Flyin' High wrote:
Search found 63 matches
Return to “Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]”
- Sun Feb 02, 2014 12:00 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 10]
- Thu Jan 30, 2014 11:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
- Sun Jan 26, 2014 11:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 7]
Maybe someone who is a confirmed civ?
- Sun Jan 26, 2014 12:25 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 7]
your loss...Epignosis wrote:No.insertnamehere wrote:Anybody want a confirmed civvie with a chip on his shoulder?
- Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 7]
Anybody want a confirmed civvie with a chip on his shoulder?
- Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:58 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 6]
You sound overcome with emotion.Bass_the_Clever wrote:Sorry INH.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 6]
So you aren't even going to defend yourself?Sorsha wrote:Well with parting words like that all I have to say is good riddance, civvie or not.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 6]
Turnip Head wrote:Rest in peace INH. Now I'm just wondering why Aces would change his vote like that if he was a civ.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:09 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
*starts eating popcorn*
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Bass the Clever "..."
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Sorsha: Hmm, this is an interesting development, this must mean that FH, and nobody else is bad, right?
K4J: Obviously, because I'm from K-Site, usually people who's names begin with the letter "i" are bad. So I obviously had to vote for him.
K4J: Obviously, because I'm from K-Site, usually people who's names begin with the letter "i" are bad. So I obviously had to vote for him.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
FH, what are you going to say when I come up civ? "Whoopsie, my bad. RIP INH. So, about this Aces character..."
SVS: "Whoopsie, I'm just a pawn in all of this! So, about the Turnip Head character..."
TH: "TIES ARE FUNNSDREHSFLOHGJKFJH!!!!!"
Aces: "Look Mommy, I'm A Rebel!"
SVS: "Whoopsie, I'm just a pawn in all of this! So, about the Turnip Head character..."
TH: "TIES ARE FUNNSDREHSFLOHGJKFJH!!!!!"
Aces: "Look Mommy, I'm A Rebel!"
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
BecauseTurnip Head wrote:Why did you change your vote, Ace?
FUCK
LOGIC
that's why
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
FH, Sorsha, SVS, K4J, Bass_The_Clever, Aces, and TH, I for one cannot wait to see what your excuses are when I come up civ. This is the laziest baddie rigged lynch I have ever seen. At least try to be subtle when you rig the lynch next time.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
TL:DR
I don't know what FH's case is, but I vaguely trust her, and reading and thinking is hard, so
*votes INH*
I don't know what FH's case is, but I vaguely trust her, and reading and thinking is hard, so
*votes INH*
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
crazy sex party going on over at http://pyx-1.socialgamer.net/game.jsp#game=136
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:23 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Going with FH for now
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Or shall I say, insistence?
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Flyin' High wrote:Asking a question and theorizing as to why two people are behaving a certain way is not the same as insisting.
Flyin' High wrote:
I am still curious about INH and Aces backing each other up
Those don't sound like questions, they sound like assumptions.Flyin' High wrote:today they are backing each other up.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Your entire fucking case is based on semantics.Flyin' High wrote:Asking a question and theorizing as to why two people are behaving a certain way is not the same as insisting. Regardless, neither one of you are saying anything to change my mind. You're just arguging semantics with me which isn't changing my opinion at all.
Let's recap: You think me and Aces are teammates because we both voted for Rey, and suspected him instead of each other. Forget that Rey actually was bad, and we were both right to suspect him.
You pull all of these little things out of your ass, like how Aces said that he began to trust me when I posted boo's PM, but he voted before I posted the PM which must mean we're teammates, somehow?
Also stuff like "INH makes jokes about PB, HE MUST BE PB!", "Aces said that Rey is the last person on the list, he must not of made a mistake, he clearly meant that he and INH are teammates!!!!11!!!"
Wait, by your own logic, if Aces didn't mention you being on the list, you must be teammates with us!
It's this kind of bullshit I'm talking about.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
It's like Where's WaldoFlyin' High wrote:Well I'm pleasantly surprised!
I am still curious about INH and Aces backing each other up, but at least we know neither is the PB now.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
Found another oneFlyin' High wrote:I am considering a vote for rey but am wondering why Aces and INH are getting passes as they are also on my list. And I've noticed today they are backing each other up.
This post in particular stood out to me:Why is rey the last person on the list who could be PB? Did something happen to clear INH that I missed or forgot about?AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.
And same question to INHWhy do you trust Aces over rey?insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
I agree that rey is playing a more quiet game and I feel like when he's a civvie he's more talkative, but the stuff between Aces and INH is making me a little nervous.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:18 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
lol wutFlyin' High wrote:In addition to the inconsistencies with your story that I just pointed out, I also have not insisted that you and INH were backing each other up.AceofSpaces wrote:If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
Flyin' High wrote:I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.insertnamehere wrote:No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB. Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 6:15 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 6]
Flyin' High wrote:@Aces: Arguing that INH's vote was forced to vote BWT didn't clear him at all. Rey voted BWT was well. And you mention INH quoting boo's PM as evidence for why you didn't suspect INH, except that happened after you voted for rey saying he was the only player who could be the PB. INH didn't make it 100% clear he was forced until a whole day phase after the BWT lynch (and after you voted rey).
