batterup.gif)
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:06 pm
- Forum: Previous Jobs
- Topic: Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
- Replies: 3798
- Views: 83424