DharmaHelper wrote:Haha... hats off to boo for making a game that is literally NSFW.

Moderator: Community Team
DharmaHelper wrote:Haha... hats off to boo for making a game that is literally NSFW.
So you think jj might be bad?Sorsha wrote:I suspect him yes, but its mostly circumstantial.kneel4justice wrote:What exactly made you start suspecting Llama? Because I remember at first you said you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I vote llama again.
And do you still suspect BWT?
Linki, so does this mean you suspect DH?
After the day one lynch a couple of players (MR and jj) seemed to know that the lynch was a tie.... when nothing had been said in the thread about it being so. So I was thinking one or both of them had btsc with the player who made it a tie. DH being the card czar knew for sure it was a tie because he was the tie breaker (although he didn't say anything about it until 5 hours before the lynch ended) so he could have been the source of them knowing it was a tie (bts) also.
Hope this makes sense, I'm at work and really distracted.
Well... not anymore noMister Rearranger wrote:So you think jj might be bad?Sorsha wrote:I suspect him yes, but its mostly circumstantial.kneel4justice wrote:What exactly made you start suspecting Llama? Because I remember at first you said you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I vote llama again.
And do you still suspect BWT?
Linki, so does this mean you suspect DH?
After the day one lynch a couple of players (MR and jj) seemed to know that the lynch was a tie.... when nothing had been said in the thread about it being so. So I was thinking one or both of them had btsc with the player who made it a tie. DH being the card czar knew for sure it was a tie because he was the tie breaker (although he didn't say anything about it until 5 hours before the lynch ended) so he could have been the source of them knowing it was a tie (bts) also.
Hope this makes sense, I'm at work and really distracted.
Sorsha wrote:I suspect him yes, but its mostly circumstantial.kneel4justice wrote:What exactly made you start suspecting Llama? Because I remember at first you said you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I vote llama again.
And do you still suspect BWT?
Linki, so does this mean you suspect DH?
After the day one lynch a couple of players (MR and jj) seemed to know that the lynch was a tie.... when nothing had been said in the thread about it being so. So I was thinking one or both of them had btsc with the player who made it a tie. DH being the card czar knew for sure it was a tie because he was the tie breaker (although he didn't say anything about it until 5 hours before the lynch ended) so he could have been the source of them knowing it was a tie (bts) also.
Hope this makes sense, I'm at work and really distracted.
Flyin' High wrote:I went back to pull the posts on MR and john that Sorsha was talking about to see for myself how this tie conversation initially began.
This was the post by MR asking boo how ties would be handled which makes it possible he knew the lynch was a tie and wanted to know how it was broken.Mister Rearranger wrote:I like the changeable vote thing. Wouldn't want to see it in every game, but in a zany one like this, it feels right.
I wouldn't hope that. It paints quite a target on him for baddies if that's the case. And if he's bad, based on the roles that can avoid lynches and how they can do it, he's likely vulnerable to the next lynch.FZ. wrote:Haha, why do we even bother voting. I really hope you are a civ, llama.
And that would be quite an interesting mafia game
@boo: Will ties result in no lynch? Or will the lynch be randomized?
This appears to be the first post where john makes it seem like he knew there was a tie before anyone said anything about the possibility of a tie. Then Sorsha asked if there was a tie and john proceeded to make about 3 further posts on ties.johns2jj wrote:I think he may have a grudge against me for how I played in the last game but I can't be for sure. He tends to make passable arguments for those he votes for but as admitted by himself he has lately been lynching civs. I do not know anyone's play style well enough to believe anything they say yet but if you feel he has made a good enough case than I can't dissuade you. I think he is most likely bad because he survived the kill when in this game someone breaks ties.FZ. wrote:What do you think about llama's suspicions? Would you agree with him if it were someone else and not you?johns2jj wrote:I did not no vote because it seems some hosts may react to that. I would rather not miss out on anything because I did not vote.
However, other than the penis envy prize, was there a way for a player to have access to an additional vote Day 1 that makes them likely to have been bad? Reading through the roles there is the person who starts with -2 votes and then night powers which cause vote manipulation, but I didn't see someone whose vote is worth 2.
I see Sorsha's case is that it appears both MR and john may have known about the tie in advance which can be indicative of teammates. I can't decide if MR's question means he knew there was a tie, or was genuinely curious how future ties would be handled?
Regardless, I am still wary of john for the reasons I've previously stated. I'm going to place my vote on john now but am curious to read other people's perspectives on this discussion and others.
That's what she saidMister Rearranger wrote:I think Smegma's team kills on even nights. What I'm intrigued by is that Smegma performed the kill and not the team's killer. Could just be the way the post was written though?Dom wrote:That's what She saidMister Rearranger wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:If llama really is "Balls deep", he's just going to survive tomorrow's lynch too, at least by my estimate. Would it be more worth it to try and lynch him again, or pursue other options for now? I'm not too sure right now, but I'd like some more input.
And this is why night time is hiding time.![]()
Ripiywg, Metalmarsh!I hope you'll continue to play other games here!
So yeah, I'm sticking with Llama fo sho today.
2
Also, that team didn't kill tonight? Doesn't that team kill on odd nights?
That's what she saidboo wrote:Death by smegma just fit the cringe of the n2 theme better. imoMister Rearranger wrote:I think Smegma's team kills on even nights. What I'm intrigued by is that Smegma performed the kill and not the team's killer. Could just be the way the post was written though?Dom wrote:That's what She saidMister Rearranger wrote:Metalmarsh89 wrote:If llama really is "Balls deep", he's just going to survive tomorrow's lynch too, at least by my estimate. Would it be more worth it to try and lynch him again, or pursue other options for now? I'm not too sure right now, but I'd like some more input.