Since quotes don't have timestamps or link back to the original post, I'll put times and links here.
Ace's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:54 am)Again, this post implies he knew INH wasn't PB with certainty.AceofSpaces wrote:POwer keeps going out in my house. So I'm voting now for rey. He is the last person the butt could be from FH's list, and when confronted with a direct suspcion he deflected with a joke instead of adressing it. I think he used his powers up because he saw his name being thrown around and thought he didn't have much time left.
I think it's more likely that he just forgot about me.
INH's post and vote for rey (Wed Jan 22, 2014 5:20 pm)Again, why specifically were/are you so trustful of Aces, INH?insertnamehere wrote:I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
Once again, it's not that I trusted him, I just trusted Rey less. If Rey was civ, I would of gone after him.
I called them out as being suspicious here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:43 pm) [not quoting it because it's essentially what I am saying in this post, but you can check the link]
INH didn't spill the beans about being forced until
Nope, I was hinting at being forced by PB before I quoted boo. That's why I made all the PB innuendos.
this post (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:03 pm)Then INH decided to actually quote boo's PM after S~V~S questioned him on admitting to being forced, here (Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:26 pm).insertnamehere wrote:I for one, got a PM telling me I had to vote BWT in the lynch. Other people were also acting odd about the lynch, which made me think that PB used his power. I was stating that in a humorous "pun" or joke.
Really, I already have 3 votes because I made a joke? This is Cards Against Humanity mafia, lighten up.
In addition to the inconsistencies with your story that I just pointed out, I also have not insisted that you and INH were backing each other up. I asked a question and wondered why you were both so sure/trusting of the other.AceofSpaces wrote:If you want an exact reason for why I thought it was rey over INH, I'm pretty sure you can just read back to my post leading up to rey's lynch. I found rey to be deflecting direct suspicion with quick jokes. I also noticed that the buttake had used all his powers up, after rey's name had been brought up. Which lead me to believe rey knew his time was short, and wanted to use his powers while he still could.
I didn't think INH was the Buttake, because he brought up having his vote forced for BWT. He also quoted, somewhat unethically, boo's pm. That, and I just had a much stronger feeling towards rey.
I don't know what INH's role is, I am not on a baddie team with him. I never backed him up *at all* and your insistence that I did is kind of suspicious itself.
I think Aces slipped up. The reasons he has given for ruling out INH as the PB happened after he and INH both voted rey yesterday meaning he cleared INH before INH told the thread his vote was forced. I think they are teammates.
And I will plan to vote one of them today.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
I didn't say anything for or against Aces, I just found Rey more suspicious.Flyin' High wrote:I don't think S~V~S is talking about my rationale for voting you but my analysis of which players could possibly be the PB which had rey on a short list.insertnamehere wrote:No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
And neither you or Aces have addressed my question about why the two of you were so sure the other wasn't the PB. Teammates backing each other up, perhaps?
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
No it wasn't. She thought that because I made a sexual innuendo about PB, that means that I was PB. That's horrible analysis. Then I get two more votes for me immediately after, not adding any more reasons against me, just stating that they were trusting FH. This is insanely suspicious to me.S~V~S wrote:FHs analysis was sound.
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 5]
I'm definitely looking at SVS and Epig right now. The way they instantly jumped onto FH's suspicion of me seems to me like they were trying a last ditch effort to save Rey.
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
The host sent me this:
The rules say this:
That was it.boo wrote:You must vote BWT.
The rules say this:
I don't see anything in the rules or in the PM saying I cannot state this.1. No BTSC unless specified by the host.
2. No outting (self or others).
3. No sharing which white cards you have (with anyone, even in BTSC).
4. No double-targeting.
5. Don't be an asshat.
6. Only living players may post on topic. Use all the proper tags for everything else.
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
I for one, got a PM telling me I had to vote BWT in the lynch. Other people were also acting odd about the lynch, which made me think that PB used his power. I was stating that in a humorous "pun" or joke.Flyin' High wrote:I am going to vote INH. I know my vote won't matter today since rey has so many already, but I think there is something off and in reading back through his posts, these stood out to me.
insertnamehere wrote: I can see Pixellated Bukakke all over her. And on me, as a matter of fact.These make me wonder if he's actually taunting us and is, indeed, the PB.insertnamehere wrote:We all really need to clean this Pixellated Bukkake off of us.
Really, I already have 3 votes because I made a joke? This is Cards Against Humanity mafia, lighten up.
