So you're not indy?
Retrocausality Mafia - ENDGAME: A Reprieve in the Desert
Moderator: Community Team
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
- Turnip Head
- Root Vegetable
- Posts in topic: 170
- Posts: 11432
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:37 am
- Preferred Pronouns: they/their
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 1: Better flush out the PP
If I thought that I wouldn't have to keep reminding people when they suspect me for the opposite.Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:31 pmI would still keep a look out for WIFOM-Golden defending his team mates because he'll think we think he knows better.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pmNo, I was quick to challenge it.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pmGolden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.
How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.
Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.
If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Oh ffs.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:24 pmWe have no reason to not not doubt it either though. Also how does it make sense? The way I see it two different night actions would've been needed to achieve it. Also no a civ/unaffected should doubt it. You're following information from an untraceable source, say INH and I both are civs (which you won't know since no flips and a mafia messenger would take advantage of that) who if you do figure out we're civs would you blame? Not quin since he just got the message but some faceless random player.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:19 pmBecause we have no reason to doubt it at all and it makes sense to have occurred in this game. There is zero reason to doubt it if you are a civilian and/or unaffected by it.
Honestly wouldn't be shocked if Mac sent the message, built a fake meta case to distance himself from it and now is using it to try to get me lynched. And he doesn't want to kill me since one he might believe I can't be killed and two it would paint a giant LYNCH ME I"M SCUM sign on him.
Epi has already said he wants to lynch INH next that's two phases wasted and no civs gone and mafia 4x closer to winning.
Someone pushing this PM INH vs SIg is bad and had a hand in sending the message. ALso notice how I was targeted and a semi inactive player? And I had just won the election boosting me and giving me something.

Is INH a civilian, sig?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
[VOTE:
Mac] aubergine
I'm about 85% sure he's mafia and sent the PM to quin to get INH and myself lynched all the while absolving himself of blame for our deaths.
I'm about 85% sure he's mafia and sent the PM to quin to get INH and myself lynched all the while absolving himself of blame for our deaths.




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Rude.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:32 pmAbsolutely not
Nope
Yes we both are the message is a lie.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pmOh ffs.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:24 pmWe have no reason to not not doubt it either though. Also how does it make sense? The way I see it two different night actions would've been needed to achieve it. Also no a civ/unaffected should doubt it. You're following information from an untraceable source, say INH and I both are civs (which you won't know since no flips and a mafia messenger would take advantage of that) who if you do figure out we're civs would you blame? Not quin since he just got the message but some faceless random player.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:19 pmBecause we have no reason to doubt it at all and it makes sense to have occurred in this game. There is zero reason to doubt it if you are a civilian and/or unaffected by it.
Honestly wouldn't be shocked if Mac sent the message, built a fake meta case to distance himself from it and now is using it to try to get me lynched. And he doesn't want to kill me since one he might believe I can't be killed and two it would paint a giant LYNCH ME I"M SCUM sign on him.
Epi has already said he wants to lynch INH next that's two phases wasted and no civs gone and mafia 4x closer to winning.
Someone pushing this PM INH vs SIg is bad and had a hand in sending the message. ALso notice how I was targeted and a semi inactive player? And I had just won the election boosting me and giving me something.
![]()
Is INH a civilian, sig?