And this is why night time is hiding time.![]()
Ripiywg, Metalmarsh!I hope you'll continue to play other games here!
So yeah, I'm sticking with Llama fo sho today.
2
Also, that team didn't kill tonight? Doesn't that team kill on odd nights?
That's what she said 5Hedgeowl wrote:If we are right about his role than its becAuse he had a protection the first lynch. He should die this time unless some other shenanigans are pulled.kneel4justice wrote:Obviously, I think Llama is scum. But is there a reason that the lynches aren't going through that we have to solve before we lynch him or no?
Taht's what she saidDharmaHelper wrote:Haha... hats off to boo for making a game that is literally NSFW.
That's what she saidFlyin' High wrote:RIPIYWG metalmarsh.
I've clearly stated my reasons for thinking llama is bad and what role I specifically think he is.
*votes llama*
Worst case he's balls deep and it takes one more lynch to get rid of him. But I think the scenario where he's the taint makes logical sense.
That's what she saidkneel4justice wrote:I reread Dom's post because I was wondering about this post:It jumped out at me, I still haven't caught up on other people's votes but the fact that Day 1, Dom voted for Sorsha which it seemed to me that it turned into a lynch Sorsha party at the last minute, and now she voted for JJ. If Llama comes out mafia, which I am thinking he will, then Dom is someone who may have been working to keep Llama alive. I went back and did not see any actual reason BEFORE this post why Llama was suspicious, and after this post the only reasoning I saw was the fact Llama survived the Day 2 lynch.Dom wrote:I'm gonna vote jj for now. I don't know what I'm doing for today yet (I'm spending the day with my aunt). I don't want to miss the vote. I just se egis Shawshank game coming through. I have suspicion against llama too, but I'm really not sure we're seeing his baddie game.
Dom, why are you suspicious of Llama, besides the fact that he survived the Day 2 lynch?
That's what she saidAceofSpaces wrote:FH's breakdown makes this an easy vote for me. Which is nice because I will be a bit occupied this weekend. Voting Llama
That's what she saidMister Rearranger wrote:Dom: What are your thoughts on both Rey and Sorsha now that they have posted?
I agree with you on the first two parts.Dom wrote: Rey: I don't know if this is his baddie game. He's being awfully silent, really. Even when he is posting, he isn't saying much. He's being extremely brief, so I'd love to hear more from him
Sorsha: I found her to be her typical over defensive self. I've seen her react more to less as a civvie. However, MR, the way you seemed to try and manipulate what she said about you and JJ make me raise an eyebrow upon rereading for your questions.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
kneel4justice wrote:Sorsha wrote:I suspect him yes, but its mostly circumstantial.kneel4justice wrote:What exactly made you start suspecting Llama? Because I remember at first you said you didn't.Epignosis wrote:I vote llama again.
And do you still suspect BWT?
Linki, so does this mean you suspect DH?
After the day one lynch a couple of players (MR and jj) seemed to know that the lynch was a tie.... when nothing had been said in the thread about it being so. So I was thinking one or both of them had btsc with the player who made it a tie. DH being the card czar knew for sure it was a tie because he was the tie breaker (although he didn't say anything about it until 5 hours before the lynch ended) so he could have been the source of them knowing it was a tie (bts) also.
Hope this makes sense, I'm at work and really distracted.
Well I am completely lost at what happened with this tie discussion, I just thought Llama survived. I did not even see the post where DH said there was a tie, I just saw people start saying he manipulates things like this as scum, which is alarming. However, I think the idea that they are team mates with BTSC is unlikely because that is suicidal and foolish, if they really made that mistake then they should be stripped of their status! Lol. I don't really have a solid opinion on MR or DH. The only thing I noticed with DH was that he compared his style to FZ yet he wasn't being very helpful IMO, at least not at first. And after I hear he has played with you, I need him to explain his suspicion more because to me, I have the impression you are an over defensive player in general, not necessarily an over defensive scum.
Uh? That isn't that the problem? I have to ask about other games because I could not see it this game.DharmaHelper wrote: I am usually very active and stuff, ask anybody from RM about the Justice League vs. Avengers list of baddies I deduced, or ask anybody who has played with me about my stance on random voting or phoning Day 1's in. I'm a very firm believer in starting right out the gate, and I thought FZ was as well, so
And beware asking DH to elaborate or analyze. He will bring out a can of whoopass and analyze that crap out of things if he has time. I think that was Bioshock where i made that mistake as a baddie.DharmaHelper wrote:Yeah I know I'm just saying. Usually I go out of the gate pretty strong. Just balancing two games + other stuff has made that unlikely for now :P
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.
Hedgeowl wrote:And beware asking DH to elaborate or analyze. He will bring out a can of whoopass and analyze that crap out of things if he has time. I think that was Bioshock where i made that mistake as a baddie.DharmaHelper wrote:Yeah I know I'm just saying. Usually I go out of the gate pretty strong. Just balancing two games + other stuff has made that unlikely for now :P![]()
As I expected we wont learn anything from this lynch if Llama is bad. Unaimous voting it seems ftw. Hoping we are all right and he doesnt survive again. Surprised by your self vote Llama, but love the poetry.
Yet it took you until now (multiple posts after your acknowledgement of FH's breakdown) to put your vote where your change of heart was?reywaS wrote:I'm voting llama. I wasn't thinking this was llama's baddie game based on just his posts, but after thinking and reading the game mechanic side of things...and of course FH's breakdown, it does seem quite likely that llama is a baddie.
Yes.Mister Rearranger wrote:@boo: Can we vote for ourselves as one of the 3?
The 3 you picked are probably the 3 powers I would least like any baddie to have even a remote chance of getting.DharmaHelper wrote: 4, 8 and 14 because I think they're interesting
Turnip Head wrote: We need to lynch Pennsylvania Bitch.