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
Spreadsheets are for the weak, the only spreadsheet I need is my mind.Mister Rearranger wrote:I really should have spreadsheeted this game. This is getting ricockulous. :/
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
I'm not sure what's going on with SVS vs. Dom, but I find Rey more suspicious then both of them, especially since he's on FH's list. I trust FH and Aces much more then I trust him.
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:57 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 5]
RIP Hedgeowl, and welcome back BWT!
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:21 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 4]
We all really need to clean this Pixellated Bukkake off of us.
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
I can see Pixellated Bukakke all over her. And on me, as a matter of fact.kneel4justice wrote:Neither as far as I know.Mister Rearranger wrote:Are you framing someone or are you the one being framed?kneel4justice wrote:I suspected him because of his Day 1 contradicting behavior as far as votes go.Flyin' High wrote:Why are you suspicious of BWT? I have him in the back of my mind as being suspicious, but need to read back to remember why. He's on my list of people to reread.kneel4justice wrote:Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.
He randomized after saying we had plenty of time to make a decision (when this is a speed game, at that).
I see I was wrong now, though.
MR what are you talking about?
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:34 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 4]
RIP BWT.
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:01 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
You want an explanation for a vote? You must be new around here...kneel4justice wrote:Really? I would appreciate some reasoning because I myself suspect BWT and would like to know why others do.insertnamehere wrote:I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 3:29 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
I'm going to pretend I'm Vompatti, and not give a reason for my vote, k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
Ture?
k?
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:50 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
Who won? (This is how I get all of my knowledge of sports.)Bass_the_Clever wrote:Denver Broncos and the Seattle Sea hawks . It should be a great game.insertnamehere wrote:Who's playing?Bass_the_Clever wrote:So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:53 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
Who's playing?Bass_the_Clever wrote:So what are people'a thoughts on the super bowl
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 10:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 4]
Ah yes, Nicki Minaj. Author of such detailed trips into the to human psyche as "Stupid Ho".
[quote=Modern Shakesphere]These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody
These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody[/quote]
[quote=Modern Shakesphere]
You could suck my diznick, if you take these jizzes
You don’t like them disses, give my ass some kisses
Yeah they know what this is, give bitches the business[/quote]
And of course the unforgettable chorus and hook that ties the song together in a culmination, no, the apex of modern music over the last twenty years.
[quote=Tupac Probably In Disguise]
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho[/quote]
[quote=Modern Shakesphere]These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody
These hoes so musty hoes is so crusty
These bitches is my sons and I don't want custody[/quote]
[quote=Modern Shakesphere]
You could suck my diznick, if you take these jizzes
You don’t like them disses, give my ass some kisses
Yeah they know what this is, give bitches the business[/quote]
And of course the unforgettable chorus and hook that ties the song together in a culmination, no, the apex of modern music over the last twenty years.
[quote=Tupac Probably In Disguise]
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho
You a stupid ho, you a you a stupid ho[/quote]
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]
Burn in Hell you llama bastard.
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:20 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]
I thought that was Friday?Bass_the_Clever wrote:So is anyone going to be playing the live game tonight?
- Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:58 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]
It could be ok if the person we choose is a baddie.S~V~S wrote:Explain the benefits, it looks to me like it would make someone an Indy? Why would that be good, or am I being boorishly literal?
- Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:38 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 3]
I voted for myself, because I'm a greedy bastard. I also randomized from the people who haven't got any votes, and I got BWT and Hedgeowl.
- Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:41 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 3]
Motherfucker...
- Sat Jan 18, 2014 12:11 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 3]
This time, it isn't me.AceofSpaces wrote:AceofSpaces wrote:FH's breakdown makes this an easy vote for me. Which is nice because I will be a bit occupied this weekend. Voting Llama
It's such a perfect day.
Glad I spent it with you
It's such a perfect day.
I'm glad I spent it with you.
There.
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Day 3]
There's a chance he could be bluffing, I wouldn't put it past Llama.thellama73 wrote:Go ahead and vote for me guys
But all your votes will end in ties
The card czar will decide the rest
And it will work out for the best.
Anyway, he's the strongest candidate. I'm voting for him.
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:16 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 2]
I did the same thing. John seemed to be acting very weird, even for someone new to the site. And llama just seemed like regular Llama.reywaS wrote:Great breakdown, FH. I admit that I am guilty of not reading through the roles carefully yet. I voted based entirely on what I saw in llama and jj's posts. That was clearly a mistake after reading that breakdown.
Hopefully we'll get Llama out tomorrow.
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:26 am
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 2]
That's...what....she......said?Sorsha wrote:oozing scrotum pustule
- Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:31 pm
- Forum: Previous Side Missions
- Topic: Cards Against Humanity [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 1440
- Views: 43661
Re: Cards Against Humanity [Night 2]
Get a room, you two.