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 1: Better flush out the PP
Which is why you absolutely would have to remind people of your meta tendency to bus teammates for your ploy to work.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pmIf I thought that I wouldn't have to keep reminding people when they suspect me for the opposite.Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:31 pmI would still keep a look out for WIFOM-Golden defending his team mates because he'll think we think he knows better.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pmNo, I was quick to challenge it.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pmGolden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.
How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.
Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.
If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.
Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Really?sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:24 pmWe have no reason to not not doubt it either though. Also how does it make sense? The way I see it two different night actions would've been needed to achieve it. Also no a civ/unaffected should doubt it. You're following information from an untraceable source, say INH and I both are civs (which you won't know since no flips and a mafia messenger would take advantage of that) who if you do figure out we're civs would you blame? Not quin since he just got the message but some faceless random player.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:19 pmBecause we have no reason to doubt it at all and it makes sense to have occurred in this game. There is zero reason to doubt it if you are a civilian and/or unaffected by it.
Honestly wouldn't be shocked if Mac sent the message, built a fake meta case to distance himself from it and now is using it to try to get me lynched. And he doesn't want to kill me since one he might believe I can't be killed and two it would paint a giant LYNCH ME I"M SCUM sign on him.
Epi has already said he wants to lynch INH next that's two phases wasted and no civs gone and mafia 4x closer to winning.
Someone pushing this PM INH vs SIg is bad and had a hand in sending the message. ALso notice how I was targeted and a semi inactive player? And I had just won the election boosting me and giving me something.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
This is bullshit.
If you were a civilian, and you knew yourself for a civilian, and Quin got a message saying you and INH were not "aligned," you should have been ready to bury INH.
Instead, you're making up funny theories about the origin of the message.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
[mention]speedchuck[/mention] can you please put an end-time on these polls?
Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Nope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
By the way, in case it eluded anybody's attention, INH all but claimed not to be a civilian.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
On what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
oh good you're gonna double down on that, i guess?
but you just listed a bunch of ways that that interpretation is impossible, why are you sticking with believing something you think is unlikely, when the idea that quin received blessed knowledge from our father speedchuck, makes more sense in most wayslinki: I assumed by his wording he meant a message and he never moved to correct me so I'm sticking with that until he says otherwise.
- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
you....... shouldn't call it that
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Also if I was mafia why wouldn't I bury INH? THERE ARE NO FLIPS I could've come out swinging against him got him lynched and I'd have been fine. Like it makes no sense why mafia wouldn't take advantage of that. The fact I'm pointing out another option makes me more likely to be civ since I could've just tunneled him.




- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 1: Better flush out the PP
Luna, trust me when I say this...Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:35 pmWhich is why you absolutely would have to remind people of your meta tendency to bus teammates for your ploy to work.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:33 pmIf I thought that I wouldn't have to keep reminding people when they suspect me for the opposite.Lunalee wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:31 pmI would still keep a look out for WIFOM-Golden defending his team mates because he'll think we think he knows better.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:40 pmNo, I was quick to challenge it.Quin wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 8:34 pmGolden was quick to deny my info-dump before. Feels like he's your teammate and was protecting you.
How many times do I have to say that I NEVER PROTECT TEAMMATES. Literally never because it is the stupidest thing to do.
Go read Economics, where I bussed my entire team early and rode it to the end. That's how you win as scum. Not protecting someone who had just been outed as having a 50% chance of being bad.
If you think you should get to say something and everyone just believe it without asking questions, you've got another think coming.
Telling people things never makes them listen. You have to prove it to them over games and games and games before you can flip your meta on them. And it's only worth doing it in circumstances where it's particularly meaningful, because it undoes sooo much work, and you have to start building new metas from scratch.
When I bussed people in Economics, it worked particular well because I NEVER bussed people. It still works because of the way people perceive me. I can get a lot of civ cred through leading a successful lynch if I play my cards right. But also, it partly works because I frequently successfully lead lynches when town, too, so I'm 'on meta'.
I will flip my meta on people one day. But it won't be a day when I'm reminding you of the meta I'm going to flip on you, I promise you. I know enough to know I can never convince you of what I'm telling you and betray it all in the same game - you saw how hard I had to fight just to get people to pick a different poll option on a non-important poll in U-Pick. It's not that easy to get people to listen to what you're saying. I cultivate meta as a long con, not a short con, because that's what builds the successful flip.
(Plus, there's no value to me ruining my meta in that way in a game like this. I could just as easily defend my teammates given they wouldn't flip bad, and then claim I chose to play this game differently because of the different set up which enabled me to do it, but that it isn't a shift in my meta, just a particular circumstance that required different play).
- speedchuck
- Knight of No Renown
- Posts in topic: 96
- Posts: 10958
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:43 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm a civEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:40 pmOn what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
I believe he's a civ
I think it's just as likely that this is a mafia power as a civ power and that thoughts compounded by the fact that nobody else seems to question it.
I think mafia would send a PM saying that one of two civ players aren't civ to get us both lynched and distract the thread from anything else.




- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Just to be clear I have no information to hint that INH is a civ or that the message was sent by mafia, but I'm almost certain it was and that Mac is a member of that team.




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I answered that, when I made a list ranking all the player from civ to mafia you weren't on it I forgot you.




- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Because it's not a message.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
Quin said he's 100% certain. So he didn't get a message from someone else, because he'd never say he was 100% certain in that circumstance. It's either his role power, or an item, or some other thing at play that we can't guess at. The one thing that is obvious is it's not someone pulling the wool over his eyes because this is the first thing I went out of my way to get Quin to rule out.
The only chance this is incorrect is if Quin himself is bad and just making the whole thing up.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Because there are no flips and we have to lynch you both anyway so your only chance of survival is to cast doubt on the message itself.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:41 pm Also if I was mafia why wouldn't I bury INH? THERE ARE NO FLIPS I could've come out swinging against him got him lynched and I'd have been fine. Like it makes no sense why mafia wouldn't take advantage of that. The fact I'm pointing out another option makes me more likely to be civ since I could've just tunneled him.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
It did elude my attention. Could you point this out?
Because if INH is indy it's not impossible that sig is town and just being suspicious because that's how he does things.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Right here is why i think the entire thing is fake.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:45 pmBecause there are no flips and we have to lynch you both anyway so your only chance of survival is to cast doubt on the message itself.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:41 pm Also if I was mafia why wouldn't I bury INH? THERE ARE NO FLIPS I could've come out swinging against him got him lynched and I'd have been fine. Like it makes no sense why mafia wouldn't take advantage of that. The fact I'm pointing out another option makes me more likely to be civ since I could've just tunneled him.




- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
On what basis do you believe INH is a civilian?sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:43 pmI'm a civEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:40 pmOn what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
I believe he's a civ
I think it's just as likely that this is a mafia power as a civ power and that thoughts compounded by the fact that nobody else seems to question it.
I think mafia would send a PM saying that one of two civ players aren't civ to get us both lynched and distract the thread from anything else.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Also mafia, civ, indy, why would I not cast doubt on a message that's going to get me lynched regardless! If anything this entire thing is NAI.
It should also be noted that Mac is pushing this and he's either mafia trying to lynch me or a tunneling civvie.
It should also be noted that Mac is pushing this and he's either mafia trying to lynch me or a tunneling civvie.




- Kylemii
- Bodice of Reason
- Posts in topic: 353
- Posts: 11433
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 8:50 pm
- Gender: male
- Preferred Pronouns: he/him
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
golden always writes 5 paragraph essays about the consistencies of his meta when he's civ so he's probably civ here too
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Yes this is true but it's a bloody tight fit to put sig into the civ hole when you look at the analysis of everything on display here including the fact that I had him as primary scum read before he even did this.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 1: Better flush out the PP
Wow, thats quite an explanation, Golden. I believed your claims, but thought I'd poke at it a bit to get more of a response. And you did not disappoint.Golden wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:42 pmLuna, trust me when I say this...Spoiler: show
Telling people things never makes them listen. You have to prove it to them over games and games and games before you can flip your meta on them. And it's only worth doing it in circumstances where it's particularly meaningful, because it undoes sooo much work, and you have to start building new metas from scratch.
When I bussed people in Economics, it worked particular well because I NEVER bussed people. It still works because of the way people perceive me. I can get a lot of civ cred through leading a successful lynch if I play my cards right. But also, it partly works because I frequently successfully lead lynches when town, too, so I'm 'on meta'.
I will flip my meta on people one day. But it won't be a day when I'm reminding you of the meta I'm going to flip on you, I promise you. I know enough to know I can never convince you of what I'm telling you and betray it all in the same game - you saw how hard I had to fight just to get people to pick a different poll option on a non-important poll in U-Pick. It's not that easy to get people to listen to what you're saying. I cultivate meta as a long con, not a short con, because that's what builds the successful flip.
(Plus, there's no value to me ruining my meta in that way in a game like this. I could just as easily defend my teammates given they wouldn't flip bad, and then claim I chose to play this game differently because of the different set up which enabled me to do it, but that it isn't a shift in my meta, just a particular circumstance that required different play).

Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I'm surprised nobody has said anything.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:42 am I thought Scotty's D1 voting pattern was weird and suspicious enough for me to vote for him, however, if he later went against what made me suspicious, I was open to changing it to someone else.
Quin is trying to put me in a situation where I either post the details of my role, proving that I'm not a threat to the civilians, or he's gonna make me look like a confirmed baddie, and serve my head on a platter.
But apparently the first is malevolent blackmail, and the second is okay, kosher civ behavior.
Linki:What? I thought fake-claims were more character based. Like, if everyone said the name of their role, and three of the names were obvious bad guys in time-travel related tales, then fakeclaims would allow them to at least appear as simpatico, non-enemy sounding roles. That's how I used them in the games I've hosted. I'm not familiar with fake-claims including fake abilities.
Well, what the fuck do you want from me, Quin? If literally nothing I can say about myself or my role could change anything, fuck it.
Might as well ignore you then.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Well his day 1 was different then Ass an U-pick which is why i was civ reading him a bit before. Now i'm mainly civ reading him since I think the message is fake (assuming its a message) and that mafia wouldn't have a mafia member in it.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:46 pmOn what basis do you believe INH is a civilian?sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:43 pmI'm a civEpignosis wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:40 pmOn what basis do you believe this message comes from the forces of evil? Be clear.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:39 pmNope it isn't, I'm doubtful that the message is good I think its a baddie power. I don't see why that's so odd.
Though seeing how so many people jumped on me maybe I'm wrong and INH is mafia and i'm being pushed by his teammates. BUT I doubt it.
I believe he's a civ
I think it's just as likely that this is a mafia power as a civ power and that thoughts compounded by the fact that nobody else seems to question it.
I think mafia would send a PM saying that one of two civ players aren't civ to get us both lynched and distract the thread from anything else.




- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
No sig I am a civilian who based on the balance of probability considers you highly likely to be mafia and I am not alone.

- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
yeMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:13 pm INH's reaction is not exactly what I would expect but it is a lot more easy to rationalise than sig's has been.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
okay, but like for next time though.
Luna's Wins/Losses
Spoiler: show
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I've not veen mafia for 2 years the gods of RVS hate me so blah.MacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:49 pmNo sig I am a civilian who based on the balance of probability considers you highly likely to be mafia and I am not alone.![]()




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
OH WAIT
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?
Did Speed ever say mafia would get fake flavor?




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Nevermind he did I just didn't read the rules.




Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
So that qualifies as "keep forgetting?"
Your words.
"Keep forgetting" is a tense that implies you have habitually done this. This remark came after you made that list. When did you forget me before?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Now I'm worried about what luna does to speedchuck in the privacy of their own home when speed puts timers on the polls. I feel like we've walked in on something.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 592
- Posts: 39913
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
If INH is indie-claiming then that is a point for sig for a few reasons.
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Aren't you his significant other? Can't you show him something else what would be extremely painful?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
Thinking on what epi pointed out. First instinct says I agree, want to sit with it and see if I feel differently later.
- Golden
- The Coward
- Posts in topic: 614
- Posts: 20125
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:27 am
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
I beat epi to the joke.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 192
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Retrocausality Mafia - Day 2: Sig puts his John Hancock down
a baddie who digs himself an early grave with such bizarre tactics is a baddie i aspire to beMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:22 pmIn my experience scum don't come up with random gambits that put themselves out there on day 2 just for the benefit of lynching one of two random civilians but I would be happy to receive evidence of such a thing having precedence let alone such frequency so as to be considered an "obvious ploy.sig wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:16 pmMacDougall wrote: ↑Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:11 pm How does a civilian when posed the scenario that another player has info that declares that they are not the same alignment as another player that they should not know the role of - rationalise to question the validity of that information as their primary response as opposed to becoming extremely confident of the scum alignment of the other player?
Mafia however would undoubtedly seek to do this because otherwise they will be lynched in due course. Their only long term plan for survival here is to place doubt on the validity of the information.
Ergo there is very little doubt that sig is scum at this point.
It was a random PM sent saying we were unaligned why trust that? I totally bet somewhere in scum chat land a player is giggling that y'all are failing for such an obvious ploy to get people lynched. Also how would a player both get access to that information AND be able to send a PM? Unless Quin is lying about the PM being sent and it's his role. If so then yeah I'd go after INH since ik I'm civ until we know that though I think Quin is a duped civ and mafia sent him a message containing the names of two civs so y'all would witch hunt us.
It also doesn't take much creativity to think of a role that another player (not named quin) might have that can explain this event.
"Each night you may send a player a letter with two names in it and they will be informed if those players are aligned together or not."
Work backwards from there to add flavour.